AzTrials
AzTrials

Post Operative PainNCT00849719

Effects of a Combination of IV-PCA With Continuous IV Infusion of MO, Versus IV-PCA MO on Postoperative Pain

A study testing a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MO and PCA MO only in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

After major surgery, such as abdominal or thoracic surgery, the majority of patients experience moderate to severe pain that may not be optimally controlled. Inadequate pain relief may lead to complications that can hinder rehabilitation and slow recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Post Operative Pain
What is being tested?
a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MO and PCA MO only
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Apr 2009to Jun 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients undergoing major abdominal procedures (e.g. laparotomy, nephrectomy, gastrectomy, gastric bypass, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and abdominal aortic aneurysm) or thoracic surgery (segmentectomy, lobectomy or pneumonectomy) in our institution during the years 2008-9.

Who cannot join

  • patients with a history of drug or alcohol abuse, psychiatric disturbances, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, seizures or suicide risk, use of psychotropic drugs, pregnancy or nursing, hypersensitivity to MO, or to non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or their excipients, chronic or acute pain of any origin, respiratory failure or insufficiency, uncompensated or congestive heart or hepatic failure and those scheduled for an emergency or palliative procedure.
  • we will also exclude patients using antidepressants, anticonvulsants or muscle relaxants, and patients using any monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 2 weeks of surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky medical center

    Tel Aviv, 64239

    Yifat Klein, PhD, 9726974093, yifat.klein@gmail.com

    Avi Weinbrum, MD

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Effects of Combination of Continuous Intravenous (IV) Infusion Plus Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) of Morphine (MO) vs. IV-PCA MO on Postoperative Pain Control

After major surgery, such as abdominal or thoracic surgery, the majority of patients experience moderate to severe pain that may not be optimally controlled. Inadequate pain relief may lead to complications that can hinder rehabilitation and slow recovery. Morphine (MO) is the most commonly used opioid for the treatment of post-surgical pain (14). The preferred method of administration nowadays is intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In contrast, Continuous infusion of intravenous morphine (CIVM) is seldom used in Post-Anesthesia Care Units (PACUs) for acute postoperative pain, due to concerns of cardio-respiratory deterioration, even though different studies have found this technique of administration effective and safe (in terms of opioid-related symptoms.As part of our efforts to improve postoperative pain management in the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center's PACU, we wish to determine if combining CIVM with IV PCA will be superior over IV PCA only for the treatment of postoperative pain following major abdominal or thoracic surgery.Our hypothesis is that the continuous infusion, even if given at a relatively low dose, would enable the build-up of pharmacologically effective MO blood level, thus providing an overall better control of pain.

Read the detailed description

Study objective To compare the efficacy of two MO administration-protocols: PCA MO (only) vs combination of continuous background infusion plus PCA MO (combined dosage) in patients after abdominal and thoracic surgery.

Methods Inclusion criteria The study will be conducted as a prospective, randomized, double blinded one, into which we will enroll patients aged 18-80 years undergoing major abdominal procedures (e.g. laparotomy, nephrectomy, gastrectomy, gastric bypass, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and abdominal aortic aneurysm) or thoracic surgery (segmentectomy, lobectomy or pneumonectomy) in our institution during the years 2008-9.

Exclusion criteria We will exclude from the study patients with a history of drug or alcohol abuse, psychiatric disturbances, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, seizures or suicide risk, use of psychotropic drugs, pregnancy or nursing, hypersensitivity to MO, or to non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or their excipients, chronic or acute pain of any origin, respiratory failure or insufficiency, uncompensated or congestive heart or hepatic failure and those scheduled for an emergency or palliative procedure. We will also exclude patients using antidepressants, anticonvulsants or muscle relaxants, and patients using any monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 2 weeks of surgery.

Post enrollment dropouts Patients will be dropped from the study for one of the following reasons: need for immediate postoperative artificial ventilation lasting over 4 h, lack of coherence (<5/10) or constant sedation (>5/10 VAS), or combative behavior in the PACU, postoperative requirement for re-intervention and/or transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU). Other suitable patients will be recruited to replace the ones that were dropped.

Intra-study non-replaced dropouts will include protocol violation, patient's decision to withdraw or ineffective drug protocol (pain >5/10 VAS despite full and evidenced protocol implementation).

Intra-operative management Anesthetics and surgical management will be performed similarly in all patients. All patients will receive prophylactic antibiotics. All will be premedicated with oral 10 mg diazepam the night before surgery and 40-75 min preoperatively. After a sedative dose of IV midazolam (1.5-2 mg) and fentanyl (1.5 μg/kg), propofol (1-2 mg/kg) will be slowly injected IV until the patient losses consciousness. A non-depolarizing muscle relaxant will enable endotracheal intubation.

General anesthesia will be maintained according to institutional protocol, using nitrous oxide/oxygen 2/1 L/min enriched with isoflurane, aiming at delivering 1 MAC anesthesia. A non-depolarizing muscle relaxant and fentanyl will be continually infused or given by repeated portions to maintain muscle relaxation and analgesia, and hemodynamic and ventilatory stability. Cardiovascular and respiratory parameters will be monitored in the standard manner, and intraoperative fluid administration and blood replacement will follow common cardiovascular, renal and laboratory indices.

Towards the end of surgery, all drugs will be turned off and minimal doses of atropine and neostigmine will be administered to reverse muscle relaxation and obtain the return of normal spontaneous respiration. All patients will then be transferred to the PACU for observation.

Study design Consented postoperative patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups (by using a closed-envelope technique): Group 1 will receive PCA bolus injections of MO, as practiced in our institution, whereas group 2 will receive both a basal (infusion) administration and PCA bolus injections. Dosage of the basal infusion and the PCA combination will be based on a preliminary dose-response pain control study and data obtained during a previous study, where the technique provided satisfactory reduction or even elimination of pain along with a tolerable level of side effects. For reasons of both safety and efficacy, we will maintain the doses of both basal (infusion) and demand (bolus) portions on a body weight basis.

Study phase and drug use Upon arrival in the PACU, each patient will be connected to an oxygen face-mask and a vital signs monitor. Upon the first complaint of moderate or severe rest pain (≥5/10 on a visual analog scale [VAS]), and after the PACU drug-blinded attending physician had established that the patient is coherent and cooperative, a PCA system will be connected to the patient's IV line. The physician will start device, and deliver the first bolus. The subsequent drug boluses will be self-administered by the patient. Group 1 patients will receive MO infusion (10 μg/kg/h) + MO bolus (10 μg/kg/bolus, by request), whereas group 2 will be administered with only boluses of 1.5 mg/bolus of MO. A 7 min lockout time after each bolus will prevent excessive dispensing of the drug. If needed, the physician could administer two extra boluses for optimal pain control within the first 15 min postoperatively. Rescue diclofenac 75 mg IM will be allowed once to help prompt start analgesia instead of opioid titration, and 6h later. No hourly dose limit will be set for the protocols.

All patients will be treated according to their designated study protocol for as long as they need; no use for 12 h after will prompt the patients to the standard pain care of the surgical department.

Patient assessment Outcome measurements will be assessed and documented every 15 min during the first 2 h of the study and then hourly, until POD3. Primary outcomes will include the demand/delivery ratio for MO and rescue drug (assessed by the hourly activation of the IV-PCA device, and the 12 h total drug consumption). Secondary outcomes will be: pain intensity (evaluated by both by the patients' self-rated pain, and via VAS by a blinded assessor), self-rated levels of sedation and satisfaction, time of dependence of the device and urinary catheter, time to discharge, and time until the patient sits, stand and leaves bed. Adverse effects that we will evaluate are: respiratory depression (respiratory rate, room air saturation, time to extubation in re-intubated patients); vomiting/nausea; allergic events, severe complications (e.g. morbidity).

The demographic data (age, gender, weight), background characteristics (pre-study heart and respiratory rates, SpO2, systolic and diastolic blood pressures), patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class, duration of surgery and intraoperative fentanyl usage will also be recorded; all will be analyzed at the end of the study.

Study hypothesis and benefits The present study aims at assessing whether the addition of MO infusion to the commonly used PCA, although both at a total dose that is inferior to that currently used in our institution, will provide better pain control compared to the commonly used technique. We believe that if this occurs, it will be safer for the patient and possibly allow earlier recovery, rehabilitation and home discharge.

Being tested
a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MO, PCA MO only
Keywords
visual analog scale, patient controlled analgesia, post operative pain, rescue drug
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MODrug

    Also called PCA and infusion MO

    Patients in this arm will recieve a combination of PCA MO (10 ug/kg/bolus, by request) and continuous infusion of MO (10 ug/kg/h), when visual analog scale (VAS) exeeds 5/10 boluses will be self-administered by the patient. Rescue diclofenac 75 mg IM will be allowed once to help prompt start analgesia instead of opioid titration, and 6h later. No hourly dose limit will be set for the protocols.

  • PCA MO onlyDrug

    Also called PCA MO

    When visual analog scale [VAS] exeeds 5/10, and after the PACU drug-blinded attending physician had established that the patient is coherent and cooperative, a PCA system will be connected to the patient's IV line. The physician will start device, and deliver the first bolus. The subsequent drug boluses will be self-administered by the patient. Group 2 will be administered with only boluses of 1.5 mg/bolus of MO, by request. Rescue diclofenac 75 mg IM will be allowed once to help prompt start analgesia instead of opioid titration, and 6h later. No hourly dose limit will be set for the protocols.

Study groups in NCT00849719
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalPatients in this arm will recieve a combination of PCA MO (10 ug/kg/bolus, by request) and continuous infusion of MO (10 ug/kg/h), when visual analog scale (VAS) exeeds 5/10 boluses will be self-administered by the patient.
Receives: Drug: a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MO
2Active comparatorPatients in this arm will be administered with only boluses of 1.5 mg/bolus of MO, by request.
Receives: Drug: PCA MO only

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. demand/delivery ratio for MO and rescue drug

    Measured: hourly and 12 h total drug consumption

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. pain intensity

    Measured: hourly

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2010 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2010 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00849719
Sponsor's protocol ID
TASMC-08-AW-0400-CTIL
Status last verified
Feb 2009
First submitted
17 Feb 2009
Last updated
24 Feb 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

    PubMed 12873949

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing a combination of PCA MO and continuous infusion of MO and PCA MO only in people with Post Operative Pain, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Avi Weinbrum, MD (97236973237, draviw@tasmc.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

demand/delivery ratio for MO and rescue drug (time frame: hourly and 12 h total drug consumption). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00849719, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in