EczemaPhase 3HANDELNCT00817063
Efficacy and Safety of a Retinoid in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema
A Phase 3 study testing alitretinoin in people with Eczema, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 70 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Eczema
- What is being tested?
- alitretinoin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 599 participants
- Where
- 70 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2009to 26 Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- all types of chronic hand eczema, lasting for at least 6 months since initial diagnosis
- rated as severe by the physician
- unresponsive to highly potent topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol
Who cannot join
- patients whose disease is adequately controlled by standard non-medicated therapy, including potent topical steroids, skin moisturizers, and avoidance of allergens and irritants
- patients with known allergens and irritants, who have not made a reasonable effort to avoid the substances
- patients with psoriasis lesions
- active fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the hands
- female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- female patients of childbearing potential who cannot use or will not commit to use two effective methods of contraception
Trial locations and contacts
70 sites in 1 country.
70 sites in 1 country
United States70 sites
Academy of Clinical Research
Arlington, Texas, 76011
Michael Bukhalo MD
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Dermassociates, Ltd
Belleville, Illinois, 62226
Dermatology and Laser Center NW
Bellingham, Washington, 98281
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
University of North Carolina, Dermatology Department
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 918-843-9447
Bernstein Clinical Research Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Modern Research Associates
Dallas, Texas, 75231
MAPS Applied Research Center
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Shahram Jacobs, MD, Inc.
Encino, California, 91436
Deaconess Clinic, Inc.
Evansville, Indiana, 47713
Hamzavi Dermatology Clinic
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059
Johnson Dermatology
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916
Minnesota Clinical Studies Research Center
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Silverton Skin Institute
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439
Center for Clinical Studies
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Dermatology
Indianapolis, Indiana, 37660
Dermatology Associates of Kingsport
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
University of California, San Diego Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit
La Jolla, California, 92037
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
South Lincoln Dermatology
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68502
Dermatology Research of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Longmont Clinic, P.C.
Longmont, Colorado, 80501
Dermatology Research Associates
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Dermatology Specialists
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Derm Research, PLLC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Madison Skin & Research Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin, 53719
Laser and Dermatology Center
Marina del Rey, California, 90292
Saltzer Medical Group
Nampa, Idaho, 83687
Tennessee Clinical Research Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215
The Dermatology Center
New Albany, Indiana, 47150
Tulane University Health Sciences, Dermatology Dept
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
St.Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York, 10025
Mount Sinai School of Medicine Clinical Dermatology
New York, New York, 10029
Virginia Clinical Research Inc.
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Park Avenue Dermatology, PA
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Kansas City Dermatology, PA
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Paddington Testing Co.Inc
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Dermatology Center of Indiana/Indiana Clinical Trials Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Integrated Research Group
Riverside, California, 92506
Helendale Dermatology and Medical Spa
Rochester, New York, 14609
Hull Dermatology
Rogers, Arkansas, 72758
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, California, 95816
Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 77056
Therapeutics Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92123
East Bay Psoriasis Treatment Center
San Ramon, California, 94583
Schaumburg Dermatology
Schaumburg, Illinois, 60194
Premier Clinical Research
Seattle, Washington, 99204
American Dermatology Association
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66216
UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, Dermatology
Somerset, New Jersey, 08873
Washington University Dermatology Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford University Dept of Dermatology
Stanford, California, 94305
Derm Research Center of New York Inc.
Stony Brook, New York, 11790
Toccoa Clinic Medical Associates
Toccoa, Georgia, 30577
Kansas Medical Clinic
Topeka, Kansas, 66614
Radiant Research Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Solano Clinical Research, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vallejo, California, 94589
Grekin Skin Institute
Warren, Michigan, 48088
George Washington University - Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598
Dundee Dermatology
West Dundee, Illinois, 60118
Palm Beach Research Center
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
Western State Clinical Research Inc.
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Azalea Research Center
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403
Wake Forrest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Alitretinoin in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema Refractory to Topical Therapy
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids.
Read the detailed description
Chronic hand eczema (CHE)is a distressing disease that poses difficult problems for dermatologists. CHE leads to considerable work-absenteeism, disability and exclusion from labour market. Conventional treatments, including highly potent topical steroids, yield often unsatisfactory results. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin, a retinoid, in patients who have not responded to avoidance of causative factors, such as contact allergens and skin irritants, non-medicated skin care and highly potent topical steroids. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive alitretinoin or a placebo.
- Conditions
- Eczema
- Being tested
- alitretinoin, Placebo
- Keywords
- retinoid treatment, fingertip dermatitis, hyperkeratotic hand eczema, vesicular hand eczema, pompholyx
- Medical subject headings
- Eczema, Eczema, Dyshidrotic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
alitretinoinDrug
Patients receive alitretinoin 30mg one capsule daily for up to 24 weeks
PlaceboDrug
Patients receive matching placebo for up to 24 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alitretinoin | Experimental | Patients will receive alitretinoin 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks Receives: Drug: alitretinoin |
| Placebo | Experimental | Patients will receive placebo 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24
The investigator assigned PGA grades according to a 5-point scale (clear [not detectable], almost clear [less than 10% of affected hand surface], mild disease [less than 10% of affected hand surface], moderate disease [10% to 30% of affected hand surface], severe disease [>30% of affected hand surface]). PGA ratings were based on an integrated clinical picture of signs, symptoms, and the extent of disease. Symptoms included erythema, scaling, hyperkeratosis/lichenification, vesiculation, edema, fissures, and pruritus/pain. The PGA scale ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (severe disease). Participants were considered as responders when they had a PGA of clear or almost clear.
Measured: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment
A 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to grade 7 signs or symptoms of CHE. The mTLSS was calculated as sum of assigned scores for the symptoms of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, edema, fissures and Pruritus/Pain. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 21 (worst). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100. Data for Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF) has been presented.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment
At Week 24 or at the end-of-treatment participants were asked by the investigator to grade their overall change from Baseline by selecting one of the following descriptions, which best matched their perception of overall treatment effect: cleared or almost cleared (at least 90% clearing), marked improvement (at least 75% clearing), moderate improvement (at least 50% clearing), mild improvement (at least 25% clearing), no change and worsening. Participants were considered as responders when the PaGa was cleared or almost cleared.
Measured: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment
The extent of disease was estimated as the percentage of hand area (with 100% defined as the palmar and dorsal aspects) affected by eczema at Baseline, and at the end of treatment). Extent of disease was estimated separately for the left and right hands, and the overall extent of disease for both hands was calculated as (Left+Right)/2. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Response Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy
Response Duration was defined as time from the end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.
Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Time to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy
Time to relapse was defined as the time from end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented. The median was based on the very last participant having a follow-up period longer than expected, those explaining the high median.
Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Time to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy
Time to response was defined as time from start of treatment to first PGA assessment of "clear" or "almost clear". Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.
Measured: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment Period
An AE was defined as any adverse change from the participant's Baseline (pretreatment) clinical condition, including intercurrent illness, which occurred during the course of the clinical study after written informed consent had been given, whether considered related to treatment or not. A treatment-emergent AE was defined as any adverse change that occurred after treatment started and up to 7 days after last treatment. An SAE was any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contradiction, side effect or precaution. It was any adverse event that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Up to Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference Range
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of laboratory parameters hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, reticulocytes, platelets, white blood cell, lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, total bilirubin, bilirubin conjugated (direct), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, serum albumin, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, sodium, potassium, chloride, serum calcium, serum phosphate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/urea, uric acid, Free thyroxin and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at Baseline and every 4 weeks of treatment period and Week 28 of follow up period. Data for participants with values outside the marked reference range are reported.
Measured: Up to Week 28
Number of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 Weeks
The BSI is a 53 item self-report scale used to measure nine primary symptom dimensions (somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism). Respondents rank each feeling item (e.g., "your feelings being easily hurt") on a 5-point scale where, 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely (0 indicates best outcome and 4 indicates worst outcome). The total score ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 212 (worse outcome). Participants with an increase above Baseline of 25% or more on any domain subscore in BSI-53, or with an increase above Baseline of >=2 points or a score >=3 on any BSI-53 item that reflects depression, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and hostility/aggression, were to be referred to a psychiatrist within 2 weeks.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 Weeks
The PHQ-9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28
Number of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 Weeks
Participants meeting any of the following criteria were to be referred for specialist psychiatric evaluation within 2 weeks: PHQ-9 Score >=15, Two Subsequent Scores of >=10 and PHQ-9 Question 9 >=1. The PHQ -9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly everyday. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Only categories with data available at the indicated time points have been presented. Categories with null values for all the arms have not been presented.
Measured: Up to 28 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 Weeks
HHIE-S assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 8 points); mild/moderate handicap (10 to 24 points); severe handicap (26-40 points). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 Weeks
DHI assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 14 points); mild handicap (16 to 34 points); moderate handicap (36 to 52 points); severe handicap (54 points). Increase from Baseline of <6 points, 6 to <12 points and 12 points. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Number of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 Weeks
Participants who developed tinnitus were monitored by use of the TOMI. The numbers of participants with pre-existing tinnitus, new tinnitus, increased/decreased loudness of tinnitus, or increased/decreased duration of tinnitus, pulsing quality of tinnitus were assessed.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 Weeks
Bone mineral density scans of the left proximal femur (total hip) and anterior-posterior lumbar spine were obtained by use of DXA, at Baseline, at end of therapy, and 1 year (48 weeks) after end of therapy. In case of abnormality or surgery of the left hip, the right hip was to be used. If both hips were affected, the participant was not eligible for DXA. Vertebrae L1 to L4 had to be completely scanned. At least 3 vertebrae had to be free of any abnormalities potentially interfering with DXA analysis (eg, fractures, large osteophytes), otherwise the participant was not eligible for DXA. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) * 100. Least square means and 95% confidence interval has been presented.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 72
Number of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of Bones
X-ray evaluations was done at Baseline (Week 0), end of therapy and at follow up period (Week 72). X-ray evaluations was done for Lateral C-Spine, Lateral T-Spine and Calcaneous. The images were evaluated as optimal, readable (but not optimal) or not readable.
Measured: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular Pressure
An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy, or as a worsening from Baseline for either or both eyes. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, or abnormal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, for both eyes or one eye when the other eye was not concerned by an adverse change. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy was considered as no adverse change. Optic disc, macula, and retinal periphery were assessed by fundoscopy after pupil dilation using tropicamide.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest Frequency
An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy are considered as no adverse change. All puretone testing used a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure with 5 decibel (dB) step size.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study start8 Jan 2009
- Primary completion26 Apr 2012
- Study completion26 Apr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EczemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 599 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stiefel, a GSK Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Basilea Pharmaceutica
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00817063
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 117183
- Other IDs
- BAP01346, NCT00817063
- Acronym
- HANDEL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Publications
Diepgen TL, Agner T, Aberer W, Berth-Jones J, Cambazard F, Elsner P, McFadden J, Coenraads PJ. Management of chronic hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01179.x.
PubMed 17868211Ruzicka T, Larsen FG, Galewicz D, Horvath A, Coenraads PJ, Thestrup-Pedersen K, Ortonne JP, Zouboulis CC, Harsch M, Brown TC, Zultak M. Oral alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) therapy for chronic hand dermatitis in patients refractory to standard therapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Dec;140(12):1453-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1453.
PubMed 15611422Ruzicka T, Lynde CW, Jemec GB, Diepgen T, Berth-Jones J, Coenraads PJ, Kaszuba A, Bissonnette R, Varjonen E, Hollo P, Cambazard F, Lahfa M, Elsner P, Nyberg F, Svensson A, Brown TC, Harsch M, Maares J. Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Apr;158(4):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08487.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
PubMed 18294310Fowler JF, Graff O, Hamedani AG. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of alitretinoin (BAL4079) in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema refractory to potent topical corticosteroid therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1198-204.
PubMed 25607554
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Alitretinoin in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema Refractory to Topical Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00817063
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HANDEL / 117183
- Conditions
- Eczema
- Keywords
- retinoid treatment, fingertip dermatitis, hyperkeratotic hand eczema, vesicular hand eczema, pompholyx
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 599 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stiefel, a GSK CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Basilea Pharmaceutica
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids.
Detailed description
Chronic hand eczema (CHE)is a distressing disease that poses difficult problems for dermatologists. CHE leads to considerable work-absenteeism, disability and exclusion from labour market. Conventional treatments, including highly potent topical steroids, yield often unsatisfactory results. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin, a retinoid, in patients who have not responded to avoidance of causative factors, such as contact allergens and skin irritants, non-medicated skin care and highly potent topical steroids. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive alitretinoin or a placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alitretinoin | Experimental | Drug: alitretinoinPatients will receive alitretinoin 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboPatients will receive placebo 30mg capsule for up to 24 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- all types of chronic hand eczema, lasting for at least 6 months since initial diagnosis
- rated as severe by the physician
- unresponsive to highly potent topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patients whose disease is adequately controlled by standard non-medicated therapy, including potent topical steroids, skin moisturizers, and avoidance of allergens and irritants
- patients with known allergens and irritants, who have not made a reasonable effort to avoid the substances
- patients with psoriasis lesions
- active fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the hands
- female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| alitretinoinPatients receive alitretinoin 30mg one capsule daily for up to 24 weeks | Drug | Alitretinoin |
| PlaceboPatients receive matching placebo for up to 24 weeks | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
The investigator assigned PGA grades according to a 5-point scale (clear [not detectable], almost clear [less than 10% of affected hand surface], mild disease [less than 10% of affected hand surface], moderate disease [10% to 30% of affected hand surface], severe disease [>30% of affected hand surface]). PGA ratings were based on an integrated clinical picture of signs, symptoms, and the extent of disease. Symptoms included erythema, scaling, hyperkeratosis/lichenification, vesiculation, edema, fissures, and pruritus/pain. The PGA scale ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (severe disease). Participants were considered as responders when they had a PGA of clear or almost clear.
18 secondary outcomes
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment
Time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Response Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy
Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Time to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy
Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Time to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy
Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference Range
Time frame: Up to Week 28
Number of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 Weeks
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28
Number of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 Weeks
Time frame: Up to 28 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Number of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 72
Number of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of Bones
Time frame: Up to Week 72
Number of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular Pressure
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest Frequency
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17868211Diepgen TL, Agner T, Aberer W, Berth-Jones J, Cambazard F, Elsner P, McFadden J, Coenraads PJ. Management of chronic hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01179.x.
- Background: PubMed 15611422Ruzicka T, Larsen FG, Galewicz D, Horvath A, Coenraads PJ, Thestrup-Pedersen K, Ortonne JP, Zouboulis CC, Harsch M, Brown TC, Zultak M. Oral alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) therapy for chronic hand dermatitis in patients refractory to standard therapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Dec;140(12):1453-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1453.
- Background: PubMed 18294310Ruzicka T, Lynde CW, Jemec GB, Diepgen T, Berth-Jones J, Coenraads PJ, Kaszuba A, Bissonnette R, Varjonen E, Hollo P, Cambazard F, Lahfa M, Elsner P, Nyberg F, Svensson A, Brown TC, Harsch M, Maares J. Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Apr;158(4):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08487.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25607554Fowler JF, Graff O, Hamedani AG. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of alitretinoin (BAL4079) in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema refractory to potent topical corticosteroid therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1198-204.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Eczema
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
70 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing alitretinoin in people with Eczema, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 70 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 70 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00817063, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2020.