Kidney TransplantationPhase 4OPTIMAIINCT00905515
Optima: Optimizing Prograf Therapy in Maintenance Allografts II
A Phase 4 study testing cyclosporine and Prograf (Tacrolimus) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens and evaluate immunological and non-immunological markers that may explain mechanistic differences in these agents and their effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- cyclosporine and Prograf (Tacrolimus)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2003to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is the recipient of a cadervic or living donor renal transplant.
- Patient was 18 years of age at time of transplant.
- Patient is at least 6 months post-transplant.
- Patient has been on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen since the transplant.
- Patient has a functioning allograft and a Cockcroft/Gault estimate of creatinine clearance >or= 35 mL/min within four weeks prior to randomization.
- Patient or legal guardian has signed and dated an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent document and is willing and able to follow study procedures.
- Females are not pregnant and agree to practice effective birth control while receiving immunosuppressant medication.
Who cannot join
- Patient is the recipient of a solid organ transplant other than the kidney.
- Patient experienced biopsy-confirmed, acute rejection, (Banff 97 criteria)within 3 months before randomization that required treatment, which is defined as antilymphocyte therapy, corticosteroids, or an increase in the number or dose of immunosuppressant medication.
- Patient has recurrence of primary renal disease, or de novo renal disease.
- Patient has a urine protein of > 1.5g/24 hours or two successive urinalyses sent to and reported by the laboratory indicating albuminuria greater than 2+ within 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Patient has an estimated creatinine clearance < 35 mL/min calculated using Cockcroft/Gault formula within four weeks prior to randomization.
- Patient has changed adjunctive immunosuppressant therapy within one month if randomization.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patient is pregnant or lactating.
- Patient is a known carrier of any of the HIV viruses.
- Patient has a known or suspected malignancy (except for treated squamous or basal cell skin cancers) < 5 years before randomization or a history of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).
- Patient has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, or any of the excipients of the drug.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
About this study
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens and evaluate immunological and non-immunological markers that may explain mechanistic differences in these agents and their effects.
Read the detailed description
One of the major challenges in transplantation over the past two decades has been managing long-term renal function. Serum creatinine is the most commonly used serum marker of renal function. However serum creatinine is insensitive for detecting small decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Another marker for renal function is cystatin C. Dharnidharka et al concluded that cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function since cystatin C was a more sensitive marker than serum creatinine for detecting decreases in GFR. Pirsch et al reported that tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of severe acute rejection and better lipid profiles than cyclosporine-treated patients.
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of premature death in renal and other transplant recipients. Current immunosuppressive protocols often elevate cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes.
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens to ensure the best possible long-term outcomes after renal transplantation.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Being tested
- cyclosporine, Prograf (Tacrolimus)
- Keywords
- Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppressive Agents
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cyclosporineDrug
Also called Cyclosporine/Neoral®/Sandimmune®/Gengraf®
Maintain on cyclosporine at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL.
Prograf (Tacrolimus)Drug
Also called Tacrolimus/Prograf®/FK506
Convert to Prograf at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL (Arm 2) or target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL (Arm 3).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group Cyclosporine | Active comparator | Maintain on Cyclosporine (CsA) at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL. Receives: Drug: cyclosporine |
| Low Trough Level Prograf Group | Active comparator | Convert to Prograf (TAC) at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL. Receives: Drug: Prograf (Tacrolimus) |
| High Trough Level Prograf Group | Active comparator | Convert to TAC at target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL. Receives: Drug: Prograf (Tacrolimus) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Renal Function in Patients Converted From Cyclosporine to Prograf
Measured: 3 years
Optimal Dose of Calcineurin Inhibitor in Long-term Maintenance Kidney Transplant Patients
Measured: 3 years
Change in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Morbidity and Chronic Graft Dysfunction as Evidenced by Blood Levels of Homocysteine
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2003
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- East Carolina University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paul Bolin, East Carolina University
- Investigators
- Paul Bolin, MD, Principal investigator, East Carolina University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00905515
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MR-06-001
- Acronym
- OPTIMAII
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 18 May 2009
- Last updated
- 7 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):221-6. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34487.
PubMed 12148093Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, Vincenti F, Filo RS. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation. 1997 Apr 15;63(7):977-83. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199704150-00013.
PubMed 9112351
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optima: Optimizing Prograf Therapy in Maintenance Allografts II
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00905515
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMAII / MR-06-001
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Keywords
- Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppressive Agents
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- East Carolina UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
- Study start
- Aug 2003
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Feb 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens and evaluate immunological and non-immunological markers that may explain mechanistic differences in these agents and their effects.
Detailed description
One of the major challenges in transplantation over the past two decades has been managing long-term renal function. Serum creatinine is the most commonly used serum marker of renal function. However serum creatinine is insensitive for detecting small decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Another marker for renal function is cystatin C. Dharnidharka et al concluded that cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function since cystatin C was a more sensitive marker than serum creatinine for detecting decreases in GFR. Pirsch et al reported that tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of severe acute rejection and better lipid profiles than cyclosporine-treated patients.
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of premature death in renal and other transplant recipients. Current immunosuppressive protocols often elevate cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes.
This study is designed to optimize calcineurin immunosuppressive regimens to ensure the best possible long-term outcomes after renal transplantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group Cyclosporine | Active comparator | Drug: cyclosporineMaintain on Cyclosporine (CsA) at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL. |
| Low Trough Level Prograf Group | Active comparator | Drug: Prograf (Tacrolimus)Convert to Prograf (TAC) at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL. |
| High Trough Level Prograf Group | Active comparator | Drug: Prograf (Tacrolimus)Convert to TAC at target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient is the recipient of a cadervic or living donor renal transplant.
- Patient was 18 years of age at time of transplant.
- Patient is at least 6 months post-transplant.
- Patient has been on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen since the transplant.
- Patient has a functioning allograft and a Cockcroft/Gault estimate of creatinine clearance >or= 35 mL/min within four weeks prior to randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient is the recipient of a solid organ transplant other than the kidney.
- Patient experienced biopsy-confirmed, acute rejection, (Banff 97 criteria)within 3 months before randomization that required treatment, which is defined as antilymphocyte therapy, corticosteroids, or an increase in the number or dose of immunosuppressant medication.
- Patient has recurrence of primary renal disease, or de novo renal disease.
- Patient has a urine protein of > 1.5g/24 hours or two successive urinalyses sent to and reported by the laboratory indicating albuminuria greater than 2+ within 6 months prior to enrollment.
- Patient has an estimated creatinine clearance < 35 mL/min calculated using Cockcroft/Gault formula within four weeks prior to randomization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cyclosporineAlso: Cyclosporine/Neoral®/Sandimmune®/Gengraf®Maintain on cyclosporine at target trough level of 50-250 ng/mL. | Drug | Control Group Cyclosporine |
| Prograf (Tacrolimus)Also: Tacrolimus/Prograf®/FK506Convert to Prograf at target trough levels of 3.0-5.9 ng/mL (Arm 2) or target trough levels of 6.0-8.9 ng/mL (Arm 3). | Drug | High Trough Level Prograf Group, Low Trough Level Prograf Group |
Primary outcome
Renal Function in Patients Converted From Cyclosporine to Prograf
Time frame: 3 years
Optimal Dose of Calcineurin Inhibitor in Long-term Maintenance Kidney Transplant Patients
Time frame: 3 years
Change in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Morbidity and Chronic Graft Dysfunction as Evidenced by Blood Levels of Homocysteine
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12148093Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):221-6. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34487.
- Background: PubMed 9112351Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, Vincenti F, Filo RS. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation. 1997 Apr 15;63(7):977-83. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199704150-00013.
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Felzartamab Infusions in Adults With Kidney Transplants Who Have Late Isolated Microvascular Inflammation
Microvascular Inflammation
RecruitingPhase 2/3
CIRTEN-Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Pancreas Transplantation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Sequential Daratumumab Followed by Telitacicept for the Treatment of ABMR After Kidney Transplantation-A Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Antibody-mediated Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Dd-cfDNA in Routine Patient Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients"
Renal Transplantation
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Bolin, MD principal investigator
East Carolina University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing cyclosporine and Prograf (Tacrolimus) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Feb 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Renal Function in Patients Converted From Cyclosporine to Prograf (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00905515, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Sep 2023.