AzTrials
AzTrials

LeukopeniaPhase 3NCT00811928

Safety and Efficacy Study of Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole for Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infection (P05387 AM1)(COMPLETED)

A Phase 3 study testing Posaconazole and Fluconazole in people with Leukopenia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized, open label parallel controlled, multicenter study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Posaconazole oral suspension vs Fluconazole (capsule) in high-risk leukopenic patients for prevention of invasive fungal infection Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Leukopenia
What is being tested?
Posaconazole and Fluconazole
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
252 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2008to May 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be 18-70 years of age of either sex
  • Persistent neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC] < 500/mm^3 [0.5x10^9/L])or probable neutropenia in 3-5 days is anticipated. Neutropenia >= 7 days caused by the following reasons
  • Standard or dose-intense chemotherapy, anthracyclines or other acceptable chemotherapies ( any investigational drug is not permitted) for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) treatment
  • Retreatment of chemotherapy in case of AML recurrence
  • Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) shifts to AML and bone marrow arrest induction chemotherapy is required (not including acute phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia [CML])
  • Informed consent obtained from participant or legal guardian

Who cannot join

  • Participants previously treated with amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLZ), or itraconazole (ITZ) within 30 days of enrollment.
  • Participants who have taken the following drugs:
  • terfenadine, cisapride, and ebastine within 24 hours before entry
  • astemizole at entry or within 10 days before entry
  • cimetidine, rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifabutin, barbiturates, isoniazid atharanthine and anthracyclines within 24 hours before entry
  • The above drugs are refrained during the investigation
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Serious organ diseases except hematological disorder such as cardiac or neurologic disorders or impairment expected to be unstable or progressive during the course of this study (eg, seizures or demyelinating syndromes, acute myocardial infarction within 3 months of study entry, myocardial ischemia, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation with ventricular rate <60/min, or history of torsades de pointes, symptomatic ventricular or sustained arrhythmias), unstable electrolyte abnormalities.
  • Participants who have used any investigational drugs or biologic agents other than their chemotherapy regimens within 30 days of study entry.
  • Prior enrollment in this study.
  • Participants with known or suspected hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to azole agents or amphotericin B.
  • Participants with known or suspected invasive fungal infection (IFI) at screen
  • Participants with severe renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/minute or likely to require dialysis during the study), Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase or total bilirubin are >2× (Upper Limit of Normal) ULN.
  • Participants having an electrocardiogram (ECG) with a prolonged QTc interval: QTc greater than 450 msec for men and greater than 470 msec for women.
  • Participants with AML or CML history.
  • Participants with a history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell, bone marrow transplantation, autologous stem cell transplantation history.
  • Female participants who are pregnant or are nursing.
  • Alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  • Participants cannot be compliant in the opinion of the investigator.

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open Label Parallel Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Posaconazole Oral Suspension Vs. Fluconazole (Capsule) in High-risk Leukopenic Patients for Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infection

A randomized, open label parallel controlled, multicenter study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Posaconazole oral suspension vs Fluconazole (capsule) in high-risk leukopenic patients for prevention of invasive fungal infection

Conditions
Leukopenia
Being tested
Posaconazole, Fluconazole
Keywords
high-risk leukopenic patients
Medical subject headings
Leukopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PosaconazoleDrug

    Also called Noxafil, SCH 056592

    40 mg/mL; 200 mg (5 mL) TID

    Treatment was continued with each cycle of chemotherapy until:

    • The onset of a proven or probable diagnosis of invasive fungal infection (IFI)
    • 3 chemotherapy cycles or
    • Total treatment duration up to 12 weeks (84 days)
  • FluconazoleDrug

    50 mg/capsule (2 capsules), 150 mg/capsule (2 capsules);

    400 mg QD

    Treatment was continued with each cycle of chemotherapy until:

    • The onset of a proven or probable diagnosis of invasive fungal infection (IFI)
    • 3 chemotherapy cycles or
    • Total treatment duration up to 12 weeks (84 days)
Study groups in NCT00811928
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PosaconazoleActive comparatorPosaconazole oral suspension 200 mg three times a day (TID)
Receives: Drug: Posaconazole
FluconazoleActive comparatorFluconazole 400 mg once daily (QD)
Receives: Drug: Fluconazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Proven or Probable Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) During the Treatment Period

    Number of participants developing a proven or probable IFI from randomization to the last dosage date (up to 12 weeks [84 days]) plus 7 days. IFI diagnosis criteria may include: persistent fever, failure of appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment concomitant with lower respiratory tract infection symptoms, microbiological criteria with corresponding clinical signs and symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks (84 days) plus 7 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of Participants With Proven or Probable Diagnosis of IFI Within 100 Days From Randomization

    Number of participants who developed a proven or probable IFI from randomization date to Day 100 of follow-up visit. IFI diagnosis criteria may include: persistent fever, failure of appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment concomitant with lower respiratory tract infection symptoms, microbiological criteria with corresponding clinical signs and symptoms.

    Measured: From randomization date to Day 100

  2. Time From Randomization to the First Onset of Proven or Probable IFI

    The time measured in days to the first occurrence of proven/probable IFI diagnosis in the entire FAS population from randomization to Day 100 of follow-up visit. Participants may not have accepted immediate antifungal treatment and later received antifungal treatment based upon further investigator review of the participant's IFI condition. IFI diagnosis criteria may include: persistent fever, failure of appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment concomitant with lower respiratory tract infection symptoms, positive blood/biopsy cultures with corresponding clinical signs and symptoms.

    Measured: From randomization date to Day 100

  3. Time From Randomization to Administration of First Systemic Antifungal Intravenous (IV) Therapy

    The time measured in days from randomization to the administration of the first concomitant systemic anti-fungal therapy in the entire FAS population. Not all participants who accepted systemic anti-fungal therapy may have had a IFI clinical diagnosis. IFI diagnosis criteria for antifungal therapy administration may include: persistent fever, failure of appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment concomitant with lower respiratory tract infection symptoms, microbiological criteria with corresponding clinical signs and symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks (84 days)

  4. Number of Participants With Clinical Failure During Treatment

    Clinical failure was defined as follows:

    • Presence of a proven or probable IFI
    • Systemic antifungal treatment (IV) for 4 consecutive days or more than 10 days total
    • Discontinuation due to adverse event (AE) possibly or probably related to study drug
    • Lost-to-follow-up or discontinuation from the study for any reason with loss to follow-up during the Treatment Phase

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks (84 days)

  5. Number of Participants in Whom All-cause Mortality Occurred Within 100 Days From Randomization

    Death from any cause.

    Measured: Randomization date to Day 100

  6. Number of Participants in Whom Mortality is Unlikely, Possibly, and Probably Related to Fungal Infection Occurred Within 100 Days From Randomization

    Exact Causes of Death and Their Relationship to IFI Episode Were As Follows:

    • Unlikely related: participant completed treatment and cause of death was due to primary disease or complication
    • Possibly related: IFI undergoing treatment without stabilization, or with failure to have a complete remission, where cause of death might have been due to IFI, including progression or relapse of primary disease
    • Probably related: autopsy or clinical signs suggested that progression of IFI was the probable cause of death

    Measured: From randomization date to Day 100

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
252 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00811928
Sponsor's protocol ID
P05387
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
18 Dec 2008
Last updated
7 Apr 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/Merck%20Procedure%20on%20Clinical%20Trial%20Data%20Access%20Final\_Updated%20July\_9\_2014.pdf http://engagezone.msd.com/ds\_documentation.php

Publications

  • Shen Y, Huang XJ, Wang JX, Jin J, Hu JD, Yu K, Wu DP, Wang SJ, Yu L, Chen XQ, Liu T, Liang YM, Chen FP, Li Y, Shen ZX. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole as invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in China: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Sep;51(9):738-45. doi: 10.5414/CP201880.

    PubMed 23924680

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Posaconazole and Fluconazole in people with Leukopenia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Sep 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Proven or Probable Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) During the Treatment Period (time frame: Up to 12 Weeks (84 days) plus 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00811928, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in