Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3GETGOAL-L-ASIANCT00866658
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Lixisenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes for Glycemic Control and Safety Evaluation, on Top of Basal Insulin +/- Sulfonylurea (GETGOAL-L-ASIA)
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Pen auto-injector and Sulfonylurea in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Sanofi at 4 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to basal insulin with or without sulfonylurea, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Pen auto-injector and Sulfonylurea
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 311 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year at the time of the screening visit, insufficiently controlled with basal insulin with or without sulfonylurea
Who cannot join
- HbA1c less than (<) 7 percent (%) or greater than (>) 10% at screening
- At the time of screening age <legal age of majority
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Treatment with basal insulin for less than 3 months prior to screening or insulin regimen changed during the last 3 months prior to screening
- Basal insulin dose at screening <10 units/day and/or during the last 2 months dose not stable (+/- 20%)
Show all 29Show fewer
- Sulfonylurea not at a stable (unchanged) dose for at least 3 months prior to screening
- FPG at screening >250 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (>13.9 millimole/liter [mmol/L])
- History of hypoglycemia unawareness
- Weight change of more than 5 kilogram (kg) during the 3 months preceding the screening visit
- History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, inflammatory bowel disease
- History of metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis within 1 year prior to screening
- Hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, receipt of blood or plasma products within 3 months prior to the time of screening
- Within the last 6 months prior to screening: history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization
- Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening
- Cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine disease, active malignant tumor or other major systemic disease or patients with short life expectancy making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult, history or presence of clinically significant diabetic retinopathy, history or presence of macular edema likely to require laser treatment within the study period
- Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure >180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or >95 mmHg, respectively
- Laboratory findings at the time of screening: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase: >2 times upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range; amylase and/or lipase: >3 times ULN; total bilirubin: >1.5 times ULN (except in case of Gilbert's syndrome); hemoglobin <11 gram/deciliter and/or neutrophils <1500 per cubic millimeter (mm^3) and/or platelets <100 000/mm^3; positive test for Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody and positive serum pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, or vital signs at the time of screening that, in the judgment of the investigator or any sub-investigator, precludes safe completion of the study or constrains efficacy assessment
- Patients who are considered by the investigator as inappropriate for this study for any reason (for example, impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements, such as scheduled visits, being able to do self-injections, likelihood of requiring treatment during the screening phase and treatment phase with drugs not permitted by the clinical study protocol)
- Patient was an investigator or any sub-investigator, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol
- Use of other oral or injectable antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agents other than sulfonylurea or basal insulin (for example, metformin, alpha glucosidase inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, rimonabant, exenatide, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, fast acting insulin for 1 week or more etc.) within 3 months prior to the time of screening
- Use of systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical application or inhaled forms) for 1 week or more within 3 months prior to the time of screening
- Use of any investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening
- Participation in any previous study with lixisenatide
- End-stage renal disease defined by a serum creatinine clearance of <15 milliliter/minute (mL/min) (calculated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula) and/or patients on dialysis
- Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including, but not limited to gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment, within 6 months prior to the time of screening
- Allergic reaction to any glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist in the past (for example, exenatide, liraglutide) or to metacresol
- Additional exclusion criteria at the end of the run-in phase: informed consent withdrawal; lack of compliance during the single-blind placebo run-in phase (>2 injections missed); and patient with any adverse event which could have precludes the inclusion in the study, as assessed by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 4 countries.
4 sites in 4 countries
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With a 24-Week Treatment Period Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Basal Insulin With or Without Sulfonylurea
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to basal insulin with or without sulfonylurea, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment.
The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide, when added to basal insulin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction at Week 24.
The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on body weight, 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) after standardized meal challenge test, percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than 7 percent (%), percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), change in 7-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles, change in daily basal insulin and total insulin doses; to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-lixisenatide antibody development.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Placebo, Pen auto-injector, Sulfonylurea, Basal Insulin
- Keywords
- hyperglycemia, GLP-1, sulfonylurea, insulin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hyperglycemia, Insulin Resistance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Drug
Self-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast.
PlaceboDrug
Self-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast.
Pen auto-injectorDevice
Also called OptiClik®
SulfonylureaDrug
Sulfonylurea if given, to be continued at a stable dose.
Basal InsulinDrug
To be continued at a stable dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide | Experimental | 2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. Receives: Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010); Device: Pen auto-injector; Drug: Sulfonylurea; Drug: Basal Insulin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo: 10 mcg QD for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Device: Pen auto-injector; Drug: Sulfonylurea; Drug: Basal Insulin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24
The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Average 7-Point Self Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile at Week 24
Patients recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime once in a week and the average value for the 7-time points was calculated. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Screening in Total Insulin Dose at Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting screening value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Screening, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-Week Period
Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC10887
- Acronym
- GETGOAL-L-ASIA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Seino Y, Min KW, Niemoeller E, Takami A; EFC10887 GETGOAL-L Asia Study Investigators. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on basal insulin with or without a sulfonylurea (GetGoal-L-Asia). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Oct;14(10):910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01618.x. Epub 2012 May 30.
PubMed 22564709Davidson JA, Stager W, Paranjape S, Berria R, Leiter LA. Achieving postprandial glucose control with lixisenatide improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jan 14;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0088-5. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 31956422Seino Y, Ikeda Y, Niemoeller E, Watanabe D, Takagi H, Yabe D, Inagaki N. Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled with Basal Insulin+/-Sulfonylurea: A Subanalysis of the GetGoal-L-Asia Study. Horm Metab Res. 2015 Nov;47(12):895-900. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549875. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PubMed 26039935
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With a 24-Week Treatment Period Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Basal Insulin With or Without Sulfonylurea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GETGOAL-L-ASIA / EFC10887
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- hyperglycemia, GLP-1, sulfonylurea, insulin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 311 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to basal insulin with or without sulfonylurea, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment.
The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide, when added to basal insulin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction at Week 24.
The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on body weight, 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) after standardized meal challenge test, percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than 7 percent (%), percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), change in 7-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles, change in daily basal insulin and total insulin doses; to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-lixisenatide antibody development.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide | Experimental | Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Device: Pen auto-injector, Drug: Sulfonylurea, Drug: Basal Insulin2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Device: Pen auto-injector, Drug: Sulfonylurea, Drug: Basal Insulin2-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo: 10 mcg QD for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year at the time of the screening visit, insufficiently controlled with basal insulin with or without sulfonylurea
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- HbA1c less than (<) 7 percent (%) or greater than (>) 10% at screening
- At the time of screening age <legal age of majority
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Treatment with basal insulin for less than 3 months prior to screening or insulin regimen changed during the last 3 months prior to screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Self-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast. | Drug | Lixisenatide |
| PlaceboSelf-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast. | Drug | Placebo |
| Pen auto-injectorAlso: OptiClik® | Device | Lixisenatide, Placebo |
| SulfonylureaSulfonylurea if given, to be continued at a stable dose. | Drug | Lixisenatide, Placebo |
| Basal InsulinTo be continued at a stable dose. | Drug | Lixisenatide, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.
8 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Average 7-Point Self Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Screening in Total Insulin Dose at Week 24
Time frame: Screening, Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-Week Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22564709Seino Y, Min KW, Niemoeller E, Takami A; EFC10887 GETGOAL-L Asia Study Investigators. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on basal insulin with or without a sulfonylurea (GetGoal-L-Asia). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Oct;14(10):910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01618.x. Epub 2012 May 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31956422Davidson JA, Stager W, Paranjape S, Berria R, Leiter LA. Achieving postprandial glucose control with lixisenatide improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jan 14;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0088-5. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26039935Seino Y, Ikeda Y, Niemoeller E, Watanabe D, Takagi H, Yabe D, Inagaki N. Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled with Basal Insulin+/-Sulfonylurea: A Subanalysis of the GetGoal-L-Asia Study. Horm Metab Res. 2015 Nov;47(12):895-900. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549875. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
4 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lixisenatide (AVE0010), Pen auto-injector and Sulfonylurea in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Sanofi at 4 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Japan, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00866658, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.