AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT00853099

A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 65 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Japanese subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
274 participants
Where
65 sitesJapan
Study dates
Feb 2009to Aug 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for greater than 90 days prior to Baseline.
  • Active ulcerative colitis with a Mayo Score of 6-12 points at Baseline and endoscopy subscore of 2-3 during the Screening Period, despite concurrent treatment with at least one of the following (oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants or both as defined below):
  • Stable oral corticosteroid dose (prednisolone dose of ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent) for at least 14 days prior to Baseline or stable oral corticosteroid dose (prednisolone of 5 to less than 20 mg/day) for at least 40 days prior to Baseline. And/or
  • At least a consecutive 90-day course of azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) prior to Baseline, with a dose of azathioprine ≥ 50 mg/day or 6-MP ≥ 30 mg/day, or a dose that was the highest tolerated by the patient.

Who cannot join

  • History of subtotal colectomy with ileorectostomy or colectomy with ileoanal pouch, Koch pouch, or ileostomy for ulcerative colitis or was planning bowel surgery.
  • Patients with disease limited to the rectum.
  • Indeterminate colitis and/or Crohn's disease.
  • Received any biological therapy (including infliximab) in the past.
  • History of tuberculosis or malignancy.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with positive C. difficile stool assay at Screening.
  • Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.

Trial locations and contacts

65 sites in 1 country.

65 sites in 1 country

Japan65 sites
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47136

    Asahikawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47159

    Chiba

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47183

    Chikushino-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47135

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47182

    Fukuoka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47124

    Hamamatsu

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47130

    Hirakata-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47103

    Hirosaki

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47131

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47178

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47179

    Hiroshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47176

    Izumo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47226

    Kagoshima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47123

    Kanazawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47160

    Kashiwa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47108

    Kawagoe

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47107

    Koshigaya

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47181

    Kurume

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47222

    Kurume

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47223

    Kurume

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47127

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47170

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47171

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47172

    Kyoto

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47134

    Matsuyama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47225

    Miyazaki

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47138

    Morioka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47168

    Nagakute-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47125

    Nagoya

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47126

    Nagoya

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47166

    Nagoya

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47122

    Niigata

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47227

    Nishihara

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47174

    Nishinomiya-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47224

    Ōita

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47177

    Okayama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47228

    Okinawa

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47128

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47129

    Osaka

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47169

    Ōtsu

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47118

    Sagamihara-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47158

    Saitama-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47109

    Sakura

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 15853

    Sapporo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47137

    Sapporo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47104

    Sendai

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47147

    Sendai

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47180

    Susaki-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47133

    Takamatsu

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47173

    Takatsuki-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47106

    Tokorozawa-shi

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47132

    Tokushima

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47110

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47111

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47112

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47116

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47117

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47161

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47164

    Tokyo

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47165

    Toyama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47167

    Toyoake

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47105

    Yamagata

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47175

    Yamatotakada

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47120

    Yokohama

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47121

    Yokohama

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Japanese subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Read the detailed description

Patients who meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of adalimumab at either 160/80 mg at Week 0/2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, 80/40 mg at Week 0/2 and 40 mg eow starting at Week 4 to Week 50, or placebo eow starting at Week 0 to Week 50 under the double-blind condition. At or after Week 8, participants who have inadequate response during the double-blind period can switch to the rescue arm, where participants from the placebo group initially receive adalimumab 160 mg and 80 mg 2 weeks later and those from the adalimumab group receive adalimumab 40 mg initially and 2 weeks later under double-blind conditions. All participants in the rescue arm then receive 40 mg adalimumab eow until Week 50. Participants who complete the 52-week double-blind period receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow starting at Week 52 and continuing until the end of the study. Participants who have an inadequate response or disease flare can dose escalate to 80 mg eow at or after Week 60. Participants who dose escalate to 80 mg eow and continue to have an inadequate response or disease flare are withdrawn from the study.

Being tested
adalimumab, placebo
Keywords
Ulcerative Colitis
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • adalimumabBiological

    Also called ABT-D2E7 Humira

  • placeboDrug

Study groups in NCT00853099
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. From Week 8, participants with an inadequate response could switch to rescue therapy, where they initially received adalimumab 160 mg, 80 mg 2 weeks later, and then 40 mg every other week. Participants who completed the 52-week double-blind period received open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with the possibility to escalate to 80 mg every other week, until drug approval.
Receives: Biological: adalimumab; Drug: placebo
Adalimumab 80 mg/40 mgExperimentalParticipants received adalimumab 80 mg on Day 1, 40 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week from Week 4 to Week 50, via subcutaneous injection. From Week 8, participants with an inadequate response could switch to rescue therapy, where they received adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Participants who completed the 52-week double-blind period received open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with the possibility to escalate to 80 mg every other week, until drug approval.
Receives: Biological: adalimumab
Adalimumab 160 mg/80 mgExperimentalParticipants received adalimumab 160 mg on Day 1, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week from Week 4 to Week 50, via subcutaneous injection. From Week 8, participants with an inadequate response could switch to rescue therapy, where they received adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Participants who completed the 52-week double-blind period received open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week, with the possibility to escalate to 80 mg every other week, until drug approval.
Receives: Biological: adalimumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at 8 Weeks

    Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1. The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores:

    • Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (normal number of stools) to three (5 or more stools than normal);
    • Rectal Bleeding Subscore (RBS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (no blood) to three (blood only passed);
    • Endoscopy Subscore (ESS), based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from zero (normal or inactive disease) to three (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration);
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to three (severe disease).

    The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 8

  2. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at 52 Weeks

    Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1. The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores:

    • Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (normal number of stools) to three (5 or more stools than normal);
    • Rectal Bleeding Subscore (RBS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (no blood) to three (blood only passed);
    • Endoscopy Subscore (ESS), based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from zero (normal or inactive disease) to three (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration);
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to three (severe disease).

    The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 52

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at 8, 32, and 52 Weeks

    Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore > 1. The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores:

    • Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (normal number of stools) to three (5 or more stools than normal);
    • Rectal Bleeding Subscore (RBS), based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (no blood) to three (blood only passed);
    • Endoscopy Subscore (ESS), based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scores from zero (normal or inactive disease) to three (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration);
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to three (severe disease).

    The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Response

    A clinical response was defined as a decrease in Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline PLUS a decrease in the Rectal Bleeding Subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1.

    The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores:

    • Stool Frequency Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (normal number of stools) to three (5 or more stools than normal);
    • Rectal Bleeding Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from zero (no blood) to three (blood only passed);
    • Endoscopy Subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from zero (normal or inactive disease) to three (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration);
    • Physician's Global Assessment subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to three (severe disease).

    The total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  3. Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing

    Mucosal healing was defined as an endoscopy subscore of ≤ 1 and was assessed using flexible sigmoidoscopy performed at Weeks 8, 32, and 52.

    The endoscopy subscore ranges from zero to three as follows:

    0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

    Measured: Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  4. Percentage of Participants With Rectal Bleeding Subscore Indicative of Mild Disease (≤ 1)

    Rectal bleeding was assessed from the participant's diary, taking the worst score from the 3 days prior to each study visit. The rectal bleeding subscore ranges from zero to three, according to the following scale:

    0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, 3 = blood alone passed.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  5. Percentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment Subscore Indicative of Mild Disease (≤ 1)

    The Physician's Global Assessment Subscore acknowledges the three other subscores (Stool Frequency, Rectal Bleeding, and Endoscopy), the participant's daily record of abdominal discomfort and functional assessment, and other observations such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. Possible scores range from zero to three as follows:

    0 = Normal (other subscores are 0), 1 = Mild disease (other subscores are mostly 1), 2 = Moderate disease (other subscores are 1 to 2), 3 = Severe disease (other subscores are 2 to 3).

    Measured: Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  6. Percentage of Participants With Stool Frequency Subscore Indicative of Mild Disease (≤ 1)

    Stool frequency was assessed from the participant's diary, taking the worst score from the 3 days prior to each study visit. The stool frequency subscore ranges from zero to three, according to the following scale:

    0 = Normal number of stools for this participant, 1 = 1-2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3-4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  7. Percentage of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Responders

    An inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire responder was defined as a participant with at least a 16-point increase from Baseline in total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function, and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with the total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 32, and 52

  8. Number of Participants With Adverse Events up to Week 8

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related.

    A serious adverse event is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above.

    For more details on adverse events please see the Adverse Event section below.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events up to Week 52

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related.

    A serious adverse event is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above.

    For more details on adverse events please see the Adverse Event section below.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Adalimumab Treatment Period

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related.

    A serious adverse event is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above.

    For more details on adverse events please see the Adverse Event section below.

    Measured: 221 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
274 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00853099
Sponsor's protocol ID
M10-447
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
27 Feb 2009
Last updated
5 Sep 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 65 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 65 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Nov 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at 8 Weeks (time frame: Week 8). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in