TumorsPhase 3NCT00830778
Reduced Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy
A Phase 3 study testing Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy in people with Tumors, run by Baki Topal at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tumors
- What is being tested?
- Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 336 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients, male or female, who undergo PD for a pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumor
- Age between 18 to 85 years
- Patients with and without pre-operative biliary drainage (for obstructive jaundice)
- Concomitant surgical procedures such as simultaneous colonic resection etc.
- Reconstruction of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein
Who cannot join
- Age < 18years
- Pregnancy
- Pre-operative radiotherapy
- PD for IPMT
- PD for chronic pancreatitis
- PD for pancreatic trauma
- PD for post-ERCP complications
- Any arterial reconstruction at the time of surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reduced Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy vs. Pancreaticojejunostomy
The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. The incidence of POPF after PD is dependent of its definition, and is reported in up to 20% of patients.
There is disagreement on whether to perform a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to study whether PG significantly reduces the rate of POPF following PD for pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumours. Secondary endpoints are the reduction of overall postoperative complication rate and their severity.
Read the detailed description
Therapeutic intervention
- Surgeons who have performed a minimum of five (5) PG and PJ procedures can include patients in this randomized trial.
- Any dissection device or technique is allowed.
- Pancreatic anastomosis (PG or PJ)
- 1-layer or 2-layer anastomosis is allowed but has to be registered
- mono-filament and/or poly-filament suture material is allowed but has to be registered
- no pancreatic stent will be placed
- Drainage: one (1) or more closed drain(s) with or without suction is allowed in the vicinity of the pancreatic anastomosis
- Enteral tube feeding (tube positioned in the jejunum at the time of surgery, and distal to the pancreatic anastomosis) as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is allowed
- Gastrostomy tube (percutaneous) is allowed
- Somatostatin: start intra-operatively and administered for seven (7) days after surgery at a dose of 6 mg/d
- Prophylactic use of antibiotics during 24h post-operatively
- Prophylactic use of Ranitidine as well as any PPI (proton pump inhibitor) is allowed to prevent peptic ulcer
Clinical evaluation and assessment criteria
- The number and type of POPF will be recorded according to the ISGPF guidelines and based on findings on day 3 (three) after surgery
- The number and type of postoperative complications will be recorded. The therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) of complications will be used and complications will be allocated to surgical (SSC) and non-surgical site (NSSC) complications
- The adequacy of the surgical resection margins (pR0) and the magnitude of the tumour-free resection margin (millimetres) will be monitored
- Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) will be registered
Patient randomization and registration procedure (randomization lists attached)
- This is a multicentric randomized controlled trial.
- Patient randomization will be done intra-operatively since a substantial number of patients could be dropped out intra-operatively because of the presence of unexpected intra-abdominal metastases at the time of surgery.
- Patient stratification will be performed for each centre and will be based on the diameter of the pancreatic duct. A pancreatic duct at the level of the surgical transsection margin measuring 3 millimetres or less in diameter is defined as being a "soft pancreas". A pancreatic duct measuring more than 3 millimetres is defined as a "hard pancreas".
- A prospective registration of following parameters will be performed: intra-operative diameter of the pancreatic duct at the surgical transection margin, diameter of the pancreas at the surgical transection margin, pancreatic tissue consistency assessed by the surgeon: soft vs. hard, post-operative pathology parameters.
Statistical analysis and sample size calculation based on a stratified design
- 40% of patients are expected to have a hard pancreas and 60% a soft pancreas.
- It is assumed that the magnitude of the effect of the intervention (PJ vs. PG) on the POPF rate, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), is similar in both strata.
- The needed sample size is calculated to have 80% power to detect a common odds ratio of 2.7. POPF rates of 12% and 20% are assumed after PJ within the hard and soft pancreas stratum respectively (yielding 4.8% and 8.4% after PG). Note that, given the unequal size strata, this leads to an expected POPF rate of 16.8% after PJ and 7% after PG (≈12% POPF overall).
- A 2-sided (with alpha=5%) Mantel-Haenszel test of OR=1 for stratified 2x2 tables is planned
- 168 patients are required per group (total patient population 336)
- Expected duration of recruitment: 3-4 years
- An interim analysis will be performed annually (i.e. after inclusion of 1/3 and 2/3 of the patients) to to allow early stop of the study (or accrual of patients in a specific treatment group) due to rejection of the null hypothesis. Using the O'Brien-Fleming method (O'Brien and Fleming 1979) results in respectively |3.471|, |2.454| and |2.004| as critical values for the Z-statistic at the three analysis moments. Otherwise stated, p-values are declared significant if <.00052, <0.0141 and <0.0451 at respectively the first interim analysis, the second interim analysis and at the final analysis.
- Exact 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for the POPF and post-operative complication rates within each stratum. A stratified Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the TOSGS grading.
Translational research: optional Prognostic relevance of gene expression profiling in pancreatic cancer: analyses will be performed at UZ.Leuven/KU.Leuven (project coordinator B.Topal)
- Fresh tissue samples from pancreatic cancer and from non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be stored in RNA-later (samples in 2 separate tubes; 5-10 volumes of RNA-later)
- Sample tubes will be transported (or picked up by the coördinator's research team), within 3 days from sampling, to be stored in -80°C for further analyses
- Conditions
- Tumors
- Being tested
- Pancreaticojejunostomy, Pancreaticogastrostomy
- Keywords
- pancreas, surgery, cancer, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), peri-ampullary tumours (ampulla, duodenum, distal bile duct, and miscellaneous tumours), pancreatic tumors, peri-ampullary tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PancreaticojejunostomyProcedure or surgery
Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis
PancreaticogastrostomyProcedure or surgery
Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PG anastomosis | Experimental | Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) Receives: Procedure: Pancreaticogastrostomy |
| PJ anastomosis | Active comparator | Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) Receives: Procedure: Pancreaticojejunostomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Reduction of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula rate
Measured: 3 years
Reduction of the severity of postoperative complications
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 336 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baki Topal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasme ULB, Brussels, Jolimont, Brussels, St.Lucas, Brugge, General Hospital Groeninge, Université Catholique de Louvain, Clinique Saint Joseph, Liège, University Hospital, Antwerp, Jan Palfijn, Antwerp, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Monica, Deurne
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Baki Topal, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
- Investigators
- Baki Topal, MD, PhD, Study director, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenClaude Bertrand, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Jolimont, BrusselsJean Closset, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Erasme (ULB), BrusselsHenk Thieren, MD, Principal investigator, AZ. St.Lucas, BruggeFranky Vansteenkiste, MD, Principal investigator, General Hospital GroeningeJean-Francois Gigot, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Université Catholique de LouvainJoseph Weerts, MD, Principal investigator, St.Joseph Hospital, LiègeGeert Roeyen, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00830778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S51480
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J; Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8. Epub 2013 May 2.
PubMed 23643139Bertrand C, Squifflet JP, Gys T, Berrevoet F, Jehaes C, Lerut T, Malaise J, Topal B. The Society for Internet-based Scientific Studies: a new platform to promote multicentric studies in the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jan-Feb;110(1):3-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2010.11680554. No abstract available.
PubMed 20306901
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reduced Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Rate Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial on Pancreaticogastrostomy vs. Pancreaticojejunostomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00830778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S51480
- Conditions
- Tumors
- Keywords
- pancreas, surgery, cancer, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), peri-ampullary tumours (ampulla, duodenum, distal bile duct, and miscellaneous tumours), pancreatic tumors, peri-ampullary tumors
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 336 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baki TopalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasme ULB, Brussels, Jolimont, Brussels, St.Lucas, Brugge, General Hospital Groeninge, Université Catholique de Louvain, Clinique Saint Joseph, Liège, University Hospital, Antwerp, Jan Palfijn, Antwerp, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Monica, Deurne
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is around 50 %. The postoperative course after PD is strongly dependent of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (POPF), which determines postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay and costs. The incidence of POPF after PD is dependent of its definition, and is reported in up to 20% of patients.
There is disagreement on whether to perform a pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or a pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to study whether PG significantly reduces the rate of POPF following PD for pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumours. Secondary endpoints are the reduction of overall postoperative complication rate and their severity.
Detailed description
Therapeutic intervention
- Surgeons who have performed a minimum of five (5) PG and PJ procedures can include patients in this randomized trial.
- Any dissection device or technique is allowed.
- Pancreatic anastomosis (PG or PJ)
- 1-layer or 2-layer anastomosis is allowed but has to be registered
- mono-filament and/or poly-filament suture material is allowed but has to be registered
- no pancreatic stent will be placed
- Drainage: one (1) or more closed drain(s) with or without suction is allowed in the vicinity of the pancreatic anastomosis
- Enteral tube feeding (tube positioned in the jejunum at the time of surgery, and distal to the pancreatic anastomosis) as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is allowed
- Gastrostomy tube (percutaneous) is allowed
- Somatostatin: start intra-operatively and administered for seven (7) days after surgery at a dose of 6 mg/d
- Prophylactic use of antibiotics during 24h post-operatively
- Prophylactic use of Ranitidine as well as any PPI (proton pump inhibitor) is allowed to prevent peptic ulcer
Clinical evaluation and assessment criteria
- The number and type of POPF will be recorded according to the ISGPF guidelines and based on findings on day 3 (three) after surgery
- The number and type of postoperative complications will be recorded. The therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) of complications will be used and complications will be allocated to surgical (SSC) and non-surgical site (NSSC) complications
- The adequacy of the surgical resection margins (pR0) and the magnitude of the tumour-free resection margin (millimetres) will be monitored
- Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) will be registered
Patient randomization and registration procedure (randomization lists attached)
- This is a multicentric randomized controlled trial.
- Patient randomization will be done intra-operatively since a substantial number of patients could be dropped out intra-operatively because of the presence of unexpected intra-abdominal metastases at the time of surgery.
- Patient stratification will be performed for each centre and will be based on the diameter of the pancreatic duct. A pancreatic duct at the level of the surgical transsection margin measuring 3 millimetres or less in diameter is defined as being a "soft pancreas". A pancreatic duct measuring more than 3 millimetres is defined as a "hard pancreas".
- A prospective registration of following parameters will be performed: intra-operative diameter of the pancreatic duct at the surgical transection margin, diameter of the pancreas at the surgical transection margin, pancreatic tissue consistency assessed by the surgeon: soft vs. hard, post-operative pathology parameters.
Statistical analysis and sample size calculation based on a stratified design
- 40% of patients are expected to have a hard pancreas and 60% a soft pancreas.
- It is assumed that the magnitude of the effect of the intervention (PJ vs. PG) on the POPF rate, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), is similar in both strata.
- The needed sample size is calculated to have 80% power to detect a common odds ratio of 2.7. POPF rates of 12% and 20% are assumed after PJ within the hard and soft pancreas stratum respectively (yielding 4.8% and 8.4% after PG). Note that, given the unequal size strata, this leads to an expected POPF rate of 16.8% after PJ and 7% after PG (≈12% POPF overall).
- A 2-sided (with alpha=5%) Mantel-Haenszel test of OR=1 for stratified 2x2 tables is planned
- 168 patients are required per group (total patient population 336)
- Expected duration of recruitment: 3-4 years
- An interim analysis will be performed annually (i.e. after inclusion of 1/3 and 2/3 of the patients) to to allow early stop of the study (or accrual of patients in a specific treatment group) due to rejection of the null hypothesis. Using the O'Brien-Fleming method (O'Brien and Fleming 1979) results in respectively |3.471|, |2.454| and |2.004| as critical values for the Z-statistic at the three analysis moments. Otherwise stated, p-values are declared significant if <.00052, <0.0141 and <0.0451 at respectively the first interim analysis, the second interim analysis and at the final analysis.
- Exact 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for the POPF and post-operative complication rates within each stratum. A stratified Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the TOSGS grading.
Translational research: optional Prognostic relevance of gene expression profiling in pancreatic cancer: analyses will be performed at UZ.Leuven/KU.Leuven (project coordinator B.Topal)
- Fresh tissue samples from pancreatic cancer and from non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be stored in RNA-later (samples in 2 separate tubes; 5-10 volumes of RNA-later)
- Sample tubes will be transported (or picked up by the coördinator's research team), within 3 days from sampling, to be stored in -80°C for further analyses
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PG anastomosis | Experimental | Procedure: PancreaticogastrostomyPancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) |
| PJ anastomosis | Active comparator | Procedure: PancreaticojejunostomyPancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients, male or female, who undergo PD for a pancreatic or peri-ampullary tumor
- Age between 18 to 85 years
- Patients with and without pre-operative biliary drainage (for obstructive jaundice)
- Concomitant surgical procedures such as simultaneous colonic resection etc.
- Reconstruction of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age < 18years
- Pregnancy
- Pre-operative radiotherapy
- PD for IPMT
- PD for chronic pancreatitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PancreaticojejunostomyPancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction/anastomosis | Procedure or surgery | PJ anastomosis |
| PancreaticogastrostomyPancreaticogastrostomy (PG) reconstruction/anastomosis | Procedure or surgery | PG anastomosis |
Primary outcome
Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate
Time frame: 3 years
2 secondary outcomes
Reduction of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula rate
Time frame: 3 years
Reduction of the severity of postoperative complications
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23643139Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J; Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8. Epub 2013 May 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20306901Bertrand C, Squifflet JP, Gys T, Berrevoet F, Jehaes C, Lerut T, Malaise J, Topal B. The Society for Internet-based Scientific Studies: a new platform to promote multicentric studies in the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jan-Feb;110(1):3-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2010.11680554. No abstract available.
Related trials for Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Baki Topal, MD, PhD study director
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Claude Bertrand, MD principal investigator
Hospital Jolimont, Brussels
Jean Closset, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Erasme (ULB), Brussels
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Pancreaticojejunostomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy in people with Tumors, run by Baki Topal at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00830778, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2012.