MalariaPhase 4NCT00808951
In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of Antimalarial Treatments in Children in Burkina Faso
A Phase 4 study testing Artesunate-amodiaquine and Artemether-lumefantrine in people with Malaria, run by Centre Muraz at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
Trial summary
Resistance to antimalarial drugs represents a major obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries, so that most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to the new Artemisinin Containing Therapies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Artesunate-amodiaquine and Artemether-lumefantrine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 440 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBurkina Faso
- Study dates
- Dec 2008to Feb 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 6 - 59 months
- Weight > 5 kg
- Mono-infection with P. falciparum
- Parasitemia of 4,000-200,000 asexual parasites per µl
- Fever: > 37.5 °C or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours
- Haemoglobin > 5.0 g/dl
- Signed informed consent by the parents or guardians
- Parents' or guardians' willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the trial.
Who cannot join
- Participation in any other clinical trial during the previous 30 days
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs
- Severe and/or complicated malaria (cases will be referred to Bobo-Dioulasso University hospital for treatment)
- Danger signs: not able to drink or breast-feed, vomiting (> twice in 24hours), recent history of convulsions (>1 in 24h), unconscious state, unable to sit or stand;
- Known intercurrent illness or any condition which would place the subject at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study.
- Severe malnutrition (weight for height <70% of the median NCHS/WHO reference)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of the Recommended First Line Antimalarial Treatments (Artemether-Lumefantrine and Amodiaquine-Artesunate) in Children With Uncomplicated Malaria in Burkina Faso
Resistance to antimalarial drugs represents a major obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries, so that most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to the new Artemisinin Containing Therapies. Burkina Faso has changed its policy for uncomplicated malaria to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS), but there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; both treatments have shown to be efficacious, but AL seems to have higher occurrence of recurrent malaria infections during a 28-day follow up period. Thus, this study aims at comparing the safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up), AND also at comparing their in vitro sensitivity, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.
Read the detailed description
Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drugs represents the major drawback and obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries; that's why most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to Artemisinin Containing Therapies (ACT), which produce a rapid clinical and parasitological cure, reduce gametocyte carriage rate and are generally well tolerated. Burkina Faso has recently changed its policy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, from Chloroquine to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS). However, there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; a recent study carried out in Bobo Dioulasso showed that both treatments were extremely efficacious (adjusted treatment failure less than 5%) but with AL showing significantly high occurrence of recurrent infections during the 28-day follow up period. The higher risk for recurrent infections for AL was confirmed in a subsequent trial comparing AL with AQ-SP and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, but so far no direct comparison between AQ+AS and AL has been completed, though a study in Nanoro, near Ouagadougou, is ongoing. Thus, the present study aims at comparing the in vivo safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up),AND at comparing the in vitro sensitivity of the different ACT components, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- Artesunate-amodiaquine, Artemether-lumefantrine
- Keywords
- Uncomplicated malaria, P falciparum, Children, National treatment protocol, Burkina Faso, Artemether-lumefantrine, Artesunate-amodiaquine, In vivo efficacy, In vitro efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artesunate-amodiaquineDrug
Also called ASAQ, Coarsucam
Coformulated AQ+AS by Sanofi-Aventis has been pre-qualified by WHO in 2008. It is administered once daily for three consecutive days, and it is available in three different dosages (25mg/67.5mg; 50mg/135mg; 100mg/270mg)
Artemether-lumefantrineDrug
Also called AL, Coartem(R), Riamet(R)
Artemether-lumefantrine by Novartis was the first fixed-dose ACT that was prequalified by WHO in April 2004. A 3-day, 6-dose regimen of AL is recommended for infants and children weighing 5-35 kg and adults weighing > 35 kg.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Artemether -lumefantrine | Experimental | Treatment of malaria with Artemether-lumefantrine (AL), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso Receives: Drug: Artemether-lumefantrine |
| Artesunate-amodiaquine | Experimental | Treatment of malaria with Artesunate-amodiaquine(AS-AQ), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso Receives: Drug: Artesunate-amodiaquine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PCR unadjusted treatment failure (regardless of genotyping).
Measured: 42 days
Secondary outcomes (8)
PCR adjusted treatment failure
Measured: 42 days
PCR unadjusted treatment failure
Measured: 28 days
PCR adjusted treatment failure
Measured: 28 days
Fever clearance time
Measured: day 1, 2, 3
Asexual parasite clearance time
Measured: day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Gametocytaemia (prevalence and density)
Measured: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42
Safety profiles of the two treatments
Measured: 42 days overall
Parasites in vitro sensitivity to the drugs tested and their relationship with the in vivo results
Measured: before treatment and at the day of reccurrente parasitemia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2008
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionFeb 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 440 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Muraz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tinto Halidou, Centre Muraz
- Investigators
- Halidou Tinto, PhD, Principal investigator, Centre Muraz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00808951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Malactres-BF
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lingani M, Bonkian LN, Yerbanga I, Kazienga A, Valea I, Sorgho H, Ouedraogo JB, Mens PF, Schallig HDFH, Ravinetto R, d'Alessandro U, Tinto H. In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2020 Jan 6;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3089-z.
PubMed 31906948
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of the Recommended First Line Antimalarial Treatments (Artemether-Lumefantrine and Amodiaquine-Artesunate) in Children With Uncomplicated Malaria in Burkina Faso
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00808951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Malactres-BF
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Uncomplicated malaria, P falciparum, Children, National treatment protocol, Burkina Faso, Artemether-lumefantrine, Artesunate-amodiaquine, In vivo efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 440 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre MurazUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
- Study start
- Dec 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Resistance to antimalarial drugs represents a major obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries, so that most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to the new Artemisinin Containing Therapies. Burkina Faso has changed its policy for uncomplicated malaria to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS), but there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; both treatments have shown to be efficacious, but AL seems to have higher occurrence of recurrent malaria infections during a 28-day follow up period. Thus, this study aims at comparing the safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up), AND also at comparing their in vitro sensitivity, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.
Detailed description
Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drugs represents the major drawback and obstacle for controlling malaria in endemic countries; that's why most sub-Saharan countries have changed their antimalarial drug policy to Artemisinin Containing Therapies (ACT), which produce a rapid clinical and parasitological cure, reduce gametocyte carriage rate and are generally well tolerated. Burkina Faso has recently changed its policy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, from Chloroquine to Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) and Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AQ+AS). However, there are still little available data on safety and efficacy of these treatments in Burkina Faso; a recent study carried out in Bobo Dioulasso showed that both treatments were extremely efficacious (adjusted treatment failure less than 5%) but with AL showing significantly high occurrence of recurrent infections during the 28-day follow up period. The higher risk for recurrent infections for AL was confirmed in a subsequent trial comparing AL with AQ-SP and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, but so far no direct comparison between AQ+AS and AL has been completed, though a study in Nanoro, near Ouagadougou, is ongoing. Thus, the present study aims at comparing the in vivo safety and efficacy of AL and AS-AQ (42-day follow-up),AND at comparing the in vitro sensitivity of the different ACT components, in patients with recurrent infection, with the results obtained in vivo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Artemether -lumefantrine | Experimental | Drug: Artemether-lumefantrineTreatment of malaria with Artemether-lumefantrine (AL), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso |
| Artesunate-amodiaquine | Experimental | Drug: Artesunate-amodiaquineTreatment of malaria with Artesunate-amodiaquine(AS-AQ), according to one of the two options given by national protocol in Burkina Faso |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 6 - 59 months
- Weight > 5 kg
- Mono-infection with P. falciparum
- Parasitemia of 4,000-200,000 asexual parasites per µl
- Fever: > 37.5 °C or history of fever in the preceding 24 hours
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participation in any other clinical trial during the previous 30 days
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs
- Severe and/or complicated malaria (cases will be referred to Bobo-Dioulasso University hospital for treatment)
- Danger signs: not able to drink or breast-feed, vomiting (> twice in 24hours), recent history of convulsions (>1 in 24h), unconscious state, unable to sit or stand;
- Known intercurrent illness or any condition which would place the subject at undue risk or interfere with the results of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artesunate-amodiaquineAlso: ASAQ, CoarsucamCoformulated AQ+AS by Sanofi-Aventis has been pre-qualified by WHO in 2008. It is administered once daily for three consecutive days, and it is available in three different dosages (25mg/67.5mg; 50mg/135mg; 100mg/270mg) | Drug | Artesunate-amodiaquine |
| Artemether-lumefantrineAlso: AL, Coartem(R), Riamet(R)Artemether-lumefantrine by Novartis was the first fixed-dose ACT that was prequalified by WHO in April 2004. A 3-day, 6-dose regimen of AL is recommended for infants and children weighing 5-35 kg and adults weighing > 35 kg. | Drug | Artemether -lumefantrine |
Primary outcome
PCR unadjusted treatment failure (regardless of genotyping).
Time frame: 42 days
8 secondary outcomes
PCR adjusted treatment failure
Time frame: 42 days
PCR unadjusted treatment failure
Time frame: 28 days
PCR adjusted treatment failure
Time frame: 28 days
Fever clearance time
Time frame: day 1, 2, 3
Asexual parasite clearance time
Time frame: day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
Gametocytaemia (prevalence and density)
Time frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42
Safety profiles of the two treatments
Time frame: 42 days overall
Parasites in vitro sensitivity to the drugs tested and their relationship with the in vivo results
Time frame: before treatment and at the day of reccurrente parasitemia
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31906948Lingani M, Bonkian LN, Yerbanga I, Kazienga A, Valea I, Sorgho H, Ouedraogo JB, Mens PF, Schallig HDFH, Ravinetto R, d'Alessandro U, Tinto H. In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2020 Jan 6;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3089-z.
- webpageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Halidou Tinto, PhD principal investigator
Centre Muraz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Artesunate-amodiaquine and Artemether-lumefantrine in people with Malaria, run by Centre Muraz at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Burkina Faso. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PCR unadjusted treatment failure (regardless of genotyping). (time frame: 42 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00808951, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2015.