Bladder CancerPhase 3NCT00867347
Radiation Therapy or Surgery in Treating Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing therapeutic conventional surgery and radiation therapy in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- therapeutic conventional surgery and radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Apr 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder
- Clinical stage T2-T3, N0, M0
- No widespread carcinoma in situ (CIS) or CIS remote from muscle invasive tumor
- No adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), small cell carcinoma, or other variant histology
- N.B. squamoid differentiation or mixed TCC/SCC allowed
- No simultaneous upper tract, urethral, or prostatic urethral TCC
- Direct prostatic urethral extension from bladder primary allowed if not involving prostatic stroma
- Currently receiving 3 courses of gemcitabine hydrochloride-cisplatin or other protocol approved neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen AND willing and fit to receive a 4th course according to study protocol
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0-1
- Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL
- WBC > 3,000/mm³
- Platelet count > 150,000/mm³
- Bilirubin < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST < 1.5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase < 1.5 times ULN
- Not pregnant
- Fit for radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy
- No prior malignancy within the past 5 years except superficial TCC or CIS
- No untreated hydronephrosis
- Patients with hydronephrosis are eligible if the kidney/ureter has been stented or nephrostomy has been inserted and renal function has been maintained
- No contraindication to radical radiotherapy (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, radiosensitivity syndrome, or severe diverticular disease)
- No bilateral total hip replacements
- No significant comorbid medical conditions that would interfere with administration of any protocol treatment
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior pelvic radiotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Institute of Cancer Research - Sutton
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
About this study
Official title: Randomised Trial of Selective Bladder Preservation Against Radical Excision (Cystectomy) in Muscle Invasive T2/T3 Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder - Feasibility Study
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine the feasibility and patient acceptability of radical cystectomy vs selective bladder preservation (SBP) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
- To determine compliance rates of patients with their assigned treatments.
- To determine if bladder preservation is equivalent to radical cystectomy, in terms of overall survival, in responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Secondary
- To compare the overall survival of patients receiving SBP vs radical cystectomy.
- To determine the rate of salvage cystectomy in patients undergoing bladder preservation.
- To determine and compare the toxicity of treatment in both arms.
- To determine and compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare locoregional progression-free and metastasis-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to cancer center and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients are assessed after completion of 3 courses of pre-study neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with poor response (≥ pT2, residual pT2, macroscopic invasive tumor) undergo immediate radical cystectomy (within 6 weeks fo completing chemotherapy). Patients* with responsive disease (≤ pT1 tumor or macroscopically normal bladder) proceed to course 4 of chemotherapy (on-study) followed by treatment according to randomization arm.
NOTE: *Patients with a clear bladder or those who are unsure of their histological results prior to course 4 also proceed to chemotherapy.
- Course 4 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on day 1.
- Arm I (radical cystectomy): Patients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy, between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy.
- Arm II (selective bladder preservation): Patients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks.
Health-related quality of life is assessed periodically.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- therapeutic conventional surgery, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, stage II bladder cancer, stage III bladder cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
therapeutic conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
Patients undergo radical cystectomy
radiation therapyRadiation
Patients undergo radiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Active comparator | Patients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy,
between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy. Receives: Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery |
| Arm II | Experimental | Patients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients randomized over 3 years
Proportion of patients undergoing selective bladder preservation
Proportion of patients undergoing radical cystectomy
Overall survival
Secondary outcomes (5)
Compliance with randomized treatment
Rate of salvage cystectomy after selective bladder preservation
Toxicity as assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Quality of life as assessed by the QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire
Locoregional progression-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionApr 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institute of Cancer Research, United KingdomThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert A. Huddart, MD, Principal investigator, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00867347
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000633526
- Other IDs
- ICR-SPARE, ISRCTN61126465, EU-20907, ICR-CTSU/2006/10002
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011 Mar 15;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-78.
PubMed 21406089Huddart RA, Birtle A, Maynard L, Beresford M, Blazeby J, Donovan J, Kelly JD, Kirkbank T, McLaren DB, Mead G, Moynihan C, Persad R, Scrase C, Lewis R, Hall E. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of SPARE - a randomised feasibility study of selective bladder preservation versus radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):639-650. doi: 10.1111/bju.13900. Epub 2017 May 29.
PubMed 28453896
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Trial of Selective Bladder Preservation Against Radical Excision (Cystectomy) in Muscle Invasive T2/T3 Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder - Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00867347
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000633526
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Keywords
- transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, stage II bladder cancer, stage III bladder cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Cancer Research, United KingdomUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective than surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine the feasibility and patient acceptability of radical cystectomy vs selective bladder preservation (SBP) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
- To determine compliance rates of patients with their assigned treatments.
- To determine if bladder preservation is equivalent to radical cystectomy, in terms of overall survival, in responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Secondary
- To compare the overall survival of patients receiving SBP vs radical cystectomy.
- To determine the rate of salvage cystectomy in patients undergoing bladder preservation.
- To determine and compare the toxicity of treatment in both arms.
- To determine and compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare locoregional progression-free and metastasis-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to cancer center and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients are assessed after completion of 3 courses of pre-study neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with poor response (≥ pT2, residual pT2, macroscopic invasive tumor) undergo immediate radical cystectomy (within 6 weeks fo completing chemotherapy). Patients* with responsive disease (≤ pT1 tumor or macroscopically normal bladder) proceed to course 4 of chemotherapy (on-study) followed by treatment according to randomization arm.
NOTE: *Patients with a clear bladder or those who are unsure of their histological results prior to course 4 also proceed to chemotherapy.
- Course 4 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on day 1.
- Arm I (radical cystectomy): Patients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy, between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy.
- Arm II (selective bladder preservation): Patients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks.
Health-related quality of life is assessed periodically.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Active comparator | Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgeryPatients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy, between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy. |
| Arm II | Experimental | Radiation: radiation therapyPatients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| therapeutic conventional surgeryPatients undergo radical cystectomy | Procedure or surgery | Arm I |
| radiation therapyPatients undergo radiotherapy | Radiation | Arm II |
Primary outcome
Number of patients randomized over 3 years
Proportion of patients undergoing selective bladder preservation
Proportion of patients undergoing radical cystectomy
Overall survival
5 secondary outcomes
Compliance with randomized treatment
Rate of salvage cystectomy after selective bladder preservation
Toxicity as assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Quality of life as assessed by the QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire
Locoregional progression-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 21406089Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011 Mar 15;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-78.
- Results publication: PubMed 28453896Huddart RA, Birtle A, Maynard L, Beresford M, Blazeby J, Donovan J, Kelly JD, Kirkbank T, McLaren DB, Mead G, Moynihan C, Persad R, Scrase C, Lewis R, Hall E. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of SPARE - a randomised feasibility study of selective bladder preservation versus radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):639-650. doi: 10.1111/bju.13900. Epub 2017 May 29.
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert A. Huddart, MD principal investigator
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing therapeutic conventional surgery and radiation therapy in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients randomized over 3 years. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00867347, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2019.