AzTrials
AzTrials

EndometriosisPhase 2NCT00797225

Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix Versus Placebo or Leuprorelin Acetate in Endometriosis

A Phase 2 study testing Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and beneficial effects of elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo and leuprorelin (an approved endometriosis therapy) over a three month period followed by an additional three months of treatment on elagolix. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis
What is being tested?
Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
174 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
26 Nov 2008to 24 Feb 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female, aged 18 to 45 years, inclusive
  • Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis
  • Have been surgically (laparoscopy) diagnosed with endometriosis within the last 5 years and have recurrent or persistent endometriosis symptoms
  • Have regular menstrual cycle (23-33 day)
  • Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study

Who cannot join

  • Received a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, GnRH antagonist, danazol, or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening.
  • Received subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular (i.m.) medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), or have received either of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening.
  • Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month
  • Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month
  • Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months
  • Have uterine fibroids or other pelvic lesions ≥ 3 cm in diameter
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Have had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy
  • Have pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis
  • Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease
  • Have been pregnant within the last 6 months and is currently breast feeding

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and beneficial effects of elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo and leuprorelin (an approved endometriosis therapy) over a three month period followed by an additional three months of treatment on elagolix.

Read the detailed description

The study followed a parallel-group design in which participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of the following treatment groups for the first 12 weeks of dosing: 150 mg elagolix once daily (q.d.); 250 mg elagolix q.d.; placebo; or leuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg (monthly). Blinding was achieved using a double-dummy design. Following 12 weeks of dosing, participants continued in the study for an additional 12 weeks; participants randomized to elagolix continued to receive their assigned dose and participants randomized to placebo or leuprorelin acetate were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg q.d. or 250 mg q.d.) for 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Six weeks after the last dose of the study drug at the end of Week 24, a follow-up visit was performed (end of Week 30).

There was no pre-specified primary efficacy end point as there was no single key efficacy outcome measure in this exploratory Phase 2 study. For purposes of results reported here, Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain is designated as the primary outcome measure.

Conditions
Endometriosis
Being tested
Leuprorelin Acetate Depot, Elagolix, Placebo to Elagolix, Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate
Keywords
bone mineral density,endometriosis,pelvic pain
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Leuprorelin Acetate DepotDrug

    Also called Prostap SR

    Leuprorelin acetate depot injection 3.75 mg administered as an intramuscular injection

  • ElagolixDrug

    Also called NBI-56418, Orilissa™

    Elagolix tablets administered orally

  • Placebo to ElagolixDrug

    Placebo tablet administered orally

  • Placebo to Leuprorelin AcetateDrug

    Saline solution administered as an intramuscular injection

Study groups in NCT00797225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo to Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate
Elagolix 150 mgExperimentalParticipants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 150 mg for an additional 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate
Elagolix 250 mgExperimentalParticipants received elagolix 250 mg tablets once a day and placebo intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants continued to receive elagolix 250 mg for an additional 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Elagolix; Drug: Placebo to Leuprorelin Acetate
LeuprorelinOtherParticipants received placebo tablets once a day and leuprorelin acetate 1-month depot 3.75 mg intramuscular injection once a month for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks participants were re-randomized to receive one of the two doses of elagolix (150 mg or 250 mg) for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Leuprorelin Acetate Depot; Drug: Placebo to Elagolix

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

    The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.

    The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain

    The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day.

    The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  2. Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score

    Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0 = No pelvic pain
    • 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does
    • 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does
    • 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does.

    The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  3. Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score

    Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • Subject is not having her period
    • 0 = No pain related to period
    • 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does
    • 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does
    • 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does.

    The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  4. Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Sum of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores

    Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The dysmenorrhea scale included an option for participants who were not having their period.

    The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  5. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use

    The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.

    The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  6. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use

    The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.

    The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use

    The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic.

    The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of "none").

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS)

    The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.

    To assess dyspareunia (painful intercourse) participants were asked to select the best description of pain during sexual intercourse over the past 28 days using the following response categories:

    • 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse.
    • 1 = Mild; I can tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse.
    • 2 = Moderate; Intercourse is sometime interrupted due to pain.
    • 3 = Severe; I prefer to avoid intercourse because of pain.
    • Not applicable. I am not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS

    The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.

    To assess dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), participants were asked to select the best description of painful menstruation over the past 28 days using the following response categories:

    • 0 = Absent; Amenorrhea (no bleeding) or no discomfort.
    • 1 = Mild; Some loss of work efficiency; occasional use of analgesics.
    • 2 = Moderate; In bed part of one day, occasional loss of work; regular use of analgesics.
    • 3 = Severe; In bed ≥ 1 day, incapacitation; requirement for strong analgesics.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain CPSSS Component

    The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration.

    To assess non-menstrual pelvic pain, participants were asked to select the best description of pelvic pain over the past 28 days using the following response categories:

    • 0 = Absent; No discomfort.
    • 1 = Mild; Occasional pelvic discomfort that can be treated with NSAIDs.
    • 2 = Moderate; Noticeable discomfort or pain for most of cycle requiring regular use of NSAID or weak opiate.
    • 3 = Severe; Pain persisting during the cycle or pain requiring strong analgesics.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  11. Patient Global Impression of Change at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:

    1. Very Much Improved
    2. Much Improved
    3. Minimally Improved
    4. Not Changed
    5. Minimally Worse
    6. Much Worse
    7. Very Much Worse

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  12. Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Minimally Improved, Much Improved, or Very Much Improved

    The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:

    1. Very Much Improved
    2. Much Improved
    3. Minimally Improved
    4. Not Changed
    5. Minimally Worse
    6. Much Worse
    7. Very Much Worse

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  13. Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

    The PGIC is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:

    1. Very Much Improved
    2. Much Improved
    3. Minimally Improved
    4. Not Changed
    5. Minimally Worse
    6. Much Worse
    7. Very Much Worse

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) at Week 12

    The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:

    • A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always)
    • A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored.

    The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  15. Concentration of Serum Estradiol

    The concentration of serum estradiol (E2) was quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrophotometry (LC/MS/MS). Serum estradiol concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ) were set equal to the lower limit of quantification (2.5 pg/mL).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 12

    Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 12

    Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  18. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24

    Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur (total hip) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24

    Bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in Serum N-telopeptide Concentration at Week 12

    Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  21. Average Number of Hot Flashes Per Day

    Hot flashes, if any, were reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.

    The average number of hot flashes per day was calculated for each participant as the total number of hot flashes divided by total days in the phase.

    Measured: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)

  22. Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding

    Uterine bleeding was reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary.

    The percentage of days a participant reported any bleeding was calculated as the total number of days the participant reported any bleeding ( light, moderate, or heavy) divided by the total number of days the participant had a non-missing eDiary report of vaginal bleeding in the phase.

    Measured: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1), Treatment phase (weeks 1 to 12 for participants in the placebo and leuprorelin treatment groups and weeks 1 to 24 for participants in the elagolix treatment groups)

  23. Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses

    Defined as the number of days from the last dose of study drug until the start date of the first post-treatment menses.

    Measured: From last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Nov 2008
  3. Primary completion24 Feb 2010
  4. Study completion24 Feb 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
174 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00797225
Sponsor's protocol ID
NBI-56418-0703
Other IDs
2007-006474-28
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
21 Nov 2008
Last updated
10 Sep 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Leuprorelin Acetate Depot and Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain (time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in