AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityIVM vs IVFNCT00867763

In Vitro Maturation With in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Compared to Mild in Vitro Fertilization

A study testing In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization and Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation. in people with Infertility, run by Batzofin Fertility Services at 2 sites in United States.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Methods of infertility treatment may involve in vitro fertilization or IVF. Though effective, IVF is complex and expensive. Methods using no gonadotropin hormone stimulation of the ovaries are being compared to mild stimulation doses. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 41 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization and Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,440 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2009to Jun 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 41 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Under age 42 female, normal uterine cavity, BMI 18-34kg/m2,

Who cannot join

  • Donor eggs, donor sperm, myoma over 5 cm
  • Current hydrosalpinx, abnormal uterine cavity.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Batzofin Fertilty Services

    New York, New York, 10016

  • BFS

    New York, New York

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Research Study on in Vitro Maturation With IVF Compared to Mild Stimulation IVF

Methods of infertility treatment may involve in vitro fertilization or IVF. Though effective, IVF is complex and expensive. Methods using no gonadotropin hormone stimulation of the ovaries are being compared to mild stimulation doses. The goal of the research is to determine which of these if more suitable as a low cost approach for varying individual patients.

Read the detailed description

Low cost environment is utilized, but fees are charged.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization, Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation.
Keywords
Polycystic ovaries,, Tubal occlusion, Unexplained infertility, Low ovarian reserve, Male factor infertility
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilizationProcedure or surgery

    Also called assisted reproduction

    No gonadotropin, eggs harvested early

  • Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation.Procedure or surgery

    Also called Assisted reproduction, IVF.

    Gonadotropin followed by conventional IVF

Study groups in NCT00867763
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVMExperimentalEarly egg retrieval, in vitro maturation, then IVF
Receives: Procedure: In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization
Mild IVFActive comparatorMild gonadotropin and conventional IVF
Receives: Procedure: Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost effectiveness

    Measured: two years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2011 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2012 (estimated)

Why it stopped: investigator changed location, requires new training effort

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,440 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00867763
Sponsor's protocol ID
2939
Acronym
IVM vs IVF
Status last verified
Mar 2009
First submitted
23 Mar 2009
Last updated
11 Aug 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Son WY, Chung JT, Herrero B, Dean N, Demirtas E, Holzer H, Elizur S, Chian RC, Tan SL. Selection of the optimal day for oocyte retrieval based on the diameter of the dominant follicle in hCG-primed in vitro maturation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;23(12):2680-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den332. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

    PubMed 18775885
  • Son WY, Chung JT, Demirtas E, Holzer H, Sylvestre C, Buckett W, Chian RC, Tan SL. Comparison of in-vitro maturation cycles with and without in-vivo matured oocytes retrieved. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Jul;17(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60294-5.

    PubMed 18616892

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing In vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization and Low doses of gonadotropin stimulation. in people with Infertility, run by Batzofin Fertility Services at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cost effectiveness (time frame: two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00867763, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in