Ulcerative ColitisNCT00816491
Comparison Between Chromoendoscopy and Conventional Colonoscopy to Improve the Detection of Neoplasia in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
A study testing conventional white light colonoscopy and FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy) in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy with recommended targeted and random biopsies) in the endoscopic surveillance of patient with long-standing UC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- conventional white light colonoscopy and FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2008to 9 Nov 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinically and histologically verified UC
- Disease duration ≥ 8 years
- A Mayo score ≤ 8 with an endoscopic sub score ≤ 2
- CPAM affiliation
- Able to give written informed consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Known intraepithelial neoplasia or colorectal cancer or any other active malignancy
- Previous colo-rectal surgery
- Non-treatable coagulopathy or hemostatic dysfunction (prothrombin index < 50% of control or/and partial thromboplastin time > 50 seconds and/or thrombopenia < 60000 / mm3)
- Pregnancy
- Inability to give informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Departement d'Endoscopie digestive - Hopital Archet 2, CHU de Nice
Nice, 06202
About this study
Official title: Comparaison de la Chromo Endoscopie Virtuelle FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy) Avec la Coloscopie Conventionnelle Dans la détection de la Dysplasie Chez Patients Porteurs de Recto Colite ulcéro hémorragique (RCH).
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy with recommended targeted and random biopsies) in the endoscopic surveillance of patient with long-standing UC. Accuracy will be measured based on the number of patients with confirmed neoplasia using each technique. The combined histological outcome following the two procedures will represent the gold-standard diagnosis for each patient. Secondary outcomes will be the number of patients with false-positive findings, the number of neoplastic lesions detected, the number of false-positive lesions per patient for each technique and the total time required for each procedure.
Read the detailed description
Patients will undergo two colonoscopies each, with an interval of three months between procedures. This minimum time interval is chosen in order to allow for the healing of the mucosa on sampled areas and thus prevent recognition of biopsy sites. The first procedure will be randomly allocated to be either conventional white light endoscopy coupled with targeted and random biopsies or high-resolution endoscopy with FICE system and magnification. Randomisation will be achieved prior to the first endoscopy by means of sealed envelopes. In each recruitment centre, one of the two endoscopists with experience in endoscopic surveillance and treatment of ulcerative colitis will be assigned to carry out the first procedure. The second procedure will automatically be scheduled with the second endoscopist, who will be blinded as to the clinical and histological findings of the first investigation.
The two participating centres are already endowed with identical endoscopic equipment. All examinations will be performed using the same high resolution endoscope (EC-590 ZW, Fujinon Inc., Daitama, Japan). The zoom function on the device will only be used during the FICE procedures. The system is equipped with the EPX 4400 processor (Fujinon Inc., Japan) that enables the CVC technology. This digital processing system can switch between conventional imaging and CVC imaging at any time during the procedure by means of a simple pushbutton on the endoscope. The system has up to ten (# 10) settings designed to select the most suitable wavelengths. In this study the CVC procedure will be performed using setting number three (# 3).
The colonoscopy protocol will be the same in both participating centres. All patients will undergo a bowel preparation consisting in the intake of four litres of hypertonic polyethylene glycol solution. The procedures will be performed under conscious sedation using propofol. The caecum will be reached in white light endoscopy in all cases. Cecal intubation will be confirmed by identification of the ileocecal valve and appendiceal orifice. Upon extubation, 20 mg of butyl scopolamine will be given intravenously, barring any contraindication, to reduce colonic motility and facilitate the examination of the colon. When performing the FICE procedure, the imaging mode will be switched to CVC at the caecum and will then be used throughout withdrawal. The endoscopist will classify the degree of inflammation in each segment of the colon on a scale and give the Mayo Clinic score (proctosigmoiditis - left-sided colitis - Pan Colitis). The quality of the bowel preparation will be noted. During the extubation phase, washing of the colon and aspiration of waste will be accomplished in an optimal way to maximise the detection capabilities of each procedure.
The biopsy protocol is meant to reflect observed mucosal abnormalities and, in the case of conventional colonoscopy, it will be supplemented by random samples taken every 10 cm of the colon. A standard biopsy forceps will be used (Radial Jaw 4, Boston Scientific Inc., USA). To reduce the risk of sampling error, a minimum of two biopsies for each suspicious lesion will be performed. The number of lesions suspect of neoplasia will be noted and targeted by each procedure. In the case of high-resolution FICE colonoscopy, an analysis of the surface pattern will be performed for each targeted lesion according to the pit pattern classification. Suspicious FICE lesions will be defined as having a polyploidy, flat or irregular mucosal structure with Kudo pit pattern III - V, unusual ulcers, strictures or areas with increased and disrupted vascular intensity revealed by dark coloration/discoloration and confirmed with magnification (annexe 9). In conventional endoscopy without FICE, suspicious lesions will be defined as polypoid or irregular mucosa, and unusual ulcers or strictures. During the conventional white light endoscopy (but not during FICE) additional four-quadrant random biopsies will be taken every 10 cm of colon and placed in a specimen container of formalin. Targeted biopsy samples will be sent separately for analysis.
The histopathological evaluation will be performed twice, by two different pathologists, at each participating centre. The pathologists were recruited according to their expertise in digestive histology. For the purposes of this study, they will be blinded to the assessment of the endoscopist when analysing biopsy samples. The inflammation activity level of each specimen will be ranked into the following categories: no inflammation, mild to moderate inflammation or severe inflammation. Dysplasia will be classified according to the new Vienna classification 21. Lesions classified as "indefinite for neoplasia" with no differentiation between adenoma and colitis-associated dysplasia in biopsy material will be not considered as neoplastic. The final histopathology findings will then be compared with the endoscopic assessment with regards to the presence of intraepithelial neoplasia and colorectal cancer.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- conventional white light colonoscopy, FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy)
- Keywords
- patient with long-standing UC
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional white light colonoscopyDevice
conventional white light colonoscopy
FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy)Device
chromoendoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Conventional white light colonoscopy Receives: Device: conventional white light colonoscopy |
| B | Experimental | Chromoendoscopy Receives: Device: FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy)
Measured: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
Secondary outcomes (2)
The goal is to detect more and earlier neoplastic lesions in order to influence patient management in terms of treatment (potential colectomy) and surveillance.
Measured: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
To quantify the number of true positive and false positive lesions by comparing the number of targeted biopsies performed for suspicious lesions and the resulting histological findings.
Measured: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2008
- Primary completion26 Sep 2011
- Study completion9 Nov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Geoffrey VANBIERVLIET, PH, Principal investigator, Departement d'Endoscopie digestive, CHU de Nice
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00816491
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 08-PP-06
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparaison de la Chromo Endoscopie Virtuelle FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy) Avec la Coloscopie Conventionnelle Dans la détection de la Dysplasie Chez Patients Porteurs de Recto Colite ulcéro hémorragique (RCH).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00816491
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 08-PP-06
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Keywords
- patient with long-standing UC
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy with recommended targeted and random biopsies) in the endoscopic surveillance of patient with long-standing UC. Accuracy will be measured based on the number of patients with confirmed neoplasia using each technique. The combined histological outcome following the two procedures will represent the gold-standard diagnosis for each patient. Secondary outcomes will be the number of patients with false-positive findings, the number of neoplastic lesions detected, the number of false-positive lesions per patient for each technique and the total time required for each procedure.
Detailed description
Patients will undergo two colonoscopies each, with an interval of three months between procedures. This minimum time interval is chosen in order to allow for the healing of the mucosa on sampled areas and thus prevent recognition of biopsy sites. The first procedure will be randomly allocated to be either conventional white light endoscopy coupled with targeted and random biopsies or high-resolution endoscopy with FICE system and magnification. Randomisation will be achieved prior to the first endoscopy by means of sealed envelopes. In each recruitment centre, one of the two endoscopists with experience in endoscopic surveillance and treatment of ulcerative colitis will be assigned to carry out the first procedure. The second procedure will automatically be scheduled with the second endoscopist, who will be blinded as to the clinical and histological findings of the first investigation.
The two participating centres are already endowed with identical endoscopic equipment. All examinations will be performed using the same high resolution endoscope (EC-590 ZW, Fujinon Inc., Daitama, Japan). The zoom function on the device will only be used during the FICE procedures. The system is equipped with the EPX 4400 processor (Fujinon Inc., Japan) that enables the CVC technology. This digital processing system can switch between conventional imaging and CVC imaging at any time during the procedure by means of a simple pushbutton on the endoscope. The system has up to ten (# 10) settings designed to select the most suitable wavelengths. In this study the CVC procedure will be performed using setting number three (# 3).
The colonoscopy protocol will be the same in both participating centres. All patients will undergo a bowel preparation consisting in the intake of four litres of hypertonic polyethylene glycol solution. The procedures will be performed under conscious sedation using propofol. The caecum will be reached in white light endoscopy in all cases. Cecal intubation will be confirmed by identification of the ileocecal valve and appendiceal orifice. Upon extubation, 20 mg of butyl scopolamine will be given intravenously, barring any contraindication, to reduce colonic motility and facilitate the examination of the colon. When performing the FICE procedure, the imaging mode will be switched to CVC at the caecum and will then be used throughout withdrawal. The endoscopist will classify the degree of inflammation in each segment of the colon on a scale and give the Mayo Clinic score (proctosigmoiditis - left-sided colitis - Pan Colitis). The quality of the bowel preparation will be noted. During the extubation phase, washing of the colon and aspiration of waste will be accomplished in an optimal way to maximise the detection capabilities of each procedure.
The biopsy protocol is meant to reflect observed mucosal abnormalities and, in the case of conventional colonoscopy, it will be supplemented by random samples taken every 10 cm of the colon. A standard biopsy forceps will be used (Radial Jaw 4, Boston Scientific Inc., USA). To reduce the risk of sampling error, a minimum of two biopsies for each suspicious lesion will be performed. The number of lesions suspect of neoplasia will be noted and targeted by each procedure. In the case of high-resolution FICE colonoscopy, an analysis of the surface pattern will be performed for each targeted lesion according to the pit pattern classification. Suspicious FICE lesions will be defined as having a polyploidy, flat or irregular mucosal structure with Kudo pit pattern III - V, unusual ulcers, strictures or areas with increased and disrupted vascular intensity revealed by dark coloration/discoloration and confirmed with magnification (annexe 9). In conventional endoscopy without FICE, suspicious lesions will be defined as polypoid or irregular mucosa, and unusual ulcers or strictures. During the conventional white light endoscopy (but not during FICE) additional four-quadrant random biopsies will be taken every 10 cm of colon and placed in a specimen container of formalin. Targeted biopsy samples will be sent separately for analysis.
The histopathological evaluation will be performed twice, by two different pathologists, at each participating centre. The pathologists were recruited according to their expertise in digestive histology. For the purposes of this study, they will be blinded to the assessment of the endoscopist when analysing biopsy samples. The inflammation activity level of each specimen will be ranked into the following categories: no inflammation, mild to moderate inflammation or severe inflammation. Dysplasia will be classified according to the new Vienna classification 21. Lesions classified as "indefinite for neoplasia" with no differentiation between adenoma and colitis-associated dysplasia in biopsy material will be not considered as neoplastic. The final histopathology findings will then be compared with the endoscopic assessment with regards to the presence of intraepithelial neoplasia and colorectal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Device: conventional white light colonoscopyConventional white light colonoscopy |
| B | Experimental | Device: FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy)Chromoendoscopy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinically and histologically verified UC
- Disease duration ≥ 8 years
- A Mayo score ≤ 8 with an endoscopic sub score ≤ 2
- CPAM affiliation
- Able to give written informed consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Known intraepithelial neoplasia or colorectal cancer or any other active malignancy
- Previous colo-rectal surgery
- Non-treatable coagulopathy or hemostatic dysfunction (prothrombin index < 50% of control or/and partial thromboplastin time > 50 seconds and/or thrombopenia < 60000 / mm3)
- Pregnancy
- Inability to give informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional white light colonoscopyconventional white light colonoscopy | Device | A |
| FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy)chromoendoscopy | Device | B |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy)
Time frame: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
2 secondary outcomes
The goal is to detect more and earlier neoplastic lesions in order to influence patient management in terms of treatment (potential colectomy) and surveillance.
Time frame: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
To quantify the number of true positive and false positive lesions by comparing the number of targeted biopsies performed for suspicious lesions and the resulting histological findings.
Time frame: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2022.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Prospective Long-term Exposure Registry of Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Dosage, and Microbiome Engraftment Study of MGT-006 for Ulcerative Colitis (ROOT Study)
Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Ulcerative Colitis, Active Moderate
RecruitingPhase 4
A Remotely Conducted Study to Assess Concentration of TREMFYA in Breast Milk of Lactating Women Who Are Receiving TREMFYA Therapeutically
Psoriasis, Colitis, Ulcerative
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-78934804 in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study of Continued Use of Guselkumab in Participants With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis in Real World Setting
Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Geoffrey VANBIERVLIET, PH principal investigator
Departement d'Endoscopie digestive, CHU de Nice
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional white light colonoscopy and FICE (Fujinon Intelligent Chromoendoscopy) in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the accuracy of two procedures (FICE with target biopsies only, versus conventional white light colonoscopy) (time frame: 3 months between FICE and Conventional white light colonoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2022.