AzTrials
AzTrials

Jaw, EdentulousNCT00901017

Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation

A study testing Straumann BoneCeramic and Bio-Oss in people with Jaw, Edentulous and Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, run by Institut Straumann AG at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of the study is to test the efficacy on bone formation of Straumann Bone Ceramic as a grafting material applied in buccal bone dehiscences on simultaneously placed oral implants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
What is being tested?
Straumann BoneCeramic and Bio-Oss
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Mar 2006to Aug 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females, 18 years to 80 years of age
  • At least two missing teeth up to full edentulous arches.
  • Desiring implant supported restorations.
  • Both study implants should have a self-containing (2-wall) buccal dehiscence defect after oral implant placement (at least 3.0 mm / max. 5.0 mm defect in apico-coronal aspect to be measured from the boarder of the rough surface of the oral implant to the bottom of the defect).
  • At least 4mm of the implant, measured from the apical end to the lowest margin of the bone level, should be covered with bone.
  • Sufficient bone volume such that both oral implants will not encroach on vital structures and primary stability of the oral implant can be achieved;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent.
  • Patient in good general health as documented by self assessment;
  • Full mouth plaque score of <20%;

Who cannot join

  • Any systemic medical condition that could interfere with the surgical procedure or planned treatment;
  • Current pregnancy or breast feeding/ lactating at the time of recruitment;
  • Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromise.
  • Patients who smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day.
  • Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which could represent a general contra-indication for surgical procedure or would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Lack of primary stability of 1 or both implant(s) at surgery, measured by hand testing. In this instance the patient must be withdrawn and treated accordingly.
  • Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus
  • History of local radiation therapy.
  • Presence of osseous pathologies.
  • Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
  • Severe bruxing or clenching habits.
  • Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis.
  • Bone surgery at the implant site(s) (bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration techniques for bone enhancement) prior to implant placement unless performed more than 6 months prior to implant placement.
  • Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease.
  • Existing teeth in the residual dentition with untreated endodontic pathologies.
  • Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Controlled Spilt-mouth Clinical Study Comparing a Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Primarily Horizontal Bone Augmentation Procedure During Placement of Straumann Oral Implants

The objective of the study is to test the efficacy on bone formation of Straumann Bone Ceramic as a grafting material applied in buccal bone dehiscences on simultaneously placed oral implants.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, controlled, split mouth, prospective, single centre study. The total study duration for each patient should be 76 weeks +/-18 months.

In total 8 visits per patient are scheduled in this study.

The study devices Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss are CE-marked, and approved by the FDA. The products are used within the indication.

One center in Beligum will participate.

Being tested
Straumann BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss
Medical subject headings
Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Straumann BoneCeramicDevice

    Bone augmentation procedure performed with Bone Ceramic

  • Bio-OssDevice

    Bone Augmentation procedure performed with Bio Oss

Study groups in NCT00901017
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Straumann BoneCeramicActive comparatorStraumann BoneCeramic
Receives: Device: Straumann BoneCeramic
Bio-OssActive comparatorGeistlich Bio-Oss
Receives: Device: Bio-Oss

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of Vertical Height of Buccal Defects

    Change of vertical height of buccal defects over 26 weeks, measured during 1st - and 2nd- stage surgery

    Measured: Baseline to 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Implant Success Rate

    The success of oral implant will be determined according to the following parameters:

    • Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
    • Absence of implant mobility (based on hand testing)
    • Absence of a peri-implant infection with suppuration.
    • Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
    • Bone level changes evaluated on periapical radiographs around implants less than 1 mm during the first year of loading, starting at abutment connection.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Implant Survival Rate

    A surviving implant will be considered an implant fulfilling the following criteria:

    • Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
    • Absence of implant mobility.
    • Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
    • Absence of pain or any other adverse observation by the patient, so that the implant has to be removed.

    Measured: 6 Months

  3. Implant Success Rate

    The success of oral implant will be determined according to the following parameters:

    • Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
    • Absence of implant mobility (based on hand testing)
    • Absence of a peri-implant infection with suppuration.
    • Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
    • Bone level changes evaluated on periapical radiographs around implants less than 1 mm during the first year of loading, starting at abutment connection.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Implant Survival Rate

    A surviving implant will be considered an implant fulfilling the following criteria:

    • Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
    • Absence of implant mobility.
    • Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
    • Absence of pain or any other adverse observation by the patient, so that the implant has to be removed.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2006
  3. Primary completionFeb 2008
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00901017
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR 04/05
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
11 May 2009
Last updated
30 Mar 2016
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Straumann BoneCeramic and Bio-Oss in people with Jaw, Edentulous and Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, run by Institut Straumann AG at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of Vertical Height of Buccal Defects (time frame: Baseline to 26 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in