OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00863304
Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)
A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 95 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 849 participants
- Where
- 95 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2009to 16 Aug 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2
Who cannot join
- pregnancy or intent to become pregnant
- BMI greater than 39
- other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease
Trial locations and contacts
95 sites in 1 country.
95 sites in 1 country
United States95 sites
Commonwealth Orthopedics & Rehabilitation , P.C.
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
IntegraTrials, LLC
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
Virginia Hospital Center
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
South Austin Orthopedics
Austin, Texas, 78745
Tekton Research Inc. - Research Office
Austin, Texas, 78746
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Gulf Coast Research, LLC
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Greystone Medical Research, LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
HeartCare
Bradenton, Florida, 34202
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
Miray Medical Center
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
Peak Anesthesia and Pain Management
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
eStudySite
Chula Vista, California, 91911
The Family Healthcare Center, PA
Clinton, South Carolina, 29325
Southern Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Providence Health Partners - Center for Clinical Research
Dayton, Ohio, 45439
Denver Internal Medicine Group
Denver, Colorado, 80209
Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, 80209
In Vivo Clinical Research, Inc
Doral, Florida, 33166
Orthopedic Physicians of Colorado, PC
Englewood, California, 80113
University Parks Hematology/Oncology
Englewood, California, 80113
Colorado Hematology
Englewood, Colorado, 80110
Colorado Orthopedic Consultants, PC
Englewood, Colorado, 80110
American Clinical Research, LLC
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
S & W Clinical Research
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33306
Centre for Rheumatology, Immunology and Arthritis
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Edinger Medical Group and Research Center
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Valley Research
Fresno, California, 93720
Texas Orthopedic Specialists
Grapevine, Texas, 76051
Diagnositc Center of Medicine
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers
Hollywood, Maryland, 20636
Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic Research
Houston, Texas, 77030
Southwest Orthopedic Group
Houston, Texas, 77030
The Neurology Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Saadat Ansari, MD
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Lakewood Orthopedic Medical & Surgical Group
Lakewood, California, 90712
High Desert Medical Group Research for Life
Lancaster, California, 93534
Independent Clinical Researchers
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
Wolfson Medical Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
Clinical Research Consortium
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Rheumatology Consultants of Delaware
Lewes, Delaware, 19958
Pasadena Pharmacy
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Premiere Clinical Research, LLC
Long Beach, California, 90807
Miracle Mile Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Samaritan Center for Medical Research
Los Gatos, California, 95032
L-Marc Research Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213
Gill Orthopedic Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Robert R. King, M.D., PA
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / Central Arizona Medical Associates, PC
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Novara Clinical Research
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
Mesa, Arizona, 85213
Kendall South Medical Center, Inc
Miami, Florida, 33175
Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Consultants
Middletown, Ohio, 45042
Signal Point Clinical Research Center, LLC
Middletown, Ohio, 45042
Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Coastal Carolina Research Center
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
New York, New York, 10004
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Norwalk Medical Group
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851
Cor Clinical Research, LLC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Sunshine Research Center
Opa-locka, Florida, 33054
Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Central Phoenix Medical - Clinical Research Advantage
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Planters Clinic
Port Gibson, Mississippi, 39150
Del Carmen Medical Center
Reseda, California, 91335
HypotheTest, LLC
Roanoke, Virginia, 24018
The Carolina Center for Rheumatology and Arthritis Care, PA
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109
J. Lewis Research, Incorporated/Foothill Family Clinic South
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121
Probe Clinical Research, Corp.
Santa Ana, California, 92701
HeartCare Research
Sarasota, Florida, 34232
Empirical Clinical Trials, LLC
Selah, Washington, 98942
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Arthritis Northwest, PLLC
Spokane, Washington, 99204-2336
St. John's Medical Research Institute, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
AZ Clinical Research
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478
Spring Clinical Research
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478
Sugar Land Med-Ped, P.A.
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Tampa Medical Group PA
Tampa, Florida, 33614
SPRI Bronx LLC
The Bronx, New York, 10454
Lawrence P.McAdam, MD, A Medical Corporation
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Paradigm Clinical, Inc
Tucson, Arizona, 85705
Westlake Medical Center
Westlake Village, California, 91361
Grayline Clinical Drug Trials
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76309
Physicians' Research, Inc
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
PrimeCare of Southeastern Ohio, Inc
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO AND NAPROXEN CONTROLLED MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE
Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg, naproxen, placebo
- Keywords
- monoclonal antibody RN624 PF-04383119 nerve growth factor anti-nerve growth factor OA pain arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tanezumab 10 mgBiological
tanezumab 10 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8
tanezumab 5 mgBiological
tanezumab 5 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8
naproxenDrug
naproxen 1000 mg daily for 16 weeks
placeboOther
placebo to match tanezumab and naproxen dosing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: tanezumab 10 mg |
| 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: tanezumab 5 mg |
| 3 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: naproxen |
| 4 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (32)
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 percent [%]; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants assessed their average daily pain score in the index hip/knee using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. A weekly mean was calculated using the daily index hip/knee pain scores within each specified study week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [worst stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse response.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher score indicated a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). These 8 domains are also summarized as 2 summary scores: mental component aggregate (MCA) and physical component aggregate (PCA). Total score range for each of the 2 summary scores =0 (minimum level of functioning) to 100 (maximum level of functioning). Higher (8 domains and 2 summary) scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during the specified study week were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days participants used any of the rescue medication, during the specified week were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified week were summarized.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Laboratory values: hematology (hemoglobin; hematocrit; red blood cell count [less than {<}0.8* lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5* LLN,>1.75* upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell count<0.6* LLN, >1.5* ULN, liver function (total bilirubin>1.5* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0* ULN, total protein; albumin<0.8* LLN; >1.2* ULN), renal function (blood urea nitrogen; creatinine>1.3* ULN, uric acid>1.2* ULN), lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN), electrolytes (sodium<0.95* LLN, >1.05* ULN; potassium; chloride; calcium; magnesium; phosphate; bicarbonate<0.9* LLN, >1.1* ULN), chemistry (glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN), urinalysis (specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8, glucose; protein; blood; ketones; urobilinogen; bilirubin; nitrite, esterase>=1).
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as treatment related adverse events were presented. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality and 13 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 2 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 122 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Participants who developed anti-tanezumab antibodies after treatment were evaluated for the presence of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Number of participants with positive ADA were summarized for reporting groups: Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo and Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo. Results with titer value >= 4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies were counted as positive.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, and 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, heart, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, breasts, abdomen, musculoskeletal, neck, extremities, thyroid and others. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements
Vital signs included the assessment of the following: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs (based on the investigator's judgment) considered as adverse events were reported.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jun 2009
- Primary completion27 Apr 2010
- Study completion16 Aug 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 849 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00863304
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091018
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 17 May 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
PubMed 37460782Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30936738Ekman EF, Gimbel JS, Bello AE, Smith MD, Keller DS, Annis KM, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tanezumab for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: 2 randomized controlled trials versus naproxen. J Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;41(11):2249-59. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131294. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PubMed 25274899
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO AND NAPROXEN CONTROLLED MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00863304
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091018
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- monoclonal antibody RN624 PF-04383119 nerve growth factor anti-nerve growth factor OA pain arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 849 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Aug 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 May 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Biological: tanezumab 10 mg |
| 2 | Experimental | Biological: tanezumab 5 mg |
| 3 | Active comparator | Drug: naproxen |
| 4 | Placebo comparator | Other: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- pregnancy or intent to become pregnant
- BMI greater than 39
- other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tanezumab 10 mgtanezumab 10 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8 | Biological | 1 |
| tanezumab 5 mgtanezumab 5 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8 | Biological | 2 |
| naproxennaproxen 1000 mg daily for 16 weeks | Drug | 3 |
| placeboplacebo to match tanezumab and naproxen dosing | Other | 4 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
32 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, and 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 May 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37460782Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30936738Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25274899Ekman EF, Gimbel JS, Bello AE, Smith MD, Keller DS, Annis KM, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tanezumab for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: 2 randomized controlled trials versus naproxen. J Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;41(11):2249-59. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131294. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
95 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab 10 mg, tanezumab 5 mg and naproxen in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 95 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 95 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00863304, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2021.