Cervical CancerNCT00907634
Prospective Evaluation of Intrafractional and Interfractional Cervical Motion During External Beam Radiation for Intact Cervical Cancer by the Calypso® 4D Localization System™
An observational study of Cervical Cancer, run by Emory University.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to find out how the cervix normally moves during radiation treatment. This study will also evaluate how cervical cancer shrinks during chemotherapy and radiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Stage IB-IV Cervical cancer patients
Who may be able to join
- Stage IB-IVA Cervical Squamous cell carcinoma
- Karnofsky Performance Score 60-100
Who cannot join
- Other histologies
- Karnofsky Performance Score < 60
About this study
The purpose of this study is to find out how the cervix normally moves during radiation treatment. This study will also evaluate how cervical cancer shrinks during chemotherapy and radiation. By better understanding these two things, the investigators can see if radiation could safely be given in a more focused way in the future.
The investigational portion of this study includes (1) daily cone beam CT scans to confirm transponder placement and evaluate tumor changes during treatment and (2) tracking movement of the cervix during daily radiation treatment.
Read the detailed description
There has been recent interest in the use of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), a form of focal external beam radiation for intact cervical cancer. IMRT has been proposed as (1) an alternative treatment of the whole pelvis in an attempt to reduce the dose of radiation delivered to normal tissues and (2) a replacement for brachytherapy as an integrated or sequential radiation boost instead of intracavitary brachytherapy. At other tumor sites, IMRT has allowed for radiation dose escalation to the tumor while sparing adjacent normal tissues. IMRT requires greater accuracy of targeting and understanding of tumor and organ motion and tumor regression during radiotherapy to protect adjacent normal tissues and prevent against tumor underdosage.
Currently, there is limited knowledge of cervical organ motion. Previous studies have evaluated interfractional cervical motion [daily set-up variation, i.e. the location of the cervix on Day 1 vs. Day 2 or Day 30 of radiation treatment] with weekly CT and MRI scans or localization of fiducial markers evaluated by fluoroscopy daily before radiation therapy. There is no published literature regarding intrafractional cervical motion [motion during a single radiation treatment]. We propose a prospective clinical trial utilizing the Calypso® 4D Localization System™ to evaluate intrafractional and interfractional cervical motion for intact cervical cancer.
The Calypso® 4D Localization System™ is an FDA approved tumor localization system for adjunctive use in patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The system is designed to provide accurate, objective, and continuous 3-dimensional localization of the treatment target for patient alignment and target position monitoring relative to the isocenter of the linear accelerator. The Calypso system consists of implantable electromagnetic transponders, each with a unique resonant frequency. An array is placed over the patient and remains in place during radiation delivery. Source coils in the array emit electromagnetic signals that excite the transponders identifying the position of each individual transponder. The transponder position can be continuously monitored throughout treatment delivery reporting transponder motion in lateral, superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions.
Our goal is to enroll 10 patients over a 1-2 year time period with intact cervical cancer (Stage IB-IVA) who will receive definitive radiation therapy at Emory University Hospital and Emory Crawford Long Hospital. Two Calypso beacons will be attached within a cervical "Smit" sleeve [1 superior, 1 inferior] which will be placed within the cervical os prior to CT simulation (radiation planning session). The cervical sleeve will be sutured in with 2 stitches. The location of the transponders will be tracked throughout the treatment delivery. Daily cone beam CT on the radiation treatment machine will also be utilized to confirm transponder placement and evaluate tumor volume changes during the treatment course. There will be no treatment field modifications based on cervical (transponder) displacement. While enrolled on this study, patients will be treated with the current standard of care treatment: 5 weeks of external beam radiation with concurrent weekly cisplatin and followed a focal radiation "boost" using intracavitary brachytherapy. The 5 weeks of external beam radiation therapy will be delivered with a conventional 4-field technique to the whole pelvis for a total of 45Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. All external beam radiation treatments will be delivered at the Emory Clinic, Clifton Road. The cervical sleeve will be removed following the external beam portion of therapy.
The calypso beacons will be provided free of charge for this study and there will be no additional costs to the patient or the Radiation Oncology Department for patients enrolling in this study. No additional risks are anticipated for patients enrolled in this study compared to the current standard of care treatment. The only "tests" that are part of our protocol that are outside of the standard of care for the treatment of intact cervical cancer would be the use of the (1) Calypso array used to localize the calypso "beacons" and (2) daily cone-beam CT scans to evaluate cervical cancer response to therapy. The Radiation Oncology department regularly uses both systems for patient set-up for other solid tumors and there will be no additional charge for these tests.
We believe this study will greater improve our current knowledge of cervical cancer motion and tumor regression during radiation therapy. There is concern that smaller radiation fields, as would be delivered with IMRT could underdose portions of the tumor resulting in inadequate local tumor control and compromising cure. As a result of this study will be able to infer if IMRT is a safe and reasonable treatment option for patients with intact cervical cancer. Knowledge of the extent and direction of cervical motion will also help determine IMRT treatment margins.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- cervix, cervical, radiation
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completionAug 2011
Why it stopped: Study closed by IRB because a Continuing Review and/or Close-Out have not been submitted. Study closed by IRB
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter J. Rossi, MD, Emory University
- Investigators
- Peter Rossi, MD, Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00907634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00013078
- Other IDs
- EmoryCervicalMotion
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 21 May 2009
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Evaluation of Intrafractional and Interfractional Cervical Motion During External Beam Radiation for Intact Cervical Cancer by the Calypso® 4D Localization System™
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00907634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00013078
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- cervix, cervical, radiation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study closed by IRB because a Continuing Review and/or Close-Out have not been submitted. Study closed by IRB
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to find out how the cervix normally moves during radiation treatment. This study will also evaluate how cervical cancer shrinks during chemotherapy and radiation. By better understanding these two things, the investigators can see if radiation could safely be given in a more focused way in the future.
The investigational portion of this study includes (1) daily cone beam CT scans to confirm transponder placement and evaluate tumor changes during treatment and (2) tracking movement of the cervix during daily radiation treatment.
Detailed description
There has been recent interest in the use of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), a form of focal external beam radiation for intact cervical cancer. IMRT has been proposed as (1) an alternative treatment of the whole pelvis in an attempt to reduce the dose of radiation delivered to normal tissues and (2) a replacement for brachytherapy as an integrated or sequential radiation boost instead of intracavitary brachytherapy. At other tumor sites, IMRT has allowed for radiation dose escalation to the tumor while sparing adjacent normal tissues. IMRT requires greater accuracy of targeting and understanding of tumor and organ motion and tumor regression during radiotherapy to protect adjacent normal tissues and prevent against tumor underdosage.
Currently, there is limited knowledge of cervical organ motion. Previous studies have evaluated interfractional cervical motion [daily set-up variation, i.e. the location of the cervix on Day 1 vs. Day 2 or Day 30 of radiation treatment] with weekly CT and MRI scans or localization of fiducial markers evaluated by fluoroscopy daily before radiation therapy. There is no published literature regarding intrafractional cervical motion [motion during a single radiation treatment]. We propose a prospective clinical trial utilizing the Calypso® 4D Localization System™ to evaluate intrafractional and interfractional cervical motion for intact cervical cancer.
The Calypso® 4D Localization System™ is an FDA approved tumor localization system for adjunctive use in patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The system is designed to provide accurate, objective, and continuous 3-dimensional localization of the treatment target for patient alignment and target position monitoring relative to the isocenter of the linear accelerator. The Calypso system consists of implantable electromagnetic transponders, each with a unique resonant frequency. An array is placed over the patient and remains in place during radiation delivery. Source coils in the array emit electromagnetic signals that excite the transponders identifying the position of each individual transponder. The transponder position can be continuously monitored throughout treatment delivery reporting transponder motion in lateral, superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions.
Our goal is to enroll 10 patients over a 1-2 year time period with intact cervical cancer (Stage IB-IVA) who will receive definitive radiation therapy at Emory University Hospital and Emory Crawford Long Hospital. Two Calypso beacons will be attached within a cervical "Smit" sleeve [1 superior, 1 inferior] which will be placed within the cervical os prior to CT simulation (radiation planning session). The cervical sleeve will be sutured in with 2 stitches. The location of the transponders will be tracked throughout the treatment delivery. Daily cone beam CT on the radiation treatment machine will also be utilized to confirm transponder placement and evaluate tumor volume changes during the treatment course. There will be no treatment field modifications based on cervical (transponder) displacement. While enrolled on this study, patients will be treated with the current standard of care treatment: 5 weeks of external beam radiation with concurrent weekly cisplatin and followed a focal radiation "boost" using intracavitary brachytherapy. The 5 weeks of external beam radiation therapy will be delivered with a conventional 4-field technique to the whole pelvis for a total of 45Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. All external beam radiation treatments will be delivered at the Emory Clinic, Clifton Road. The cervical sleeve will be removed following the external beam portion of therapy.
The calypso beacons will be provided free of charge for this study and there will be no additional costs to the patient or the Radiation Oncology Department for patients enrolling in this study. No additional risks are anticipated for patients enrolled in this study compared to the current standard of care treatment. The only "tests" that are part of our protocol that are outside of the standard of care for the treatment of intact cervical cancer would be the use of the (1) Calypso array used to localize the calypso "beacons" and (2) daily cone-beam CT scans to evaluate cervical cancer response to therapy. The Radiation Oncology department regularly uses both systems for patient set-up for other solid tumors and there will be no additional charge for these tests.
We believe this study will greater improve our current knowledge of cervical cancer motion and tumor regression during radiation therapy. There is concern that smaller radiation fields, as would be delivered with IMRT could underdose portions of the tumor resulting in inadequate local tumor control and compromising cure. As a result of this study will be able to infer if IMRT is a safe and reasonable treatment option for patients with intact cervical cancer. Knowledge of the extent and direction of cervical motion will also help determine IMRT treatment margins.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Stage IB-IV Cervical cancer patients
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Stage IB-IVA Cervical Squamous cell carcinoma
- Karnofsky Performance Score 60-100
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Other histologies
- Karnofsky Performance Score < 60
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2013.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Rossi, MD principal investigator
Emory University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Cancer, run by Emory University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2013.