AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal RefluxNCT00852098

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Comparing Division Versus Non-Division of Short Gastric Vessels

A study testing Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels and Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Federal University of São Paulo at 2 sites in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recently, total fundoplication followed by laparoscopic esophageal hiatoplasty has been the most common surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux. Although this procedure is effective, some patients still develop complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastroesophageal Reflux
What is being tested?
Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels and Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2 participants
Where
2 sitesBrazil
Study dates
Nov 1997to May 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • objective gastroesophageal reflux in adults

Who cannot join

  • esophageal motility disorder
  • hard stenosis
  • previous antireflux surgery

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Brazil2 sites
  • Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04023-071

  • State Public Server of São Paulo Hospital (HSPE)

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04025-000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinic Trial of Total Fundoplication and Fundal Mobilization With or Without Division of Short Gastric Vessels: Long-Term Endoscopic Evaluation

Recently, total fundoplication followed by laparoscopic esophageal hiatoplasty has been the most common surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux. Although this procedure is effective, some patients still develop complications. Indeed, dividing the short gastric vessels is claimed by many authors to confer benefit to patients even it could not be proved in other studies. In an attempt to evaluate the role of dividing the short gastric vessels and its long-term impact on the surgical treatment of the gastro-esophageal reflux, the investigators initiated a randomized clinical trial to clarify this important fact. Patients were recruited for this trial and short-term results had been already published in a national journal. The investigators are now registering this study which particularly focuses on the endoscopic outcome evaluated on long-term basis after gastro-esophageal reflux surgical treatment.

Being tested
Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels, Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels
Keywords
Fundoplication, gastroesophageal reflux, gastric vessels, surgery
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vesselsProcedure or surgery

    Also called Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal Reflux,Surgery

    Dividing short gastric vessels

  • Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vesselsProcedure or surgery

    Also called Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal Reflux,Surgery

    non-dividing short gastric vessels

Study groups in NCT00852098
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatordividing short gastric vessels
Receives: Procedure: Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels
2Active comparatornon-dividing short gastric vessels
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate outcomes after Laparoscopic Nissen comparing division and non-division of short gastric vessels.

    Measured: two years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Long-term clinical and endoscopic outcome

    Measured: 8-10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 1997
  3. Primary completionJan 2000
  4. Study completionMay 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00852098
Sponsor's protocol ID
1069/06
Status last verified
Feb 2009
First submitted
25 Feb 2009
Last updated
26 Feb 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Yang H, Watson DI, Lally CJ, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG. Randomized trial of division versus nondivision of the short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 10-year outcomes. Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):38-42. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814a693e.

    PubMed 18156921
  • O'Boyle CJ, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Game PA, Devitt PG. Division of short gastric vessels at laparoscopic nissen fundoplication: a prospective double-blind randomized trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):165-70. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00001.

    PubMed 11807353
  • Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Lally C, Archer S, Bessell JR, Booth M, Cade R, Cullingford G, Devitt PG, Fletcher DR, Hurley J, Kiroff G, Martin CJ, Martin IJ, Nathanson LK, Windsor JA; International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus--Australasian Section. Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1160-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1160.

    PubMed 15545560
  • Farah JF, Grande JC, Goldenberg A, Martinez JC, Lupinacci RA, Matone J. Randomized trial of total fundoplication and fundal mobilization with or without division of short gastric vessels: a short-term clinical evaluation. Acta Cir Bras. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):422-9. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502007000600002.

    PubMed 18235928

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels and Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux, run by Federal University of São Paulo at 2 sites in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate outcomes after Laparoscopic Nissen comparing division and non-division of short gastric vessels. (time frame: two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00852098, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in