AzTrials
AzTrials

TumorPhase 2NCT00806156

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-102 in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Ovarian Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing NKTR-102 q14d and NKTR-102 q21d in people with Tumor and Ovarian Cancer, run by Nektar Therapeutics at 20 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, 2-stage, Phase 2 study of NKTR-102 in patients with metastatic or locally advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Approximately 70 patients will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms. NKTR-102 will be administered at a dose level of 145 mg/m^2 in both arms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Tumor, Ovarian Cancer
What is being tested?
NKTR-102 q14d and NKTR-102 q21d
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
178 participants
Where
20 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Oct 2008to Jan 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer or fallopian tube cancer
  • Inoperable metastatic or locally advanced ovarian cancer
  • Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer defined as progression by RECIST within 6 months of last dose of most recent platinum drug
  • Platinum-resistant patients who have progressed after receiving PLD (Doxil/Caelyx)therapy in a platinum-resistant setting or who otherwise unable to receive PLD therapy.
  • Diseases must be measurable as defined by RECIST in at least 1 lesion not previously irradiated.
  • ECOG performance score of 0 or 1.
  • Adequate organ and bone marrow functions at Screening.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) and have not recovered to NCI-CTCAE grade 1 toxicity prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
  • Patients who have had any major surgery within 4 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1 or minor surgery within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
  • Patients who have received CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors.
  • Patients who have received any treatment with a camptothecin derivative (eg. irinotecan, topotecan, SN38 investigational agents, etc.).
  • Patients with CNS metastases.

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 3 countries.

20 sites in 3 countries

United States11 sites
  • Investigator Site - Charlottesville

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • Investigator Site - East Providence

    East Providence, Rhode Island, 02915

  • Investigator Site - Higland

    Highland, California, 92346

  • Investigator Site - Iowa City

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Investigator Site - Lansing

    Lansing, Michigan, 48912

  • Investigator Site - Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Investigator Site - Nashville

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Investigator Site - Newport Beach

    Newport Beach, California, 92663

  • Investigator Site - Oklahoma City

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73142

  • Investigator Site - West Palm Beach

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401

  • Investigator Site - Winston-Salem

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Investigator Site - Coventry

    Coventry

  • Investigator Site - Dundee

    Dundee, DD1 9SY

  • Investigator Site - Glasgow

    Glasgow, G12 OYN

  • Investigator Site - Middlesex

    Middlesex, Northwood

  • Investigator Site - Newcastle Upon Tyne

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium4 sites
  • Investigator Site - Gent

    Ghent

  • Investigator Site - Leuven

    Leuven

  • Investigator Site - Liege

    Liège

  • Investigator Site - Wilrijk

    Wilrijk

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-102 When Given on a Q14 Day or a Q21 Day Schedule in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

This is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, 2-stage, Phase 2 study of NKTR-102 in patients with metastatic or locally advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Approximately 70 patients will be randomized 1:1 into one of two treatment arms. NKTR-102 will be administered at a dose level of 145 mg/m^2 in both arms. In Arm A, NKTR-102 will be given on a q14d schedule. In Arm B, NKTR-102 will be given on a q21d schedule. After the initial 70 patients have been enrolled, Arm B will enroll approximately 110 additional patients.

Being tested
NKTR-102 q14d, NKTR-102 q21d
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NKTR-102 q14dDrug

    NKTR-102 given on a q14 day schedule

  • NKTR-102 q21dDrug

    NKTR-102 given on a q21 day schedule

Study groups in NCT00806156
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NKTR-102 q14dExperimentalNKTR-102 was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 2-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 4 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.
Receives: Drug: NKTR-102 q14d
NKTR-102 q21dExperimentalNKTR-102 was administered as an IV infusion over 90 ± 10 minutes, on Day 1 of each 3-week [± 2 days] cycle at a dose of 170 mg/m^2 for the first 6 patients enrolled and at a dose of 145 mg/m^2 for the remainder of the patients.
Receives: Drug: NKTR-102 q21d

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Primary Efficacy Population

    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator. CR was defined by RECIST 1.1 as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined by RECIST 1.1 as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. The analysis was performed for patients in the Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Secondary: Best Overall Response by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria: MITT Population

    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR as assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  2. Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Primary Efficacy Population

    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  3. Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  4. Secondary: Best Overall Response by GCIG Criteria: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Best overall response was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per assessed per GCIG criteria. The GCIG proposed the following definition for the date of progression which used both the RECIST and CA-125 criteria. "A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is ≥ 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Patients can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they had a pretreatment sample that was at least twice the ULN and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment." Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  5. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS): MITT Population

    According to enhanced RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was the appearance of one or more new lesions, OR an unambiguous increase in the sum of target lesion volumes with both 1) >20% increase in the sum of volumes (SOV) of all target lesions (taking as reference the nadir) and 2) greater than two times the variability of the measurements estimated by the sponsor and/or its designees.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  6. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Primary Efficacy Population

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  7. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Platinum-Refractory Population

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  8. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first NKTR-102 administration to the date of PD or death due to any cause. Progressive disease was determined by Investigators using RECIST criteria. Patients who were alive without disease progression at the time of data-cut-off were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated a lack of disease progression (or on Cycle 1 Day 1 if the patient did not undergo repeated imaging while on study). Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  9. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Duration of Overall Response (DoR): MITT Population

    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  10. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Primary Efficacy Population

    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  11. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Platinum-Refractory Population

    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  12. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of DoR: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    DoR was defined as the time from the first documented CR or PR, the date of PD (assessed by central radiological review according to RECIST), or death due to any cause, whichever came first. Patients who were alive without documented PD per RECIST were censored at the date of last tumor assessment without disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy for the study disease, whichever was earlier. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  13. Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: MITT Population

    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  14. Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Primary Efficacy Population

    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  15. Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population

    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  16. Secondary: CA-125 Response Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    CA-125 response was determined by having achieved a ≥50% reduction in serum levels of CA-125 from a pre-treatment level of at least twice the ULN within 2 weeks of starting treatment according to the GCIG criteria. The CA-125 response rate was calculated as the number of patients meeting the endpoint definition divided by the total number of eligible patients per the GCIG criteria for CA-125 in the analysis population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  17. Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: MITT Population

    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  18. Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Primary Efficacy Population

    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  19. Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  20. Secondary: Clinical Benefit Rate: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Clinical benefit rate was calculated as the number of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or SD (where the duration of SD should be ≥ 3 months) by RECIST divided by the total number of measurable patients in the population. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  21. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Overall Survival (OS): MITT Population

    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  22. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Primary Efficacy Population

    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Primary Efficacy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  23. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Platinum-Refractory Population

    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  24. Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Analysis of OS: Prior PLD Therapy Population

    Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. Analysis was performed in Prior PLD Therapy Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  25. Secondary: ORR by RECIST: MITT Population

    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the MITT Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  26. Secondary: ORR by RECIST: Prior PLD Population

    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the PLD Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

  27. Secondary: ORR by RECIST: Platinum-Refractory Population

    The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a CR or a PR per RECIST 1.0 based upon the best response as assessed by the Investigator assessment. The analysis was performed for patients in the Platinum-Refractory Population.

    Measured: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2008
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
178 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00806156
Sponsor's protocol ID
08-PIR-04
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
4 Dec 2008
Last updated
12 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rustin G, Vergote I, Micha JP, Duska LR, Reed N, Bendell J, Spitz D, Dark G, Hoch U, Tagliaferri M, Hannah AL, Garcia AA. A multicenter, open-label, expanded phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etirinotecan pegol, a polymer conjugate of irinotecan, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

    PubMed 28935273

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing NKTR-102 q14d and NKTR-102 q21d in people with Tumor and Ovarian Cancer, run by Nektar Therapeutics at 20 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary: Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Primary Efficacy Population (time frame: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study (approximately 3 years and 11 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00806156, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in