Diabetes MellitusNCT00797563
Evaluation of a New Blood Glucose Meter System With Capillary and Venous Blood
A study testing Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of the meter system in the hands of subjects and healthcare professionals (HCPs). It also evaluated the product user guides in the hands of untrained subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Nov 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Be > 18, < 76 year of age at time of consent, with approximately 50% (+10%)being less than 55 years of age
- Be willing to complete all study procedures
- Be routinely testing their blood sugar at home (at least once per day)
- Be able to speak, read, and understand English and understand the Informed Consent document
- Be able to read the labeling instructions
Who cannot join
- Minors < 18 years of age and adults > 75 years of age
- Pregnancy
- Physical (dexterity), visual, or neurological impairments that would make the person unable to perform testing with the BGMS
- Disorders in the fingertip lancing areas
- Acute or chronic infections, particularly skin infections
- Infection with a blood borne pathogen
Show all 10Show fewer
- Taking prescription anti-coagulants or having clotting problems that may prolong bleeding. Taking aspirin daily (81 mg or 325 mg) is not reason for exclusion
- Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
- Having a condition which, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or designee, would put the person at risk or seriously compromise the integrity of the study
- Working for a competitive medical device company
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Consumer Product Testing Co., Inc.
Fairfield, New Jersey, 07004
About this study
Official title: Clinical Evaluation of the Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Capillary and Venous Blood [Commercial Name is CONTOUR® USB]
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of the meter system in the hands of subjects and healthcare professionals (HCPs). It also evaluated the product user guides in the hands of untrained subjects.
Read the detailed description
The study evaluated the performance of the blood glucose meter system (BGMS) compared to a laboratory glucose method. Subjects and healthcare professionals tested subject capillary blood and healthcare professionals tested subject venous blood. Two meter configurations were evaluated. The study evaluated the acceptability of product labeling in enabling subjects to perform blood glucose testing with the new meter system and for using meter features. Subjects and healthcare professionals provided feedback about the BGMS and its features.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemDevice
Also called CONTOUR® USB
Subjects with diabetes use a new blood glucose monitoring system with capillary blood; healthcare professionals use the new blood glucose monitoring system with subject capillary and venous blood. All results are compared to a laboratory glucose method - Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects with diabetes | Other | Subjects with diabetes use a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System with capillary blood; healthcare professionals use the new BGMS with subject capillary and venous blood. Receives: Device: Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Capillary and Venous Results Within +/- 15mg/dL or +/- 20% of Laboratory Glucose Method
Subjects with diabetes and healthcare professionals (HCPs) used a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) with subject capillary blood. HCPs used the new bgms with subject venous blood. All results were compared to a lab glucose method. The BGMS has programmed algorithms to provide results equivalent to either serum/plasma or whole blood glucose methods. Number of results were obtained by combining results from three lots of Contour Blood Glucose strips.
Measured: One hour
Secondary outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants Rated as <=3 (Labeling Comprehension)
Study staff rated participants on their success at performing BG testing and Autolog feature after reading product labeling. The rating scale was:
- Successful
- Successful after being referred to user instructions
- Successful with verbal assistance or review of part of user instructions (Similar to review of a specific function during a Customer Service call.)
- Unsuccessful (Incorrectly performed part of the testing regimen or required intervention by study staff.)
Measured: One hour
Number of Partipants Who Gave These Ratings for Overall Testing Experience With This Meter
Subjects completed a questionnaire rating their overall experience with the Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (User feedback on the system). The rating scale was 0 (Unacceptable) to 4 (Excellent).
Measured: One hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionNov 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ascensia Diabetes Care
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joy Frank, RN, Principal investigator, Consumer Product Testing Co., Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797563
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTD-2008-17
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2008
- Last updated
- 29 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation of the Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Capillary and Venous Blood [Commercial Name is CONTOUR® USB]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00797563
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTD-2008-17
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ascensia Diabetes CareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Dec 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of the meter system in the hands of subjects and healthcare professionals (HCPs). It also evaluated the product user guides in the hands of untrained subjects.
Detailed description
The study evaluated the performance of the blood glucose meter system (BGMS) compared to a laboratory glucose method. Subjects and healthcare professionals tested subject capillary blood and healthcare professionals tested subject venous blood. Two meter configurations were evaluated. The study evaluated the acceptability of product labeling in enabling subjects to perform blood glucose testing with the new meter system and for using meter features. Subjects and healthcare professionals provided feedback about the BGMS and its features.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects with diabetes | Other | Device: Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemSubjects with diabetes use a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System with capillary blood; healthcare professionals use the new BGMS with subject capillary and venous blood. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Have type 1 or type 2 diabetes
- Be > 18, < 76 year of age at time of consent, with approximately 50% (+10%)being less than 55 years of age
- Be willing to complete all study procedures
- Be routinely testing their blood sugar at home (at least once per day)
- Be able to speak, read, and understand English and understand the Informed Consent document
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Minors < 18 years of age and adults > 75 years of age
- Pregnancy
- Physical (dexterity), visual, or neurological impairments that would make the person unable to perform testing with the BGMS
- Disorders in the fingertip lancing areas
- Acute or chronic infections, particularly skin infections
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemAlso: CONTOUR® USBSubjects with diabetes use a new blood glucose monitoring system with capillary blood; healthcare professionals use the new blood glucose monitoring system with subject capillary and venous blood. All results are compared to a laboratory glucose method - Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI). | Device | Subjects with diabetes |
Primary outcome
Number of Capillary and Venous Results Within +/- 15mg/dL or +/- 20% of Laboratory Glucose Method
Time frame: One hour
Subjects with diabetes and healthcare professionals (HCPs) used a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) with subject capillary blood. HCPs used the new bgms with subject venous blood. All results were compared to a lab glucose method. The BGMS has programmed algorithms to provide results equivalent to either serum/plasma or whole blood glucose methods. Number of results were obtained by combining results from three lots of Contour Blood Glucose strips.
2 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Rated as <=3 (Labeling Comprehension)
Time frame: One hour
Number of Partipants Who Gave These Ratings for Overall Testing Experience With This Meter
Time frame: One hour
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joy Frank, RN principal investigator
Consumer Product Testing Co., Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Dec 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Capillary and Venous Results Within +/- 15mg/dL or +/- 20% of Laboratory Glucose Method (time frame: One hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2016.