Bone MetastasesPhase 3NCT00858741
Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Single Versus Multiple Fractions.
A Phase 3 study testing single fraction and multiple fractions in people with Bone Metastases and Pain, run by Marilia Medicine School at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether 8 Gy in a single fraction provides equivalent pain and narcotic relief compared to 30 Gy in 10 fractions for patients with painful bone metastases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Metastases, Pain
- What is being tested?
- single fraction and multiple fractions
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1 month.
- Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection. Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
Who cannot join
- The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration.
- This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
- Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone.
- Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Radiation Oncology Department at Marilia Medicine school
Marília, São Paulo, 17501570
About this study
Official title: Phase III Study of Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases Comparing Single to Multiple Fractions.
The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether 8 Gy in a single fraction provides equivalent pain and narcotic relief compared to 30 Gy in 10 fractions for patients with painful bone metastases.
The secondary objectives were to evaluate the frequency, duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.
Read the detailed description
This prospective, phase III, randomized study was conducted by department of radiation oncology at Marilia Medicine School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eligibility requirements included:
Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1months.
Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection.
Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Acceptable studies included plain radiographs, radionuclide bone scans, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging. Other studies were acceptable with the approval of the principal investigator.
Eligible treatment sites were: pelvis, femur, sacrum and/or sacroiliac joints, tibia, cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebral bodies, humerus, fibula, radius ± ulna, clavicle, sternum, scapula and púbis.
Patients had a "Worst Pain Score" of > 5 on a scale of 10 (as scored on the Brief Pain Inventory [BP]: 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain) or if BPI is < 5, had be taking narcotic medications with a daily morphine equivalent dose ≥ 60 mg p.o. Patients receiving systemic therapy were eligible for this study as long as there has been no introduction of any systemic therapy within the 30 days prior to entry into this study.
The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration. This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone. Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
Required information before randomization included history and physical examination, Karnofsky performance status, radiographically documented bone metastases within 8 weeks before randomization, and completed Brief Pain Inventory.
RADIATION THERAPY
Treatment Plan
Arm A: 3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. Arm B: 8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.
Simulation of treatment fields was required prior to the first treatment. Prior to the first treatment, an acceptable simulator and portal film documenting that the treatment site was adequately covered and verified by the treating radiation oncologist.
Treatment was given using megavoltage equipment with Cobalt-60 or 6-Mev photons. The minimum Source-Axis Distance (SAD) was 80 cm. All fields were treated each day. Treatment volume was including the radiographic abnormality with at least a 2 cm margin. Treatment of the entire bone is not required. Anterior and posterior parallel opposed fields were used for lumbar spine, sacrum, pelvis, and extremity sites. Equal weighting was recommended, although unequal weighting was used for the lumbar or sacral spine with a ratio of doses of 1:2 AP:PA. Dose was prescribed at mid thickness at the central axis, or at the center of target volume if unequal weighting is used. The cervical spine was treated with either parallel opposed lateral fields or with a single posterior field. When lateral fields were used, the isocenter should be at mid-thickness, with the dose prescribed to the mid-vertebral body. For a single posterior field, the dose was prescribed at a depth of 5 cm or other depth as determined from a lateral simulator film. When more than one osseous site was included into one treatment field, the treating radiation oncologist used differing field arrangements at her/his discretion, with the fields arranged to provide relatively uniform treatment of the target sites with a minimum of uninvolved normal tissues.
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases, Pain
- Being tested
- single fraction, multiple fractions
- Keywords
- bone metastases from any histological subtype.
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
single fractionRadiation
8 Gy x 1 fraction to 8 Gy total dose in single dose.
multiple fractionsRadiation
3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Gy arm | Experimental | 8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose. Receives: Radiation: single fraction |
| 30 Gy arm | Active comparator | 3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. Receives: Radiation: multiple fractions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain relief
Secondary outcomes (1)
duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2009 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone MetastasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marilia Medicine School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00858741
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FAMEMA - BONE METASTASES
- Status last verified
- Mar 2009
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Study of Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases Comparing Single to Multiple Fractions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00858741
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAMEMA - BONE METASTASES
- Conditions
- Bone Metastases, Pain
- Keywords
- bone metastases from any histological subtype.
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marilia Medicine SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether 8 Gy in a single fraction provides equivalent pain and narcotic relief compared to 30 Gy in 10 fractions for patients with painful bone metastases.
The secondary objectives were to evaluate the frequency, duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.
Detailed description
This prospective, phase III, randomized study was conducted by department of radiation oncology at Marilia Medicine School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eligibility requirements included:
Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1months.
Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection.
Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Acceptable studies included plain radiographs, radionuclide bone scans, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging. Other studies were acceptable with the approval of the principal investigator.
Eligible treatment sites were: pelvis, femur, sacrum and/or sacroiliac joints, tibia, cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebral bodies, humerus, fibula, radius ± ulna, clavicle, sternum, scapula and púbis.
Patients had a "Worst Pain Score" of > 5 on a scale of 10 (as scored on the Brief Pain Inventory [BP]: 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain) or if BPI is < 5, had be taking narcotic medications with a daily morphine equivalent dose ≥ 60 mg p.o. Patients receiving systemic therapy were eligible for this study as long as there has been no introduction of any systemic therapy within the 30 days prior to entry into this study.
The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration. This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone. Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
Required information before randomization included history and physical examination, Karnofsky performance status, radiographically documented bone metastases within 8 weeks before randomization, and completed Brief Pain Inventory.
RADIATION THERAPY
Treatment Plan
Arm A: 3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. Arm B: 8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.
Simulation of treatment fields was required prior to the first treatment. Prior to the first treatment, an acceptable simulator and portal film documenting that the treatment site was adequately covered and verified by the treating radiation oncologist.
Treatment was given using megavoltage equipment with Cobalt-60 or 6-Mev photons. The minimum Source-Axis Distance (SAD) was 80 cm. All fields were treated each day. Treatment volume was including the radiographic abnormality with at least a 2 cm margin. Treatment of the entire bone is not required. Anterior and posterior parallel opposed fields were used for lumbar spine, sacrum, pelvis, and extremity sites. Equal weighting was recommended, although unequal weighting was used for the lumbar or sacral spine with a ratio of doses of 1:2 AP:PA. Dose was prescribed at mid thickness at the central axis, or at the center of target volume if unequal weighting is used. The cervical spine was treated with either parallel opposed lateral fields or with a single posterior field. When lateral fields were used, the isocenter should be at mid-thickness, with the dose prescribed to the mid-vertebral body. For a single posterior field, the dose was prescribed at a depth of 5 cm or other depth as determined from a lateral simulator film. When more than one osseous site was included into one treatment field, the treating radiation oncologist used differing field arrangements at her/his discretion, with the fields arranged to provide relatively uniform treatment of the target sites with a minimum of uninvolved normal tissues.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Gy arm | Experimental | Radiation: single fraction8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose. |
| 30 Gy arm | Active comparator | Radiation: multiple fractions3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1 month.
- Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection. Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration.
- This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
- Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone.
- Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| single fraction8 Gy x 1 fraction to 8 Gy total dose in single dose. | Radiation | 8 Gy arm |
| multiple fractions3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. | Radiation | 30 Gy arm |
Primary outcome
Pain relief
1 secondary outcome
duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2009.
Related trials for Bone Metastases
RecruitingObservational study
Dual Energy CT - a Tool for Delineation of Tumor and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases
Not yet recruiting
Peri-Transplant Gecacitinib in Patients With Myelofibrosis Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Myelofibrosis, Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF)
RecruitingObservational study
Cancer Experience Registry (CER) for Cancer Patients and Caregivers
Neoplasms, Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue, Blood, and Body Fluid Sample Collection From Patients With Hematologic Cancer
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Patients With Bone Metastases
Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Bone, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing single fraction and multiple fractions in people with Bone Metastases and Pain, run by Marilia Medicine School at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain relief. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2009.