Defect of Articular CartilagePhase 1NCT00885729
Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects
A Phase 1 study testing stem cells, Chondrocytes and Rehabilitation program in people with Defect of Articular Cartilage, run by University Hospital, Akershus at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to: Compare the treatment efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) versus chondrocytes implanted in a commercial available scaffold in a human clinical trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- What is being tested?
- stem cells, Chondrocytes and Rehabilitation program
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Apr 2009to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Norwegian citizens
- A full-thickness cartilage lesion (diameter > 15 mm, but less than 6 cm2 and Lysholm score < 75 points) located on the femoral condyle
Who cannot join
- Patients with malignment of the knee
- Other knee pathology such as ACL injury or a nontreated meniscus injury will not be included in the study to avoid the impact of these knee pathologies on the final results
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to:
- Compare the treatment efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) versus chondrocytes implanted in a commercial available scaffold in a human clinical trial.
- Determine the effects of specific three months strength training program preoperatively to improve knee function and possible postpone the need of cartilage repair surgery.
- Determine if degenerative changes occur in the knee joints following cartilage repair. This question will be investigated in the proposed clinical trial.
- Determine the characteristics of patients treated either by surgery or by rehabilitation in a long-term follow-up (1, 5 years).
Read the detailed description
Musculoskeletal diseases are growing in the Norwegian population and are currently the largest group of the chronic diseases (31%). Musculoskeletal diseases are the largest cause of disability on the working part of our population (49%). The most frequent problems are rheumatism, osteoarthritis and unspecific back pain. The most common known etiology is traumatic events towards the joint. Often, the degenerative development starts with a small injury to the cartilage on weightbearing surface of the joint. This leads to changes in the surrounding cartilage, indicative of degenerative joint disease or arthrosis. When the injured area becomes larger than 2 cm2, the patients seem to experience pain. Our group has shown that 11% of patients, who underwent an arthroscopy for knee pain, had a cartilage injury on weightbearing surface with depth down to bone (grade IV) (Aroen et al.).Unfortunately, articular cartilage shows a very limited capacity of healing. Several surgical techniques have been developed to fill the cartilage defects, but so far none of them have been able to produce normal cartilage Chondrocyte implantation techniques are at date the most popular treatment, but have not demonstrated their superiority to other cartilage repair techniques. Some clinical randomised studies exist though a more thorough review of the cartilage repair methods in a study by Jakobsen and coauthors verified that no conclusion could be made considering treatment options for articular cartilage injury (Jakobsen, Engebretsen, and Slauterbeck). Although the natural history of these lesions is not finally outlined it is clear that for some patients the disruption of the cartilage surface imposes disability especially for the young athlete. The clinical studies report a significant improvement from the preoperative status although full knee function is not obtained with either of the techniques available today (Bentley et al.;Brittberg et al.;Horas et al.;Knutsen et al.). The expected Lysholm score of 80 and the standard deviation tends to be large or is not reported which illustrating the considerable variation and that full knee function is not obtained (Peterson et al.).The impact of disrupting the cartilage surface to obtain chondrocytes for culturing has not gained much attention in the clinical studies using this repair method. However it is reported that adverse effects exist as a result of this harvesting of chondrocytes for culturing (Whittaker et al.). Whittaker and coauthors observed that the harvesting of chondrocytes for cell culturing and subsequent implantation in talus resulted in a mean 15 points reduction in Lysholm score in 7 out of 10 patients. Furthermore, additional even in the best hands a mean Lysholm score of 79 are obtained for a single lesion at the femoral condyle (Peterson et al.). Even though the new scaffolds seem to reduce the rate of reoperation as a result of graft hypertrophy from 21 % to 9 %, the harvesting procedure of cartilage may still contribute to the suboptimal by this approach (Bartlett et al.;Gooding et al.). Consequently, there is a need for a better causing less morbidity when harvesting. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent an alternative cell source with the potential of generating hyaline cartilage without the same adverse effects. In addition with MSC more cells will be available for culturing with the potential of treatment of larger lesions possible. Furthermore, the repair potential of mesenchymal stem cells is not expected to decrease with age indicating that also the aging athlete may benefit from a procedure based on cartilage repair with this cell source (Dressler, Butler, and Boivin). The use of mesenchymal stem cell aspirate from the iliaca crest under a periosteum flap support the view that this might be an option to treat knee cartilage defects with success, although this study also has periosteum hypertrophy as a side effect in one of the patients (Slynarski, Deszczynski, and Karpinski). The beneficial effects of this therapy has also been reported in other studies both clinical and experimental ones (Takagi et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.). Thus, the current project will investigate if the similar results can be obtained with mesenchymal stem cells as with chondrocytes both delivered in a commercial available scaffold in clinical trial with patients eligible for the current treatment options.
- Conditions
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- Being tested
- stem cells, Chondrocytes, Rehabilitation program
- Keywords
- Cartilage defect, chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), femoral condyle, knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stem cellsProcedure or surgery
Stem cells or chondrocytes under a commercial available membrane
ChondrocytesProcedure or surgery
Implantation of chondrocytes
Rehabilitation programOther
Strength exercises, neuromuscular exercises
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stem cells | Experimental | Cartilage defect are treated surgical either with chondrocytes or stem cells Receives: Procedure: stem cells; Procedure: Chondrocytes |
| Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Active rehabilitation program Receives: Other: Rehabilitation program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lysholm score
Measured: 2018
Secondary outcomes (1)
Radiographics
Measured: Two and five years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2009
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Defect of Articular CartilageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Akershus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Asbjorn Aroen, University Hospital, Akershus
- Investigators
- Lars Engebretsen, MD,PhD, Study chair, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00885729
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S-0738c 2009
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Aroen A, Brogger H, Rotterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Evaluation of focal cartilage lesions of the knee using MRI T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 11;17:73. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0941-y.
PubMed 26868015Rotterud JH, Reinholt FP, Beckstrom KJ, Risberg MA, Aroen A. Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory cohort study of 48 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 24;15:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-99.
PubMed 24661577Wondrasch B, Aroen A, Rotterud JH, Hoysveen T, Bolstad K, Risberg MA. The feasibility of a 3-month active rehabilitation program for patients with knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions: the Oslo Cartilage Active Rehabilitation and Education Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):310-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4354. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PubMed 23485794
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Clinical Trial to Heal Articular Cartilage Defects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00885729
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S-0738c 2009
- Conditions
- Defect of Articular Cartilage
- Keywords
- Cartilage defect, chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), femoral condyle, knee
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AkershusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to:
- Compare the treatment efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) versus chondrocytes implanted in a commercial available scaffold in a human clinical trial.
- Determine the effects of specific three months strength training program preoperatively to improve knee function and possible postpone the need of cartilage repair surgery.
- Determine if degenerative changes occur in the knee joints following cartilage repair. This question will be investigated in the proposed clinical trial.
- Determine the characteristics of patients treated either by surgery or by rehabilitation in a long-term follow-up (1, 5 years).
Detailed description
Musculoskeletal diseases are growing in the Norwegian population and are currently the largest group of the chronic diseases (31%). Musculoskeletal diseases are the largest cause of disability on the working part of our population (49%). The most frequent problems are rheumatism, osteoarthritis and unspecific back pain. The most common known etiology is traumatic events towards the joint. Often, the degenerative development starts with a small injury to the cartilage on weightbearing surface of the joint. This leads to changes in the surrounding cartilage, indicative of degenerative joint disease or arthrosis. When the injured area becomes larger than 2 cm2, the patients seem to experience pain. Our group has shown that 11% of patients, who underwent an arthroscopy for knee pain, had a cartilage injury on weightbearing surface with depth down to bone (grade IV) (Aroen et al.).Unfortunately, articular cartilage shows a very limited capacity of healing. Several surgical techniques have been developed to fill the cartilage defects, but so far none of them have been able to produce normal cartilage Chondrocyte implantation techniques are at date the most popular treatment, but have not demonstrated their superiority to other cartilage repair techniques. Some clinical randomised studies exist though a more thorough review of the cartilage repair methods in a study by Jakobsen and coauthors verified that no conclusion could be made considering treatment options for articular cartilage injury (Jakobsen, Engebretsen, and Slauterbeck). Although the natural history of these lesions is not finally outlined it is clear that for some patients the disruption of the cartilage surface imposes disability especially for the young athlete. The clinical studies report a significant improvement from the preoperative status although full knee function is not obtained with either of the techniques available today (Bentley et al.;Brittberg et al.;Horas et al.;Knutsen et al.). The expected Lysholm score of 80 and the standard deviation tends to be large or is not reported which illustrating the considerable variation and that full knee function is not obtained (Peterson et al.).The impact of disrupting the cartilage surface to obtain chondrocytes for culturing has not gained much attention in the clinical studies using this repair method. However it is reported that adverse effects exist as a result of this harvesting of chondrocytes for culturing (Whittaker et al.). Whittaker and coauthors observed that the harvesting of chondrocytes for cell culturing and subsequent implantation in talus resulted in a mean 15 points reduction in Lysholm score in 7 out of 10 patients. Furthermore, additional even in the best hands a mean Lysholm score of 79 are obtained for a single lesion at the femoral condyle (Peterson et al.). Even though the new scaffolds seem to reduce the rate of reoperation as a result of graft hypertrophy from 21 % to 9 %, the harvesting procedure of cartilage may still contribute to the suboptimal by this approach (Bartlett et al.;Gooding et al.). Consequently, there is a need for a better causing less morbidity when harvesting. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) represent an alternative cell source with the potential of generating hyaline cartilage without the same adverse effects. In addition with MSC more cells will be available for culturing with the potential of treatment of larger lesions possible. Furthermore, the repair potential of mesenchymal stem cells is not expected to decrease with age indicating that also the aging athlete may benefit from a procedure based on cartilage repair with this cell source (Dressler, Butler, and Boivin). The use of mesenchymal stem cell aspirate from the iliaca crest under a periosteum flap support the view that this might be an option to treat knee cartilage defects with success, although this study also has periosteum hypertrophy as a side effect in one of the patients (Slynarski, Deszczynski, and Karpinski). The beneficial effects of this therapy has also been reported in other studies both clinical and experimental ones (Takagi et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.;Wakitani et al.). Thus, the current project will investigate if the similar results can be obtained with mesenchymal stem cells as with chondrocytes both delivered in a commercial available scaffold in clinical trial with patients eligible for the current treatment options.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stem cells | Experimental | Procedure: stem cells, Procedure: ChondrocytesCartilage defect are treated surgical either with chondrocytes or stem cells |
| Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Rehabilitation programActive rehabilitation program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Norwegian citizens
- A full-thickness cartilage lesion (diameter > 15 mm, but less than 6 cm2 and Lysholm score < 75 points) located on the femoral condyle
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with malignment of the knee
- Other knee pathology such as ACL injury or a nontreated meniscus injury will not be included in the study to avoid the impact of these knee pathologies on the final results
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stem cellsStem cells or chondrocytes under a commercial available membrane | Procedure or surgery | Stem cells |
| ChondrocytesImplantation of chondrocytes | Procedure or surgery | Stem cells |
| Rehabilitation programStrength exercises, neuromuscular exercises | Other | Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Lysholm score
Time frame: 2018
1 secondary outcome
Radiographics
Time frame: Two and five years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26868015Aroen A, Brogger H, Rotterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Evaluation of focal cartilage lesions of the knee using MRI T2 mapping and delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 11;17:73. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0941-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24661577Rotterud JH, Reinholt FP, Beckstrom KJ, Risberg MA, Aroen A. Relationship between CTX-II and patient characteristics, patient-reported outcome, muscle strength, and rehabilitation in patients with a focal cartilage lesion of the knee: a prospective exploratory cohort study of 48 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 24;15:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-99.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23485794Wondrasch B, Aroen A, Rotterud JH, Hoysveen T, Bolstad K, Risberg MA. The feasibility of a 3-month active rehabilitation program for patients with knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions: the Oslo Cartilage Active Rehabilitation and Education Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):310-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4354. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Related trials for Defect of Articular Cartilage
Recruiting
BioPoly® Partial Resurfacing Knee Implant IDE
Knee Pain Chronic, Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of MACI in Patients Aged 17 to 65 Years With Symptomatic Chondral or Osteochondral Defects of the Ankle
Chondral Defect, Articular Cartilage Defect
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of MACI in Patients Aged 10 to 17 Years With Symptomatic Chondral or Osteochondral Defects of the Knee
Chondral Defect, Osteochondritis Dissecans (OCD)
Not yet recruiting
Biologic Augmentation of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee
Osteochondral Defect, Articular Cartilage Defect
RecruitingPhase 1
AMIC Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip
Hip Arthroscopy, Articular Cartilage Defect
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lars Engebretsen, MD,PhD study chair
Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing stem cells, Chondrocytes and Rehabilitation program in people with Defect of Articular Cartilage, run by University Hospital, Akershus at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lysholm score (time frame: 2018). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00885729, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2015.