AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisNCT00846053

FDG-PET Imaging in Young Cystic Fibrosis Patients

A study testing FDG-PET in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research is to determine how a person's lungs will uptake [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), as measured with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in young cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
FDG-PET
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2009to Feb 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
  • Age 12 to 21 years old, of either gender, any race or ethnicity
  • Stable recent pulmonary status (defined as no new pulmonary symptoms, new antibiotic use, or hospitalization for pulmonary symptoms for at least 1 month).
  • We will permit patients treated with the macrolide antibiotic, azithromycin, to participate in this study. Azithromycin has recently become a virtual standard of care in CF, based on small but reproducible improvements in pulmonary function over 4 months of treatment with this drug. The mechanism of benefit is uncertain, but an anti-inflammatory effect has been suggested. The high prevalence of use means that a study without azithromycin would likely require a wash-out period, without data about the appropriate duration for such a wash-out, or whether inflammatory markers would reverse during that time.

Who cannot join

  • Failure to obtain informed consent
  • Positive pregnancy test or lactation
  • Currently enrolled in another study involving radioisotopes or an investigational drug
  • Recent (within 30 days of screening) hospitalization for any reason
  • New antibiotic use (within 30 days of screening).
  • Patient incapable of lying still and supine within the PET/computed X-ray tomography (CT) scanner for 90 minutes.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patient incapable of completing other testing procedures (e.g., PFT, induced sputum)
  • Patient with serum glucose greater than 150 mg/dl at time of PET imaging study
  • Patient incapable of fasting for 4 to 6 hrs prior to PET imaging study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this research is to determine how a person's lungs will uptake [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), as measured with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in young cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.

Read the detailed description

Our recent study in CF adults, supplemented by recent pre-clinical and clinical studies by our group suggests that labeled fluorodeoxyglocose-based positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging may be a valuable quantitative biomarker of lung inflammation. The proposed study would validate our earlier findings, but in a younger patient population. The implications of such a test could be highly significant for both the testing of promising new anti-inflammatory agents and for patient management decisions. To capitalize on this exciting opportunity, the critical next step is to show that we can identify a cohort of young CF patients with both stable lung function and normal (or near normal) FDG-PET imaging studies. Similar patients, then, would become the subjects for a future prospective cohort study to determine if FDG-PET imaging can in fact serve as a predictor of future changes in lung function.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Being tested
FDG-PET
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FDG-PETDiagnostic test

    All subjects underwent FDG-PET and low-dose volumetric CT imaging. After completing a transmission scan, [18F]FDG was injected intravenously at the start of dynamic scan acquisition. Regions of interest were drawn over multiple tomographic slices to determine average whole-lung and regional lung tissue [18F] FDG uptake. Patlak graphical analysis was used to determine the rate of [18F]FDG uptake from the blood input function and lung tissue activity curves, measured as the influx constant Ki (slope of the linear regression from the Patlak plot). Corrected Ki (i.e., Ki divided by the initial volume of distribution). Lung density was calculated from the attenuation image by standard methods.

Study groups in NCT00846053
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stable lung functionOther* Group S (n = 14) will consist of CF patients, aged 12-21 years old, who underwent FDG-PET with stable lung function during the past 4 years, defined as less than 2% decline per year. There is no therapeutic intervention and FDG-PET scan will be performed in both cohorts.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: FDG-PET
Rapidly deteriorating lung functionOther* Group R (n = 14) will contain CF patients, aged 12-21 years old, who underwent FDG-PET with rapidly deteriorating lung function during the past 4 years with greater than 4% per year decline. There is no therapeutic intervention and FDG-PET scan will be performed in both cohorts.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: FDG-PET

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Kinetic Influx Constant (Ki)

    The whole lung kinetic influx constant (Ki) is the primary outcome measure that is derived from the time-activity curves, which are generated from regions of interest placed over the whole lungs. Therefore, a single time-activity curves from each scan is used to derive the Ki.

    Measured: At the time of FDG scan, 1 to 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Sputum Neutrophil Elastase (NE) Concentration

    Using established techniques, functional activity of neutrophil elastase in sputum sols were measured using methoxy-succinyl-ala-ala-pro-val-nitroanilide (Elastin Products, Owensville, MO), specific peptide chromogenic substrates of the neutrophil protease

    Measured: Sample collected within 2-hours of PET scan

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
In this pilot study, we examined the value of FDG-PET scans as a noninvasive measure of neutrophilic inflammation in adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis. All subjects underwent scans.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00846053
Sponsor's protocol ID
08-1219
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
16 Feb 2009
Last updated
24 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data generated will be published at the end of the project, consistent with normal scientific practices. Such research data will be anonymized to prevent the disclosure of personal identifiers. In return for the use of data, investigators will acknowledge our grant number in publications and presentations, and in productivity reports on publications or funding that were derived from the project, and they will not distribute materials to third-parties without notification. There will be no charge for sharing data unless the request requires effort beyond what can be subsumed under normal project budgeted effort. If the request justifies a charge, the cost is kept to a minimum and based on actual expenses.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FDG-PET in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Kinetic Influx Constant (Ki) (time frame: At the time of FDG scan, 1 to 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in