Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3SUNRISENCT00801944
Solifenacin Succinate 5mg or 10mg Once Daily in the Treatment of Urgency Symptoms
A Phase 3 study testing Solifenacin succinate in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 78 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective, double-blind, double-randomised, 2-arm parallel group study. Optimal dose increase. Primary efficacy assessment of OAB symptoms by patient diaries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- What is being tested?
- Solifenacin succinate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 973 participants
- Where
- 78 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2004to Oct 2005
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary correctly.
- Symptoms of overactive bladder (including urinary frequency, urgency with/without urge incontinence) for >= 3 months
- At least 3 episodes of urgency with or without incontinence in last 3 days
- At least three episodes of urgency with or without incontinence (PPIUS grade 3 or 4) during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average >= 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study or women of childbearing potential who are sexually active and practising an unreliable method of birth control or will be lactating during the study. Reliable contraceptive methods are intra-uterine devices, contraceptive pills of combination type, hormonal implants and injectable or patch contraceptives
- Clinically significant outflow obstruction (at the discretion of the investigator)
- Significant post void residual volume (PVR>200ml)
- Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator
- Patient with indwelling catheters or practising intermittent self-catheterisation
- Evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
Show all 14Show fewer
- Hypersensitivity to solifenacin or to any of the excipients, uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, urinary or gastric retention, severe renal impairment (GFR ≥30 ml/min), moderate or severe hepatic impairment, chronic intestinal disease, megacolon, requirement for dialysis, concomitant use of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, e.g. ketoconazole
- Non drug OAB treatment such as bladder-training, biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises are permissible if established at least 4 weeks prior to study start and intended to be continued throughout the study; electrostimulation therapy is not permissible at any time
- Use of drugs intended to treat urinary incontinence
- Diabetic neuropathy
- Any clinically significant condition, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient unsuitable for the trial
- Participation in any clinical trial within 30 days prior to randomisation
- Employees of the Yamanouchi Group, third parties associated with the study, or the study site
- Patient who did not complete the micturition diary according to the instructions
Trial locations and contacts
78 sites in 14 countries.
78 sites in 14 countries
Germany14 sites
Study site
Aichach
Study site
Bad Neuenaher
Study site
Bamberg
Study site
Bautzen
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Dierdorf
Study site
Dülmen
Study site
Düsseldorf
Study site
Frankfurt
Study site
Henningsdorf
Study site
Munich
Study site
Neustadt
Study site
Nuremberg
Study site
Planegg
United Kingdom13 sites
Study site
Birmingham
Study site
Cottingham
Study site
Croydon
Study site
Edinburgh
Study site
Huntingdon
Study site
London
Study site
Manchester
Study site
Oldham
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent
Study site
Sunderland
Study site
Torbay
Study site
Welwyn Garden City
Study site
Worthing
Belgium8 sites
Study site
Antwerp
Study site
Bruges
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Ghent
Study site
Hasselt
Study site
Kortrijk
Study site
Leuven
Study site
Liège
Italy8 sites
Study site
Bari
Study site
Catanzaro
Study site
Cinisello Balsamo
Study site
Magenta
Study site
Modena
Study site
Perugia
Study site
Turin
Study site
Udine
Spain7 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Coaña
Study site
Córdoba
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Mérida
Study site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna
Study site
Seville
France6 sites
Study site
Lille
Study site
Lomme
Study site
Mulhouse
Study site
Nantes
Study site
Nîmes
Study site
Paris
Hungary5 sites
Study site
Budapest
Study site
Nyíregyháza
Study site
Pécs
Study site
Szeged
Study site
Tatabánya
Portugal4 sites
Study site
Abrantes
Study site
Lisbon
Study site
Porto
Study site
Santarém
Slovakia3 sites
Study site
Banska Bysterica
Study site
Martin
Study site
Žilina
About this study
Official title: Solifenacin in the Treatment of Urgency Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in a Rising Dose, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial
Prospective, double-blind, double-randomised, 2-arm parallel group study. Optimal dose increase. Primary efficacy assessment of OAB symptoms by patient diaries.
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Being tested
- Solifenacin succinate, Placebo
- Keywords
- Overactive Bladder
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Solifenacin succinateDrug
Also called YM905, Vesicare
oral
PlaceboDrug
oral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Solifenacin succinate 5/10mg Receives: Drug: Solifenacin succinate |
| II | Experimental | Placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes/24 hours at EOS -from the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale at void (PPIUS) grades 3 and 4
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes (PPIUS grades 1-4)
Measured: Week 16
Change from baseline in the mean number of micturition, incontinence and urge incontinence (PPIUS grade 4) episodes per 24 hours
Measured: Week 16
Change from baseline in patient perception of bladder condition (PBC)
Measured: Week 16
Change from baseline in patient perception of urgency 'bother' (UB-VAS)
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of patients requiring an increase in the dose of the study medication
Measured: Week 8
Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction (TS-VAS)
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2004
- Primary completionOct 2005
- Study completionOct 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Bladder, OveractiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 973 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Central Contact, Study chair, Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00801944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 905-EC-002
- Acronym
- SUNRISE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Cardozo L, Hessdorfer E, Milani R, Arano P, Dewilde L, Slack M, Drogendijk T, Wright M, Bolodeoku J; SUNRISE Study Group. Solifenacin in the treatment of urgency and other symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, rising-dose trial. BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(9):1120-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07939.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
PubMed 18990175Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.
PubMed 37160401
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Solifenacin in the Treatment of Urgency Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in a Rising Dose, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00801944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUNRISE / 905-EC-002
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Keywords
- Overactive Bladder
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 973 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2004
- Primary completion
- Oct 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, double-blind, double-randomised, 2-arm parallel group study. Optimal dose increase. Primary efficacy assessment of OAB symptoms by patient diaries.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| I | Experimental | Drug: Solifenacin succinateSolifenacin succinate 5/10mg |
| II | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary correctly.
- Symptoms of overactive bladder (including urinary frequency, urgency with/without urge incontinence) for >= 3 months
- At least 3 episodes of urgency with or without incontinence in last 3 days
- At least three episodes of urgency with or without incontinence (PPIUS grade 3 or 4) during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average >= 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Pregnant women or women who intend to become pregnant during the study or women of childbearing potential who are sexually active and practising an unreliable method of birth control or will be lactating during the study. Reliable contraceptive methods are intra-uterine devices, contraceptive pills of combination type, hormonal implants and injectable or patch contraceptives
- Clinically significant outflow obstruction (at the discretion of the investigator)
- Significant post void residual volume (PVR>200ml)
- Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator
- Patient with indwelling catheters or practising intermittent self-catheterisation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Solifenacin succinateAlso: YM905, Vesicareoral | Drug | I |
| Placebooral | Drug | II |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes/24 hours at EOS -from the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale at void (PPIUS) grades 3 and 4
Time frame: Week 16
6 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes (PPIUS grades 1-4)
Time frame: Week 16
Change from baseline in the mean number of micturition, incontinence and urge incontinence (PPIUS grade 4) episodes per 24 hours
Time frame: Week 16
Change from baseline in patient perception of bladder condition (PBC)
Time frame: Week 16
Change from baseline in patient perception of urgency 'bother' (UB-VAS)
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of patients requiring an increase in the dose of the study medication
Time frame: Week 8
Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction (TS-VAS)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2014.
- Background: PubMed 18990175Cardozo L, Hessdorfer E, Milani R, Arano P, Dewilde L, Slack M, Drogendijk T, Wright M, Bolodeoku J; SUNRISE Study Group. Solifenacin in the treatment of urgency and other symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, rising-dose trial. BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(9):1120-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07939.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37160401Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.
Related trials for Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Central Contact study chair
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
78 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Solifenacin succinate in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 78 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 78 sites in Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Italy, Spain and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes/24 hours at EOS -from the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale at void (PPIUS) grades 3 and 4 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00801944, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2014.