HypertensionPhase 2/3EFFORTNCT00829296
Safety Study to Lower the Risk of Heart Failure is Also Effective in Reducing Stiffness of the Arteries
A Phase 2/3 study testing nebivolol and Metoprolol in people with Hypertension and Diabetes, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study is being done to see if a drug shown to lower the risk of heart failure is also effective in reducing the stiffness of the arteries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- nebivolol and Metoprolol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Established Type 2 diabetic not treated with insulin
- Stage 1 hypertensives blood pressure > 130/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg
- BMI < 35
- Hemoglobin A1C < 8.5
- Must be postmenopausal or taking some form of birth control of surgically sterile
Who cannot join
- Acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke or TIA within the past year.
- Active angina in the last three months
- Diabetes requiring treatment with insulin
- Severe asthma
- Female who are pregnant, planning to be pregnant during the study period, lactating or women of childbearing potential who are not using a medically approved method of contraception
- Recent history of substance or alcohol abuse .
- Uncontrolled hypertension systolic blood pressure >160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Nebivolol on Aortic Impedance Parameters in Type 2 Diabetics
The study is being done to see if a drug shown to lower the risk of heart failure is also effective in reducing the stiffness of the arteries.
Read the detailed description
To determine the effect of nebivolol versus metoprolol in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients on systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- Being tested
- nebivolol, Metoprolol
- Keywords
- diabetes, hypertension, aortic impedance
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nebivololDrug
Also called bystolic
Starting at dose of 5 mg daily titrated up to max of 40 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached
MetoprololDrug
Also called lopressor
Starting at 50 mg daily dose is titrated to max 200 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| nebivolol | Experimental | Starting at dose of 5 mg daily titrated up to max of 40 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached Receives: Drug: nebivolol |
| Metoprolol | Active comparator | Starting at 50 mg daily dose is titrated to max 200 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached Receives: Drug: Metoprolol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Central Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Changes in aortic impedance in patients on nebivolol vs. metoprolol succinate in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients as measured by the change from baseline in central systolic blood pressure.
Measured: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
To examine the effect of nebivolol versus metoprolol succinate in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients on other measures of central conduit artery function such as pulse wave velocity.
Measured: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Change in Augmentation Index
Augmentation index is defined as the percentage of the central pulse pressure which is attributed to the reflected pulse wave and, therefore, reflects the degree to which central arterial pressure is augmented by wave reflection.
Measured: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Change in Pulse Pressure Amplification
To examine the effect of nebivolol versus metoprolol succinate in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients on other measures of central conduit artery function such as pulse pressure amplification (central pulse pressure /brachial pulse pressure).
Measured: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- George Bakris, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00829296
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16310B (EFFORT trial)
- Acronym
- EFFORT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Nebivolol on Aortic Impedance Parameters in Type 2 Diabetics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00829296
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFFORT / 16310B (EFFORT trial)
- Conditions
- Hypertension, Diabetes
- Keywords
- diabetes, hypertension, aortic impedance
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Nov 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is being done to see if a drug shown to lower the risk of heart failure is also effective in reducing the stiffness of the arteries.
Detailed description
To determine the effect of nebivolol versus metoprolol in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients on systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| nebivolol | Experimental | Drug: nebivololStarting at dose of 5 mg daily titrated up to max of 40 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached |
| Metoprolol | Active comparator | Drug: MetoprololStarting at 50 mg daily dose is titrated to max 200 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Established Type 2 diabetic not treated with insulin
- Stage 1 hypertensives blood pressure > 130/80 mmHg and < 160/100 mmHg
- BMI < 35
- Hemoglobin A1C < 8.5
- Must be postmenopausal or taking some form of birth control of surgically sterile
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke or TIA within the past year.
- Active angina in the last three months
- Diabetes requiring treatment with insulin
- Severe asthma
- Female who are pregnant, planning to be pregnant during the study period, lactating or women of childbearing potential who are not using a medically approved method of contraception
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nebivololAlso: bystolicStarting at dose of 5 mg daily titrated up to max of 40 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached | Drug | nebivolol |
| MetoprololAlso: lopressorStarting at 50 mg daily dose is titrated to max 200 mg until target BP of 130/80 is reached | Drug | Metoprolol |
Primary outcome
Change in Central Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Changes in aortic impedance in patients on nebivolol vs. metoprolol succinate in Type 2 hypertensive diabetic patients as measured by the change from baseline in central systolic blood pressure.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Change in Augmentation Index
Time frame: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Change in Pulse Pressure Amplification
Time frame: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
George Bakris, M.D. principal investigator
University of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing nebivolol and Metoprolol in people with Hypertension and Diabetes, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Central Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) (time frame: Baseline and 26 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2016.