AzTrials
AzTrials

LeukemiaPhase 2NCT00818961

Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High-Risk Hematologic Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing alemtuzumab, graft-versus-tumor induction therapy and rituximab in people with Leukemia and Lymphoma, run by Northside Hospital, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Giving low doses of chemotherapy before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 72 years
Conditions the study is for
Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What is being tested?
alemtuzumab, graft-versus-tumor induction therapy and rituximab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2005to Mar 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 72 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult
  • Diagnosis of one of the following hematological malignancies:
  • CML, with 1 of the following:
  • In first CP AND failed imatinib mesylate therapy, defined as failure to obtain a hematologic remission at 3 months or a major cytogenetic response (i.e., Ph+ cells < 35%) at 6 months or demonstrated clonal evolution or disease progression during therapy
  • In accelerated phase with < 15% blasts
  • In blast crisis that has entered into a second CP following induction chemotherapy
  • AML, with 1 of the following:
  • In second or subsequent complete remission (CR) (i.e., < 5% blasts by morphology, no residual leukemia by flow cytometry, and absence of cytogenetic abnormalities)
  • Failed primary induction chemotherapy, but subsequently entered into a CR with ≤ 2 subsequent re-induction chemotherapy treatment(s)
  • In first CR with intermediate-risk or poor-risk cytogenetics
  • ALL with 1 of the following:
  • In second or subsequent CR
  • In first CR AND presence of t(9;22)
  • MDS, with the following:
  • High-risk disease, defined by IPSS score of ≥ 1.5 at diagnosis AND meets 1 of the following criteria:
  • ≤ 10% blasts at diagnosis
  • In morphologic CR (< 5% blasts) following cytoreductive chemotherapy
  • CMML, with 1 of the following:
  • ≤ 10% blasts at diagnosis
  • In morphologic CR (< 5% blasts) following cytoreductive chemotherapy
  • CLL/PLL with the following:
  • Rai stage I-IV disease
  • Failed ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen (including fludarabine phosphate) or ASCT
  • Documented chemosensitive or stable, non-bulky disease prior to transplant, defined as < 20% bone marrow involvement AND lymph node size < 3 cm in axial diameter
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (i.e., small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular center lymphoma [grade 1 or 2], marginal zone lymphoma, or B-cell lymphoma), with the following criteria:
  • Failed ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen or ASCT
  • Documented chemosensitive or stable, non-bulky disease prior to transplant, defined as < 20% bone marrow involvement AND lymph node size < 3 cm in axial diameter
  • Received ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (monoclonal antibody therapy and involved-field radiotherapy are not considered a prior regimen)
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated LDH, B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Mantle cell lymphoma, with the following:
  • Failed to achieve remission or recurred after either conventional chemotherapy or ASCT
  • Responsive or stable disease to most recent prior therapy
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated LDH, B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Intermediate-grade NHL (i.e., follicular center lymphoma [grade 3] or diffuse large cell lymphoma), meeting the following criteria:
  • Failed to achieve remission or recurred after either conventional chemotherapy or ASCT
  • Documented chemosensitive, non-bulky disease prior to transplant, defined as at least a partial remission to salvage chemotherapy (≥ 50% reduction in diameter of all disease sites)
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated LDH, B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Hodgkin lymphoma, with the following:
  • Relapsed after prior ASCT OR after ≥ 2 combination chemotherapy regimens and ineligible for ASCT
  • Documented chemosensitive, non-bulky disease prior to transplant, defined as at least a partial remission to salvage chemotherapy (≥ 50% reduction in diameter of all disease sites)
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated LDH, B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Peripheral T-cell NHL, with the following:
  • Failed to achieve remission or recurred after either conventional chemotherapy or ASCT
  • Documented chemosensitive, non-bulky disease prior to transplant, defined as at least a partial remission to salvage chemotherapy (≥ 50% reduction in diameter of all disease sites)
  • No bulky tumor masses, elevated LDH, B symptoms, or progressive disease prior to transplant
  • Myeloproliferative syndrome with poor risk features, meeting 1 of the following criteria:
  • < 55 years old AND Lille score of 1
  • Lille score of 2
  • HgB < 10 g/dL AND abnormal karyotype
  • High-risk disease, with 1 of the following:
  • Age 40-72 years
  • Any age AND deemed to be at significantly increased risk of morbidity and death following a standard, myeloablative unrelated donor stem cell transplant (e.g., received extensive prior therapy, including ASCT)
  • HLA-matched unrelated donor available, with 1 of the following:
  • 8/8 match at HLA-A, B, C, or DR loci by high-resolution genotyping
  • Single allelic mismatch at either the HLA-B or HLA-C loci donor by high-resolution molecular typing
  • No single allelic mismatch at HLA-A or HLA-DR loci
  • KPS 80-100%
  • Adapted weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index < 3
  • Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
  • AST or ALT < 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Total bilirubin < 1.5 times ULN
  • LVEF ≥ 45%
  • DLCO > 50%
  • No hypoxia at rest with oxygen saturation < 92% on room air (corrected with bronchodilator therapy)
  • No other severe pulmonary function abnormalities
  • No HIV infection
  • No active hepatitis B or C infection that, in the opinion of a gastroenterologist or the transplant committee, places the patient at moderate to high risk for developing severe hepatic disease
  • No active opportunistic infection (e.g., fungal pneumonia, tuberculosis, or viral infection)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation With Matched Unrelated Donors for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

RATIONALE: Giving low doses of chemotherapy before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving a monoclonal antibody, such as alemtuzumab, before transplant and tacrolimus and methotrexate after transplant may stop this from happening.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of donor stem cell transplant and to see how well it works in treating patients with high-risk hematologic cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To evaluate the safety and toxicity of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen followed by allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from an HLA-matched unrelated donor in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.
  • To evaluate engraftment by peripheral blood chimerism analysis.
  • To determine the incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease following the transplant.
  • To examine the possibility of controlling hematologic malignancies by induction of a graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect.
  • To determine the disease-free survival, relapse, transplant-related mortality, and death from all causes.

OUTLINE:

  • Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen: Patients receive 1 of 2 conditioning regimens according to diagnosis.
  • Regimen 1 (acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloproliferative syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia): Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes and busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -6 to -3 or orally 4 times daily on days -7 to -3.
  • Regimen 2 (lymphoproliferative malignancies): Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -3. Patients with CD20+ malignancies also receive rituximab IV over 4-6 hours on days -13, -6, 1, and 8.
  • Transplantation: Patients undergo allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0.
  • Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis: Patients receive low-dose alemtuzumab subcutaneously on days -11 to -9 and tacrolimus IV over 24 hours beginning on day -3 and then orally twice daily beginning on day 14 and continuing until day 60, followed by a taper until day 180 in the absence of clinically significant GVHD. Patients also receive methotrexate on days 1, 3, and 6.

Patients who exhibit persistent mixed chimerism or disease relapse/progression despite full withdrawal of immunosuppression may receive up to 3 donor lymphocyte infusions.

Blood samples are taken on days 30, 60, and 100 and then every 4 weeks thereafter for chimerism studies by PCR analysis.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for up to 60 months.

Being tested
alemtuzumab, graft-versus-tumor induction therapy, rituximab, busulfan, cyclophosphamide
Keywords
accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission, adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission, adult AML with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities, blastic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, prolymphocytic leukemia, recurrent adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage II adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage III adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage IV adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases, Leukemia, Myeloid, Accelerated Phase, Congenital Abnormalities, Blast Crisis, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • alemtuzumabBiological

    Also called Campath

    43 mg subcutaneously over 3 days (3 mg on day -11, 10 mg on day -10, 30 mg on day -9)

  • graft-versus-tumor induction therapyBiological

    curative potential of allogeneic transplant results from the immune anti-tumor effect of donor cells or GVT/GVL

  • rituximabBiological

    Also called Rituxan

    in patients with Cd20+ malignancies: rituximab 375 mg/m*2 day -13. rituximab 1000 mg/m*2 on days, -6, +1, +8.

  • busulfanDrug

    For patients with AML, CML, MDS, MPS and ALL only: IV or oral busulfan may be given IV busulfan: 130 mg/m2 over 3 hours once daily on days -6, -5, -4 and -3 Oral busulfan: taken every 6 hours x 15 doses beginning on day -7 at 6pm and continuing through day -3 at 6am. 1 mg/kg test dose will be given prior to day -7 and PK samples will be drawn to calculate AUC.

  • cyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan

    750 mg/m2 infused over 1 hour once daily on days -5, -4 and -3. Cyclophosphamide will be started approximately 4 hours after the start of Fludarabine

  • fludarabine phosphateDrug

    Also called Fludara

    For patients with CLL, NHL \& HD: 30 mg/m2 infused over 30 minutes once daily on days -5, -4 and -3 For patients with AML, CML, MDS, MPS and ALL: 40 mg/m2 infused over 30 minutes once daily on days -6, -5, -4 and -3.

  • methotrexateDrug

    5 mg/m2 administered on days +1, +3 and +6

  • tacrolimusDrug

    Also called Prograf; FK506

    0.03mg/kg/day infused over 24 hours starting on day -1 and switched to oral (twice daily divided dose) on day 14 or when able to tolerate PO

  • allogeneic bone marrow transplantationProcedure or surgery

    Also called HSCT, allo transplant

    Recipients will receive an allogeneic transplant on day 0 after receiving high-dose chemotherapy. This trial uses matched unrelated donor stem cells.

Study groups in NCT00818961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationOtherAll patients receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant using one of two chemotherapy regimens based on donor type
Receives: Biological: alemtuzumab; Biological: graft-versus-tumor induction therapy; Biological: rituximab; Drug: busulfan; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: fludarabine phosphate; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: tacrolimus; Procedure: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival at Day 100

    Survival at Day 100

    Measured: 100 day

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Overall Survival at 1 Year

    Evaluation of overall survival at 1 year (# of patients who are alive at 1 year post-transplant)

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Non-relapse Mortality at Day 100

    patients are evaluable for their cause of death at Day 100

    Measured: Day 100

  3. Non-relapse Mortality at 1 Year Post-transplant

    Number of patients who died of non-relapse causes at one year. this is in clusive of all patients who were transplanted on study even though only 10 patients died at by 1 year time point. This outcome will be referenced in the donor chimerism outcome. Only 26/36 patients were eligible for this time point as that is all that were alive.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Complete Donor Chimerism

    Complete donor chimerism (defined as >/= 95% donor cells in peripheral blood CD3+ and CD33+ was measured.

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Neutrophil Recovery

    The number of patients experiencing neutrophil recovery post transplant

    Measured: Day 100

  6. Platelet Engraftment

    The number of patients experiencing platelet engraftment post-transplant

    Measured: Day 100

  7. Number of Patients Requiring the Use of Donor Leukocyte Infusion (DLI) for Early Mixed T-cell Chimerism

    DLI is used for patients with mixed chimerism following transplant

    Measured: Day 100

  8. Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 2-4 Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Post-transplant

    patients experiencing acute graft versus host disease post-transplant

    Measured: patients were followed for 2 years

  9. Number of Patients Experiencing Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

    Measured: >100 days post-transplant

  10. Number of Patients Experiencing Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD) Post-transplant

    Patients will be evaluated up to 4 years post transplant

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Why it stopped: terminated early due to meeting end point with fewer patients than anticipated

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00818961
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000630617
Other IDs
BMTGG-NSH-756
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
7 Jan 2009
Last updated
18 Dec 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • McGlave PB, Shu XO, Wen W, Anasetti C, Nademanee A, Champlin R, Antin JH, Kernan NA, King R, Weisdorf DJ. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: 9 years' experience of the national marrow donor program. Blood. 2000 Apr 1;95(7):2219-25.

    PubMed 10733488
  • Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen JA, Martin PJ, Petersdorf EW, Woolfrey A, Matthews D, Sanders JE, Storb R, Appelbaum FR, Anasetti C. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Aug;26(4):397-404. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702519.

    PubMed 10982286
  • Weisdorf DJ, Billett AL, Hannan P, Ritz J, Sallan SE, Steinbuch M, Ramsay NK. Autologous versus unrelated donor allogeneic marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1997 Oct 15;90(8):2962-8.

    PubMed 9376576
  • Anderson JE, Anasetti C, Appelbaum FR, Schoch G, Gooley TA, Hansen JA, Buckner CD, Sanders JE, Sullivan KM, Storb R. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for myelodysplasia (MDS) and MDS-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1996 Apr;93(1):59-67. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.4811022.x.

    PubMed 8611476
  • Izutsu K, Kanda Y, Ohno H, Sao H, Ogawa H, Miyazaki Y, Kawa K, Kodera Y, Kato S, Morishima Y, Hirai H; Japan Marrow Donor Program. Unrelated bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a study from the Japan Marrow Donor Program. Blood. 2004 Mar 1;103(5):1955-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0937. Epub 2003 Nov 6.

    PubMed 14604976
  • Shaw BE, Peggs K, Bird JM, Cavenagh J, Hunter A, Alejandro Madrigal J, Russell NH, Sirohi B, Towlson K, Williams CD, Marks DI; Clinical Trials Committee of the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. The outcome of unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2003 Dec;123(5):886-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04714.x.

    PubMed 14632780
  • Davies SM, Kollman C, Anasetti C, Antin JH, Gajewski J, Casper JT, Nademanee A, Noreen H, King R, Confer D, Kernan NA. Engraftment and survival after unrelated-donor bone marrow transplantation: a report from the national marrow donor program. Blood. 2000 Dec 15;96(13):4096-102.

    PubMed 11110679
  • Hansen JA, Gooley TA, Martin PJ, Appelbaum F, Chauncey TR, Clift RA, Petersdorf EW, Radich J, Sanders JE, Storb RF, Sullivan KM, Anasetti C. Bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 2;338(14):962-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804023381405.

    PubMed 9521984
  • Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storer B, Sandmaier BM, Diaconescu R, Flowers C, Maloney DG, Storb R. Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplantation comorbidities. Blood. 2004 Aug 15;104(4):961-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0545. Epub 2004 Apr 27.

    PubMed 15113759
  • Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, Storb R, Witherspoon RP, Fefer A, Fisher L, Buckner CD, Anasetti C, Appelbaum FR, Badger C, et al. Influence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease on relapse and survival after bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings as treatment of acute and chronic leukemia. Blood. 1989 May 1;73(6):1720-8.

    PubMed 2653460
  • Mehta J, Singhal S. Graft-versus-myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Nov;22(9):835-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701459.

    PubMed 9827810
  • Jones RJ, Ambinder RF, Piantadosi S, Santos GW. Evidence of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect associated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1991 Feb 1;77(3):649-53.

    PubMed 1991174
  • Porter DL, Connors JM, Van Deerlin VM, Duffy KM, McGarigle C, Saidman SL, Leonard DG, Antin JH. Graft-versus-tumor induction with donor leukocyte infusions as primary therapy for patients with malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1234. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1234.

    PubMed 10561184
  • O'Brien S, Kantarjian H, Beran M, Smith T, Koller C, Estey E, Robertson LE, Lerner S, Keating M. Results of fludarabine and prednisone therapy in 264 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with multivariate analysis-derived prognostic model for response to treatment. Blood. 1993 Sep 15;82(6):1695-700.

    PubMed 8400226
  • Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, van Besien K, Rondon G, Anderlini P, O'Brien S, Khouri I, Gajewski J, Mehra R, Claxton D, Andersson B, Beran M, Przepiorka D, Koller C, Kornblau S, Korbling M, Keating M, Kantarjian H, Champlin R. Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy. Blood. 1997 Jun 15;89(12):4531-6.

    PubMed 9192777

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing alemtuzumab, graft-versus-tumor induction therapy and rituximab in people with Leukemia and Lymphoma, run by Northside Hospital, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Dec 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival at Day 100 (time frame: 100 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00818961, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in