AzTrials
AzTrials

SCIVA GI QOLNCT00860990

VA Gastrointestinal (GI) Quality of Life Survey

An observational study of SCI, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in reduced bowel function and regularity, leading to a decrease in quality of life for those who are affected. Evidence-based research has indicated that, when surveyed, individuals with SCI express a greater reduction in quality of life derived from their bowel routine than… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
SCI
What is being tested?
Completion of GI quality of life survey
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2007to Apr 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Volunteers will be recruited from the spinal cord injury service/clinic, the primary care service/clinic, the geriatric service/clinic, the chronic kidney service/clinic, and the rehabilitation service/clinic at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center.

Who may be able to join

  • 18+ years of age
  • Able to understand English

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed dementia, severe TBI or other conditions which limit the ability to provide acute information in the judgment of the investigators.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA Medical Center, Bronx

    The Bronx, New York, 10468

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: VA GI Quality of Life Survey

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in reduced bowel function and regularity, leading to a decrease in quality of life for those who are affected. Evidence-based research has indicated that, when surveyed, individuals with SCI express a greater reduction in quality of life derived from their bowel routine than able-bodied subjects. In addition, the extent of reduction in quality of life has a direct relationship with the level of Injury. Those with tetraplegia score worse than those with paraplegia and paraplegics score worse than controls. The development of an adequate quality of life questionnaire is needed to effectively identify the impact of bowel care on quality of life in patients with SCI compared to able-bodied controls. The purpose of this study is to determine the discriminatory ability of the survey for various diagnoses such as SCI, CVA, TBI, chronic back pain, radiculopathy from the Rehabilitation Service and able bodied persons.

Read the detailed description

In an abstract " A Bowel Care Survey to Assess Quality of Life in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury" in Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine in 2006, JP Lirio, et al surveyed 20 subjects (10 controls, 5 para, 5 tetra). The survey consisted of 42 items relating to GI function, bowel program/routine and quality of life. Survey items were weighted across a range of outcomes (e.g., complete continence=0 to frequent incontinence of solid evacuate=5). Total survey scores were compared among the groups by ANOVA with a Scheffe post hoc test. In those with SCI, level of injury (LOI) was converted to a numeric value and the relationship between LOI and total score was determined by simple regression.

The range of scores across the groups was 2 to 111 points. The controls scored significantly lower than those in the Para group who were significantly lower than those in the Tetra group (6 5 vs. 46 38 vs. 92 24, P<0.01, respectively). Within SCI, 43% of the variance of the total score was explained by level of injury. (r2=42.5, P<0.05), which is suggestive for the potential of good content validity of this tool. The authors concluded that the preliminary results of this survey show that persons with greater degrees of neurological impairment also manifest a greater negative impact from bowel care on their QoL. These results are encouraging for being able to develop a sensitive tool that will capture changes in bowel care status after therapeutic intervention that would be expected to influence QoL.

Innovative and potentially efficacious treatments for bowel care are being developed. There is a clinical/investigative need for a valid survey that is sensitive to quality of life (QoL) changes relating to interventions for bowel care in those with spinal cord injury (SCI). This is an ongoing project to develop a self-reported gastrointestinal (GI) survey that measures the impact of bowel function on QoL in individuals with SCI. This research seeks to develop a quality of life questionnaire that can be used to assess bowel function in able bodied individuals as well as spinal cord patients. This tool is essential for measuring change in bowel function due to an intervention or aging, rehabilitation, medications, etc.

Conditions
SCI
Being tested
Completion of GI quality of life survey

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Completion of GI quality of life surveyOther

    Subjects are asked to complete a survey related to bowel care and its effects on various variables related to quality of life.

Study groups in NCT00860990
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1SCI or disabled
Receives: Other: Completion of GI quality of life survey
2Able-bodied
Receives: Other: Completion of GI quality of life survey

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of life relative to bowel function and care

    Measured: 3-6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2010

Why it stopped: Outcome measures are included in another, similar study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00860990
Sponsor's protocol ID
B4162C-4
Other IDs
2380-07-042
Acronym
VA GI QOL
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
6 Mar 2009
Last updated
26 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of SCI, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Outcome measures are included in another, similar study.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of life relative to bowel function and care (time frame: 3-6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in