AzTrials
AzTrials

Corneal DiseasesFANCYNCT00810472

Functional Antigen Matching in Corneal Transplantation

A study testing HLA Matching and Penetrating keratoplasty in people with Corneal Diseases, run by University Hospital Freiburg at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Penetrating keratoplasty is one of the most commonly performed transplantation surgeries. Graft rejection is a major complication. HLA compatibility has already been demonstrated an effective prophylaxis in several retrospective investigations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Corneal Diseases
What is being tested?
HLA Matching and Penetrating keratoplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
650 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2009to May 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Predicted waiting time for a 4/6 match lower than 6 months.

Who cannot join

  • Minority
  • Legal incapacity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Eye Hospital Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Clinical Trial to Investigate Superiority of HLA Matching in Comparison to Random Graft Assignment With Respect to the Endpoint 'Time to First Endothelial Graft Rejection' in Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Penetrating keratoplasty is one of the most commonly performed transplantation surgeries. Graft rejection is a major complication. HLA compatibility has already been demonstrated an effective prophylaxis in several retrospective investigations. The purpose of the investigators randomized clinical trial is to demonstrate superiority of HLA matching in comparison to random graft assignment with respect to the endpoint 'time to first endothelial graft rejection' in penetrating keratoplasty. The investigators will perform DNA-based allele resolution typing.

Being tested
HLA Matching, Penetrating keratoplasty
Keywords
Penetrating keratoplasty, HLA matching, Corneal diseases that require penetrating keratoplasty
Medical subject headings
Corneal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HLA MatchingOther

    HLA matching is exerted by selecting the donor with least-most additional HLA alleles. We will predict the waiting time for such a donor in order to assess eligibility for the trial [8]. In addition, we will dynamically adopt the degree of matching that is aimed at depending on the predicted time interval and actual waiting time: the first donors not exerting more than 7 mismatches at the triplet-amino-acid-residue-level (HLAMatchmaker method [6]) is accepted if the patient is waiting less than half of his predicted waiting time. The next available donor exerting a 2/6 match (or better) is assigned thereafter. The next graft will be assigned, regardless of HLA matching after 6 months.

  • Penetrating keratoplastyProcedure or surgery

    Corneal transplantation.

Study groups in NCT00810472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HLA MatchingExperimentalHLA matching is exerted by selecting the donor with least-most additional HLA alleles. We will predict the waiting time for such a donor in order to assess eligibility for the trial [8]. In addition, we will dynamically adopt the degree of matching that is aimed at depending on the predicted time interval and actual waiting time: the first donors not exerting more than 7 mismatches at the triplet-amino-acid-residue-level (HLAMatchmaker method [6]) is accepted if the patient is waiting less than half of his predicted waiting time. The next available donor exerting a 2/6 match (or better) is assigned thereafter. The next graft will be assigned, regardless of HLA matching after 6 months.
Receives: Other: HLA Matching; Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty
Random graft assignmentPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Penetrating keratoplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first endothelial graft rejection.

    Measured: Mostly within the first six months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
650 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00810472
Sponsor's protocol ID
FR-2008-FANCY
Acronym
FANCY
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
17 Dec 2008
Last updated
25 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Bohringer D, Spierings E, Enczmann J, Bohringer S, Sundmacher R, Goulmy E, Reinhard T. Matching of the minor histocompatibility antigen HLA-A1/H-Y may improve prognosis in corneal transplantation. Transplantation. 2006 Oct 27;82(8):1037-41. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235908.54766.44.

    PubMed 17060851
  • Reinhard T, Spelsberg H, Henke L, Kontopoulos T, Enczmann J, Wernet P, Berschick P, Sundmacher R, Bohringer D. Long-term results of allogeneic penetrating limbo-keratoplasty in total limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.013.

    PubMed 15051212
  • Reinhard T, Bohringer D, Enczmann J, Kogler G, Mayweg S, Wernet P, Sundmacher R. Improvement of graft prognosis in penetrating normal-risk keratoplasty by HLA class I and II matching. Eye (Lond). 2004 Mar;18(3):269-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700636.

    PubMed 15004576
  • Bohringer D, Reinhard T, Duquesnoy RJ, Bohringer S, Enczmann J, Lange P, Claas F, Sundmacher R. Beneficial effect of matching at the HLA-A and -B amino-acid triplet level on rejection-free clear graft survival in penetrating keratoplasty. Transplantation. 2004 Feb 15;77(3):417-21. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000110415.10401.94.

    PubMed 14966417
  • Reinhard T, Bohringer D, Enczmann J, Kogler G, Wernet P, Bohringer S, Sundmacher R. HLA class I/II matching and chronic endothelial cell loss in penetrating normal risk keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Feb;82(1):13-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0420.2003.00188.x.

    PubMed 14738484
  • Bohringer D, Reinhard T, Enczmann J, Godehard E, Sundmacher R. Individual analysis of expected time on the waiting list for HLA-matched corneal grafts. Dev Ophthalmol. 2003;36:50-5. doi: 10.1159/000067648.

    PubMed 12494680
  • Bohringer D, Grotejohann B, Ihorst G, Reinshagen H, Spierings E, Reinhard T. Rejection Prophylaxis in Corneal Transplant. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Apr 13;115(15):259-265. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0259.

    PubMed 29735006
  • Bohringer D, Ihorst G, Grotejohann B, Maurer J, Spierings E, Reinhard T; FANCY study group. Functional antigen matching in corneal transplantation: matching for the HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 antigens (FANCY) - study protocol. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 13;14:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-156.

    PubMed 25496165

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HLA Matching and Penetrating keratoplasty in people with Corneal Diseases, run by University Hospital Freiburg at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to first endothelial graft rejection. (time frame: Mostly within the first six months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00810472, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in