AzTrials
AzTrials

Refractory LeukemiaPhase 2NCT00880269

Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat (LBH589) in Patients With Refractory de Novo or Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

A Phase 2 study testing Panobinostat/LBH589 in people with Refractory Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 40 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single agent oral panobinostat in patients who have refractory de novo or refractory secondary AML. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Panobinostat/LBH589
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
40 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
Aug 2009to Feb 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent prior to study-specific screening procedures
  • Life expectancy of ≥ 60 days
  • Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
  • Refractory AML with confirmed initial diagnosis of de novo AML (excluding APL) - OR- Refractory AML with confirmed initial diagnosis of AML (excluding APL) secondary to AHD or MDS with either condition precedent to AML (MDS/AHD)
  • Negative serum pregnancy test (within 7 days of first dose)
  • Negative urine pregnancy test immediately prior to first dose

Who cannot join

  • Known HIV
  • Psychiatric disorder that interfered with ability to understand the study and give informed consent, and/or would impact study participation or follow-up
  • Concurrent use of medications that might prolong the QT interval or of inducing Torsade de Pointes
  • Female patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding or patients of childbearing potential who were not willing to use a double barrier method of contraception during the study and for 3 months following the last dose of study drug.
  • Male patients whose sexual partner(s) were women of childbearing potential who were not willing to use a double method of contraception, one of which included a condom, during the study and for 3 months after the end of treatment
  • Patient unable to swallow capsules
  • Patients with impaired gastrointestinal systems which might cause interference with digesting and absorbing panobinostat
  • Other Protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

40 sites in 12 countries.

40 sites in 12 countries

United States7 sites
  • University of Chicago Medical Center Dept. of U. of Chicago Hosp(3)

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dept of Simmons Cancer Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center Dept of MD Anderson (14)

    Houston, Texas, 77030-4009

  • North Shore University Hospital North Shore Univ

    Manhasset, New York, 10030

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Dept. of MSKCC (2)

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Nebraska Methodist Hospital Nebraska Methodist Hospital(2)

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Oregon Health Sciences University Dept. of OHSU (2)

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

Australia6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gosford, New South Wales, 2250

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herston, Queensland, 4029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Parkville, Victoria, 3002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Prahran, Victoria, 3181

Other trials in Australia

France5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bobigny, 93009

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nantes, 44035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75181

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liverpool, L7 8XP

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, W12 0HS

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bruges, 8000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ghent, 9000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Germany3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leipzig, 04103

Other trials in Germany

Italy3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00133

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00161

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Udine, UD, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Spain2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907

Other trials in Spain

Switzerland2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bern, 3010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zurich, Switzerland, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ankara, Turkey, 06100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Balcova / Izmir, 35340

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Peru1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Surquillo, Lima region, 34

Other trials in Peru

South Korea1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, Korea, 06591

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study of Oral Single Agent Panobinostat in Patients With Refractory de Novo or Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single agent oral panobinostat in patients who have refractory de novo or refractory secondary AML.

Being tested
Panobinostat/LBH589
Keywords
Acute myeloid leukemia, AML, relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, refractory AML, refractory de novo AML, refractory secondary AML, secondary AML, AML following myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), AML following antecedent hematological disorder (AHD), AML resistant to therapy
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Panobinostat/LBH589Drug

Study groups in NCT00880269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stratum AExperimentalpatients with refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) initially diagnosed as de novo AML received 60 mg of panobinostat per day on three discontinuous days per week.
Receives: Drug: Panobinostat/LBH589
Stratum BExperimentalpatients with refractory AML initially diagnosed as AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD) received 60 mg of panobinostat per day on three discontinuous days per week.
Receives: Drug: Panobinostat/LBH589

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Best Response as Per Investigator Assessment by Stratum (FAS)

    Response to treatment was defined as complete remission rate (CRR). CRR is complete remission (CR) and morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (residual neutropenia or thrombocytopenia) (CRi). To stop or to proceed with Stage 2 of a given stratum of the Simon's optimal 2-stage design was based on the number of patients with CR/CRi and a safety evaluation of the patients from Stage 1 in that stratum. If early results clearly indicated that the drug was not active or worthy of further investigation, enrollment of that particular stratum would be terminated. CR and CRi were assessed by the Investigator according to IWG response Criteria for AML (Cheson et al 2003). As per protocol we would continue to stage II if ≥ 4 patients out of 26 patients enrolled to stage I had a CR or a CRi. As per response observed there was only 1 patient with CR/CRi in stratum A and 2 patients with CR/CRi in Stratum B.

    Measured: 6 cycles of treatment with a 28-day treatment cycle (Day 168)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Partial Response Measured in Stratum A and B

    As predefined in the study's protocol, stage II was not pursued due to lack of activity (at end of stage I less than 4 patients in each stratum with CR/CRi)

    Measured: 6 treatment cycles (28-day/treatment cycle)

  2. Time to Remission Measured in Stratum A and B

    Measured: 6 treatment cycles (28-day/treatment cycle)

  3. Duration of Remission Measured in Stratum A and B

    Measured: 6 treatment cycles (28-day/treatment cycle)

  4. Event-free Survival Measured in Stratum A and B

    Measured: 6 treatment cycles (28-day/treatment cycle)

  5. Overall Survival Measured in Stratum A and B

    Measured: 6 treatment cycles (28-day/treatment cycle)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2009
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00880269
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLBH589B2213
Other IDs
2008-002983-32, 2008
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
30 Mar 2009
Last updated
23 Feb 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Panobinostat/LBH589 in people with Refractory Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 40 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 40 sites in United States, Australia, France, United Kingdom, Belgium and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Best Response as Per Investigator Assessment by Stratum (FAS) (time frame: 6 cycles of treatment with a 28-day treatment cycle (Day 168)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in