AzTrials
AzTrials

DiabetesNCT00804596

Evaluation of Labeling Comprehension and Performance of a New Blood Glucose Meter System

A study testing Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the acceptability of product user guides for untrained subjects and to evaluate the performance of the system with lay users and healthcare providers (HCPs). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes
What is being tested?
Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2008to Jan 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • Be at least 18 years of age but have not reached their 76th birthday, with approximately 50% (+10%) being less than 55 years of age, at time of consent
  • Be willing to complete all study procedures
  • Be routinely testing their blood sugar at home (at least once per day)
  • Be able to speak, read, and understand English and understand the Informed Consent document
  • Be able to read the labeling instructions
  • Own or operate a computer for personal or professional use beyond that for email correspondence. Subjects will not have to use their personal computer for the study, but computer use will be required.

Who cannot join

  • Minors <18 years of age and adults >75 years of age
  • Pregnancy
  • Physical (dexterity), visual, or neurological impairments that would make the person unable to perform testing with the BGMS
  • Disorders in the fingertip lancing areas
  • Acute or chronic infections, particularly skin infections
  • Infection with a blood borne pathogen
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Taking prescription anti-coagulants or having clotting problems that may prolong bleeding. Taking aspirin daily (81mg or 325 mg) is not reason for exclusion
  • Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
  • Having a condition which, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or designee, would put the person at risk or seriously compromise the integrity of the study
  • Working for a competitive medical device company

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • International Diabetes Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Labeling Comprehension and Performance Evaluation of the Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Capillary Blood [Commercial Name is CONTOUR® USB]

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the acceptability of product user guides for untrained subjects and to evaluate the performance of the system with lay users and healthcare providers (HCPs).

Read the detailed description

The study evaluated the acceptability of product labeling for performing blood glucose testing with the new blood glucose meter system (BGMS) and for using meter features. Sections of the User Guide and Quick Reference Guide that gave instruction on performing a blood glucose test and operating system features were evaluated, including instructions on connectivity of the system with a computer, meter setup, glucose trends display, and other system features. The study also evaluated the performance of the blood glucose meter system (BGMS) in the hands of subjects and healthcare professionals using capillary blood. Subjects and healthcare professionals provided feedback about the BGMS and its features. Some subjects took the system home to evaluate the robustness of the BGMS.

Conditions
Diabetes
Being tested
Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemDevice

    Also called Commercial name is CONTOUR® USB

    Subjects with diabetes were rated for success in performing tasks with a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS). Also, subjects and healthcare professionals (HCPs) used the new blood glucose monitoring system with subject capillary blood. All blood glucose results were compared to a laboratory glucose method - Yellow Springs Instrument(YSI) Analyzer.

Study groups in NCT00804596
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subjects with diabetesOtherSubjects with diabetes use a new blood glucose monitoring system with subject capillary blood.
Receives: Device: Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Rated as <=3 (Comprehension of Labeling)

    Study staff rated participants on their success at performing Blood Glucose (BG) testing and other system features after subjects read product labeling. The rating scale was:

    1. Successful in performing tasks correctly without assistance
    2. Successful after being referred to user instructions
    3. Successful after verbal assistance or review of part of user instructions (Similar to review of a specific function during a Customer Service call.)
    4. Unsuccessful (Incorrectly performed part of the testing regimen or required intervention by study staff.)

    Measured: 1-2 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Capillary Blood Results Within +/- 15mg/dL or +/- 20% of Laboratory Glucose Method

    Subjects with diabetes and healthcare professionals (HCPs) used a new Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS) with subject capillary blood. The BGMS has programmed algorithms to provide results equivalent to either serum/plasma or whole blood glucose methods; this study evaluated results equivalent to plasma lab methods. All results were compared to a lab glucose method - Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) Analyzer. BG results were obtained in duplicate from subjects using three lots of Contour Blood Glucose strips, evenly distributed among the subjects.

    Measured: 1-2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2008
  3. Primary completionJan 2009
  4. Study completionJan 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00804596
Sponsor's protocol ID
CTD-2008-18
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
5 Dec 2008
Last updated
29 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Apollo Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes, run by Ascensia Diabetes Care at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Rated as <=3 (Comprehension of Labeling) (time frame: 1-2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in