AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone MetastasesPhase 3NCT00858741

Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases: Single Versus Multiple Fractions.

A Phase 3 study testing single fraction and multiple fractions in people with Bone Metastases and Pain, run by Marilia Medicine School at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether 8 Gy in a single fraction provides equivalent pain and narcotic relief compared to 30 Gy in 10 fractions for patients with painful bone metastases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bone Metastases, Pain
What is being tested?
single fraction and multiple fractions
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
148 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Start not givento not given
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1 month.
  • Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection. Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization.

Who cannot join

  • The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration.
  • This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
  • Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone.
  • Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Radiation Oncology Department at Marilia Medicine school

    Marília, São Paulo, 17501570

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Phase III Study of Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases Comparing Single to Multiple Fractions.

The aim of the investigators study was to determine whether 8 Gy in a single fraction provides equivalent pain and narcotic relief compared to 30 Gy in 10 fractions for patients with painful bone metastases.

The secondary objectives were to evaluate the frequency, duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, phase III, randomized study was conducted by department of radiation oncology at Marilia Medicine School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Eligibility requirements included:

Age of 18 years or older, histologically proven primary malignancy of any histological type, radiographic evidence of bone metastasis, pain corresponding to the area of bone metastasis, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 40, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 1months.

Histologic diagnosis was established from needle biopsy, bone marrow biopsy, cytology, or a surgical biopsy or resection.

Radiographic evidence of bone metastasis was required and performed within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Acceptable studies included plain radiographs, radionuclide bone scans, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging. Other studies were acceptable with the approval of the principal investigator.

Eligible treatment sites were: pelvis, femur, sacrum and/or sacroiliac joints, tibia, cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebral bodies, humerus, fibula, radius ± ulna, clavicle, sternum, scapula and púbis.

Patients had a "Worst Pain Score" of > 5 on a scale of 10 (as scored on the Brief Pain Inventory [BP]: 0 = no pain; 10 = worst possible pain) or if BPI is < 5, had be taking narcotic medications with a daily morphine equivalent dose ≥ 60 mg p.o. Patients receiving systemic therapy were eligible for this study as long as there has been no introduction of any systemic therapy within the 30 days prior to entry into this study.

The patient was ineligible if the systemic agent commences within the 30 days prior to registration. This includes hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Patients were ineligible if the painful area had received prior radiation therapy or palliative surgery, if there was pathologic fracture or impending fracture of the treatment site, or if there was planned surgical fi xation of the bone. Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression and/or effacement were not eligible.

Required information before randomization included history and physical examination, Karnofsky performance status, radiographically documented bone metastases within 8 weeks before randomization, and completed Brief Pain Inventory.

RADIATION THERAPY

Treatment Plan

Arm A: 3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks. Arm B: 8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.

Simulation of treatment fields was required prior to the first treatment. Prior to the first treatment, an acceptable simulator and portal film documenting that the treatment site was adequately covered and verified by the treating radiation oncologist.

Treatment was given using megavoltage equipment with Cobalt-60 or 6-Mev photons. The minimum Source-Axis Distance (SAD) was 80 cm. All fields were treated each day. Treatment volume was including the radiographic abnormality with at least a 2 cm margin. Treatment of the entire bone is not required. Anterior and posterior parallel opposed fields were used for lumbar spine, sacrum, pelvis, and extremity sites. Equal weighting was recommended, although unequal weighting was used for the lumbar or sacral spine with a ratio of doses of 1:2 AP:PA. Dose was prescribed at mid thickness at the central axis, or at the center of target volume if unequal weighting is used. The cervical spine was treated with either parallel opposed lateral fields or with a single posterior field. When lateral fields were used, the isocenter should be at mid-thickness, with the dose prescribed to the mid-vertebral body. For a single posterior field, the dose was prescribed at a depth of 5 cm or other depth as determined from a lateral simulator film. When more than one osseous site was included into one treatment field, the treating radiation oncologist used differing field arrangements at her/his discretion, with the fields arranged to provide relatively uniform treatment of the target sites with a minimum of uninvolved normal tissues.

Being tested
single fraction, multiple fractions
Keywords
bone metastases from any histological subtype.
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • single fractionRadiation

    8 Gy x 1 fraction to 8 Gy total dose in single dose.

  • multiple fractionsRadiation

    3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.

Study groups in NCT00858741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
8 Gy armExperimental8.0 Gy in 1 fraction to 8.0 Gy total dose.
Receives: Radiation: single fraction
30 Gy armActive comparator3.0 Gy x 10 fractions to 30.0 Gy total dose in two weeks.
Receives: Radiation: multiple fractions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain relief

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. duration of pain relief, narcotic relief, toxicity and the effect on quality of life measures for each of the two treatment arms.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2009 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
148 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00858741
Sponsor's protocol ID
FAMEMA - BONE METASTASES
Status last verified
Mar 2009
First submitted
6 Mar 2009
Last updated
10 Mar 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing single fraction and multiple fractions in people with Bone Metastases and Pain, run by Marilia Medicine School at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain relief. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT00858741 | AzTrials