Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3NCT00849017
Safety and Efficacy Study of Albiglutide in Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 3 study testing albiglutide and albiglutide uptitration in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 262 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether albiglutide is effective in the treament of patients with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- albiglutide and albiglutide uptitration
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 309 participants
- Where
- 262 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- type 2 diabetes
- BMI 20-45kg/m2 inclusive
Who cannot join
- females who are pregnant, lactating, or <6 weeks post-partum
- CHF NYHA class III-IV
Trial locations and contacts
262 sites in 3 countries.
262 sites in 3 countries
United States247 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, 44320
GSK Investigational Site
Alabaster, Alabama, 35007
GSK Investigational Site
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005
GSK Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012
GSK Investigational Site
Arvada, Colorado, 80005
GSK Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
GSK Investigational Site
Ashland, Oregon, 97520
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30338
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
GSK Investigational Site
Avon, Indiana, 46123
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237-3998
GSK Investigational Site
Bay City, Michigan, 48708
GSK Investigational Site
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, 19020
GSK Investigational Site
Benzonia, Michigan, 49616
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
GSK Investigational Site
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
GSK Investigational Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
GSK Investigational Site
Broken Bow, Nebraska, 68822
GSK Investigational Site
Bull Shoals, Arkansas, 72619
GSK Investigational Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
GSK Investigational Site
Burlington, North Carolina, 27215
GSK Investigational Site
Calabash, North Carolina, 28467
GSK Investigational Site
Canal Fulton, Ohio, 44614
GSK Investigational Site
Carmichael, California, 95608
GSK Investigational Site
Chadbourn, North Carolina, 28431
GSK Investigational Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85225
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
GSK Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910
GSK Investigational Site
Clarksville, Tennessee, 37043
GSK Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
GSK Investigational Site
Cleburne, Texas, 76033
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
GSK Investigational Site
Cocoa, Florida, 32927
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, Tennessee, 38401
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
GSK Investigational Site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414
GSK Investigational Site
Council Bluffs, Iowa, 51501
GSK Investigational Site
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
GSK Investigational Site
Crescent Springs, Kentucky, 41017
GSK Investigational Site
Crossville, Tennessee, 38555
GSK Investigational Site
Cutler Bay, Florida, 33189
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75224
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75235
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75251
GSK Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio, 45432
GSK Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio, 45439
GSK Investigational Site
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30032
GSK Investigational Site
Deer Park, Texas, 77536
GSK Investigational Site
Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33442
GSK Investigational Site
Delray Beach, Florida, 33445
GSK Investigational Site
Dothan, Alabama, 36301
GSK Investigational Site
Downington, Pennsylvania, 19335
GSK Investigational Site
Dubuque, Iowa, 52001
GSK Investigational Site
East Providence, Rhode Island, 02914
GSK Investigational Site
El Paso, Texas, 79925
GSK Investigational Site
Elizabeth, New Jersey, 07202
GSK Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
GSK Investigational Site
Evergreen Park, Illinois, 60805
GSK Investigational Site
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304
GSK Investigational Site
Foothill Ranch, California, 92610
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
GSK Investigational Site
Gilbert, Arizona, 85295
GSK Investigational Site
Great Falls, Montana, 59405
GSK Investigational Site
Green Valley, Arizona, 85614
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27455
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
GSK Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
GSK Investigational Site
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, 08035
GSK Investigational Site
Hainesport, New Jersey, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Hallandale, Florida, 33009
GSK Investigational Site
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17112
GSK Investigational Site
Haverhill, Massachusetts, 01830
GSK Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
GSK Investigational Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
GSK Investigational Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33023
GSK Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
GSK Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814
GSK Investigational Site
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77024
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77034
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77036
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77055
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77058
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77070
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92646
GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
GSK Investigational Site
Hurst, Texas, 76054
GSK Investigational Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46254
GSK Investigational Site
Indio, California, 92201
GSK Investigational Site
Interlochen, Michigan, 49643
GSK Investigational Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52243
GSK Investigational Site
Irvine, California, 92618
GSK Investigational Site
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
GSK Investigational Site
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
GSK Investigational Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
GSK Investigational Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49009
GSK Investigational Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
GSK Investigational Site
Katy, Texas, 77450
GSK Investigational Site
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
GSK Investigational Site
La Grange, Illinois, 60525
GSK Investigational Site
La Porte, Indiana, 46350
GSK Investigational Site
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601
GSK Investigational Site
Lakewood, California, 90712
GSK Investigational Site
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, 19446
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
GSK Investigational Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
GSK Investigational Site
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645
GSK Investigational Site
Lewisburg, West Virginia, 24901
GSK Investigational Site
Lewisville, Texas, 75067
GSK Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
GSK Investigational Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
GSK Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90806
GSK Investigational Site
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90022
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90025
GSK Investigational Site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
GSK Investigational Site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
GSK Investigational Site
Marianna, Florida, 32446
GSK Investigational Site
Mason, Ohio, 45040
GSK Investigational Site
Maumee, Ohio, 43537-9402
GSK Investigational Site
McKenzie, Tennessee, 38201
GSK Investigational Site
Melrose Park, Pennsylvania, 19027
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33156
GSK Investigational Site
Middletown, Delaware, 19709
GSK Investigational Site
Midland, Texas, 79705
GSK Investigational Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
GSK Investigational Site
Mint Hill, North Carolina, 28227
GSK Investigational Site
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
GSK Investigational Site
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
GSK Investigational Site
Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, 29576
GSK Investigational Site
Naperville, Illinois, 60564
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
GSK Investigational Site
New Britain, Connecticut, 06050
GSK Investigational Site
Newton, Kansas, 67114
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
GSK Investigational Site
North Massapequa, New York, 11758
GSK Investigational Site
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29582
GSK Investigational Site
Northridge, California, 91325
GSK Investigational Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
GSK Investigational Site
Odessa, Texas, 79761
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
GSK Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68124
GSK Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
GSK Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
GSK Investigational Site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29115
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32822
GSK Investigational Site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
GSK Investigational Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
GSK Investigational Site
Oviedo, Florida, 32765
GSK Investigational Site
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
GSK Investigational Site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
GSK Investigational Site
Palm Desert, California, 92260
GSK Investigational Site
Panama City, Florida, 32401
GSK Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91105
GSK Investigational Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026
GSK Investigational Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027
GSK Investigational Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85051
GSK Investigational Site
Picayune, Mississippi, 39466
GSK Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243
GSK Investigational Site
Plantation, Florida, 33317
GSK Investigational Site
Richland, Washington, 99352
GSK Investigational Site
Riverside, California, 92506
GSK Investigational Site
Rolling Fork, Mississippi, 39159
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Cloud, Florida, 34769
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84120
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78224
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4801
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92117
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92120
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92128
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92177
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Ana, California, 92701
GSK Investigational Site
Satna Monica, California, 90404
GSK Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
GSK Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31419
GSK Investigational Site
Schertz, Texas, 78154
GSK Investigational Site
Searcy, Arkansas, 72143
GSK Investigational Site
Selah, Washington, 98942
GSK Investigational Site
Shelby, North Carolina, 28150
GSK Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
GSK Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71115
GSK Investigational Site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
GSK Investigational Site
Snellville, Georgia, 30078
GSK Investigational Site
South Bend, Indiana, 46614
GSK Investigational Site
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
GSK Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, 99216
GSK Investigational Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
GSK Investigational Site
Stratford, New Jersey, 08084
GSK Investigational Site
Suffolk, Virginia, 23434
GSK Investigational Site
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
GSK Investigational Site
Sugarland, Texas, 77479
GSK Investigational Site
Tabor City, North Carolina, 28463
GSK Investigational Site
Tarzana, California, 91356
GSK Investigational Site
Taylors, South Carolina, 29687
GSK Investigational Site
Thornville, Ohio, 43076
GSK Investigational Site
Tipton, Pennsylvania, 16684
GSK Investigational Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, 90503
GSK Investigational Site
Tucker, Georgia, 30084
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
GSK Investigational Site
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37388
GSK Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
GSK Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
GSK Investigational Site
Uniontown, Pennsylvania, 15401
GSK Investigational Site
Victorville, California, 92395
GSK Investigational Site
Virgina Beach, Virginia, 23455
GSK Investigational Site
Vista, California, 92083
GSK Investigational Site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
GSK Investigational Site
Waterloo, Iowa, 50701
GSK Investigational Site
Weber City, Virginia, 24290
GSK Investigational Site
West Hills, California, 91307
GSK Investigational Site
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
GSK Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
GSK Investigational Site
West Plains, Missouri, 65775
GSK Investigational Site
West Valley City, Utah, 84120
GSK Investigational Site
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
Mexico14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cuernavaca, 62250
GSK Investigational Site
Distrito Federal, 06700
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, 44600
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, 44680
GSK Investigational Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
GSK Investigational Site
Mexico City, 03300
GSK Investigational Site
Mexico City, 11570
GSK Investigational Site
Morelia, Michoacán, C.P. 58249
GSK Investigational Site
Nezahualcóyotl, 57170
GSK Investigational Site
Pachuca, Hidalgo, 42086
GSK Investigational Site
Puebla City, Puebla, 72190
GSK Investigational Site
Tijuana, Baja California Norte, 22010
GSK Investigational Site
Torreón, 27000
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45200
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
The purpose of this study is to determine whether albiglutide is effective in the treament of patients with type 2 diabetes.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- albiglutide, albiglutide uptitration, placebo
- Keywords
- placebo, albiglutide, monotherapy, diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
albiglutideBiological
albiglutide weekly injection
albiglutide uptitrationBiological
albiglutide uptitration at week 12
placeboBiological
matching albiglutide placebo weekly injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutide | Experimental | albiglutide weekly injection Receives: Biological: albiglutide |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | albiglutide matching placebo Receives: Biological: placebo |
| albiglutide up-titration | Experimental | albiglutide weekly injection uptitration at week 12 Receives: Biological: albiglutide uptitration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus ≥65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156
Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and <Week 4; FPG >=250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and <Week 12; HbA1c >=8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and <Week 24; HbA1c >=8.5% between >=Week 24 and <Week 48; HbA1c >=8.0% between >= Week 48 and <Week 156. Participants could have been rescued at any time on or after Week 2. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.
Measured: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156
The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG.
Measured: Baseline and Week 156
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed.
Measured: Week 156
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight.
Measured: Baseline and Week 156
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter-4 Hour C-peptide AUC
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was 4 hour c-peptide AUC. The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter- 4 Hour Blood Glucose AUC
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was: 4 hour blood glucose area under urve AUC The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameters-4 Hour Insulin AUC and 4 Hour Proinsulin AUC
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameters analyzed were: 4-hour insulin AUC (4 hr Ins AUC), and 4-hour proinsulin AUC (4 hr pro-Ins AUC). The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Albiglutide Plasma Concentration at Weeks 8 and 24
Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 12, participants in the albiglutide 50 mg treatment group were uptitrated to receive albiglutide 50 mg for the remainder of the study.
Measured: Weeks 8 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionNov 2011
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 309 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00849017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 112756
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Home PD, Ahren B, Reusch JEB, Rendell M, Weissman PN, Cirkel DT, Miller D, Ambery P, Carr MC, Nauck MA. Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;131:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PubMed 28683300Nauck MA, Stewart MW, Perkins C, Jones-Leone A, Yang F, Perry C, Reinhardt RR, Rendell M. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 2): 52 week primary endpoint results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetologia. 2016 Feb;59(2):266-74. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3795-1. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
PubMed 26577795Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Scott R, Hodge RJ, Zhi H, Reinhardt RR. Clinical pharmacology of albiglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Postgrad Med. 2014 Nov;126(7):84-97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.11.2836.
PubMed 25387217Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Yang F, Reinhardt RR. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of albiglutide. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):35-46. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2754.
PubMed 24918790
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00849017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 112756
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- placebo, albiglutide, monotherapy, diabetes
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 309 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jun 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether albiglutide is effective in the treament of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutide | Experimental | Biological: albiglutidealbiglutide weekly injection |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: placeboalbiglutide matching placebo |
| albiglutide up-titration | Experimental | Biological: albiglutide uptitrationalbiglutide weekly injection uptitration at week 12 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- type 2 diabetes
- BMI 20-45kg/m2 inclusive
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- females who are pregnant, lactating, or <6 weeks post-partum
- CHF NYHA class III-IV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutidealbiglutide weekly injection | Biological | albiglutide |
| albiglutide uptitrationalbiglutide uptitration at week 12 | Biological | albiglutide up-titration |
| placebomatching albiglutide placebo weekly injection | Biological | placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus ≥65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.
12 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156
Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue
Time frame: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156
Time frame: Baseline and Week 156
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156
Time frame: Week 156
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156
Time frame: Baseline and Week 156
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter-4 Hour C-peptide AUC
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter- 4 Hour Blood Glucose AUC
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameters-4 Hour Insulin AUC and 4 Hour Proinsulin AUC
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Albiglutide Plasma Concentration at Weeks 8 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 8 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28683300Home PD, Ahren B, Reusch JEB, Rendell M, Weissman PN, Cirkel DT, Miller D, Ambery P, Carr MC, Nauck MA. Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;131:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26577795Nauck MA, Stewart MW, Perkins C, Jones-Leone A, Yang F, Perry C, Reinhardt RR, Rendell M. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 2): 52 week primary endpoint results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetologia. 2016 Feb;59(2):266-74. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3795-1. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25387217Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Scott R, Hodge RJ, Zhi H, Reinhardt RR. Clinical pharmacology of albiglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Postgrad Med. 2014 Nov;126(7):84-97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.11.2836.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24918790Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Yang F, Reinhardt RR. Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of albiglutide. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):35-46. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2754.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
262 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing albiglutide and albiglutide uptitration in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 262 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 262 sites in United States, Mexico, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52 (time frame: Baseline and Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00849017, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2017.