AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuropathic PainEDONISNCT00812734

Epidemiologic Multicentre Study of Neuropathic Post-surgical Pain

An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cohort study aims to know the prevalence at 3 and 6 months after surgery, of persistent pain, as well as to describe the neuropathic features of this pain. It includes more than 3000 patients scheduled for different types of surgery, some of them already known to induce persistent pain, some being frequent… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neuropathic Pain
What is being tested?
Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
3,322 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2006to Sep 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Definied population

Who may be able to join

  • Agreement to the study
  • Scheduled for one of the following surgeries :
  • caesarean section
  • inguinal hernia repair
  • mastectomy
  • cholecystectomy under laparoscopy
Show all 11Show fewer
  • saphenectomy (excluding harvesting for coronary bypass)
  • sternotomy
  • thoracotomy
  • knee arthroscopy
  • Major over 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Emergency
  • Inability to fill questionnaires
  • Unreachable patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Etude épidémiologique Multicentrique Des Douleurs Neuropathiques Post-opératoires

This cohort study aims to know the prevalence at 3 and 6 months after surgery, of persistent pain, as well as to describe the neuropathic features of this pain. It includes more than 3000 patients scheduled for different types of surgery, some of them already known to induce persistent pain, some being frequent procedures with no additional data. Clinical and genetical risk factors will be searched.

Read the detailed description

Neuropathic post-surgical pain (NPSP) motivates the consultation of the French Centres for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain in 20 to 35% of the cases. The following table shows the available data of literature about chronic post-surgical pain:

Surgery Prevalence of chronic pain (%) Neuropathic symptoms Mastectomy 22 to 49 Yes Inguinal hernia repair 30 to 63 Yes Sternotomy 28 to 40 Unknown Saphenectomy 5 to 7 Yes Mandibular osteotomy Unknown Yes Cholecystectomy 3 to 20 Unknown Caesarean section 6 Unknown Thoracotomy 50 to 75 Yes Knee arthroscopy Unknown Unknown Rectal amputation 12 to 18 Unknown Limb amputation 60 Yes Endodontic treatment 5 to 13 Unknown

In most of these cases, the mechanism of pain is highly suspected as neuropathic, although the location of the nerve(s) concerned is unclear. However, the clinical features of the pain are often poorly described. In other types of surgery (such as caesarean section or cholecystectomy), the report of chronic pain may be related to the high frequency of these procedures.

The initiation of NPSP can be identified on a time scale (i.e. day of surgery), and can be prospectively expected. This leads to possibility of (i) a better understanding of the evolution of neuropathy following time and (ii) a study of putative preventive (peritraumatic) treatments. Thus, NPSP appears as strongly different from other chronic pain syndromes (such as diabetes mellitus, chemotherapy for cancer or even post-traumatic) for which the time course, mechanisms and psychic interactions are more complex.

We suspect that overall prevalence of NPSP may have been underestimated, as (i) the delay of onset of pain may be in a range between some days to several months, (ii) there is not always a systematic follow-up after most of the surgical procedures, and patients may stay out of the medical network and (iii) the benefit provided by the surgical procedure may lead to patient not to complain from a somewhat "necessary" complication.

No large epidemiologic study has been performed concerning neuropathic post-surgical pain at this date. The principal aim of this study is to know the exact prevalence of NPSP, 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery. Only nine surgical procedures have been considered for the study, according to the previous data of literature and/or the high frequency of practice. This is a prospective open epidemiologic study, performed in nine French university general hospitals, three anti-cancer university hospitals and many other general hospitals. The secondary endpoints are (i) to find a relationship (by multivariate analysis) between NPSP and a large number of clinical/biological items (quality of life, habits, treatments, drug abuse, psychic/mental state, genome…) collected preoperatively, (ii) to validate a self-completed version of a questionnaire already validated for discriminating the neuropathic feature of chronic pain (DN4), and (iii) to assess the availability of the existing medical networks for the care of NPSP.

Patients (age > 18) scheduled for one of the nine types of surgery will be recruited. The number of patients (following table) to be recruited has been calculated on the basis of the reported prevalence of pain in literature (set to 20% if no data were available), with a risk set to 5%, a precision measure set to 5% and a prediction of 20% of lost patients during the study.

Type of surgery Number requested Caesarean section 103 Inguinal hernia repair (under laparoscopy) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (without mesh) 389 Inguinal hernia repair (with mesh) 389 Mastectomy (simple without axillary node dissection) 454 Cholecystectomy (under laparoscopy) 297 Saphenectomy (excluding harvesting for coronary bypass) 167 Sternotomy 374 Thoracotomy 463 Knee arthroscopy 297 Total 3322

The anaesthetist in charge of the patient during the pre-anaesthetic visit will complete the data sheet concerning the preoperative status of the patient. He will proceed to the inclusion and provide the data concerning the anaesthetic and analgesic protocol that have been followed. The inclusion will be registered by the local coordinating assistant, who will (i) send to the patient self-questionnaires 3 and 6 months after the date of surgery (about pain, neuropathic symptoms and the resulting quality of life) and (ii) transfer the information to the national coordinating centre (Centre for Clinical Investigations of Clermont-Ferrand). A permanent monitoring of inclusions and follow-up will be performed at both local and national levels. This will help to organise the rhythm and the location of inclusions at any time of the study.

If a case of chronic pain is identified, the willing patient will be sent to the closest Centre for Evaluation and Treatment of Pain, in which the diagnosis will be completed and a treatment initiated if required. For the validation of the self-completed version of the DN4 questionnaire, data from painless, painful neuropathic, and painful non-neuropathic patients, will be compared.

Being tested
Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)
Keywords
Neuropathic pain, chronic pain, postoperative, surgery, anesthesiology, Scheduled surgery
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)Procedure or surgery

    Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)

Study groups in NCT00812734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
surgeryNot described
Receives: Procedure: Blood sampling for genomics; harvesting of a sample of intercostal muscle for proteomics (thoracotomies only)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of persistent pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery

    Measured: at 3 and 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Rate of persistent neuropathic pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Identification of risk factors collected before surgery. Links with genome.

    Measured: at 3 and 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2006
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
3,322 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00812734
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHU-0044
Acronym
EDONIS
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
19 Dec 2008
Last updated
28 May 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Niccolai P, Ouchchane L, Libier M, Beouche F, Belon M, Vedrinne JM, El Drayi B, Vallet L, Ruiz F, Biermann C, Duchene P, Chirat C, Soule-Sonneville S, Duale C, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. Persistent neuropathic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy depending on the procedure (open mesh v. laparoscopy): a propensity-matched analysis. Can J Surg. 2015 Apr;58(2):114-20. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008314.

    PubMed 25799247
  • Blanc P, Genin E, Jesson B, Dubray C, Duale C; EDONIS-gene Investigating group. Genetics and postsurgical neuropathic pain: An ancillary study of a multicentre survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 May;36(5):342-350. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000986.

    PubMed 30882400
  • Richez B, Ouchchane L, Guttmann A, Mirault F, Bonnin M, Noudem Y, Cognet V, Dalmas AF, Brisebrat L, Andant N, Soule-Sonneville S, Dubray C, Duale C, Schoeffler P. The Role of Psychological Factors in Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

    PubMed 26299436
  • Lefebvre-Kuntz D, Duale C, Albi-Feldzer A, Nougarede B, Falewee MN, Ouchchane L, Soule-Sonneville S, Bonneau J, Dubray C, Schoeffler P. General anaesthetic agents do not influence persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;32(10):697-704. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000215.

    PubMed 26053994
  • Duale C, Ouchchane L, Schoeffler P; EDONIS Investigating Group; Dubray C. Neuropathic aspects of persistent postsurgical pain: a French multicenter survey with a 6-month prospective follow-up. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):24.e1-24.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

    PubMed 24373573

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of persistent pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery (time frame: at 3 and 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00812734, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in