CataractNCT00808886
Study of Comparison Between Pentacam and locs3
An observational study of Cataract, run by Soroka University Medical Center.
Trial summary
Hypothesis: There is no difference between pentacam scheimpflug system and locs3 in grading of cataract. Major aims: 1. research the efficiency of pentacam scheimpflug system in lens density measurment. 2. To compare the pentacam with the locs3 in grading of cataract. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2008to May 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: catract patients who are coming for pre- surgical evaluation.
Who may be able to join
- cataract patient
- age>18
Who cannot join
- pregnant women
- any disease of the eye except for cataract
- patients who are ineligible by law to take decisions by themselves.patients who have a custodian.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Pentacam Scheimpflug System and locs3 in Grading of Cataract
Hypothesis: There is no difference between pentacam scheimpflug system and locs3 in grading of cataract.
Major aims:
- research the efficiency of pentacam scheimpflug system in lens density measurment.
- To compare the pentacam with the locs3 in grading of cataract.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Keywords
- cataract, locs3, pentacam
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2008
- Primary completionApr 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Soroka University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00808886
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- sor478308ctil
- Status last verified
- Nov 2008
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Pentacam Scheimpflug System and locs3 in Grading of Cataract
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00808886
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- sor478308ctil
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Keywords
- cataract, locs3, pentacam
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Lead sponsor
- Soroka University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2009 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypothesis: There is no difference between pentacam scheimpflug system and locs3 in grading of cataract.
Major aims:
- research the efficiency of pentacam scheimpflug system in lens density measurment.
- To compare the pentacam with the locs3 in grading of cataract.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- catract patients who are coming for pre- surgical evaluation.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- cataract patient
- age>18
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- pregnant women
- any disease of the eye except for cataract
- patients who are ineligible by law to take decisions by themselves.patients who have a custodian.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2008.
Related trials for Cataract
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Follow-Up
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Objective Depth-of-Focus Changes During Light Adjustable Lens UV Adjustments
Light Adjustable Lens, Objective Depth of Focus
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Clinical Performance of the LENTIS® MAX LS-313 MF80 Compared With the Monofocal L-313 in Cataract Patients With Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Comparative Clinical Investigation.
Cataract, AMD - Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Capella Scientia Development Study
Cataract
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cataract, run by Soroka University Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact nadav belfair (086403347, nbelfair@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2008.