AzTrials
AzTrials

Infant, PrematureNCT00879957

Heparin Versus no Heparin on Duration of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Patency in Neonates

A study testing heparin and No heparin in people with Infant, Premature and Anticoagulants, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Heparin is an anticoagulant commonly used in the neonatal population as a means to prevent catheter related occlusion and malfunction by thrombosis (clot). Given the recent overdoses of infants using heparin, there is concern as to whether heparin should be used in peripherally inserted central venous… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 1 year
Conditions the study is for
Infant, Premature, Anticoagulants, Thrombosis
What is being tested?
heparin and No heparin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2010to May 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 1 year
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at University Hospital in San Antonio, Texas who require a percutaneous central venous catheter, as determined by the attending neonatologist.

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of bleeding (prolonged aPTT)
  • Recent sepsis (w/in 48 hours of initiation of antimicrobial therapy)
  • Propensity for stroke or thrombophilia
  • Requiring heparinization (i.e. dialysis)
  • Discretion of the neonatologist (severe illness to the point of uncertain viability, poor intravenous access requiring surgical placement of a long term intravenous catheter e.g. Broviac)
  • Requirement of a 1 French catheter
  • Uncertain viability (this is based on the discretion of the infant's neonatologist who is not a member of the research team)
  • Nonviable neonates (this is based on the discretion of the infant's neonatologist who is not a member of the research team)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University Hospital

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Heparin vs. no Heparin on Duration of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Patency in Neonates

Background: Heparin is an anticoagulant commonly used in the neonatal population as a means to prevent catheter related occlusion and malfunction by thrombosis (clot). Given the recent overdoses of infants using heparin, there is concern as to whether heparin should be used in peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC). Scientific evidence comparing the duration of use of heparin versus no heparin in PICCs is conflicting.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of continuous IV fluids with heparin versus IV fluids without heparin on the duration of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICC) in neonates.

Read more

Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial Hypothesis: The use of heparin in PICC fluids has no difference on duration of catheter patency.

Design and Methods: The study will be conducted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at University Hospital, San Antonio, TX. Randomization to either the experimental group (no-heparin) or the standard medical group (with heparin) will occur once parental consent is obtained and prior to PICC insertion. PICC placement will be done by the PICC certified neonatal nurses. Correct placement of the PICC will be assured by radiography which is standard procedure.

Parents, NICU team members and staff, and investigators will be masked to the grouping. Pharmacy will be responsible for randomization. Both the heparin group and the no heparin group solutions will be dispensed in identical containers, compounded by the pharmacy.

The study medication, heparin, will be mixed by the pharmacy at a standard dose of 0.5 units/mL for the intravenous infusions used in the heparin group. The experimental group will receive only the base solution, whether it is 5% dextrose, 0.9% sodium chloride, or total parenteral nutrition infused into the PICC line. Pharmacy and the NICU staff will ensure compatibility of heparin with other infusions. Heparin bonded catheters, heparin flushes, and hep-lock solutions are not used by the NICU service.

The primary outcome, duration of catheter use, is defined as the time (in hours) between insertion and removal of the catheter due to occlusion. Occlusion will be defined as the inability to push 1 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, via a 5 mL syringe, through the catheter in situ or detection of clots along the catheter after removal.

Secondary outcomes include septicemia vs. catheter-related septicemia, phlebitis, death before discharge, and thrombosis. Septicemia is identified as clinical signs and symptoms associated with sepsis in the presence of a positive peripheral blood culture obtained irrespective of the catheter tip culture result. Catheter-related sepsis will be defined as positive blood culture obtained from the catheter fluid as well as a positive blood culture obtained from a peripheral venous specimen. Both cultures must demonstrate the same organism. Phlebitis is defined by visual detection, swelling, and change of skin color associated with an inflamed vein. Thrombosis is defined as a thrombus along catheter path diagnosed by visual inspection upon removal of the catheter. Elective versus non-elective removal will also be recorded.

Adverse events monitored include: heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), defined as a platelet count dropping below 50 x 103/mL with a positive antibody titer, aPTT > 100 seconds (This will be measured upon clinical evidence of bleeding), hemorrhage from > 2 sites, intraventricular hemorrhage, extravasation, and dislodgement or breakage of catheter.

The sample size will be determined based on retrospective data collection to reach a statistical power of 80% with a type I error or 0.05. The investigators expect the sample size to be approximately 102 patients in each arm of the study.

The study will terminate once the PICC is discontinued or if there is an indication to stop the study early for safety reasons. These could include increased adverse events in one group versus the other. A Safety Control Panel composed of 2 neonatologists from another site will review the data at the points when 1/3 and then 2/3 of total patient enrollment has been achieved.

Data Collection and Analysis: Data will be collected and tabulated on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using unique patient identifiers and stored at a secure location at UHS then analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

Being tested
heparin, No heparin
Keywords
Infant, Premature, Infant, Central venous catheterization, Anticoagulants
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • heparinDrug

    Heparin will be added to PICC infusions at a dose of 0.5 units heparin per milliliter of intravenous fluid/parenteral nutrition.

  • No heparinDrug

    In the no heparin group, the subjects will not receive heparin as an additive to their PICC infusions.

Study groups in NCT00879957
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Heparin groupActive comparatorThe heparin group is the arm of the study in which all of the subjects will be treated according to current standard medical therapy. All fluids to be infused through their PICCs will have 0.5 units heparin per milliliter of intravenous fluid.
Receives: Drug: heparin
No heparin groupExperimentalThis group will only receive the prescribed fluids to infuse through their PICCs. No heparin will be added to the intravenous infusions.
Receives: Drug: No heparin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome will be duration of catheter patency, as defined by the length of time between insertion and removal of the PICC due to catheter occlusion.

    Measured: 1 day to 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Bacteremia

    Measured: 1 day to 3 months

  2. Catheter-related bacteremia

    Measured: 1 day to 3 months

  3. Phlebitis

    Measured: 1 day to 3 months

  4. Thrombosis

    Measured: 1 day to 3 months

  5. Death

    Measured: 1 day to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2011 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Why it stopped: A study was published regarding the same question this study had.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00879957
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC20090136H
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
26 Mar 2009
Last updated
15 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Moclair A, Bates I. The efficacy of heparin in maintaining peripheral infusions in neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 1995 Jul;154(7):567-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02074836.

    PubMed 7556325
  • Klenner AF, Fusch C, Rakow A, Kadow I, Beyersdorff E, Eichler P, Wander K, Lietz T, Greinacher A. Benefit and risk of heparin for maintaining peripheral venous catheters in neonates: a placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003 Dec;143(6):741-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.024.

    PubMed 14657819
  • Shah PS, Kalyn A, Satodia P, Dunn MS, Parvez B, Daneman A, Salem S, Glanc P, Ohlsson A, Shah V. A randomized, controlled trial of heparin versus placebo infusion to prolong the usability of peripherally placed percutaneous central venous catheters (PCVCs) in neonates: the HIP (Heparin Infusion for PCVC) study. Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e284-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0529.

    PubMed 17200252
  • Kamala F, Boo NY, Cheah FC, Birinder K. Randomized controlled trial of heparin for prevention of blockage of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(12):1350-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02833.x.

    PubMed 12578294
  • Shah PS, Shah VS. Continuous heparin infusion to prevent thrombosis and catheter occlusion in neonates with peripherally placed percutaneous central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD002772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002772.pub3.

    PubMed 18425882
  • de Neef M, Heijboer H, van Woensel JB, de Haan RJ. The efficacy of heparinization in prolonging patency of arterial and central venous catheters in children: a randomized double-blind trial. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Dec;19(8):553-60. doi: 10.1080/08880010290097404.

    PubMed 12487830

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing heparin and No heparin in people with Infant, Premature and Anticoagulants, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome will be duration of catheter patency, as defined by the length of time between insertion and removal of the PICC due to catheter occlusion. (time frame: 1 day to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00879957, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in