Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, IdiopathicPhase 2PETITNCT00908037
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eltrombopag in Pediatric Patients With Thrombocytopenia From Chronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 33 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
Phase II, multi-center, 3 part, staggered cohort, open-label and double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study involving 3 age-determined cohorts (Cohort 1: between 12 and 17 years old; Cohort 2: between 6 and 11 years old; Cohort 3: between 1 and 5 years old). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
- What is being tested?
- eltrombopag
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2009to 1 Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Subjects between 1 year and <18 years of age at Day 1.
- Written informed consent from subject's guardian and accompanying informed assent from subject (for children over 6 years old).
- Confirmed diagnosis of chronic ITP, according to the American Society of Hematology / British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines [George, 1996; BCSH, 2003]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear or bone marrow examination should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other causes of thrombocytopenia.
- Subjects who are refractory or have relapsed after at least one prior ITP therapy or are not eligible, for a medical reason, for other treatments.
- Day 1 (or within 48 hours prior) platelet count <30 Gi/L.
- Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to Day 1 or have been clearly ineffective.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1.
- Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1 or have clearly been ineffective.
- Subjects must have prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within 80 to 120% of the normal range.
- Subjects must have a complete blood count (CBC) not suggestive of another hematological disorder.
- The following clinical chemistries for the subjects MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
- For subjects of child-bearing potential (after menarche): subject must not be sexually active or is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index <1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study:
- Complete abstinence from intercourse;
- Intrauterine device (IUD);
- Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide);
- Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only).
Who cannot join
- Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g. thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease).
- Concurrent or past malignant disease, including myeloproliferative disorder.
- Subjects who are not suitable for continuation of their current therapy for at least 7 additional additional weeks.
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding Day 1.
- History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
- Diagnosis of secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence of active hepatitis at the time of subject screening.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subject with Evans syndrome (autoimmune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolysis).
- Subjects with known inherited thrombocytopenia (e.g. MYH-9 disorders)
- Subjects treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for >3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of Day 1.
- Subjects who have previously received eltrombopag or any other thrombopoietin receptor agonist.
- For female subjects who have reached menarche status, an inability or unwillingness to provide a blood or urine specimen for pregnancy testing.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 6 countries.
33 sites in 6 countries
United States18 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2605
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10021
GSK Investigational Site
Orange, California, 92868
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32827
GSK Investigational Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61614
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
GSK Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98105
United Kingdom5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
GSK Investigational Site
London, W2 1NY
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
GSK Investigational Site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
GSK Investigational Site
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Spain4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barakaldo (Vizcaya), 48903
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08035
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28009
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046
France3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33076
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75571
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75935
Canada2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8
About this study
Official title: A Three Part, Staggered Cohort, Open-label and Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Eltrombopag, a Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist, in Previously Treated Pediatric Patients With Chronic ITP.
Phase II, multi-center, 3 part, staggered cohort, open-label and double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study involving 3 age-determined cohorts (Cohort 1: between 12 and 17 years old; Cohort 2: between 6 and 11 years old; Cohort 3: between 1 and 5 years old). Daily dosing with eltrombopag will begin with 5 patients in the oldest age cohort in an open label fashion, and a review of safety, pharmacokinetic and platelet count data will be performed regularly. If no safety concerns are identified after 12 weeks, 18 additional patients will be randomised to placebo or eltrombopag (2:1 randomisation). After 7 weeks of randomized treatment, all patients will receive eltrombopag in an open label fashion. The total duration of treatment with eltrombopag will be 24 weeks. If at the time of the aforementioned 12 week review of the first 5 patients no safety issues are identified, dosing will begin in the next lower age cohort with an initial group of 5 patients. The same procedure will be followed in terms of safety review and subsequent enrolment and randomisation of the additional patients. Initiation of the younger age cohort will take place once data from the previous has been evaluated. Doses will be adjusted according to platelet counts and tolerability. The study will include a review of the safety data by a Data Safety Monitoring Board.
- Conditions
- Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
- Being tested
- eltrombopag, Placebo
- Keywords
- idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombocytopenia, pharmacodynamics, ITP, eltrombopag, pharmacokinetics, chronic ITP, pediatrics
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Thrombocytopenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eltrombopagDrug
thrombopoietin receptor agonist
PlaceboDrug
placebo for comparison
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eltrombopag plus standard of care | Experimental | eltrombopag Receives: Drug: eltrombopag |
| placebo plus standard of care | Placebo comparator | placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50 Giga Cells Per Liter (Gi/L) at Least Once, Between Day 8 and Day 43 (Weeks 1 to 6) of the Randomized Period of the Study (Part 2)
Participants who achieved a platelet count >=50 Gi/L at least once between Day 8 and Day 43 (first 6 weeks of Part 2) in the absense of rescue treatment were reported. A 95% confidence interval was calculated by the exact binomial method.
Measured: From Day 8 up to Day 43 of Part 2
Secondary outcomes (39)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50Gi/L During Treatment With Eltrombopag in >= 60% of Assessments Between Day 15 and Day 43 (Weeks 2 Through 6) of the Randomized Treatment Period (Part 2)
Sustained platelet response between the treatment groups was assessed by determining the number of participants who achieved a platelet count >=50 Gi/L during treatment with eltrombopag in >= 60% of assessments between Day 15 and Day 43 in the absence of rescue treatment were reported here.
Measured: Between Day 15 and Day 43 of Part 2
Weighted Mean Platelet Count
The weighted mean platelet count is defined as the area under the platelet-time curve divided by the duration of the treatment (12 weeks). Based on the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model, the weighted mean platelet count is the sum of the Baseline count plus the age cohort plus the treatment. Baseline was defined as the platelet count taken on Day 1 or within 48 hours prior to the first dose of treatment.
Measured: Baseline and Day 43 of Part 2
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50Gi/L at Any Time During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Dosing During Part 1.
The percentage of participants achieving platelet counts >=50Gi/L at least once at any time during the 24 weeks of eltrombopag treatment were reported.
Measured: From Day 1 of treatment up to Week 24 of Part 1
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50 Gi/L at Any Time During the 31 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 2/ 3.
The percentage of participants achieving platelet counts >=50Gi/L at least once at any time during the 24 weeks of eltrombopag treatment during Part 2/3 of the study were reported. Participants randmoized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: Part 2/3 up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment for Eltrombopag for AUC(0-t) During Part 1, 2, and 2/3.
The area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-t) data was collected to estimate primary model-based PK parameters. PK samples were collected within 3 hours prior to dosing and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after dosing. Doses were normalized to 50mg for comparison. PK samples were collected at each on-treatment visit during Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3. The concentration data were pooled across visits to identify population PK and variability parameter estimates and covariate effects. AUC(0-t) is defined as the area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval. From the final model, a single value of AUC(0-t) was estimated for each subject, and geometric mean (95% CI) values are presented for each cohort for a 50mg dose.
Measured: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Cmax and Ct During Part 1, 2, and 2/3.
The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and the concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ct) data were collected to estimate primary model-based PK parameters. PK samples were collected within 3 hours prior to dosing and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after dosing. Doses were normalized to 50mg for comparison. PK samples were collected at each on-treatment visit during Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3. The concentration data were pooled across visits to identify population PK and variability parameter estimates and covariate effects. From the final model, a single value of Cmax and Ct were estimated for each subject, and geometric mean (95% CI) values are presented for each cohort for a 50mg dose.
Measured: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Tmax During Part 1, 2, and 2/3
The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was collected to estimate primary model-based PK parameters. PK samples were collected within 3 hours prior to dosing and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after dosing. PK samples were collected at each on-treatment visit during Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3. The concentration data were pooled across visits to identify population PK and variability parameter estimates and covariate effects. From the final model, a single value of tmax was estimated for each subject, and geometric mean (95% CI) values are presented for each cohort for a 50mg dose.
Measured: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for CL/F During Part 1, 2, and 2/3
The apparent plasma clearance following oral dosing of eltrombopag (CL/F) was collected to estimate primary model-based PK parameters. PK samples were collected within 3 hours prior to dosing and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after dosing. PK samples were collected at each on-treatment visit during Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3. The concentration data were pooled across visits to identify population PK and variability parameter estimates and covariate effects. From the final model, a single value of CL/F was estimated for each subject, and geometric mean (95% CI) values are presented for each cohort for a 50mg dose.
Measured: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Maximum Duration for Which a Participant Continuously Maintained a Platelet Count of >=50 Gi/L During the 7 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment in Part 2
The maximum duration for which a participant continuously maintained a platelet count >=50 Gi/L in the absence of rescue treatment was calculated and summarized during the 24 weeks of eltrombopag treatment in Part 2. Participants with non-weekly assessments were assumed to have maintained a positive response for each week between two assessments that had positive responses. If a particpant achieved a positive response at an assessment and then achieved a negative response at the next assessment, then it was assumed that the participant had achieved a positive response for one day. Excludes periods from initiation of rescue medication until platelet count falls to below 50Gi/L, irrespective of platelet count
Measured: From Baseline through Week 7 of Part 2
Maximum Duration for Which a Participant Continuously Maintained a Platelet Count of >=50 Gi/L During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment in Part 2/ 3
The maximum duration for which a participant continuously maintained a platelet count >=50 Gi/L in the absence of rescue treatment was calculated and summarized during the 24 weeks of eltrombopag treatment in Part 2/3. Participants with non-weekly assessments were assumed to have maintained a positive response for each week between two assessments that had positive responses. If a particpant achieved a positive response at an assessment and then achieved a negative response at the next assessment, then it was assumed that the participant had achieved a positive response for one day. Participants randmoized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: From Baseline up to Study Week 31
Percentage of Participants Who Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Medications During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 1.
The participants who discontinued (dis) or had a sustained reduction (red) of a Baseline (BL) ITP medication for at least one day during the period of Day 1 of Part 1 to the last dose of study medication +1 day are reported. The denominator is the number of subjects taking an ITP medication at baseline. For participants in Part 1, Baseline is defined as Day 1 of Part 1. A sustained reduction is defined as reduction for 4 weeks or more. An attempted red or dis is a decrease in the dose or frequency from the BL dose or frequency of an ITP medication for at least one day during the period Part 1 Day 1 to the last dose of study medication + 1 day.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 24+ 1 day of Part 1
Percentage of Participants Who Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant ITP Medications During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 2/ 3
Participants who discontinued (dis) or had a sustained reduction (red) of a Baseline (BL) ITP medication for at least one day during the period of Day 1 of Part 2/3 to the last dose of study medication +1 day are reported. The denominator is the number of subjects taking an ITP medication at baseline. For participants randomized to placebo in Part 2, BL is defined as Week 7 of Part 2. For participants randomized to eltrombopag in Part 2, BL is defined as Day 1 of Part 2. A sustained reduction is defined as reduction for 4 weeks or more. An attempted reduction or discontinuation is a decrease in the dose or frequency from the BL dose or frequency of an ITP medication for at least one day during the period Part 2/3 Day 1 to the last dose of study medication + 1 day.
Measured: From Baseline to the end of treatment up to Week 31 + 1 day of Part 2/3
Number of Participants Who Required a Protocol-defined Rescue Treatment During Part 2/3
Rescue treatment was defined as either a new immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) medication, an increase in the dose of a concomitant ITP medication from Baseline, a platelet transfusion, or a splenectomy. For particpants randomized to placebo in Part 2, Baseline is defined as Week 7 of Part 2. For participants randomized to eltrombopag in Part 2, Baseline is defined as Day 1 of Part 2. Participants randmoized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: From Baseline to the end of treatment up to Week 31 + 1 day of Part2/3
Kids' ITP Tool (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Dose Finding Period, Part 1
The KIT questionnaire measures the impact on the quality of life determined by the participant and the guardian by self reported outcomes at Baseline or the Screening Visit, after 6 weeks of treatment, after 12 weeks of treatment and at the end of treatment or withdrawal from the study. The KIT total score is calculated from the scores of each of the individual questions from Q1 - Q26 (excluding any answer that is 'Not applicable'). The code list used for the individual question scores is: 1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always and 9 = not applicable. The range of values the total score can take is 0 (worst) to 100 (best). For subjects under the age of six, the family questionnaire (parental proxy) has been used.
Measured: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 of Part 1
Kids' ITP Tool (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline and Week 6as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Randomized Period, Part 2
The KIT questionnaire measures the impact on the quality of life determined by the participant and the guardian by self reported outcomes at Baseline or the Screening Visit, after 6 weeks of treatment or withdrawal from the study. The KIT total score is calculated from the scores of each of the individual questions from Q1 - Q26 (excluding any answer that is 'Not applicable'). The code list used for the individual question scores is: 1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = always and 9 = not applicable. The range of values the total score can take is 0 (worst) to 100 (best). For subjects under the age of six, the family questionnaire (parental proxy) has been used.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6 of Part 2
Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline, Week, 6, Week 12, and End of Treatment Visit as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Eltrombopag Open-Label Period, Part 2/3
The KIT questionnaire measures the impact on the quality of life determined by the participant and the guardian by self reported outcomes at Baseline or the Screening Visit, after 6 weeks of treatment, after 12 weeks of treatment and at the end of treatment or withdrawal from the study. The KIT total score is calculated from the scores of each of the individual questions from Q1 - Q26 (excluding any answer that is 'Not applicable'). The code list used for the individual question scores is: 1=never, 2=seldom, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always and 9=not applicable. The range of values the total score can take is 0 (worst) to 100 (best). For subjects under the age of six, the family questionnaire (parental proxy) has been used.
Measured: From Baseline to end of treatment up to Study Week 31
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding, no Clinically Significant Bleeding and Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale During Part 2
The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: Grade 0 = no bleeding, Grade 1 = petechiae, Grade 2 = mild blood loss, Grade 3 = gross bleeding and Grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO grades were dichotomized into the following categories: no bleeding=Grade 0; any bleeding=Grades 1 to 4; no clinically significant bleeding=Grades 0 to 1; clinically significant bleeding=Grades 2 to 4. For participants randomized to Placebo in Part 2, Baseline defined as Week 7 of Part 2. For participants randomized to Eltrombopag in Part 2, Baseline defined as Day 1 of Part 2.
Measured: From Baseline through Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding, no Clinically Significant Bleeding and Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale During Part 2/3
The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: Grade 0 = no bleeding, Grade 1 = petechiae, Grade 2 = mild blood loss, Grade 3 = gross bleeding and Grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO grades were dichotomized into the following categories: no bleeding=Grade 0; any bleeding=Grades 1 to 4; no clinically significant bleeding=Grades 0 to 1; clinically significant bleeding=Grades 2 to 4. For participants randomized to Placebo in Part 2, Baseline defined as Week 7 of Part 2. For participants randomized to Eltrombopag in Part 2, Baseline defined as Day 1 of Part 2.
Measured: From Baseline of Part 2/3 through Follow-up
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter Falling Outside of the Reference Range Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Clinical chemistry parameters included: aspartate amino transferase (AST, reference range [RR]: 0-38 International Units per Liter [IU/L]), alkaline phosphatase (ALP: RR: 50 - 375 IU/L), total bilirubin (RR: 3.42 - 22.23 micromoles [umol]/L), albumin grams [g/L], alanine amino transferase (ALT, RR: 5-30 IU/L), prothrombin international normalized ratio (PT INR, RR-0.9 - 1.2), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT, RR: 24.2 - 32.9 seconds), glucose (RR: 4.107- 6.55018 millimoles [mmol]/L), potassium (3 - 5 mmol/L), and sodium (135 - 143 mmol/L). Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. The number of participants with the indicated clinical chemistry data outside of the reference range (with high and low) any time post-Baseline are presented. Anytime post-Baseline assesments included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment
Measured: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Parameters Falling Outside of the Reference Range at Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Hematology parameters included: erythrocytes (RR: 4.2 - 6.1 teragrams per liter [TI/L]), hemoglobin (RR: 125 - 165 g/L), hematocrit (RR: 0.36 - 0.46), platelets (RR: 170 - 430 gigagrams per liter [GI/L]), mean platelet volume (MPV, RR: 4 - 14 femotoliter [fL]), leukocytes (RR: 3.4 - 11.2 GI/L), total neutrophils (RR: 2.1 - 4.9 GI/L), lymphocytes (RR: 1.4 - 2.9 GI/L), monocytes (RR: 0.2 - 0.9 GI/L), eosinophils (RR: 0.2 - 0.7 GI/L), and basophils (RR: 0.02 - 0.12 GI/L). Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. The number of participants with the indicated hematology parameters data outside of the reference range (with high and low) any time post-baseline are presented. Anytime post-Baseline assesments included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment
Measured: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With the Indicated Renal Parameters Falling Outside of the Reference Range Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Renal parameters included: creatinine (RR: 44.2 - 88.4 umol/L), creatinine clearance derived (RR: 89.0 - 165.0 milliliter per minute [ ml/min]), protein/creatinine (RR: 0.113- 18.0992 microgram per millimoles [mg/mmol]), and urea (RR: 1.785- 8.925 mmol/L). Baseline values were obtained at Day 1. The number of participants with the indicated renal parameters data outside the reference range (with high and low) any time post-Baseline are presented. Anytime post-Baseline assesments included any scheduled and unscheduled post-baseline assessment
Measured: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1
Urine microscopy included Red Blood Cell (RBC) casts, white blood cell (WBC) casts, and epithelial renal tubular cell casts. Urine microscopy data was reviewed by the Medical Monitor in order to classify the results as positive or negative. The number of participants with a positive result at any time post Baseline were reported. A positive result indicated if the result was positive for at least one of RBC casts, WBC casts, or epithelial renal tubular cell casts.
Measured: From Baseline up to Study Week 24 of Part 1
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 2
Urine microscopy included Red Blood Cell (RBC) casts, white blood cell (WBC) casts, and epithelial renal tubular cell casts. Urine microscopy data was reviewed by the Medical Monitor in order to classify the results as positive or negative. The nmber of participants with positive finding at Baseline and at anytime post-Baseline (Post-BL) were reported. Baseline was defined as the value obtained at the first visit before treatment (Pre-trt). A positive result indicated if the result was positive for at least one of RBC casts, WBC casts, or epithelial renal tubular cell casts.
Measured: From Baseline and post-Baseline up to Study Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 2/3
Urine microscopy included Red Blood Cell (RBC) casts, white blood cell (WBC) casts, and epithelial renal tubular cell casts. Urine microscopy data was reviewed by the Medical Monitor in order to classify the results as positive or negative. The number of participants with positive finding at Baseline and at anytime post-Baseline (Post-BL) were reported. Baseline was defined as the value obtained at the first visit before treatment (Pre-trt). A positive result indicated if the result was positive for at least one of RBC casts, WBC casts, or epithelial renal tubular cell casts. Participants randomized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: From Baseline and post-Baseline up to Study Week 31 of Part 2/3
Number of Participants With the Indicated Vital Signs Falling Outside of the Reference Range During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Vital sign assessments included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements that were measured before any blood draw at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, at each Follow-up week (Week 1-4) and the maximum post- Baseline (BL) visit. BL is defined as the value obtained on Day 1of treatment. The maximum post-BL visit (MPB) included any scheduled and unscheduled post-BL assessment. Reference ranges (RR) for SBP (mmHg) (Lower limit of normal, normal, Upper limit of normal) for Cohort 1: <85, 85-115, >115; for Cohort 2: <85, 85-120,>120; and Cohort 3: <95, 95-135, >135. RR for DBP (mmHg) for Cohort 1: <45, 45-70,>70; for Cohort 2: <50, 50-75, >75; and Cohort 3: <55, 55-85, >85.
Measured: From Baseline through Study Week 35
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Value Recorded During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Respiratory rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline value included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment.
Measured: From Baseline through Week 24
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Value Recorded During the Randomized Period, Part 2
Respiratory rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline value included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment.
Measured: From Week 1 to Week 7 of Part 2
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and Maximum Post-Baseline Visit During Part 2/3
Respiratory rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline visit included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment. Participants randomized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: From Week 1 to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 2/3 up to Study Week 35
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Pulse rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline (MPB) visit included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment..
Measured: From Week 1 to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 1, up to Study Week 28
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Randomized Period, Part 2
Pulse rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline visit included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment.
Measured: From Week 1 to Week 7 of Part 2
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Eltrombopag Only Period Part 2/3
Pulse rate was measured at the following scheduled time points: Screening, Day 1, each week from Week 1 to Week 24, and at each Follow-up Weeks 1-4. Baseline is defined as the value obtained on Day 1 of treatment. The maximum post-Baseline visit included any scheduled and unscheduled post-Baseline assessment. Participants randomized to receive eltrombopag for 7 weeks in Part 2 continued receiving eltrombopag for an additional 17 weeks in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 24. Participants randomized to receive placebo for 7 weeks in Part 2, received 24 weeks of eltrombopag in Part 2/3 (for a total of 24 weeks of treatment) up to Study Week 31.
Measured: From Week 1to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 2/3, up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 24 During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Urinalysis parameters included: urine protein (UP), urine glucose (UG), urine ketones (UK), urine occult blood (UOB), and pH. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UP was categorized as missing (MS), no result (NR), negative (Neg), Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+. UG results were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, normal, 5, 15(1+), 30(2+), 60(3+), 110(4+)UK parameters were categorized as as MS, NR, Neg, Trace(5), Small(15), Moderate(40), Large(80), Large(160). UOB parameters were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, 1+, 2+, 3+, Non haemolysed trace, and haemolysed trace. PH results were categorized as MS. NR, normalresult, Neg, and range of pH (from 5-9in increments of 0.5). Data for indicated parameters was reported at Baseline (BL) and Week 24 (W24). The Baseline value was the measurement taken at Day 1.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24 of Part 1
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 7 During the Randomized Period,Part 2
Urinalysis parameters included: urine protein (UP), urine glucose (UG), urine ketones (UK), urine occult blood (UOB), and pH. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UP was categorized as missing (MS), no result (NR), negative (Neg), Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+. UG results were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, normal, 5, 15(1+), 30(2+), 60(3+), 110(4+)UK parameters were categorized as as MS, NR, Neg, Trace(5), Small(15), Moderate(40), Large(80), Large(160). UOB parameters were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, 1+, 2+, 3+, Non haemolysed trace, and haemolysed trace. PH results were categorized as MS. NR, normalresult, Neg, and range of pH (from 5-9in increments of 0.5). Data for indicated parameters was reported at Baseline (BL) and Week 7 (W7). The Baseline value was the measurement taken at Day 1.
Measured: Baseline and Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 24 During the Eltrombopag Open-label Period, Part 2/3
Urinalysis parameters included: urine protein (UP), urine glucose (UG), urine ketones (UK), urine occult blood (UOB), and pH. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. UP was categorized as missing (MS), no result (NR), negative (Neg), Trace, 1+, 2+, 3+ and 4+. UG results were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, normal, 5, 15(1+), 30(2+), 60(3+), 110(4+)UK parameters were categorized as as MS, NR, Neg, Trace(5), Small(15), Moderate(40), Large(80), Large(160). UOB parameters were categorized as MS, NR, Neg, 1+, 2+, 3+, Non haemolysed trace, and haemolysed trace. PH results were categorized as MS. NR, normalresult, Neg, and range of pH (from 5-9in increments of 0.5). Data for indicated parameters was reported at Baseline (BL) and Week 24 (W24). The Baseline value was the measurement taken at Day 1.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24 of Part 2/3 up to Study Week 31
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 1
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.
Measured: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 24 of Part1
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 2
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.
Measured: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 2/3
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.
Measured: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 31 of Part2/3
Number of Participants With a Change in Visual Acuity and a Change Due to Worsening of Cataracts During Part 1
The visual acuity assessment was performed by an ophthalmologist or an optometrist under the guidance of an ophthalmologist. Visual acuity is defined as acuteness or clearness of vision. The number of participants with a change in visual acuity and worsening visual acuity due to cataracts since Baseline are presented for Part 1 Follow-up Visits at 3-months (FU3) and at 6-months (FU6). Change in visual acuity since Baseline is displayed under the left eye but applies to both eyes. Change in visual acuity (VA) is categorized as "yes" or "no". Change due to cataracts is categorized as "yes" or "no".
Measured: Baseline, 3and 6-mo Follow-up of Part 1
Number of Participants With a Change in Visual Acuity and a Change Due to Worsening of Cataracts
The visual acuity assessment was performed by an ophthalmologist or an optometrist under the guidance of an ophthalmologist. Visual acuity is defined as acuteness or clearness of vision. Number of participants with a change in visual acuity and change in visual acuity due to the worsening of cataracts since Baseline are presented for Part 2/3 Follow-up Visits at 3-months (FU3) and 6-months (FU6). Change in visual acuity since Baseline is displayed under the left eye but applies to both eyes. Change in visual acuity (VA) is categorized as "yes" or "no". Change due to cataracts is categorized as "yes" or "no".
Measured: BL, 3 and 6mo Follow-up of Part 2/3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study start30 Sep 2009
- Primary completion1 Feb 2014
- Study completion1 Feb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, IdiopathicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00908037
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 108062
- Acronym
- PETIT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 21 May 2009
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Grainger JD, Blanchette VS, Grotzinger KM, Roy A, Bussel JB. Health-related quality of life in children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia treated with eltrombopag in the PETIT study. Br J Haematol. 2019 Apr;185(1):102-106. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15732. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
PubMed 30592022Wire MB, Li X, Zhang J, Sallas W, Aslanis V, Ouatas T. Modeling and Simulation Support Eltrombopag Dosing in Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec;104(6):1199-1207. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1066. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
PubMed 29536526Bussel JB, de Miguel PG, Despotovic JM, Grainger JD, Sevilla J, Blanchette VS, Krishnamurti L, Connor P, David M, Boayue KB, Matthews DC, Lambert MP, Marcello LM, Iyengar M, Chan GW, Chagin KD, Theodore D, Bailey CK, Bakshi KK. Eltrombopag for the treatment of children with persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (PETIT): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Haematol. 2015 Aug;2(8):e315-25. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00114-3. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
PubMed 26688484
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Three Part, Staggered Cohort, Open-label and Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Eltrombopag, a Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist, in Previously Treated Pediatric Patients With Chronic ITP.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00908037
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETIT / 108062
- Conditions
- Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
- Keywords
- idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombocytopenia, pharmacodynamics, ITP, eltrombopag, pharmacokinetics, chronic ITP, pediatrics
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2009
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Phase II, multi-center, 3 part, staggered cohort, open-label and double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study involving 3 age-determined cohorts (Cohort 1: between 12 and 17 years old; Cohort 2: between 6 and 11 years old; Cohort 3: between 1 and 5 years old). Daily dosing with eltrombopag will begin with 5 patients in the oldest age cohort in an open label fashion, and a review of safety, pharmacokinetic and platelet count data will be performed regularly. If no safety concerns are identified after 12 weeks, 18 additional patients will be randomised to placebo or eltrombopag (2:1 randomisation). After 7 weeks of randomized treatment, all patients will receive eltrombopag in an open label fashion. The total duration of treatment with eltrombopag will be 24 weeks. If at the time of the aforementioned 12 week review of the first 5 patients no safety issues are identified, dosing will begin in the next lower age cohort with an initial group of 5 patients. The same procedure will be followed in terms of safety review and subsequent enrolment and randomisation of the additional patients. Initiation of the younger age cohort will take place once data from the previous has been evaluated. Doses will be adjusted according to platelet counts and tolerability. The study will include a review of the safety data by a Data Safety Monitoring Board.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eltrombopag plus standard of care | Experimental | Drug: eltrombopageltrombopag |
| placebo plus standard of care | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placeboplacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subjects between 1 year and <18 years of age at Day 1.
- Written informed consent from subject's guardian and accompanying informed assent from subject (for children over 6 years old).
- Confirmed diagnosis of chronic ITP, according to the American Society of Hematology / British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines [George, 1996; BCSH, 2003]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear or bone marrow examination should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other causes of thrombocytopenia.
- Subjects who are refractory or have relapsed after at least one prior ITP therapy or are not eligible, for a medical reason, for other treatments.
- Day 1 (or within 48 hours prior) platelet count <30 Gi/L.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g. thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease).
- Concurrent or past malignant disease, including myeloproliferative disorder.
- Subjects who are not suitable for continuation of their current therapy for at least 7 additional additional weeks.
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding Day 1.
- History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eltrombopagthrombopoietin receptor agonist | Drug | eltrombopag plus standard of care |
| Placeboplacebo for comparison | Drug | placebo plus standard of care |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50 Giga Cells Per Liter (Gi/L) at Least Once, Between Day 8 and Day 43 (Weeks 1 to 6) of the Randomized Period of the Study (Part 2)
Time frame: From Day 8 up to Day 43 of Part 2
Participants who achieved a platelet count >=50 Gi/L at least once between Day 8 and Day 43 (first 6 weeks of Part 2) in the absense of rescue treatment were reported. A 95% confidence interval was calculated by the exact binomial method.
39 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50Gi/L During Treatment With Eltrombopag in >= 60% of Assessments Between Day 15 and Day 43 (Weeks 2 Through 6) of the Randomized Treatment Period (Part 2)
Time frame: Between Day 15 and Day 43 of Part 2
Weighted Mean Platelet Count
Time frame: Baseline and Day 43 of Part 2
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50Gi/L at Any Time During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Dosing During Part 1.
Time frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to Week 24 of Part 1
Percentage of Participants Achieving Platelet Counts >=50 Gi/L at Any Time During the 31 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 2/ 3.
Time frame: Part 2/3 up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment for Eltrombopag for AUC(0-t) During Part 1, 2, and 2/3.
Time frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Cmax and Ct During Part 1, 2, and 2/3.
Time frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Tmax During Part 1, 2, and 2/3
Time frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for CL/F During Part 1, 2, and 2/3
Time frame: From Day 1 of treatment up to Study Week 31
Maximum Duration for Which a Participant Continuously Maintained a Platelet Count of >=50 Gi/L During the 7 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment in Part 2
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 7 of Part 2
Maximum Duration for Which a Participant Continuously Maintained a Platelet Count of >=50 Gi/L During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment in Part 2/ 3
Time frame: From Baseline up to Study Week 31
Percentage of Participants Who Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Medications During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 1.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 24+ 1 day of Part 1
Percentage of Participants Who Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant ITP Medications During the 24 Weeks of Eltrombopag Treatment During Part 2/ 3
Time frame: From Baseline to the end of treatment up to Week 31 + 1 day of Part 2/3
Number of Participants Who Required a Protocol-defined Rescue Treatment During Part 2/3
Time frame: From Baseline to the end of treatment up to Week 31 + 1 day of Part2/3
Kids' ITP Tool (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Dose Finding Period, Part 1
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24 of Part 1
Kids' ITP Tool (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline and Week 6as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Randomized Period, Part 2
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6 of Part 2
Kids' ITP Tools (KIT) Questionnaire Total Score at Baseline, Week, 6, Week 12, and End of Treatment Visit as Assessed Using the KIT Questionnaire During the Eltrombopag Open-Label Period, Part 2/3
Time frame: From Baseline to end of treatment up to Study Week 31
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding, no Clinically Significant Bleeding and Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale During Part 2
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding, no Clinically Significant Bleeding and Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale During Part 2/3
Time frame: From Baseline of Part 2/3 through Follow-up
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter Falling Outside of the Reference Range Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Time frame: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Parameters Falling Outside of the Reference Range at Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Time frame: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With the Indicated Renal Parameters Falling Outside of the Reference Range Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Time frame: Post-Baseline from Week 1 through Follow-up up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 1
Time frame: From Baseline up to Study Week 24 of Part 1
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 2
Time frame: From Baseline and post-Baseline up to Study Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With a Positive Urine Microscopy Parameters Any Time Post-Baseline During Part 2/3
Time frame: From Baseline and post-Baseline up to Study Week 31 of Part 2/3
Number of Participants With the Indicated Vital Signs Falling Outside of the Reference Range During Part 1, Part 2, and Part 2/3
Time frame: From Baseline through Study Week 35
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Value Recorded During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 24
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Value Recorded During the Randomized Period, Part 2
Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 7 of Part 2
Mean Respiratory Rate at Baseline and Maximum Post-Baseline Visit During Part 2/3
Time frame: From Week 1 to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 2/3 up to Study Week 35
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Time frame: From Week 1 to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 1, up to Study Week 28
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Randomized Period, Part 2
Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 7 of Part 2
Mean Pulse Rate at Baseline and the Maximum Post-Baseline Visit Recorded During the Eltrombopag Only Period Part 2/3
Time frame: From Week 1to Follow-up Week 4 of Part 2/3, up to Study Week 35
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 24 During the Dose-Finding Period, Part 1
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 of Part 1
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 7 During the Randomized Period,Part 2
Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants for the Indicated Urinalysis Parameters Tested by Dipstick at Baseline and Week 24 During the Eltrombopag Open-label Period, Part 2/3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24 of Part 2/3 up to Study Week 31
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 1
Time frame: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 24 of Part1
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 2
Time frame: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 7 of Part 2
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During Part 2/3
Time frame: From Treatment + 1 day up to Week 31 of Part2/3
Number of Participants With a Change in Visual Acuity and a Change Due to Worsening of Cataracts During Part 1
Time frame: Baseline, 3and 6-mo Follow-up of Part 1
Number of Participants With a Change in Visual Acuity and a Change Due to Worsening of Cataracts
Time frame: BL, 3 and 6mo Follow-up of Part 2/3
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30592022Grainger JD, Blanchette VS, Grotzinger KM, Roy A, Bussel JB. Health-related quality of life in children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia treated with eltrombopag in the PETIT study. Br J Haematol. 2019 Apr;185(1):102-106. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15732. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29536526Wire MB, Li X, Zhang J, Sallas W, Aslanis V, Ouatas T. Modeling and Simulation Support Eltrombopag Dosing in Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec;104(6):1199-1207. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1066. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26688484Bussel JB, de Miguel PG, Despotovic JM, Grainger JD, Sevilla J, Blanchette VS, Krishnamurti L, Connor P, David M, Boayue KB, Matthews DC, Lambert MP, Marcello LM, Iyengar M, Chan GW, Chagin KD, Theodore D, Bailey CK, Bakshi KK. Eltrombopag for the treatment of children with persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia (PETIT): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Haematol. 2015 Aug;2(8):e315-25. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00114-3. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Related trials for Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Tolerability of Ianalumab (VAY736) With Investigator's Choice Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist (IC TPO-RA) in Patients With Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), Primary Evans Syndrome (ES)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Pirtobrutinib in Participants With Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Tafasitamab in Adult Participants With Primary Autoimmune Blood Cell Disorders
Immune Thrombocytopenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Follow-up Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
33 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 33 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Spain, France, Canada and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50 Giga Cells Per Liter (Gi/L) at Least Once, Between Day 8 and Day 43 (Weeks 1 to 6) of the Randomized Period of the Study (Part 2) (time frame: From Day 8 up to Day 43 of Part 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00908037, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2018.