PsoriasisPhase 4NCT00842153
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate Foam Compared to Vehicle Foam
A Phase 4 study testing Clobetasol propionate foam in people with Psoriasis, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Clobetasol propionate foam
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, and at least 12 years of age. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
- Mild to moderate, plaque-type psoriasis
- Target lesion on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees) with a score of 2 or 3 for each of erythema, scaling and plaque thickness
- Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent/HIPAA Authorization Forms. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the study is conducted must also have the written, informed consent of a parent or legal guardian.
Who cannot join
- Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) breast feeding or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control
- Known allergy to clobetasol propionate or other topical corticosteroids; or to any component of the investigational formulations
- Subjects who have not complied with the proper wash-out periods for prohibited medications
- Medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation in the clinical study
- Skin disease/disorder that might interfere with the study related diagnosis or evaluations
- Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse
- History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment or unreliability
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Center for Dermatology, Cosmetic and Laser
Fremont, California, 94538
Dermatology Specialists
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
About this study
Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis. This is a multi-center, double blind, randomized, parallel designed study which consists of 2 weeks of treatment and a follow-up visit 2 weeks later.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Clobetasol propionate foam, Vehicle foam
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Plaque Type Psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clobetasol propionate foamDrug
Also called Olux-E
Topical Clobetasol propionate foam
Vehicle foamDrug
Vehicle foam does not include the active drug.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clobetasol Propionate Foam | Experimental | Topical foam formulation that includes clobetasol propionate (Steroid) Receives: Drug: Clobetasol propionate foam |
| Vehicle Foam | Placebo comparator | Vehicle foam is the same as the clobetasol propionate foam except it does not include the active drug. Receives: Drug: Vehicle foam |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
The investigator assessed the TLGI of participants relative to their initial Baseline condition based on a 7-point scale: 0=completely cleared, possible residual discoloration; 1=almost cleared, 90% improvement, very significant clearance with only traces of disease remaining; 2=marked improvement, approximately 75%, with some disease remaining; 3=moderate improvement, approximately 50%; 4=mild improvement, approximately 25%, significant disease remains; 5=no change, no detectable improvement; 6=excerbation, worsening of signs and symptoms of disease.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Secondary outcomes (16)
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
The investigator assessed the TLGI of participants relative to their initial Baseline condition based on a 7-point scale: 0=completely cleared, possible residual discoloration; 1=almost cleared, 90% improvement, very significant clearance with only traces of disease remaining; 2=marked improvement, approximately 75%, with some disease remaining; 3=moderate improvement, approximately 50%; 4=mild improvement, approximately 25%, significant disease remains; 5=no change, no detectable improvement; 6=excerbation, worsening of signs and symptoms of disease.
Measured: Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Participants assessed their level of pruritus (itching) over the previous 24-hour period using the following scale: 0=no itching; 1=minimal, very rarely aware of localized itching, present when relaxing and lasted for very short time; 2=mild, aware of itching at times, present when relaxing, not present when focused on other activities; 3=moderate, often aware of itching, annoying, sometimes disturbed sleep and daytime activities; and 4=severe, constant itching, distressing, frequent sleep disturbance, interfered with activities.
Measured: Week 2
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
The investigator individually graded the severity of erythema (redness of skin) in participants as: 0=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules (flat, distinct, colored area of skin), diffuse faint pink or red coloration; 1=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation present; 2=faint erythema; 3=light red coloration; 4=moderate red coloration; and 5=bright red coloration.
Measured: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
The investigator individually graded the severity of scaling in participants as: 0=no scaling; 1=no evidence of scaling; 2=minimal, occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion; 3=mild, fine scales predominate; 4=moderate, coarse scales predominate; and 5=marked, thick nontenacious scales predominate.
Measured: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
The investigator individually graded the severity of plaque thickness in participants as: 0=no elevation over normal skin; 1=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin; 2=slight but definite elevation, typically edges are indistinct or sloped; 3=moderate elevation with rough or sloped edges; 4=marked elevation typically with hard or sharp edges; and 5=very marked elevation typically with hard, sharp edges.
Measured: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Week 2
Participants assessed all treated areas using the Subject Global Assessment scale: 0=skin completely clear, possible residual hyperpigmentation; 1=psoriasis almost clear, patchy remnants of fine scaling present; 2=psoriasis mild, with small amount of psoriasis remaining (i.e., fine to coarse scales in some areas, definite redness, barely visible plaque thickness); 3=psoriasis moderate, between slight and definitely noticeable; 4=psoriasis very noticeable with redness, scaling, plaque thickness; 5=psoriasis severe with severe redness, thick scaling, and plaques.
Measured: Week 2
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
Participants assessed their level of pruritus (itching) for the target lesion using a 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with the left side anchored with "0=None" and the right side anchored with "10=Very Severe." A target lesion (>2 cm squared [cm^2]) was considered to be one on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 2 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0) divided by the Baseline (Week 0) value * 100.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 2 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0) divided by the Baseline (Week 0) value * 100. Data for this outcome measure were not collected; thus, no data were analyzed.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 1 and Week 4
The investigator assessed the TLGI of participants relative to their initial Baseline condition based on a 7-point scale: 0=completely cleared, possible residual discoloration; 1=almost cleared, 90% improvement, very significant clearance with only traces of disease remaining; 2=marked improvement, approximately 75%, with some disease remaining; 3=moderate improvement, approximately 50%; 4=mild improvement, approximately 25%, significant disease remains; 5=no change, no detectable improvement; 6=excerbation, worsening of signs and symptoms of disease.
Measured: Week 1 and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
Participants assessed their level of pruritus (itching) over the previous 24-hour period using the following scale: 0=no itching; 1=minimal, very rarely aware of localized itching, present when relaxing and lasted for very short time; 2=mild, aware of itching at times, present when relaxing, not present when focused on other activities; 3=moderate, often aware of itching, annoying, sometimes disturbed sleep and daytime activities; and 4=severe, constant itching, distressing, frequent sleep disturbance, interfered with activities.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
The investigator individually graded the severity of erythema (redness of skin) in participants as: 0=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules (flat, distinct, colored area of skin), diffuse faint pink or red coloration; 1=no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation present; 2=faint erythema; 3=light red coloration; 4=moderate red coloration; and 5=bright red coloration.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
The investigator individually graded the severity of scaling in participants as: 0=no scaling; 1=no evidence of scaling; 2=minimal, occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion; 3=mild, fine scales predominate; 4=moderate, coarse scales predominate; and 5=marked, thick nontenacious scales predominate.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
The investigator individually graded the severity of plaque thickness in participants as: 0=no elevation over normal skin; 1=possible but difficult to ascertain whether there is a slight elevation above normal skin; 2=slight but definite elevation, typically edges are indistinct or sloped; 3=moderate elevation with rough or sloped edges; 4=marked elevation typically with hard or sharp edges; and 5=very marked elevation typically with hard, sharp edges.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Baseline and Week 4
Participants assessed all treated areas using the Subject Global Assessment scale: 0=skin completely clear, possible residual hyperpigmentation; 1=psoriasis almost clear, patchy remnants of fine scaling present; 2=psoriasis mild, with small amount of psoriasis remaining (i.e., fine to coarse scales in some areas, definite redness, barely visible plaque thickness); 3=psoriasis moderate, between slight and definitely noticeable; 4=psoriasis very noticeable with redness, scaling, plaque thickness; 5=psoriasis severe with severe redness, thick scaling, and plaques.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
Participants assessed their level of pruritus (itching) for the target lesion using a 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with the left side anchored with "0=None" and the right side anchored with "10=Very Severe." A target lesion (>2 cm squared [cm^2]) was considered to be one on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees). Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 4 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0) divided by the Baseline (Week 0) value * 100.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 4 minus the value at Baseline (Week 0) divided by the Baseline (Week 0) value * 100. Data for this outcome measure were not collected; thus, no data were analyzed.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionDec 2007
- Study completionJan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stiefel, a GSK Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00842153
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OEF0701
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque-Type Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00842153
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OEF0701
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Plaque Type Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stiefel, a GSK CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Jan 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.
Detailed description
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis. This is a multi-center, double blind, randomized, parallel designed study which consists of 2 weeks of treatment and a follow-up visit 2 weeks later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clobetasol Propionate Foam | Experimental | Drug: Clobetasol propionate foamTopical foam formulation that includes clobetasol propionate (Steroid) |
| Vehicle Foam | Placebo comparator | Drug: Vehicle foamVehicle foam is the same as the clobetasol propionate foam except it does not include the active drug. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Outpatient, male or female of any race, and at least 12 years of age. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
- Mild to moderate, plaque-type psoriasis
- Target lesion on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees) with a score of 2 or 3 for each of erythema, scaling and plaque thickness
- Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent/HIPAA Authorization Forms. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the study is conducted must also have the written, informed consent of a parent or legal guardian.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) breast feeding or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control
- Known allergy to clobetasol propionate or other topical corticosteroids; or to any component of the investigational formulations
- Subjects who have not complied with the proper wash-out periods for prohibited medications
- Medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation in the clinical study
- Skin disease/disorder that might interfere with the study related diagnosis or evaluations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clobetasol propionate foamAlso: Olux-ETopical Clobetasol propionate foam | Drug | Clobetasol Propionate Foam |
| Vehicle foamVehicle foam does not include the active drug. | Drug | Vehicle Foam |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, and 4
The investigator assessed the TLGI of participants relative to their initial Baseline condition based on a 7-point scale: 0=completely cleared, possible residual discoloration; 1=almost cleared, 90% improvement, very significant clearance with only traces of disease remaining; 2=marked improvement, approximately 75%, with some disease remaining; 3=moderate improvement, approximately 50%; 4=mild improvement, approximately 25%, significant disease remains; 5=no change, no detectable improvement; 6=excerbation, worsening of signs and symptoms of disease.
16 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, and 4
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 1 and Week 4
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Baseline and Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Clobetasol propionate foam in people with Psoriasis, run by Stiefel, a GSK Company at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4 (time frame: Weeks 1, 2, and 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2017.