AzTrials
AzTrials

Preterm InfantsPhase 4NCT00877175

Comparison of Instillation and Packing in Mydriasis for Premature Infants

A Phase 4 study testing 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine in people with Preterm Infants, run by Khon Kaen University at 1 site in Thailand.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the mydriatic effect of 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide by conventional instillation and lower conjunctival fornix packing in premature infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 4 months
Conditions the study is for
Preterm Infants
What is being tested?
1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Mar 2009to Jun 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 4 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • gestational age of less than 32 weeks and/or the birth weight of less than 1,500 grams
  • stable clinical course

Who cannot join

  • history of intraocular surgery or laser treatment
  • previous eyedrop instillation that might affect the pupil size
  • severe underlying disease or unstable clinical course that mydriatic drugs or the examination could aggravate their conditions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Srinagarind Hospital

    Khon Kaen, Changwat Khon Kaen, 40002

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Conventional Instillation and Lower Conjunctival Fornix Packing in Mydriasis for Premature Infants

The purpose of this study is to compare the mydriatic effect of 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide by conventional instillation and lower conjunctival fornix packing in premature infants.

Read the detailed description

Adequate pupil dilatation was needed for screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants.In general clinical practice, mydriatic drugs were instilled many times until the pupil reached the maximum size. However, poor mydriasis were found in many eyes despite maximum instillation was used. From the clinical observation, we found the packing of mydriatic drugs in lower conjunctival fornix was much more effective to dilate the pupil than instillation in some patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the mydriatic effect of 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide by conventional instillation and lower conjunctival fornix packing in premature infants.

Conditions
Preterm Infants
Being tested
1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine
Keywords
preterm infants, mydriasis, pupil dilation
Medical subject headings
Mydriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrineDrug

    For the eyes receiving lower conjunctival fornix packing (study group), one small piece of the cotton wool soaked with one drop of 2.5% phenylephrine and one drop of 1% tropicamide was packed in the lower conjunctival fornix. For the eyes receiving the instillation (control group), 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide were alternately instilled every 5 minutes for two doses each.

Study groups in NCT00877175
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalLower conjunctival fornix packing arm. For the eyes receiving lower conjunctival fornix packing (study group), one small piece of the cotton wool soaked with one drop of 2.5% phenylephrine and one drop of 1% tropicamide was packed in the lower conjunctival fornix.
Receives: Drug: 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine
2Active comparatorConventional instillation arm. For the eyes receiving the instillation (control group), 2.5% phenylephrine and 1% tropicamide were alternately instilled every 5 minutes for two doses each.
Receives: Drug: 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome measure was the horizontal pupil diameter measured with a ruler in millimeters

    Measured: 40 minutes after mydriatric drugs

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00877175
Sponsor's protocol ID
I50221
Other IDs
HE480729
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
6 Apr 2009
Last updated
9 Mar 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Thanathanee O, Ratanapakorn T, Morley MG, Yospaiboon Y. Lower conjunctival fornix packing for mydriasis in premature infants: a randomized trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:253-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S28714. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

    PubMed 22368443

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine in people with Preterm Infants, run by Khon Kaen University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome measure was the horizontal pupil diameter measured with a ruler in millimeters (time frame: 40 minutes after mydriatric drugs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00877175, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in