Bloodstream InfectionNCT00870623
Procalcitonin and Endotoxin Sequential Levels to Optimize the Treatment of Bloodstream Infections
An observational study of Bloodstream Infection, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Bloodstream infections are also costly and result in prolonged hospital stays. The duration of therapy necessary to clear blood stream infections is unknown and no study has systematically addressed this issue. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bloodstream Infection
- How many people
- 223 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2009to 13 Jan 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hospitalized adult patients with positive blood cultures
Who may be able to join
- Hospitalized, adult patient, at least one positive blood culture reported within 24 hours of enrollment
Who cannot join
- Previously enrolled in the study; discharged/deceased before first positive culture; receiving antibiotic for greater than or equal to 48 hours; endocarditis or osteomyelitis; antithymocyte globulin in the last 12 months; blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus only.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Unversity of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
About this study
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Bloodstream infections are also costly and result in prolonged hospital stays. The duration of therapy necessary to clear blood stream infections is unknown and no study has systematically addressed this issue. However, the use of antimicrobials is not without consequence. These include financial cost, side-effects, promotion of superinfection (especially Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), and the promotion of microbial resistance. This study hypothesizes that a procalcitonin (host biomarker) and endotoxin (microorganism biomarker) guided treatment plan could significantly decrease unnecessary exposure to antibiotics in patients with bloodstream infections.
Read the detailed description
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Community-onset BSI have an overall attributable mortality of 10-13% while nosocomial BSI mortality ranges are quite variable from 12-80%. Bloodstream infections are also costly and result in prolonged hospital stays. Nosocomial BSIs have been shown to increase length of stay by 5-25 days and increase costs $23,000 - 40,000 above matched controls. The duration of therapy necessary to clear blood stream infections is unknown and no study has systematically addressed this issue. The use of antimicrobials is also not without consequence. These include financial cost, side-effects, promotion of superinfection (especially Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), and the promotion of microbial resistance. This study hypothesizes that a procalcitonin (host biomarker) and endotoxin (microorganism biomarker) guided treatment plan could significantly decrease unnecessary exposure to antibiotics in patients with bloodstream infections.
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Optimal length of treatment
To determine the optimal length of treatment by observing the normalization of procalcitonin (PCT) and Endotoxin levels, compared with the length of treatment by standard of care.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Association of procalcitonin and endotoxin levels and outcomes
To determine if procalcitonin and endotoxin levels (or lack of decrease) are associated with treatment failure, complication, survival, cost, length of stay, progression to severe sepsis, or superinfections.
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jun 2009
- Primary completion13 Jan 2016
- Study completion13 Jan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bloodstream InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of NebraskaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 223 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nebraska
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andre Kalil, MD, Principal investigator, University of Nebraska
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00870623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0540-08-FB
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Diekema DJ, Beekmann SE, Chapin KC, Morel KA, Munson E, Doern GV. Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial and community-onset bloodstream infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3655-60. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3655-3660.2003.
PubMed 12904371Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Aug 1;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1086/421946. Epub 2004 Jul 15.
PubMed 15306996Laupland KB, Gregson DB, Flemons WW, Hawkins D, Ross T, Church DL. Burden of community-onset bloodstream infection: a population-based assessment. Epidemiol Infect. 2007 Aug;135(6):1037-42. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007631. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
PubMed 17156500Shorr AF, Tabak YP, Killian AD, Gupta V, Liu LZ, Kollef MH. Healthcare-associated bloodstream infection: A distinct entity? Insights from a large U.S. database. Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2588-95. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239121.09533.09.
PubMed 16915117Digiovine B, Chenoweth C, Watts C, Higgins M. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;160(3):976-81. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.9808145.
PubMed 10471627Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2084-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227648.15804.2D.
PubMed 16763511Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1598-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1598.
PubMed 8182812Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, Raad II, O'Grady N, Harris JS, Craven DE; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 May 1;32(9):1249-72. doi: 10.1086/320001. Epub 2001 Apr 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 11303260Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
PubMed 17278083Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm WE. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;29(4):745-58. doi: 10.1086/520427.
PubMed 10589881Corona A, Bertolini G, Ricotta AM, Wilson A, Singer M. Variability of treatment duration for bacteraemia in the critically ill: a multinational survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Nov;52(5):849-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg447. Epub 2003 Sep 30.
PubMed 14519681Corona A, Wilson AP, Grassi M, Singer M. Prospective audit of bacteraemia management in a university hospital ICU using a general strategy of short-course monotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):809-17. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh416. Epub 2004 Sep 16.
PubMed 15375106Rice LB. The Maxwell Finland Lecture: for the duration-rational antibiotic administration in an era of antimicrobial resistance and clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 15;46(4):491-6. doi: 10.1086/526535.
PubMed 18194098Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, Gencay MM, Huber PR, Tamm M, Muller B. Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):600-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8.
PubMed 14987884Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Muller C, Miedinger D, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Harbarth S, Tamm M, Muller B. Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 1;174(1):84-93. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
PubMed 16603606
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Procalcitonin and Endotoxin Sequential Levels to Optimize the Treatment of Bloodstream Infections
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00870623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0540-08-FB
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 223 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of NebraskaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Bloodstream infections are also costly and result in prolonged hospital stays. The duration of therapy necessary to clear blood stream infections is unknown and no study has systematically addressed this issue. However, the use of antimicrobials is not without consequence. These include financial cost, side-effects, promotion of superinfection (especially Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), and the promotion of microbial resistance. This study hypothesizes that a procalcitonin (host biomarker) and endotoxin (microorganism biomarker) guided treatment plan could significantly decrease unnecessary exposure to antibiotics in patients with bloodstream infections.
Detailed description
Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Community-onset BSI have an overall attributable mortality of 10-13% while nosocomial BSI mortality ranges are quite variable from 12-80%. Bloodstream infections are also costly and result in prolonged hospital stays. Nosocomial BSIs have been shown to increase length of stay by 5-25 days and increase costs $23,000 - 40,000 above matched controls. The duration of therapy necessary to clear blood stream infections is unknown and no study has systematically addressed this issue. The use of antimicrobials is also not without consequence. These include financial cost, side-effects, promotion of superinfection (especially Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), and the promotion of microbial resistance. This study hypothesizes that a procalcitonin (host biomarker) and endotoxin (microorganism biomarker) guided treatment plan could significantly decrease unnecessary exposure to antibiotics in patients with bloodstream infections.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hospitalized adult patients with positive blood cultures
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Hospitalized, adult patient, at least one positive blood culture reported within 24 hours of enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previously enrolled in the study; discharged/deceased before first positive culture; receiving antibiotic for greater than or equal to 48 hours; endocarditis or osteomyelitis; antithymocyte globulin in the last 12 months; blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus only.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Optimal length of treatment
Time frame: 30 days
To determine the optimal length of treatment by observing the normalization of procalcitonin (PCT) and Endotoxin levels, compared with the length of treatment by standard of care.
1 secondary outcome
Association of procalcitonin and endotoxin levels and outcomes
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 12904371Diekema DJ, Beekmann SE, Chapin KC, Morel KA, Munson E, Doern GV. Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial and community-onset bloodstream infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3655-60. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3655-3660.2003.
- Background: PubMed 15306996Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Aug 1;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1086/421946. Epub 2004 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 17156500Laupland KB, Gregson DB, Flemons WW, Hawkins D, Ross T, Church DL. Burden of community-onset bloodstream infection: a population-based assessment. Epidemiol Infect. 2007 Aug;135(6):1037-42. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007631. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 16915117Shorr AF, Tabak YP, Killian AD, Gupta V, Liu LZ, Kollef MH. Healthcare-associated bloodstream infection: A distinct entity? Insights from a large U.S. database. Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2588-95. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239121.09533.09.
- Background: PubMed 10471627Digiovine B, Chenoweth C, Watts C, Higgins M. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;160(3):976-81. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.9808145.
- Background: PubMed 16763511Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2084-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227648.15804.2D.
- Background: PubMed 8182812Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1598-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1598.
- Background: PubMed 11303260Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, Raad II, O'Grady N, Harris JS, Craven DE; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 May 1;32(9):1249-72. doi: 10.1086/320001. Epub 2001 Apr 3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17278083Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10589881Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm WE. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;29(4):745-58. doi: 10.1086/520427.
- Background: PubMed 14519681Corona A, Bertolini G, Ricotta AM, Wilson A, Singer M. Variability of treatment duration for bacteraemia in the critically ill: a multinational survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Nov;52(5):849-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg447. Epub 2003 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 15375106Corona A, Wilson AP, Grassi M, Singer M. Prospective audit of bacteraemia management in a university hospital ICU using a general strategy of short-course monotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):809-17. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh416. Epub 2004 Sep 16.
Related trials for Bloodstream Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andre Kalil, MD principal investigator
University of Nebraska
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bloodstream Infection, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Optimal length of treatment (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00870623, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2023.