Neuropathic PainEDONISNCT00812734
Epidemiologic Multicentre Study of Neuropathic Post-surgical Pain
An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This cohort study aims to know the prevalence at 3 and 6 months after surgery, of persistent pain, as well as to describe the neuropathic features of this pain. It includes more than 3000 patients scheduled for different types of surgery, some of them already known to induce persistent pain, some being frequent… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 3,322 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Definied population
Who may be able to join
- Agreement to the study
- Scheduled for one of the following surgeries :
- caesarean section
- inguinal hernia repair
- mastectomy
- cholecystectomy under laparoscopy
Show all 11Show fewer
- saphenectomy (excluding harvesting for coronary bypass)
- sternotomy
- thoracotomy
- knee arthroscopy
- Major over 18 years
Who cannot join
- Emergency
- Inability to fill questionnaires
- Unreachable patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Etude épidémiologique Multicentrique Des Douleurs Neuropathiques Post-opératoires
This cohort study aims to know the prevalence at 3 and 6 months after surgery, of persistent pain, as well as to describe the neuropathic features of this pain. It includes more than 3000 patients scheduled for different types of surgery, some of them already known to induce persistent pain, some being frequent procedures with no additional data. Clinical and genetical risk factors will be searched.
Read the detailed description
Neuropathic post-surgical pain (NPSP) motivates the consultation of the French Centres for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in 20 to 35% of the cases. The following table shows the available data of literature about chronic post-surgical pain:
Surgery Prevalence of chronic pain (%) Neuropathic symptoms Mastectomy 22 to 49 Yes Inguinal hernia repair 30 to 63 Yes Sternotomy 28 to 40 Unknown Saphenectomy 5 to 7 Yes Mandibular osteotomy Unknown Yes Cholecystectomy 3 to 20 Unknown Caesarean section 6 Unknown Thoracotomy 50 to 75 Yes Knee arthroscopy Unknown Unknown Rectal amputation 12 to 18 Unknown Limb amputation 60 Yes Endodontic treatment 5 to 13 Unknown
In most of these cases, the mechanism of pain is highly suspected as neuropathic, although the location of the nerve(s) concerned is unclear. However, the clinical features of the pain are often poorly described. In other types of surgery (such as caesarean section or cholecystectomy), the report of chronic pain may be related to the high frequency of these procedures.
The initiation of NPSP can be identified on a time scale (i.e. day of surgery), and can be prospectively expected. This leads to possibility of (i) a better understanding of the evolution of neuropathy following time and (ii) a study of putative preventive (peritraumatic) treatments. Thus, NPSP appears as strongly different from other chronic pain syndromes (such as diabetes mellitus, chemotherapy for cancer or even post-traumatic) for which the time course, mechanisms and psychic interactions are more complex.
We suspect that overall prevalence of NPSP may have been underestimated, as (i) the delay of onset of pain may be in a range between some days to several months, (ii) there is not always a systematic follow-up after most of the surgical procedures, and patients may stay out of the medical network and (iii) the benefit provided by the surgical procedure may lead to patient not to complain from a somewhat "necessary" complication.
No large epidemiologic study has been performed concerning neuropathic post-surgical pain at this date. The principal aim of this study is to know the exact prevalence of NPSP, 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery. Only nine surgical procedures have been considered for the study, according to the previous data of literature and/or the high frequency of practice. This is a prospective open epidemiologic study, performed in nine French university general hospitals, three anti-cancer university hospitals and many other general hospitals. The secondary endpoints are (i) to find a relationship (by multivariate analysis) between NPSP and a large number of clinical/biological items (quality of life, habits, treatments, drug abuse, psychic/mental state, genome…) collected preoperatively, (ii) to validate a self-completed version of a questionnaire already validated for discriminating the neuropathic feature of chronic pain (DN4), and (iii) to assess the availability of the existing medical networks for the care of NPSP.
Patients (age > 18) scheduled for one of the nine types of surgery will be recruited. The number of patients (following table) to be recruited has been calculated on the basis of the reported prevalence of pain in literature (set to 20% if no data were available), with a risk set to 5%, a precision measure set to 5% and a prediction of 20% of lost patients during the study.
Type of surgery Number requested Caesarean section 103 Inguinal hernia repair (under laparoscopy) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (without mesh) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (with mesh) 389 Mastectomy (simple without axillary node dissection) 454 Cholecystectomy (under laparoscopy) 297 Saphenectomy (excluding harvesting for coronary bypass) 167 Sternotomy 374 Thoracotomy 463 Knee arthroscopy 297 Total 3322
The anaesthetist in charge of the patient during the pre-anaesthetic visit will complete the data sheet concerning the preoperative status of the patient. He will proceed to the inclusion and provide the data concerning the anaesthetic and analgesic protocol that have been followed. The inclusion will be registered by the local coordinating assistant, who will (i) send to the patient self-questionnaires 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery (about pain, neuropathic symptoms and the resulting quality of life) and (ii) transfer the information to the national coordinating centre (Centre for Clinical Investigations of Clermont-Ferrand). A permanent monitoring of inclusions and follow-up will be performed at both local and national levels. This will help to organise the rhythm and the location of inclusions at any time of the study.
If a case of chronic pain is identified, the willing patient will be sent to the closest Centre for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain, in which the diagnosis will be completed and a treatment initiated if required. For the validation of the self-completed version of the DN4 questionnaire, data from painless, painful neuropathic, and painful non-neuropathic patients, will be compared.
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)
- Keywords
- Neuropathic pain, chronic pain, postoperative, surgery, anesthesiology, Scheduled surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)Procedure or surgery
Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | Not described Receives: Procedure: Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of persistent pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Measured: at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Rate of persistent neuropathic pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Identification of risk factors collected before surgery. Links with genome.
Measured: at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 3,322 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Dualé, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00812734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHU-0044
- Acronym
- EDONIS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 28 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Niccolai P, Ouchchane L, Libier M, Beouche F, Belon M, Vedrinne JM, El Drayi B, Vallet L, Ruiz F, Biermann C, Duchene P, Chirat C, Soule-Sonneville S, Duale C, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. Persistent neuropathic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy depending on the procedure (open mesh v. laparoscopy): a propensity-matched analysis. Can J Surg. 2015 Apr;58(2):114-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008314.
PubMed 25799247Blanc P, Genin E, Jesson B, Dubray C, Duale C; EDONIS-gene Investigating group. Genetics and postsurgical neuropathic pain: An ancillary study of a multicentre survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 May;36(5):342-350. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000986.
PubMed 30882400Richez B, Ouchchane L, Guttmann A, Mirault F, Bonnin M, Noudem Y, Cognet V, Dalmas AF, Brisebrat L, Andant N, Soule-Sonneville S, Dubray C, Duale C, Schoeffler P. The Role of Psychological Factors in Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
PubMed 26299436Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Duale C, Albi-Feldzer A, Nougarede B, Falewee MN, Ouchchane L, Soule-Sonneville S, Bonneau J, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. General anaesthetic agents do not influence persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;32(10):697-704. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000215.
PubMed 26053994Duale C, Ouchchane L, Schoeffler P; EDONIS Investigating Group; Dubray C. Neuropathic aspects of persistent postsurgical pain: a French multicenter survey with a 6-month prospective follow-up. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):24.e1-24.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PubMed 24373573
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Etude épidémiologique Multicentrique Des Douleurs Neuropathiques Post-opératoires
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00812734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EDONIS / CHU-0044
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Keywords
- Neuropathic pain, chronic pain, postoperative, surgery, anesthesiology, Scheduled surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,322 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This cohort study aims to know the prevalence at 3 and 6 months after surgery, of persistent pain, as well as to describe the neuropathic features of this pain. It includes more than 3000 patients scheduled for different types of surgery, some of them already known to induce persistent pain, some being frequent procedures with no additional data. Clinical and genetical risk factors will be searched.
Detailed description
Neuropathic post-surgical pain (NPSP) motivates the consultation of the French Centres for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in 20 to 35% of the cases. The following table shows the available data of literature about chronic post-surgical pain:
Surgery Prevalence of chronic pain (%) Neuropathic symptoms Mastectomy 22 to 49 Yes Inguinal hernia repair 30 to 63 Yes Sternotomy 28 to 40 Unknown Saphenectomy 5 to 7 Yes Mandibular osteotomy Unknown Yes Cholecystectomy 3 to 20 Unknown Caesarean section 6 Unknown Thoracotomy 50 to 75 Yes Knee arthroscopy Unknown Unknown Rectal amputation 12 to 18 Unknown Limb amputation 60 Yes Endodontic treatment 5 to 13 Unknown
In most of these cases, the mechanism of pain is highly suspected as neuropathic, although the location of the nerve(s) concerned is unclear. However, the clinical features of the pain are often poorly described. In other types of surgery (such as caesarean section or cholecystectomy), the report of chronic pain may be related to the high frequency of these procedures.
The initiation of NPSP can be identified on a time scale (i.e. day of surgery), and can be prospectively expected. This leads to possibility of (i) a better understanding of the evolution of neuropathy following time and (ii) a study of putative preventive (peritraumatic) treatments. Thus, NPSP appears as strongly different from other chronic pain syndromes (such as diabetes mellitus, chemotherapy for cancer or even post-traumatic) for which the time course, mechanisms and psychic interactions are more complex.
We suspect that overall prevalence of NPSP may have been underestimated, as (i) the delay of onset of pain may be in a range between some days to several months, (ii) there is not always a systematic follow-up after most of the surgical procedures, and patients may stay out of the medical network and (iii) the benefit provided by the surgical procedure may lead to patient not to complain from a somewhat "necessary" complication.
No large epidemiologic study has been performed concerning neuropathic post-surgical pain at this date. The principal aim of this study is to know the exact prevalence of NPSP, 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery. Only nine surgical procedures have been considered for the study, according to the previous data of literature and/or the high frequency of practice. This is a prospective open epidemiologic study, performed in nine French university general hospitals, three anti-cancer university hospitals and many other general hospitals. The secondary endpoints are (i) to find a relationship (by multivariate analysis) between NPSP and a large number of clinical/biological items (quality of life, habits, treatments, drug abuse, psychic/mental state, genome…) collected preoperatively, (ii) to validate a self-completed version of a questionnaire already validated for discriminating the neuropathic feature of chronic pain (DN4), and (iii) to assess the availability of the existing medical networks for the care of NPSP.
Patients (age > 18) scheduled for one of the nine types of surgery will be recruited. The number of patients (following table) to be recruited has been calculated on the basis of the reported prevalence of pain in literature (set to 20% if no data were available), with a risk set to 5%, a precision measure set to 5% and a prediction of 20% of lost patients during the study.
Type of surgery Number requested Caesarean section 103 Inguinal hernia repair (under laparoscopy) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (without mesh) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (with mesh) 389 Mastectomy (simple without axillary node dissection) 454 Cholecystectomy (under laparoscopy) 297 Saphenectomy (excluding harvesting for coronary bypass) 167 Sternotomy 374 Thoracotomy 463 Knee arthroscopy 297 Total 3322
The anaesthetist in charge of the patient during the pre-anaesthetic visit will complete the data sheet concerning the preoperative status of the patient. He will proceed to the inclusion and provide the data concerning the anaesthetic and analgesic protocol that have been followed. The inclusion will be registered by the local coordinating assistant, who will (i) send to the patient self-questionnaires 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery (about pain, neuropathic symptoms and the resulting quality of life) and (ii) transfer the information to the national coordinating centre (Centre for Clinical Investigations of Clermont-Ferrand). A permanent monitoring of inclusions and follow-up will be performed at both local and national levels. This will help to organise the rhythm and the location of inclusions at any time of the study.
If a case of chronic pain is identified, the willing patient will be sent to the closest Centre for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain, in which the diagnosis will be completed and a treatment initiated if required. For the validation of the self-completed version of the DN4 questionnaire, data from painless, painful neuropathic, and painful non-neuropathic patients, will be compared.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | – | Procedure: Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Definied population
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Agreement to the study
- Scheduled for one of the following surgeries :
- Major over 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Emergency
- Inability to fill questionnaires
- Unreachable patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only) | Procedure or surgery | surgery |
Primary outcome
Rate of persistent pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months after surgery
1 secondary outcome
Rate of persistent neuropathic pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Identification of risk factors collected before surgery. Links with genome.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25799247Niccolai P, Ouchchane L, Libier M, Beouche F, Belon M, Vedrinne JM, El Drayi B, Vallet L, Ruiz F, Biermann C, Duchene P, Chirat C, Soule-Sonneville S, Duale C, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. Persistent neuropathic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy depending on the procedure (open mesh v. laparoscopy): a propensity-matched analysis. Can J Surg. 2015 Apr;58(2):114-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008314.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30882400Blanc P, Genin E, Jesson B, Dubray C, Duale C; EDONIS-gene Investigating group. Genetics and postsurgical neuropathic pain: An ancillary study of a multicentre survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 May;36(5):342-350. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000986.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26299436Richez B, Ouchchane L, Guttmann A, Mirault F, Bonnin M, Noudem Y, Cognet V, Dalmas AF, Brisebrat L, Andant N, Soule-Sonneville S, Dubray C, Duale C, Schoeffler P. The Role of Psychological Factors in Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26053994Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Duale C, Albi-Feldzer A, Nougarede B, Falewee MN, Ouchchane L, Soule-Sonneville S, Bonneau J, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. General anaesthetic agents do not influence persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;32(10):697-704. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000215.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24373573Duale C, Ouchchane L, Schoeffler P; EDONIS Investigating Group; Dubray C. Neuropathic aspects of persistent postsurgical pain: a French multicenter survey with a 6-month prospective follow-up. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):24.e1-24.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
Related trials for Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Dualé principal investigator
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of persistent pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery (time frame: at 3 and 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00812734, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.