AzTrials
AzTrials

P Acnes ColonizationPhase 4NCT00907101

Evaluate Effectiveness of Epiduo® Gel in Reducing Antibiotic Sensitive & Resistant Strains of Propionibacterium (P)Acnes

A Phase 4 study testing Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel) in people with P Acnes Colonization, run by Galderma R&D at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Epiduo® Gel in reducing antibiotic sensitive and resistant strains of P acnes in vivo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
P Acnes Colonization
What is being tested?
Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2009to Jul 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy adult male or female subjects 18 years of age and older, with no past or present history of any significant internal disease
  • Subjects who:
  • show a high degree of fluorescence of the facial skin under a Wood's lamp, indicating the presence of P acnes
  • have Baseline P acnes count of > 10,000 per cm2 CFU of the facial skin (forehead)
  • have high level resistance to erythromycin, variable resistance to clindamycin, resistance to tetracycline and variable resistance to doxycycline and minocycline

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who exhibit any skin disorders of an acute or chronic nature (e.g., psoriasis, eczema, etc)
  • Subjects who have taken topical or systemic antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to baseline assessments
  • Subjects who have used other medications which may influence skin surface P acnes levels
  • Subjects who are unwilling to refrain from using toners, astringents or other drying agents on the face during the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Skin Study Center

    Broomall, Pennsylvania, 19008

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Epiduo® Gel (Adapalene 0.1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel) in Reducing Antibiotic Sensitive and Resistant Strains of P Acnes

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Epiduo® Gel in reducing antibiotic sensitive and resistant strains of P acnes in vivo.

Being tested
Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel)Drug

    Also called Epiduo® Gel

    Apply once daily

Study groups in NCT00907101
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study TreatmentExperimentalAdapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel) Other Names: Epiduo® Gel Apply once daily
Receives: Drug: Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Quantitative Bacteriology Measurements at Week 4

    Mean log10 values of P. acnes from swabbed skin samples Please note: Quantitative bacteriologic cultures were obtained from the facial skin (forehead) at screening, baseline, week 2 and week 4/early termination. Samples were obtained according to a modification of the technique of Williamson and Kligman. CFUs of P. acnes were counted at the dilution that contained between 10 and 100 CFUs. Total densities of P. acnes were calculated and reported as the average (of both plates) of the log10 CFUs per cm².

    Measured: Week 4

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Worst Post Baseline Tolerability Assessment - Erythema

    Please note: Tolerability assessments were recorded separately from adverse events. Tolerability changes which may have required a temporary or permanent interruption of the subject's participation in the study (at his/her request or at the investigator's discretion), or concomitant treatment, was to be recorded in the AE form of the CRF. An entry was to be made on the AE form for all AEs.

    Measured: Week 4

  2. Worst Post Baseline Tolerability Assessment - Dryness

    Please note: Tolerability assessments were recorded separately from adverse events. Tolerability changes which may have required a temporary or permanent interruption of the subject's participation in the study (at his/her request or at the investigator's discretion), or concomitant treatment, was to be recorded in the AE form of the CRF. An entry was to be made on the AE form for all AEs.

    Measured: Week 4

  3. Worst Post Baseline Tolerability Assessment - Scaling

    Please note: Tolerability assessments were recorded separately from adverse events. Tolerability changes which may have required a temporary or permanent interruption of the subject's participation in the study (at his/her request or at the investigator's discretion), or concomitant treatment, was to be recorded in the AE form of the CRF. An entry was to be made on the AE form for all AEs.

    Measured: Week 4

  4. Worst Post Baseline Tolerability Assessment - Stinging/Burning

    Please note: Tolerability assessments were recorded separately from adverse events. Tolerability changes which may have required a temporary or permanent interruption of the subject's participation in the study (at his/her request or at the investigator's discretion), or concomitant treatment, was to be recorded in the AE form of the CRF. An entry was to be made on the AE form for all AEs.

    Measured: Week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2009
  4. Study completionJul 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00907101
Sponsor's protocol ID
US10127
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
20 May 2009
Last updated
1 Aug 2022
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Leyden JJ, Preston N, Osborn C, Gottschalk RW. In-vivo Effectiveness of Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel on Antibiotic-sensitive and Resistant Propionibacterium acnes. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 May;4(5):22-6.

    PubMed 21607190

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel (Epiduo® Gel) in people with P Acnes Colonization, run by Galderma R&D at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Bacteriology Measurements at Week 4 (time frame: Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00907101, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in