Prostate CancerNCT00807820
Phase I Targeting Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Using MR Spectroscopy and HDR Brachytherapy
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a phase I study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using MRI/MRS to identify the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) and to selectively boost the lesion using inverse planned high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patient who are candidate for prostate HDR brachytherapy will be offered this protocol
Who may be able to join
- Patient must be a candidate for HDR prostate brachytherapy
- Patient must be able to have MR scan
- Patient must have a visible DIL on MRS
- Patient has signed the protocol consent form
- No prior pelvic or prostate radiation or chemotherapy for any reason
- Induction hormonal therapy beginning ≤ 120 days prior to study entry is acceptable only if there is a MRI/MRS done prior to starting hormonal therapy
Show all 11Show fewer
- Prostate specific antigen prior to any (hormonal) therapy must be ≤ 20 ng/ml
- One of the following combinations of factors:
- Clinical stage T2a-2b, Gleason score 2-6 and PSA ≥ 10 but ≤ 20
- Clinical stage T3a-T3b, Gleason score 2-6 and PSA ≤ 20
- Clinical stage T2a-T3b, Gleason score 7-10 and PSA ≤ 20
Who cannot join
- Patient with hip prosthesis
- Patient with pacemaker
- Patient with history of radical surgery for prostate
- Patient with claustrophobia
- Patient with metal in body not safe for MR
- Stage T4 disease
Show all 10Show fewer
- Lymph node involvement (N1)
- Evidence of distant metastases (M1)
- Previous hormonal therapy beginning > 120 days prior to registration
- Hormonal therapy prior to MRI/MRS
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-1708
About this study
Official title: Phase I Study of Targeting Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Using Functional MR Spectroscopy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy
This is a phase I study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using MRI/MRS to identify the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) and to selectively boost the lesion using inverse planned high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.
The main objective is to exploit the ability of MRI/MRS to identify cancer regions within the prostate or the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). The imaging data will be combined with the treatment planning CT images to define a treatment plan that will boost the dose delivered to the DIL up to 150% of the prescribed dose. Dose to the whole prostate and the dose delivered to adjacent organs will not change. This is accomplished by using inverse treatment planning software that can focus normally occurring high dose regions within the target volume to coincide with the DIL.
After enrollment, each patient will have a MRI/MRS before starting treatment. Hormonal therapy and external beam radiotherapy will be given based on current standard of practice. During HDR brachytherapy, information about the location of tumor within the prostate will be used to design the brachytherapy treatment plan. We will try to increase dose to DIL by coincide existing high dose region on DIL using inverse planning software. Dose to prostate, and adjacent structure will remain the same as the current treatment practice. Timing and the delivery of brachytherapy will not change from our current practice. After the treatment, each patient will remain on study and follow for 12 months and treatment toxicity will be evaluated. A two-stage study design will be applied with a stopping rule for safety. Once a patient comes off study he will be routinely followed for disease outcome and any late toxicities.
Read the detailed description
1.1 The goal of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose of radiation to the target volume while minimizing the dose to the surrounding normal tissue. Using CT based three-dimensional treatment planning system and multiple field technique, the three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CRT) has become the standard of care for external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Multiple institutional studies and prospective randomized trials have been done documenting the safety and efficacy of this modality. Brachytherapy is an alternative method of delivering conformal radiotherapy for treatment of prostate cancer. The technique of HDR prostate brachytherapy has been in clinical practice since the 1980's [1-13]. Kovacs et al reported one of the earliest experiences using HDR brachytherapy boost at University of Kiel.[10, 11, 13] Patients treated were mostly T2b-T3, G3. They used a combination of split course external beam radiotherapy and two 15 Gy HDR treatments. They reported 18% positive biopsy rate 18 months post treatment. The result was updated at 10 years and 78 percent of 171 patients remained free of disease at median follow-up of 55 months. Mate et al at Swedish Medical Center reported their experience with HDR brachytherapy [9]. They used a more moderated hypofractionated schema with four treatments of 3-4 Gy fractions of HDR treatments combined with 45-50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. They recommended routine cystoscopy at the end of the implant procedure to ensure the catheters are placed at the proper depth and to avoid injuring the urethra. Pretreatment patient characteristics were stage T1b to T3c, mean initial PSA was 12.9 and Gleason grade ranges 3 to 9. They reported 84% 5-year biochemical disease free survival. Martinez et al at the William Beaumont Hospital reported the only on-going prospective dose escalation trial using HDR brachytherapy as a boost. There have been multiple updates of their results.[5-7, 12] They have continued to dose escalate using increasingly larger fractions of HDR treatment range from 5.5-6.5 Gy x 3 to 8.25-11.5 Gy x 2 combined with 46 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. As of their most recent update, they have shown acceptable toxicity level using 9.5 Gy x 2 treatments. Patients with PSA ≥ 10, T ≥ T2b, and Gleason score ≥ 7 were selected for the trial. Despite a high frequency of poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. Borghede et al. at Goteborg University in Sweden reported their experience using 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy combined with 2 fractions of 10 Gy HDR boost.[1, 2] They used ultrasound to target tumor nodules within the prostate and gave an additional 5 Gy boost during each HDR treatment. Patients included in the study were T1-3, and grade 1-3. They report a 4% positive biopsy rate at 18-months post treatment. This is a remarkably low positive biopsy rate considering no hormonal therapy was used in the study. The results from these clinical trials and others have shown the technique of HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer is feasible with minimal morbidity. Other institutional trials have suggested HDR boost may be more efficacious compared to external beam radiotherapy alone or external beam radiotherapy with short term hormonal therapy. Results of these studies need to be confirmed in large multi-institutional trials.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Estimate Grade 3 or greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (1)
MRI/MRS
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionJun 2011
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean Pouliot, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Univerisity of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00807820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H11386-24294
- Other IDs
- Grant: PC030909
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
De Bari B, Daidone A, Alongi F. Is high dose rate brachytherapy reliable and effective treatment for prostate cancer patients? A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jun;94(3):360-70. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
PubMed 25819287
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase I Study of Targeting Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Using Functional MR Spectroscopy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00807820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H11386-24294
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase I study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using MRI/MRS to identify the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) and to selectively boost the lesion using inverse planned high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.
The main objective is to exploit the ability of MRI/MRS to identify cancer regions within the prostate or the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). The imaging data will be combined with the treatment planning CT images to define a treatment plan that will boost the dose delivered to the DIL up to 150% of the prescribed dose. Dose to the whole prostate and the dose delivered to adjacent organs will not change. This is accomplished by using inverse treatment planning software that can focus normally occurring high dose regions within the target volume to coincide with the DIL.
After enrollment, each patient will have a MRI/MRS before starting treatment. Hormonal therapy and external beam radiotherapy will be given based on current standard of practice. During HDR brachytherapy, information about the location of tumor within the prostate will be used to design the brachytherapy treatment plan. We will try to increase dose to DIL by coincide existing high dose region on DIL using inverse planning software. Dose to prostate, and adjacent structure will remain the same as the current treatment practice. Timing and the delivery of brachytherapy will not change from our current practice. After the treatment, each patient will remain on study and follow for 12 months and treatment toxicity will be evaluated. A two-stage study design will be applied with a stopping rule for safety. Once a patient comes off study he will be routinely followed for disease outcome and any late toxicities.
Detailed description
1.1 The goal of radiotherapy is to deliver a high dose of radiation to the target volume while minimizing the dose to the surrounding normal tissue. Using CT based three-dimensional treatment planning system and multiple field technique, the three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CRT) has become the standard of care for external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Multiple institutional studies and prospective randomized trials have been done documenting the safety and efficacy of this modality. Brachytherapy is an alternative method of delivering conformal radiotherapy for treatment of prostate cancer. The technique of HDR prostate brachytherapy has been in clinical practice since the 1980's [1-13]. Kovacs et al reported one of the earliest experiences using HDR brachytherapy boost at University of Kiel.[10, 11, 13] Patients treated were mostly T2b-T3, G3. They used a combination of split course external beam radiotherapy and two 15 Gy HDR treatments. They reported 18% positive biopsy rate 18 months post treatment. The result was updated at 10 years and 78 percent of 171 patients remained free of disease at median follow-up of 55 months. Mate et al at Swedish Medical Center reported their experience with HDR brachytherapy [9]. They used a more moderated hypofractionated schema with four treatments of 3-4 Gy fractions of HDR treatments combined with 45-50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. They recommended routine cystoscopy at the end of the implant procedure to ensure the catheters are placed at the proper depth and to avoid injuring the urethra. Pretreatment patient characteristics were stage T1b to T3c, mean initial PSA was 12.9 and Gleason grade ranges 3 to 9. They reported 84% 5-year biochemical disease free survival. Martinez et al at the William Beaumont Hospital reported the only on-going prospective dose escalation trial using HDR brachytherapy as a boost. There have been multiple updates of their results.[5-7, 12] They have continued to dose escalate using increasingly larger fractions of HDR treatment range from 5.5-6.5 Gy x 3 to 8.25-11.5 Gy x 2 combined with 46 Gy of external beam radiotherapy. As of their most recent update, they have shown acceptable toxicity level using 9.5 Gy x 2 treatments. Patients with PSA ≥ 10, T ≥ T2b, and Gleason score ≥ 7 were selected for the trial. Despite a high frequency of poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. Borghede et al. at Goteborg University in Sweden reported their experience using 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy combined with 2 fractions of 10 Gy HDR boost.[1, 2] They used ultrasound to target tumor nodules within the prostate and gave an additional 5 Gy boost during each HDR treatment. Patients included in the study were T1-3, and grade 1-3. They report a 4% positive biopsy rate at 18-months post treatment. This is a remarkably low positive biopsy rate considering no hormonal therapy was used in the study. The results from these clinical trials and others have shown the technique of HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer is feasible with minimal morbidity. Other institutional trials have suggested HDR boost may be more efficacious compared to external beam radiotherapy alone or external beam radiotherapy with short term hormonal therapy. Results of these studies need to be confirmed in large multi-institutional trials.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patient who are candidate for prostate HDR brachytherapy will be offered this protocol
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patient must be a candidate for HDR prostate brachytherapy
- Patient must be able to have MR scan
- Patient must have a visible DIL on MRS
- Patient has signed the protocol consent form
- No prior pelvic or prostate radiation or chemotherapy for any reason
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient with hip prosthesis
- Patient with pacemaker
- Patient with history of radical surgery for prostate
- Patient with claustrophobia
- Patient with metal in body not safe for MR
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Estimate Grade 3 or greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity
Time frame: One year
1 secondary outcome
MRI/MRS
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25819287De Bari B, Daidone A, Alongi F. Is high dose rate brachytherapy reliable and effective treatment for prostate cancer patients? A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jun;94(3):360-70. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Immunotherapy Drugs (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) With One Anti-cancer Targeted Drug (Cabozantinib) for Rare Genitourinary Tumors
Bladder Adenocarcinoma, Bladder Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Effects of Exercise Therapy on Signs of Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruiting
Dose Escalation Study Evaluating Safety of TheraSphere Prostate Cancer (PCa) Device
Prostate, Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean Pouliot, Ph.D. principal investigator
Univerisity of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Estimate Grade 3 or greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00807820, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.