Type 2 Diabetes MellitusNCT00814190
Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
A study testing Internet Intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Endocrine Research Society at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Internet Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Nov 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin
- A1C 7-11%
- >25 years of age
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
- In addition patients with the potential to become pregnant or patients using medications known to influence control of diabetes (eg steroids systemic or inhaled) are excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (pills or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet. These interventions are aimed at keeping the blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels.
An important aspect of diabetes care is the monitoring of blood glucose levels in order to assess the effectiveness of treatment and to modify the treatment to achieve the desirable glucose levels. Patients with type 2 DM treated with insulin are recommended to perform testing for their blood glucose levels; however, it often requires intervention by health professionals in order to prevent the immediate and serious complications of hyper or hypoglycemia. The frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose and effective interventions by the health professionals may eventually allow tighter control of blood glucose levels and delay or prevent the complications associated with diabetes.
Read more
In this study, the investigators wish to evaluate the effect of an Internet based remote monitoring system that allows for patients to upload their blood glucose readings online and for the health care professional to view and provide feedback or therapeutic intervention. The Internet based system has the features of presenting the blood glucose readings according to the time of day and automatically calculates the daily average plus the standard deviation. A visual graph of the glucose readings over a 24-hour period is also generated for view. In addition, the doctor can give feedback by sending messages through the system. The patient's personal information is kept secure as outlined by the privacy policy of the Internet based system and only the doctor and the patient can view the uploaded glucose readings.
The investigators propose that the standardized encounters using the Internet will improve the outcome of treatment for patients with type 2 DM.
Read the detailed description
Purpose: To determine whether use of an Internet-based glucose monitoring system improves A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Hypothesis:We propose that the standardized encounters between the patient and the health care profession using the Internet will improve the outcome of treatment for patients with type 2 DM.
Justification:The standard treatment will involve glucose monitoring by testing blood glucose 3 times daily, performing a laboratory test of blood hemoglobin every three months, and visiting the doctor every three months for standard care. All of the subjects will be under standard care; however, half will also use the Internet system to report glucose readings which will allow the health care professional to view the results and to provide feedback.
Research Method: Type 2 diabetes patients who satisfy the inclusion criteria will be recruited from St. Paul's Diabetes Teaching and Training Centre. They will be randomized into 2 groups (Intervention and Control). There is an equal chance, a 50/50 chance, of being placed in either group. The control subject group will receive standard care and will be asked to perform self-blood glucose monitoring 3 times daily for 6 months. The control subject group will also make visits to the endocrinologist every 3 months with laboratory test of A1c and serum creatinine measurements at 3-month intervals for 6 months.
The Intervention group will also receive standard care and will be asked to perform self-blood glucose monitoring 3 times daily for 6 months. However, the Intervention group will also be asked to report their blood glucose reading every 2 weeks through an Internet based glucose monitoring system. The Intervention group will also make visits to the endocrinologist every 3 months with A1c and serum creatinine measurements at 3-month intervals for 6 months. The laboratory measurements of both groups will be recorded and used for data analysis.
Statistical Analysis: The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level. The secondary endpoints include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid, hospital admissions for any CVD related intervention, and adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours. Patients who do not have the required number of SBGM tests performed or patients requiring new laser therapy will be asked to discontinue the study.
For each group, A1C levels before the start of study will be compared to A1C levels 3 and 6 months after the start of the study. Paired t-tests and random effects models (longitudinal analyses) will examine differences in A1C values before and after the study duration. Unpaired, independent t-tests will be done to examine the difference in A1C values between the two groups before and after the interventions. The planned sample size is 50.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Internet Intervention
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Internet Therapeutic Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Internet InterventionOther
Also called Remote Glucose Monitoring System
The subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Internet Intervention | Experimental | The subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon. Receives: Other: Internet Intervention |
| Standard Care | No intervention | This arm will receive standard care which includes self-blood glucose monitoring at least 3 times daily and visit to the endocrinologist at least once every 3 months. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
The secondary endpoints include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid, hospital admissions for any CVD related intervention, and adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionNov 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endocrine Research Society
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Hugh D Tildesley, MD, Principal investigator, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00814190
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Internet Intervention in T2D
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
PubMed 8366922Austin MM, Haas L, Johnson T, Parkin CG, Parkin CL, Spollett G, Volpone MT. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: benefits and utilization. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-6, 844-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721706295873. No abstract available.
PubMed 17102152Hirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):419-39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0104.
PubMed 18937550Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Ferrara A, Liu J, Selby JV. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001 Jul;111(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00742-2.
PubMed 11448654Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256.
PubMed 20668152
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00814190
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Internet Intervention in T2D
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, Internet Therapeutic Intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Endocrine Research SocietyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (pills or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet. These interventions are aimed at keeping the blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels.
An important aspect of diabetes care is the monitoring of blood glucose levels in order to assess the effectiveness of treatment and to modify the treatment to achieve the desirable glucose levels. Patients with type 2 DM treated with insulin are recommended to perform testing for their blood glucose levels; however, it often requires intervention by health professionals in order to prevent the immediate and serious complications of hyper or hypoglycemia. The frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose and effective interventions by the health professionals may eventually allow tighter control of blood glucose levels and delay or prevent the complications associated with diabetes.
In this study, the investigators wish to evaluate the effect of an Internet based remote monitoring system that allows for patients to upload their blood glucose readings online and for the health care professional to view and provide feedback or therapeutic intervention. The Internet based system has the features of presenting the blood glucose readings according to the time of day and automatically calculates the daily average plus the standard deviation. A visual graph of the glucose readings over a 24-hour period is also generated for view. In addition, the doctor can give feedback by sending messages through the system. The patient's personal information is kept secure as outlined by the privacy policy of the Internet based system and only the doctor and the patient can view the uploaded glucose readings.
The investigators propose that the standardized encounters using the Internet will improve the outcome of treatment for patients with type 2 DM.
Detailed description
Purpose: To determine whether use of an Internet-based glucose monitoring system improves A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Hypothesis:We propose that the standardized encounters between the patient and the health care profession using the Internet will improve the outcome of treatment for patients with type 2 DM.
Justification:The standard treatment will involve glucose monitoring by testing blood glucose 3 times daily, performing a laboratory test of blood hemoglobin every three months, and visiting the doctor every three months for standard care. All of the subjects will be under standard care; however, half will also use the Internet system to report glucose readings which will allow the health care professional to view the results and to provide feedback.
Research Method: Type 2 diabetes patients who satisfy the inclusion criteria will be recruited from St. Paul's Diabetes Teaching and Training Centre. They will be randomized into 2 groups (Intervention and Control). There is an equal chance, a 50/50 chance, of being placed in either group. The control subject group will receive standard care and will be asked to perform self-blood glucose monitoring 3 times daily for 6 months. The control subject group will also make visits to the endocrinologist every 3 months with laboratory test of A1c and serum creatinine measurements at 3-month intervals for 6 months.
The Intervention group will also receive standard care and will be asked to perform self-blood glucose monitoring 3 times daily for 6 months. However, the Intervention group will also be asked to report their blood glucose reading every 2 weeks through an Internet based glucose monitoring system. The Intervention group will also make visits to the endocrinologist every 3 months with A1c and serum creatinine measurements at 3-month intervals for 6 months. The laboratory measurements of both groups will be recorded and used for data analysis.
Statistical Analysis: The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level. The secondary endpoints include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid, hospital admissions for any CVD related intervention, and adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours. Patients who do not have the required number of SBGM tests performed or patients requiring new laser therapy will be asked to discontinue the study.
For each group, A1C levels before the start of study will be compared to A1C levels 3 and 6 months after the start of the study. Paired t-tests and random effects models (longitudinal analyses) will examine differences in A1C values before and after the study duration. Unpaired, independent t-tests will be done to examine the difference in A1C values between the two groups before and after the interventions. The planned sample size is 50.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Internet Intervention | Experimental | Other: Internet InterventionThe subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon. |
| Standard Care | No intervention | –This arm will receive standard care which includes self-blood glucose monitoring at least 3 times daily and visit to the endocrinologist at least once every 3 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin
- A1C 7-11%
- >25 years of age
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be randomized
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.
- In addition patients with the potential to become pregnant or patients using medications known to influence control of diabetes (eg steroids systemic or inhaled) are excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Internet InterventionAlso: Remote Glucose Monitoring SystemThe subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon. | Other | Internet Intervention |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level.
Time frame: 6 months
1 secondary outcome
The secondary endpoints include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid, hospital admissions for any CVD related intervention, and adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2010.
- Background: PubMed 8366922Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
- Background: PubMed 17102152Austin MM, Haas L, Johnson T, Parkin CG, Parkin CL, Spollett G, Volpone MT. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: benefits and utilization. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-6, 844-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721706295873. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18937550Hirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):419-39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0104.
- Background: PubMed 11448654Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Ferrara A, Liu J, Selby JV. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001 Jul;111(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00742-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20668152Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hugh D Tildesley, MD principal investigator
Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Internet Intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Endocrine Research Society at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00814190, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2010.