Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 4CRESTNCT00910273
Effects of Etanercept on the Heart, Veins and Thickness of Certain Major Arteries In Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients
A Phase 4 study testing etanercept in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- etanercept
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Oct 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of AS, as defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis.
- AS with active disease as defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI, see Attachment 4) >= 4 at screening visit.
- Patients capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of complying with the treatment schedule and doses throughout the 52 weeks
- Agreement by male subjects who are not surgically sterile and female subjects who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal to use reliable methods of birth control for the duration of the study.
- Ability to self-inject drug or have a designee who can do so.
- Ability to store injectable test article at 2ºC to 8ºC.
Who cannot join
- 1. Pregnancy confirmed by test taken at screening in all women except those who were surgically sterile or at least 1 year postmenopausal. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception that needs to be continued for 15 days following discontinuation of the test article.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Italy4 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bologna, 40138
Pfizer Investigational Site
Prato, 59100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00161
About this study
Official title: Effects of Etanercept on Endothelial Function and Carotid Intima-media Thickness (IMT) in Patients With Active AS
Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- etanercept
- Keywords
- IMT evaluation in AS patients treated with etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
etanerceptDrug
Also called Enbrel
etanercept 50 mg/week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | etanercept 50 mg/week Receives: Drug: etanercept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12
Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus[-] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (22)
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52
BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) * 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)
Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52
Change in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Mean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Mean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52
CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
BASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
BASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score * 100 = greater than or equal to 50%.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Measured: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Partial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity.
Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
While in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Measurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
While participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Chest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionOct 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00910273
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881A3-4458
- Acronym
- CREST
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 27 May 2009
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Etanercept on Endothelial Function and Carotid Intima-media Thickness (IMT) in Patients With Active AS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00910273
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CREST / 0881A3-4458
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Keywords
- IMT evaluation in AS patients treated with etanercept
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: etanerceptetanercept 50 mg/week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of AS, as defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis.
- AS with active disease as defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI, see Attachment 4) >= 4 at screening visit.
- Patients capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of complying with the treatment schedule and doses throughout the 52 weeks
- Agreement by male subjects who are not surgically sterile and female subjects who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal to use reliable methods of birth control for the duration of the study.
- Ability to self-inject drug or have a designee who can do so.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Pregnancy confirmed by test taken at screening in all women except those who were surgically sterile or at least 1 year postmenopausal. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception that needs to be continued for 15 days following discontinuation of the test article.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| etanerceptAlso: Enbreletanercept 50 mg/week | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus[-] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.
22 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)
Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing etanercept in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2016.