HypertensionNCT00802152
Using Health Information Technology (HIT) to Improve Ambulatory Chronic Disease Care: Smart Device Substudy
A study testing Home monitoring in people with Hypertension and Diabetes, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In-home health monitoring devices have the potential to increase the speed and ease of modifying treatment for ambulatory patients living with chronic conditions. This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of remote data transmission from in-home devices (blood glucose meter/blood pressure machine) to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Home monitoring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2009to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- hemoglobin A1c (A1c) ≥8% OR systolic BP> 130 on last measurement
- on oral medication or insulin
- Type 2 diabetes
- Diabetes and hypertension for at least one year
- using/owns a blood glucose meter (that is compatible with study equipment)
- followed by an attending MD
- private land phone line or computer with internet connection
- enrolled at Family \& Community Medicine (FCM) Green Meadows , FCM Woodrail or Fairview General Internal Medicine (GIM) clinic and anticipate receiving primary care for next 12 months from MU primary care
Who cannot join
- newly diagnosed or Type 1 diabetes
- legally blind
- currently reside in a long-term care facility, including assisted living facility, residential care
- severe cognitive impairment (6-item cognitive screen via recruitment telephone call)
- family/household member enrolled in study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Missouri, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine
Columbia, Missouri, 65211
About this study
In-home health monitoring devices have the potential to increase the speed and ease of modifying treatment for ambulatory patients living with chronic conditions. This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of remote data transmission from in-home devices (blood glucose meter/blood pressure machine) to the clinic on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetes who have out of range blood glucose (BG) or systolic blood pressure (BP) measurements. We test whether the short-term targeted use of in-home monitoring devices facilitates management for providers and improves outcome measures for patients.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term targeted use of remote data transmission from in-home devices (blood glucose meter/blood pressure machine) to the clinic on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetes who have out of range blood glucose (BG) or systolic blood pressure (BP) measurements. Increased frequency of data transmission will provide the provider with "real time" data in order to make more timely adjustments in the treatment plan, resulting in improved glycemic control as measured by A1c values and hypertension as measured by systolic blood pressure (SBP).
Subjects will be recruited from Family \& Community Medicine (FCM) and General Internal Medicine (GIM) clinics. We will randomly select patients from physicians with a minimum number of 5 eligible patients from the performance measurement list (A1c>=8% or SBP>130) to approach for the study. Patients who agree to enroll will be randomized to experimental and control using a block randomization approach stratified by age increments (18-40; 41-55; 56-70; 71+). Subjects will be randomized using prepared sealed envelopes. A total of 200 subjects (100 intervention subjects and 100 control subjects) will be enrolled over a period of one year. We will attempt to enroll equal numbers of FCM and GIM subjects.
For all subjects, baseline data will be collected from the patient, including demographic data (age, gender, race, and years of formal education), payor status (private pay, insurance, Medicaid), number of co-morbid conditions, baseline blood pressure, and length of time diagnosed with diabetes (DM) and hypertension.
Intervention patients will be instructed to test their BP and BG according to a minimum protocol of at least once daily and upload this clinical data at least every other day for the 3-month study duration, but this frequency could be further tailored by their provider, i.e., more than once daily. At least 2 of these BG readings each week should be fasting levels. Patient training will emphasize that this system is not an emergency response system, i.e., critical values should be treated in the usual manner.
Control group patients (those who do not receive the device) will be asked to test their BP and BG at least once daily (in the same fashion as the intervention group). They will be instructed to bring these readings to their clinic visits, and again at the end of the study. We will collect these readings.
Data from patients are downloaded to the website as they enter data. These data may be printed out for MD review or verbally communicated. APNs in FCM will make changes in patient treatment based on their currently established privileges, e.g., medication adjustments; RNs in GIM or FCM will review data with MDs for changes in treatment plans. All treatment changes will be individualized according to patient need, i.e., no standardized blood glucose management protocol will be employed. Communication of changes in therapy to the patient will be accomplished per usual clinic protocol, e.g., usually by a telephone call to the patient, with documentation of a telephone note in the medical record.
After three months, all subjects will return to the clinic for an A1c and BP measure, and for post study surveys. Data collection will include achievement of clinical goals in blood glucose (A1c measure at end of 3 month intervention [+/- 2 weeks] and BP). If enrolled subjects have an available A1c and BP measure recorded in the record at the end of 6 months, we will collect these data to assess longer term effects of the intervention. Patient records will be reviewed for interventions provided to patient (i.e., documenting the process of medication changes, advice provided).
Interview data will be collected from physicians and nurses re: perceptions of use of the data from the device; patient perceptions of the home-device application, and patient use rates of data upload (intervention), and frequency of BG and BP testing both before and during the intervention period (for both intervention and control patients).
The primary outcome measure will be a comparison of A1c at three months following enrollment (i.e., patient met goal of > 0.5% change in A1c or SBP < 130). The proportion of patients who meet the blood glucose / BP goal three months after enrollment will be computed for both the intervention group and the control group. For each group, the denominator will be the number of patients enrolled in that group (and thus were not meeting the recommended goals at the time of enrollment). The numerator will be those patients who meet the recommended goals as determined during an office visit which occurs three months (+/- 14 calendar days) after enrollment.
Changes in care processes will be categorized and described, and related to the patient entered data (daily blood glucose measures).
Physician and nurse perception data will be analyzed using qualitative approaches. Intervention group patient perceptions and satisfaction with the home-device application will be measured using a short survey and analyzed descriptively.
In the intervention group, patient use rates will be calculated to include the percent of readings submitted as the numerator and total expected as denominator (e.g., submitted 70 readings/90 days = 78% use rate).
RN time per week for data review \& follow up will be analyzed descriptively to assess the burden of responding to monitoring data.
Data will be collected on the time for enrollment and patient training in order to estimate costs associated with the intervention.
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- Being tested
- Home monitoring
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Hypertension
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Home monitoringOther
Also called MetrikLink, MediCompass, iMetrikus
The subject will take their blood pressure or glucose measurements 1-4 times per day, depending on patient condition. They will upload these measurements using the device to a secure website at least every other day. Data will be reviewed at least 2 times per week Monday through Friday by the clinic nursing staff. Data indicating problems, e.g., critical out of range values, will be communicated to the patient's primary care physician after review by the nurse. The physician will then determine what is needed for follow up action based on the patient's condition and data (e.g., telephone call to patient home, scheduling a clinic appointment, etc).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Home Monitoring | Experimental | 100 eligible subjects identified as (HbA1c >= 8% OR SBP > 130 mm Hg) Receives: Other: Home monitoring |
| Usual Care | No intervention | 100 eligible subjects identified as (HbA1c >= 8% OR SBP > 130 mm Hg) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Changes in care (process), abstracted from patient's medical record
Measured: 3 months, 6 months following enrollment
Patient-entered device data
Measured: All data over three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2009
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionJun 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Missouri-ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Mehr, MD, Principal investigator, University of Missouri, School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00802152
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1095618
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Health Information Technology (HIT) to Improve Ambulatory Chronic Disease Care: Smart Device Substudy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00802152
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1095618
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Hypertension
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- May 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In-home health monitoring devices have the potential to increase the speed and ease of modifying treatment for ambulatory patients living with chronic conditions. This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of remote data transmission from in-home devices (blood glucose meter/blood pressure machine) to the clinic on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetes who have out of range blood glucose (BG) or systolic blood pressure (BP) measurements. We test whether the short-term targeted use of in-home monitoring devices facilitates management for providers and improves outcome measures for patients.
Detailed description
To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term targeted use of remote data transmission from in-home devices (blood glucose meter/blood pressure machine) to the clinic on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetes who have out of range blood glucose (BG) or systolic blood pressure (BP) measurements. Increased frequency of data transmission will provide the provider with "real time" data in order to make more timely adjustments in the treatment plan, resulting in improved glycemic control as measured by A1c values and hypertension as measured by systolic blood pressure (SBP).
Subjects will be recruited from Family \& Community Medicine (FCM) and General Internal Medicine (GIM) clinics. We will randomly select patients from physicians with a minimum number of 5 eligible patients from the performance measurement list (A1c>=8% or SBP>130) to approach for the study. Patients who agree to enroll will be randomized to experimental and control using a block randomization approach stratified by age increments (18-40; 41-55; 56-70; 71+). Subjects will be randomized using prepared sealed envelopes. A total of 200 subjects (100 intervention subjects and 100 control subjects) will be enrolled over a period of one year. We will attempt to enroll equal numbers of FCM and GIM subjects.
For all subjects, baseline data will be collected from the patient, including demographic data (age, gender, race, and years of formal education), payor status (private pay, insurance, Medicaid), number of co-morbid conditions, baseline blood pressure, and length of time diagnosed with diabetes (DM) and hypertension.
Intervention patients will be instructed to test their BP and BG according to a minimum protocol of at least once daily and upload this clinical data at least every other day for the 3-month study duration, but this frequency could be further tailored by their provider, i.e., more than once daily. At least 2 of these BG readings each week should be fasting levels. Patient training will emphasize that this system is not an emergency response system, i.e., critical values should be treated in the usual manner.
Control group patients (those who do not receive the device) will be asked to test their BP and BG at least once daily (in the same fashion as the intervention group). They will be instructed to bring these readings to their clinic visits, and again at the end of the study. We will collect these readings.
Data from patients are downloaded to the website as they enter data. These data may be printed out for MD review or verbally communicated. APNs in FCM will make changes in patient treatment based on their currently established privileges, e.g., medication adjustments; RNs in GIM or FCM will review data with MDs for changes in treatment plans. All treatment changes will be individualized according to patient need, i.e., no standardized blood glucose management protocol will be employed. Communication of changes in therapy to the patient will be accomplished per usual clinic protocol, e.g., usually by a telephone call to the patient, with documentation of a telephone note in the medical record.
After three months, all subjects will return to the clinic for an A1c and BP measure, and for post study surveys. Data collection will include achievement of clinical goals in blood glucose (A1c measure at end of 3 month intervention [+/- 2 weeks] and BP). If enrolled subjects have an available A1c and BP measure recorded in the record at the end of 6 months, we will collect these data to assess longer term effects of the intervention. Patient records will be reviewed for interventions provided to patient (i.e., documenting the process of medication changes, advice provided).
Interview data will be collected from physicians and nurses re: perceptions of use of the data from the device; patient perceptions of the home-device application, and patient use rates of data upload (intervention), and frequency of BG and BP testing both before and during the intervention period (for both intervention and control patients).
The primary outcome measure will be a comparison of A1c at three months following enrollment (i.e., patient met goal of > 0.5% change in A1c or SBP < 130). The proportion of patients who meet the blood glucose / BP goal three months after enrollment will be computed for both the intervention group and the control group. For each group, the denominator will be the number of patients enrolled in that group (and thus were not meeting the recommended goals at the time of enrollment). The numerator will be those patients who meet the recommended goals as determined during an office visit which occurs three months (+/- 14 calendar days) after enrollment.
Changes in care processes will be categorized and described, and related to the patient entered data (daily blood glucose measures).
Physician and nurse perception data will be analyzed using qualitative approaches. Intervention group patient perceptions and satisfaction with the home-device application will be measured using a short survey and analyzed descriptively.
In the intervention group, patient use rates will be calculated to include the percent of readings submitted as the numerator and total expected as denominator (e.g., submitted 70 readings/90 days = 78% use rate).
RN time per week for data review \& follow up will be analyzed descriptively to assess the burden of responding to monitoring data.
Data will be collected on the time for enrollment and patient training in order to estimate costs associated with the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Home Monitoring | Experimental | Other: Home monitoring100 eligible subjects identified as (HbA1c >= 8% OR SBP > 130 mm Hg) |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –100 eligible subjects identified as (HbA1c >= 8% OR SBP > 130 mm Hg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- hemoglobin A1c (A1c) ≥8% OR systolic BP> 130 on last measurement
- on oral medication or insulin
- Type 2 diabetes
- Diabetes and hypertension for at least one year
- using/owns a blood glucose meter (that is compatible with study equipment)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- newly diagnosed or Type 1 diabetes
- legally blind
- currently reside in a long-term care facility, including assisted living facility, residential care
- severe cognitive impairment (6-item cognitive screen via recruitment telephone call)
- family/household member enrolled in study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Home monitoringAlso: MetrikLink, MediCompass, iMetrikusThe subject will take their blood pressure or glucose measurements 1-4 times per day, depending on patient condition. They will upload these measurements using the device to a secure website at least every other day. Data will be reviewed at least 2 times per week Monday through Friday by the clinic nursing staff. Data indicating problems, e.g., critical out of range values, will be communicated to the patient's primary care physician after review by the nurse. The physician will then determine what is needed for follow up action based on the patient's condition and data (e.g., telephone call to patient home, scheduling a clinic appointment, etc). | Other | Home Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or Systolic blood pressure (SBP)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
2 secondary outcomes
Changes in care (process), abstracted from patient's medical record
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months following enrollment
Patient-entered device data
Time frame: All data over three months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Mehr, MD principal investigator
University of Missouri, School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Home monitoring in people with Hypertension and Diabetes, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (time frame: Baseline, 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.