PainPhase 3NCT00832416
A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
A Phase 3 study testing Tramadol Once A Day in people with Pain and Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Labopharm Inc..
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- What is being tested?
- Tramadol Once A Day
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 565 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Aug 2003
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee:
- Current knee pain
- Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion.
- Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study.
- C-reactive protein (CRP) < 8 ug/ml (if available at local lab) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) < 40 mm/hr
- Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of > 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis.
- Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials.
- Research Ethics Board (REB) approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.
Who cannot join
- Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease.
- Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations.
- Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cubic centimetre (cc) upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1).
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 38.
- Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period.
- The patient was unwilling to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).
Show all 18Show fewer
- Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol hydrochloride (HCl) therapy.
- Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold.
- Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days.
- A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures.
- Previous or current opioid dependency.
- Bowel disease causing malabsorption.
- Pregnancy or lactating or childbearing potential and unwilling to utilize a medically approved method of contraception during participation in this clinical trial.
- Significant liver disease, defined as active hepatitis or elevated liver enzymes >3 times the upper boundary of the normal range.
- Significant renal disease, defined as creatinine clearance <30 mL/min as estimated by the method of Levey et al., 1999.
- Current substance abuse or dependence, other than nicotine.
- Allergy or adverse reaction to tramadol or any structurally similar drugs e.g. opiates.
- Any other condition, that, in the opinion of the Investigators, would have adversely affected the patient's ability to complete the study or its measures.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo
- Conditions
- Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Being tested
- Tramadol Once A Day, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tramadol Once A DayDrug
One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.
PlaceboDrug
One Placebo tablet daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Tramadol Once A Day 100mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 4: Placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)
3-item Likert-scale: "How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective". The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
Measured: 12 weeks
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Measured: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).
Measured: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire
Patients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).
Measured: 12 weeks
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief
The Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: "How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective".
Measured: 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason
Reasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected and the percentage of participants who dropped out from trial were calculated by dropout reason
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Primary completionAug 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 565 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Labopharm Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00832416
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDT3-002
- Other IDs
- NCT00832416
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00832416
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MDT3-002
- Conditions
- Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 565 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Labopharm Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Primary completion
- Aug 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Aug 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Tramadol Once A Day 100mg | Experimental | Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg | Experimental | Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg | Experimental | Drug: Tramadol Once A Day |
| 4: Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee:
- C-reactive protein (CRP) < 8 ug/ml (if available at local lab) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) < 40 mm/hr
- Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of > 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis.
- Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials.
- Research Ethics Board (REB) approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease.
- Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations.
- Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cubic centimetre (cc) upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1).
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 38.
- Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tramadol Once A DayOne Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily. | Drug | 1 Tramadol Once A Day 100mg, 2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg, 3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg |
| PlaceboOne Placebo tablet daily. | Drug | 4: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)
Time frame: 12 weeks
3-item Likert-scale: "How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective". The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief
Time frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Approved labellingLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tramadol Once A Day in people with Pain and Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Labopharm Inc..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Aug 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks) (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2012.