AzTrials
AzTrials

Procedural SedationPhase 2NCT00869440

Dose-Finding Safety Study Evaluating Remimazolam (CNS 7056) in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy

A Phase 2 study testing CNS 7056 and Midazolam in people with Procedural Sedation and Endoscopy, run by Paion UK Ltd. at 7 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of CNS 7056 as a procedural sedative at three dose levels compared to midazolam during a diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Procedural Sedation, Endoscopy
What is being tested?
CNS 7056 and Midazolam
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
7 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2009to Sep 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female patients, aged 18 to 65 years inclusive, scheduled to undergo diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score I or II.
  • Weight range 60 to 120 kg inclusive.
  • Body mass index (BMI) 18 to < 30 kg/m2.
  • Patients with no clinically significant abnormalities in 12 lead ECG recorded at Screening.
  • Female with a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test result at Screening and negative urine hCG pregnancy test result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with negative drugs of abuse serum result at Screening and negative drugs of abuse urine result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
  • Patient has a negative serum ethanol test result at Screening and a negative ethanol saliva test result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
  • Patient voluntarily signs and dates an informed consent form (ICF) that is approved by an investigational review board (IRB) prior to the conduct of any study procedure.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with study requirements and return for a Follow up Visit (Visit 3 ± 1 day) after the endoscopy procedure.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a suspected upper GI bleed an conditions predisposing to hemorrhage at the discretion of the investigator.
  • Has a known sensitivity to benzodiazepines, flumazenil, or anesthetic agents, or a medical condition such that these agents are contraindicated.
  • Patients with evidence of uncontrolled renal, hepatic, central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular, or metabolic dysfunction, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor.
  • Patients taking an agent that inhibits cytochrome P450 subtype 3A4 (CYP3A4) or patients who have taken such an agent within 14 days prior to study start or within the duration of 7 half lives of the drug, whichever is longer.
  • Patients in receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days or less than 7 half lives (whichever is longer) before the start of the study, or scheduled to receive one during the study period.
  • Chronic use of benzodiazepines for any indication (eg, insomnia, anxiety, spasticity).
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Has known or suspected history of alcoholism or drug abuse or misuse within 2 years of Screening or evidence of tolerance or physical dependence before dosing with study drug.
  • Patients with clinically significant findings at Screening that, in the investigator's opinion, should exclude them from the study.
  • Patients with a history of laboratory results that show the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Patients with an inability to communicate well in English with the investigator.
  • Lactating female patients.
  • Patients in whom management of airway is judged to be difficult due to:
  • obesity (weight > 120 kg, or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2),
  • thyro mental distance ≤ 4 cm ("short neck"), or
  • Mallampati score of 4 (Appendix IV).

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

United States7 sites
  • Advanced Clinical Research Institute

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Charlottesville Medical Research

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911

  • HOPE Research Institute

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85050

  • Wake Research Associates

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Helen Keller Hospital

    Sheffield, Alabama, 35660

  • Miami Research Associates

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Stony Brook University Medical Center

    Stony Brook, New York, 11794

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase IIa, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Dose-Finding Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacodynamics of CNS 7056 in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of CNS 7056 as a procedural sedative at three dose levels compared to midazolam during a diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of three dose levels of CNS 7056 compared with midazolam in patients undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Patients who met all study entry criteria and completed screening procedures were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg,0.15 mg/kg, or 0.20 mg/kg; or midazolam 0.075 mg/kg. Patients received their assigned treatment administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute. The endoscopy started when a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of ≤3 has been reached, but no earlier than 90 seconds after Time 0 (the start of study drug injection). Rescue with sedative medication (midazolam 1-2 mg) was be permitted at the discretion of the administering physician.

Efficacy assessments consisted of the MOAA/S scores, Aldrete scores, and drowsiness measures using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Cognitive function was assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised™ (HVLT-R™) and memory for the procedure by the Brice Questionnaire.

Safety assessments included adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, ECGs, pulse oximetry measurements, clinical laboratory tests, and pain on injection using a VAS.

Being tested
CNS 7056, Midazolam
Keywords
CNS 7056, Procedural Sedation, Sedation, Endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CNS 7056Drug

    Also called remimazolam

    Administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute

  • MidazolamDrug

    Also called Versed

    Administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute

Study groups in NCT00869440
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.10 mg/kgExperimentalRemimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.10 mg/kg iv
Receives: Drug: CNS 7056
2: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.15 mg/kgExperimentalRemimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.15 mg/kg iv
Receives: Drug: CNS 7056
3: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.20 mg/kgExperimentalRemimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.20 mg/kg iv
Receives: Drug: CNS 7056
4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgExperimentalMidazolam 0.075 mg/kg iv
Receives: Drug: Midazolam

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success Rates of the Procedure

    Success of the procedure is a composite endpoint consisting of: MOAA/S scores ≤4 on three consecutive measurements after administration of study drug AND completion of the endoscopy procedure AND no requirement for rescue sedative medication AND no requirement for manual or mechanical ventilation

    Measured: From start of study drug injection to patient discharge

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time to Fully Alert

    Time to first of 3 consecutive Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores of 5 following study drug administration in patients who underwent the endoscopy procedure

    Measured: From study drug administration until fully alert criteria are reached

  2. Time to Ready for Discharge

    Time to first of 3 consecutive Aldrete scores ≥9 after the end endoscopy procedure

    Measured: From the end of the endoscopy procedure up to 120 minutes or until 3 consecutive Aldrete scores of ≥9 are reached, whichever occurs first

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2009
  4. Study completionSep 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00869440
Sponsor's protocol ID
CNS 7056-003
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
25 Mar 2009
Last updated
8 Jan 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548.

    PubMed 25502841

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing CNS 7056 and Midazolam in people with Procedural Sedation and Endoscopy, run by Paion UK Ltd. at 7 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success Rates of the Procedure (time frame: From start of study drug injection to patient discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00869440, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in