OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00864097
Analgesic Efficacy And Safety of Tanezumab Added On To Diclofenac SR In Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip
A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab and diclofenac in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 77 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- tanezumab and diclofenac
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 607 participants
- Where
- 77 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Aug 2009to 24 Nov 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip according to ACR criteria with Kellgren-Lawrence X-ray grade equal to, or greater than, 2.
- Patients must be experiencing some benefit from their current stable dose regimen of oral diclofenac 150 mg/day and be tolerating their diclofenac regimen.
- Pain and function levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline.
- Willing to discontinue all non-study pain medications throughout the study except as permitted per protocol.
- Willing and able to comply with lifestyle guidelines, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women.
- BMI greater than 39.
- History of other disease that may involve index knee or hip including inflammatory joint diseases, chrystalline disease (gout or pseudogout), endocrinopathies, metabolic joint diseases, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), joint infections, neuropathic disorders, avascular necrosis, Paget's disease or tumors.
- Fibromyalgia, regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression with radiculopathy or other moderate to severe pain that may confound assessments or self-evaluation of the pain associated with OA.
- Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease within 6 months prior to screening.
- Diagnosis or TIA within 6 months prior to screening or diagnosis of stroke with residual deficits that would preclude completion of required study activities.
Show all 10Show fewer
- History, diagnosis , signs or symptoms of clinically significant neurological and/or psychiatric disease/disorder.
- At Screening: uncontrolled hypertension, hemoglobin A1c greater than or equal to 10%, ALT or AST greater than or equal to 3X upper limit of normal, creatinine exceeding 150 micro-mol/L in men or 133 micro-mol/L in women.
- Patients on warfarin or other coumadin anticoagulant therapy and/or lithium therapy within 30 days prior to Screening.
- Known hypersensitivity to NSAIDs (eg, diclofenac), cyclooxygenase inhibitors or paracetamol (acetaminophen).
Trial locations and contacts
77 sites in 10 countries.
77 sites in 10 countries
Germany21 sites
Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Klinische Forschung Berlin-Buch GmbH
Berlin, 13125
Apotheke
Berlin, 13353
Herz Apotheke
Bochum, 44787
Synexus ClinPharm GmbH
Bochum, 44787
Viereck-Apotheke
Buch, 13125
Synexus ClinParm GmbH
Dresden, 01067
Apotheke im Arztehaus Mickten
Dresden, 01127
Schiller Apotheke & Stadt Apotheke
Göppingen, 73033
Schmerz- und Palliativzentrum Goeppingen
Göppingen, 73033
Falken Apotheke Hoheluft
Hamburg, 20253
Klinische Forschung Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, 20253
Klinische Forschung Hannover - Mitte GmbH
Hanover, 30159
Loewen-Apotheke
Hanover, 30159
Synexus ClinPharm GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
Arkana Apotheke OHG
Leipzig, 04315
Synexus ClinPharm GmbH
Magdeburg, 39104
Apotheke im MSZ
Magdeburg, 39112
Apotheke des Ernst von Bergmann Klinikums
Potsdam, 14467
Synexus ClinParm GmbH
Potsdam, 14467
Kirchsteig Apotheke
Potsdam, 14480
Ukraine14 sites
Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
Chernivtsi, 58000
Road Clinical Hospital at Dnipropetrovsk station, Department of Rheumatology
Dnipropetrovsk, 49008
Institute of Urgent and Recovery Surgery named after V.K. Gusaka AMS Ukraine
Donetsk, 83045
Central City Clinical Hospital#1, Department of Therapy,
Donetsk, 83114
Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
City Clinical Hospital #8, Department of reumatology,
Kharkiv, 61176
State Institution "Institute of Gerontology AMS of Ukraine"
Kiev, 04114
Oleksandrivska Clinical Hospital in Kyiv-Department of Rheumatology # 1
Kyiv, 01023
Kyiv Central Basin Clinical Hospital, Department of cardiology,
Kyiv, 04053
4th City Communal Clinical Hospital, Department of Rheumatology,
Lviv, 79011
City communal clinical hospital #5, Dept. of Therapy, Danylo Galytskiy Lviv National Med. University
Lviv, 79013
Communal Institution Ternopil regional council, "Ternopil Regional Clinical Hospital"
Ternopil, 46001
Vinnytsya regional clinical hospital named after M.I. Pyrogova
Vinnytsia, 21018
Communal institution "City Hospital #7", Department of Therapy,
Zaporizhzhya, 69118
Romania8 sites
Clinical Emergency Military Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila"
Bucharest, 010225
Duo Medical srl
Bucharest, 010584
Medical Center "SANA"
Bucharest, 011025
Clinical Hospital "Sf. Maria"
Bucharest, 011172
Center of Rheumatology "Dr Ion Stoia"
Bucharest, 020985
Clinical Emergency County Hospital Constanta
Constanța, 900591
County Emergency Clinic Hospital "Sf. Apostol Andrei"
Galati, 800578
Municipal Hospital No. 1 "Schuller"
Ploieşti, Prahova, 100337
Russia8 sites
Center polyclinic of Federal State Institution
Arkhangelsk, 163000
State Healthcare Institution of Moscow city "City Clinical Hospital #15 n.a. O. M. Filatov"
Moscow, 111539
Chair of Hospital Therapy of Ryazan State Medical University
Ryazan, 390026
St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Hospital #25 City Rheumatology Center"
Saint Petersburg, 190068
State Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education
Saint Petersburg, 191015
Institution of Russian Academy of Sciences "St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital of RAS"
Saint Petersburg, 194017
St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Outpatient Clinical #51"
Saint Petersburg, 196211
St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Pokrovskaya Hospital"
Saint Petersburg, 199106
Spain7 sites
Hospital de Basurto
Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013
Hospital Comarcal de Elda
Elda Alicante, 03600
Hospital Universitario Getafe
Getafe-Madrid, 28905
Hospital G. U. Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Centro Salud Petrer 1
Petrel, Alicante, 03610
Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Esperanza
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruna, 15705
Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Austria5 sites
LKH-Medizinische Universitatsklinik Graz
Graz, A-8036
Nuhr Zentrum
Senftenberg, 3541
ClinPharm International GmbH
Vienna, A-1090
Medizinische Universitaet Wien/AKH
Vienna, A-1090
Rheuma Zentrum Favoriten
Vienna, A-1100
Poland5 sites
"Centrum Medyczne MEDENS S.C. Niepubliczny Zaklad
Chełm Śląski, 41-403
Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.
Krakow, 31-510
Centrum Medyczne OSTEOMED Sp. z o. o.
Warsaw, 02-256
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
Wroclaw, 50-088
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "POLIMEDICA"
Zgierz, 95-100
Sweden4 sites
Me3plus AB
Gothenburg, 400 14
Me3plus AB
Gothenburg, 412 63
Center for Lakemedelsstudier
Malmö, 211 52
Medicinskt Centrum
Norrköping, 602 32
United Kingdom3 sites
Barnsley Hospital NHS Trust
Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 2EP
Department of Rheumatology
Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ
Wrightington Hospital
Wigan, WN6 9EP
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED, MULTI CENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB ADDED ON TO DICLOFENAC SR IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP
The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy.
Read the detailed description
This study was terminated on 16 Nov 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- tanezumab, diclofenac, IV placebo
- Keywords
- Arthritis monoclonal antibody nerve growth factor (NGF) anti-NGF tanezumab PF-04383119 RN-624 OA
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tanezumabBiological
IV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)
diclofenacDrug
Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks
tanezumabBiological
IV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)
diclofenacDrug
Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks
tanezumabBiological
IV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)
diclofenacDrug
Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks
diclofenacDrug
Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks
IV placeboOther
IV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 10 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | IV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac |
| Tanezumab 5 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | IV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | IV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac |
| IV placebo + diclofenac | Placebo comparator | IV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) Receives: Drug: diclofenac; Other: IV placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Week 16
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (20)
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response; LOCF
OMERACT-OARSI responder: participant has >=50 percent (%) change and >=2 absolute change from Baseline in either WOMAC pain or physical function subscale scores or at least 2 of the following being true: >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in WOMAC pain subscale; >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in the WOMAC physical function subscale; >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain and physical function score: 0 to 10 with higher score = worse response. PGA score: 1 = very good and 5 = very poor.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Greater percentage reduction indicates greater improvement. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline to Weeks 16 and 24 were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score; LOCF
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Greater percentage reduction indicates greater improvement. Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC pain intensity of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 32 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC pain subscale and are reported here.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; LOCF
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition. A decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value indicated improvement.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition. A decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Participants were asked to assess index joint (knee/hip) pain during the past 24 hours on an 0-10 point integer scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline score was calculated as the mean of the scores in the index joint over the 3 days days in the initial pain assessment period and a weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint within each study week. The change from Baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score, where negative change indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), with higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Negative change indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
WOMAC Index: self-administered, disease-specific 24 item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. WOMAC average score is the mean of the WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse response. Greater reduction in WOMAC average score indicated greater improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Participants answered the question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Where 0 is the best response and negative change indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Participants answered the question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded by using an 11-point scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Where 0 is the best response and negative change indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 24
SF-36v2 was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The total score and the score for a section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100. Higher scores reflected better participant status and positive change indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Scores at Week 12 and 24
SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and wellbeing (physical and social functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each aspect were scaled 0-100. Higher scores reflect better participant status and positive change indicated an improvement. For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale=(observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States [US] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score [better functioning])/lower (in case of negative z-score [worse functioning]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index Score at Week 24
EQ-5D was a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme dysfunction) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a visual analog scale with score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). EQ-5D summary index was obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score was interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Negative change from baseline represented worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Individual Health State Profile at Week 24
EQ-5D was a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme dysfunction) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a visual analog scale with score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Baseline EQ-5D individual health state profile was determined as number of participants "no dysfunction, moderate or some dysfunction and extreme dysfunction" and change from baseline in EQ-5D individual health state profile was determined as number of participants "improved, no change or worsened".
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Number of participants who discontinued due to lack of efficacy were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to end of study (Week 32)
Time to Discontinuation (TTD) Due to Lack of Efficacy
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16 and 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.
Measured: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose (up to Week 32)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study start11 Aug 2009
- Primary completion16 Nov 2010
- Study completion24 Nov 2010
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 607 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00864097
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091017
- Other IDs
- 2009-009318-41, P3 6 MO OA HIP/KNEE DICLOFENAC, 2009
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30936738Hochberg MC, Tive LA, Abramson SB, Vignon E, Verburg KM, West CR, Smith MD, Hungerford DS. When Is Osteonecrosis Not Osteonecrosis?: Adjudication of Reported Serious Adverse Joint Events in the Tanezumab Clinical Development Program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):382-91. doi: 10.1002/art.39492.
PubMed 26554876Balanescu AR, Feist E, Wolfram G, Davignon I, Smith MD, Brown MT, West CR. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac sustained release in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1665-72. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203164. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
PubMed 23852695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED, MULTI CENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB ADDED ON TO DICLOFENAC SR IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00864097
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091017
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Arthritis monoclonal antibody nerve growth factor (NGF) anti-NGF tanezumab PF-04383119 RN-624 OA
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 607 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Aug 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy.
Detailed description
This study was terminated on 16 Nov 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 10 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | Biological: tanezumab, Drug: diclofenacIV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) |
| Tanezumab 5 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | Biological: tanezumab, Drug: diclofenacIV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg + diclofenac | Experimental | Biological: tanezumab, Drug: diclofenacIV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) |
| IV placebo + diclofenac | Placebo comparator | Drug: diclofenac, Other: IV placeboIV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip according to ACR criteria with Kellgren-Lawrence X-ray grade equal to, or greater than, 2.
- Patients must be experiencing some benefit from their current stable dose regimen of oral diclofenac 150 mg/day and be tolerating their diclofenac regimen.
- Pain and function levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline.
- Willing to discontinue all non-study pain medications throughout the study except as permitted per protocol.
- Willing and able to comply with lifestyle guidelines, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pregnant women.
- BMI greater than 39.
- History of other disease that may involve index knee or hip including inflammatory joint diseases, chrystalline disease (gout or pseudogout), endocrinopathies, metabolic joint diseases, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), joint infections, neuropathic disorders, avascular necrosis, Paget's disease or tumors.
- Fibromyalgia, regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression with radiculopathy or other moderate to severe pain that may confound assessments or self-evaluation of the pain associated with OA.
- Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease within 6 months prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tanezumabIV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) | Biological | Tanezumab 10 mg + diclofenac |
| diclofenacOral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks | Drug | Tanezumab 10 mg + diclofenac |
| tanezumabIV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) | Biological | Tanezumab 5 mg + diclofenac |
| diclofenacOral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks | Drug | Tanezumab 5 mg + diclofenac |
| tanezumabIV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) | Biological | Tanezumab 2.5 mg + diclofenac |
| diclofenacOral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks | Drug | Tanezumab 2.5 mg + diclofenac |
| diclofenacOral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks | Drug | IV placebo + diclofenac |
| IV placeboIV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16) | Other | IV placebo + diclofenac |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition.
20 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response; LOCF
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score; LOCF
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; LOCF
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and 24
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Scores at Week 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Individual Health State Profile at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (Week 32)
Time to Discontinuation (TTD) Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16 and 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose (up to Week 32)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30936738Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26554876Hochberg MC, Tive LA, Abramson SB, Vignon E, Verburg KM, West CR, Smith MD, Hungerford DS. When Is Osteonecrosis Not Osteonecrosis?: Adjudication of Reported Serious Adverse Joint Events in the Tanezumab Clinical Development Program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):382-91. doi: 10.1002/art.39492.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23852695Balanescu AR, Feist E, Wolfram G, Davignon I, Smith MD, Brown MT, West CR. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac sustained release in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1665-72. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203164. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
77 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab and diclofenac in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 77 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 77 sites in Germany, Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00864097, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2021.