AzTrials
AzTrials

UrolithiasisNCT00907946

Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract (NT) Versus Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

A study testing NT 1 day before PCNL in people with Urolithiasis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators are trying to determine whether placement of a nephrostomy tube prior to definitive stone surgery and under ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance will reduce complications related to bleeding and infection compare to obtaining renal access at the time of surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Urolithiasis
What is being tested?
NT 1 day before PCNL
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2009to Oct 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients age 18 years to 90 years old,
  • Patients with stone disease
  • Patients who hoose to have PCNL for treatment
  • Patients who understand the informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Minors
  • Unable to understand the informed consent
  • Unwilling to fill out the SF 36 questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract and Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Its Effects on Infection and Bleeding Related Complications

The investigators are trying to determine whether placement of a nephrostomy tube prior to definitive stone surgery and under ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance will reduce complications related to bleeding and infection compare to obtaining renal access at the time of surgery.

Read the detailed description

We seek to identify whether the placement of a nephrostomy tract prior to surgery versus at the time of PCNL will: 1. decrease blood loss and related complications, and 2. decrease infection-related complications by providing the ability to an accurate collection of urine for culture and initiating appropriate antibiotic treatment prior to definitive stone management. In addition, we seek to determine whether renal puncture under fluoroscopic vs ultrasonic guidance is associated with less blood loss. Although retrospective studies have shown some benefit to placing the nephrostomy tube prior to surgery in terms of decreased blood loss, there are no well-designed, prospective studies comparing the two treatment approaches. We seek to determine which treatment approach is safer, more efficacious, and more cost-effective through a prospective, randomized trial.

Conditions
Urolithiasis
Being tested
NT 1 day before PCNL
Keywords
Renal stones
Medical subject headings
Urolithiasis, Nephrolithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NT 1 day before PCNLProcedure or surgery

    A bladder urine culture will be obtained prior to nephrostomy tube placement and antibiotic treatment will be initiated if necessary. A nephrostomy tube will be placed at least one day prior to surgery in the Vascular Interventional Radiology (VIR) suite under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. The type of imaging will be determined by the radiologist at the time of procedure and documented. A renal pelvis urine culture will be obtained at the time of nephrostomy tube placement. If the culture is positive, the patients will be treated with appropriate antibiotics for at least one week prior to PCNL. If the culture is negative, the patient will be stratified into 2 groups:

    1. Hydronephrosis present and/or stone greater than 2cm empiric antibiotics will be initiated.
    2. If neither of the above criteria (a.) are met, and the urine culture is negative, no antibiotics will be administered except peri-operatively according to standard protocol.
Study groups in NCT00907946
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NT prior to PCNLExperimentalA bladder urine culture will be obtained prior to nephrostomy tube placement and antibiotic treatment will be initiated if necessary. A nephrostomy tube will be placed at least one week prior to surgery in the Vascular Interventional Radiology (VIR) suite under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. The type of imaging will be determined by the radiologist at the time of procedure and documented. A renal pelvis urine culture will be obtained at the time of nephrostomy tube placement. If the culture is positive, the patients will be treated with appropriate antibiotics for at least one week prior to PCNL. If the culture is negative, the patient will be stratified into 2 groups: 1. Hydronephrosis present and/or stone greater than 2cm empiric antibiotics will be initiated. 2. If neither of the above criteria (a.) are met, and the urine culture is negative, no antibiotics will be administered except peri-operatively according to standard protocol.
Receives: Procedure: NT 1 day before PCNL
NT at the surgeryNo interventionA bladder urine culture will be obtained prior to surgery and appropriate antibiotic treatment will be initiated if necessary. The nephrostomy tract will be placed at the time of surgery under fluoroscopic guidance. All patients will receive empiric intravenous peri-operative antibiotics at induction. Renal pelvis urine and stone will be collected for culture and post-operative treatment will be initiated if necessary.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction of complications related to bleeding and infection

    We aim to determine whether placement of a nephrostomy tube prior to definitive stone surgery and under ultrasonic or fluoroscopic guidance will reduce complications related to bleeding and infection compared to obtaining renal access at the time of surgery.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Why it stopped: Slow accrual

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00907946
Sponsor's protocol ID
Alana Desai PCNL Study-09-0709
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
21 May 2009
Last updated
11 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing NT 1 day before PCNL in people with Urolithiasis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Slow accrual). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction of complications related to bleeding and infection (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in