Atrial FibrillationCABANANCT00911508
Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial
A study testing Left atrial ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Arrhythmia, run by Mayo Clinic at 118 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The (Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial) CABANA Trial has the overall goal of establishing the appropriate roles for medical and ablative intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia
- What is being tested?
- Left atrial ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,204 participants
- Where
- 118 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Nov 2009to 31 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over the preceding 6 months have:
- ≥2 paroxysmal (electrocardiographic documentation of at least 1) atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes lasting ≥1 hour in duration: (that terminate spontaneously within 7 days or cardioversion is performed within 48h of AF onset): or
- electrocardiographic documentation of 1 persistent AF episode: (sustained for ≥7 days or cardioversion is performed more than 48h after AF onset): or
- electrocardiographic documentation of 1 longstanding persistent AF episode: (continuous AF of duration >1 year).
- Warrant active therapy (within the past 3 months) beyond simple ongoing observation
- Be eligible for catheter ablation and ≥2 sequential rhythm control and/or ≥2 rate control drugs.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Be ≥65 yrs of age, or <65 yrs with one or more of the following risk factors for stroke: Hypertension (treated and/or defined as a blood pressure >140/90 mmHg) [90], Diabetes (treated and/or defined as a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl) [91], Congestive heart failure (including systolic or diastolic heart failure), Prior stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic emboli, Atherosclerotic vascular disease (previous myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral arterial disease or aortic plaque), left atrial (LA) size >5.0 cm (or volume index ≥40 cc/m2), or ejection fraction (EF) ≤35.
- Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent form.
- Be ≥18 years of age.
- NOTE- Subjects <65 yrs of age whose only risk factor is hypertension must have a second risk factor or left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy to qualify.Patients receiving new drug therapy initiated within the previous 3 months may continue that therapy if randomized to the drug therapy arm. Patients may have documented atrial flutter in addition to atrial fibrillation and remain eligible for enrollment.
Who cannot join
- Lone AF in the absence of risk factors for stroke in patients <65 years of age
- Patients who in the opinion of the managing clinician should not yet receive any therapy for AF
- Patients who have failed >2 membrane active anti-arrhythmic drugs at a therapeutic dose due to inefficacy or side effects (Table 5.2.2)
- An efficacy failure of full dose amiodarone treatment >8 weeks duration at any time
- Reversible causes of AF including thyroid disorders, acute alcohol intoxication, recent major surgical procedures, or trauma
- Recent cardiac events including MI, percutaneous intervention (PCI), or valve or bypass surgery in the preceding 3 months
Show all 21Show fewer
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (outflow track)
- Class IV angina or Class IV congestive heart failure (CHF) (including past or planned heart transplantation)
- Other arrhythmias mandating anti-arrhythmic drug therapy (i.e. ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF))
- Heritable arrhythmias or increased risk for torsade de pointes with class I or III drugs
- Prior LA catheter ablation with the intention of treating AF
- Prior surgical interventions for AF such as the MAZE procedure
- Prior AV nodal ablation
- Patients with other arrhythmias requiring ablative therapy
- Contraindication to appropriate anti-coagulation therapy
- Renal failure requiring dialysis
- Medical conditions limiting expected survival to <1 year
- Women of childbearing potential (unless post-menopausal or surgically sterile)
- Participation in any other clinical mortality trial (Participation in other non-mortality trials should be reviewed with the clinical trial management center)
- Unable to give informed consent
- NOTE- Prior ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus alone is not an exclusion if the patient develops subsequent recurrent AF. Planned atrial flutter ablation in combination with the left atrial ablation is not an exclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
118 sites in 10 countries.
118 sites in 10 countries
United States76 sites
Albany Associates in Cardiology
Albany, New York, 12205
Georgia Regents University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
The Medical Center of Aurora
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia
Austin, Texas, 78705
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Alexian Brothers Medical Center
Barrington, Illinois, 60010
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Womens Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
The Sanger Clinic, PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Memorial Health Care System
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44193
Penrose Saint Francis Health Services
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75226
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2160
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
NorthShore University Health System
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Virginia Hospital Center - Arlington
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Baylor All Saints Medical Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06115
Penn State University Cardiovascular Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
University of Texas Health Science Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Jackson Heart Clinic
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Arkansas Cardiology, PA
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Good Samaritan Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90017
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants & Research Institute
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
University of Miami Hospital
Miami, Florida, 60612
Minneapolis V.A. Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
New York University Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Drexel University College of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
V.A. Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201
Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55426
Intermountain Medical Center-LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143
South Texas Cardiovascular Consultants
San Antonio, Texas, 78299
University of California at San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143
Swedish Medical Center - Providence Campus
Seattle, Washington, 98122
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Saint John's Mercy Heart Health Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Saint Louis Heart and Vascular
St Louis, Missouri, 63136
Northside Hospital and Heart Institute
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, 94305
Stony Brook University Hospital and Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8167
Cardiac Study Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Florida Heart Rhythm-University of South Florida College of Medicine
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Scott and White Memorial Hospital
Temple, Texas, 76508
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Oklahoma Heart Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Waukesha Memorial Hospital
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Mercy Medical Center-Iowa Heart Center
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50226
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Germany14 sites
Kerckhoff Klinik
Bad Nauheim, D-61231
Herz-und Diabeteszentrum NRW
Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-32545
Klinikum Coburg
Coburg, Bavaria, 96450
Technische Universitat Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, D-01307
Praxisklinik Herz and GefaBe
Dresden, 01324
CCB - Cardioaniologisches Centrum Bethanien
Frankfurt, 60431
Georg-August-University
Göttingen, 37075
Universitares Herrzentrum Hamburg
Hamburg, Freie-Hansestadt Hamburg, 20246
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
Hamburg, 22291
Saint Vincentius-Kliniken
Karlsruhe, 76137
Herzzentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04289
University Hospital of Mannheim
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68167
Universitat Rostock
Rostock, D-18057
China5 sites
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, 100029
Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, 100037
First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Dalian, Liaoning, 116011
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Canada4 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
University of Western Ontario - London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 8C3
Czechia4 sites
Saint Anne's University Hospital, ICRC
Brno, 65691
Na Homolce Hospital
Prague, Prague, 150 30
Charles University
Prague, 12808
Clinic of Cardiology IKEM Medical Institute
Prague, 14021
Russia4 sites
Clinical Hospital # 83 under the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Moscow, 115682
Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Moscow, 121552
Research Institute of Circulation of Pathology
Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, 630055
Scientific Research Institute of Cardiology of Ministry of Health of Russian Foundation
Tomsk, 634012
United Kingdom4 sites
Golden Jubilee Hospital
Glasgow, G81 4HX
Saint Bartholomew's Hospital
London, EC1A 7BE
Saint George's Hospital Medical School
London, SW17 0QT
Saint Mary's Hospital
London, W2 1NY
Italy3 sites
Policlinico Multimedical Cardiology and Arrhythmia Centre
Milan, 20099
Policlinico San Donato Center of Clinical Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
San Donato Milanese, Lombardy, 20097
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese, 21100
Australia2 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
South Korea2 sites
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul
Yonsei University Severance Hospital
Seoul
About this study
The (Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial) CABANA Trial has the overall goal of establishing the appropriate roles for medical and ablative intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF). The CABANA Trial is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF) will be superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or rhythm control drugs for decreasing the incidence of the composite endpoint of total mortality, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest in patients with untreated or incompletely treated AF.
Read the detailed description
The need for this trial arises out of 1) the rapidly increasing number of pts > 60 years of age with AF accompanied by symptoms and morbidity, 2) the failure of anti-arrhythmic drug therapy to maintain sinus rhythm and reduce mortality, 3) the rapidly increasing application of radio-frequency catheter ablation without appropriate evidence-based validation, and 4) the expanding impact of AF on health care costs.
This study will randomize up to 2200 patients to a strategy of catheter ablation versus pharmacologic therapy with rate or rhythm control drugs. Each pt will have 1) characteristics similar to AFFIRM pts (≥65 yo or <65 with >1 risk factor for stroke, 2) Documented AF warranting treatment, and 3) Eligibility for both catheter ablation and ≥2 anti-arrhythmic or ≥2 rate control drugs. Pts will be followed every 6 months for an average of approximately 5 years and will undergo repeat trans-telephonic monitor, Holter monitor, and CT/MR studies to assess the impact of treatment.
The CABANA trial will disclose the role of medical and non-pharmacologic therapies for AF, establish the cost and impact of therapy on quality of life and will help determine if AF is a modifiable risk factor for increased mortality.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia
- Being tested
- Left atrial ablation, Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Ablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Catheter Ablation, Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Left atrial ablationDevice
St. Jude: Livewire TC™ , Therapy™ Dual / Thermocouple, Safire,Therapy Cool Path
Biosense Webster: NAVI-STAR, NAVI-STAR/NAVI-STAR DS, Celsius Braided/Long Tip, NAVI-STAR™ and Celsius™ ThermoCool, NAVI-STAR® RMT, Celsius® RMT, ThermoCool® SF
Medtronic CryoCath LP: Freezor®/Freezor MAX®, Artic Front®, Cardiac Ablation System
Bard: Stinger
Boston Scientific: Blazer II RF/XP, Blazer RPM, Chilli II Cooled, SteeroCath
Rate or Rhythm Control TherapyDrug
Rate control: Metoprolol 50-100mg, Atenolol 50-100mg, Propranolol 40-80mg, Acebutolol 200-300mg, Carvedilol 6.25-25mg, Diltiazem 180-240mg, Verapamil 180-240mg, Digoxin 0.125-0.25mg
Rhythm control: Propafenone 450-625mg, Flecainide 200-300mg, Sotalol 240-320mg, Dofetilide 500-1000mcg, Amiodarone 200-400mg, Quinidine 600-900mg, Dronedarone 800mg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Left Atrial Ablation | Active comparator | Pulmonary vein isolation using a circumferential ablative approach in the left atrium. Ablation may be performed using circular mapping catheter-guided ablation, antral isolation using a circular guided approach, or wide area circumferential ablation. Receives: Device: Left atrial ablation |
| Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy | Active comparator | Current state-of-the-art drug therapy for atrial fibrillation (rate control or rhythm control). Treating physicians will be encouraged to follow the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association / European Society of Cardiology Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines with regard to drug therapy for atrial fibrillation. The specific choice of rate control versus rhythm control drug therapy and the specific drugs to be used will ultimately be left to the discretion of the treating physician. Receives: Drug: Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Composite of Total Mortality, Disabling Stroke, Serious Bleeding, or Cardiac Arrest in Patients Warranting Therapy for AF.
All events for each component of the primary endpoint were reviewed and adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent clinical events committee using prospectively determined event definitions. Death was defined as all-cause mortality, disabling stroke (including intracranial bleeding) as an irreversible physical limitation defined by a Rankin Stroke Scale ≥2, and serious bleeding as bleeding accompanied by hemodynamic compromise that required surgical intervention or a transfusion of ≥3 units of blood.
Measured: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality
All deaths were reviewed and adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee
Measured: From date of enrollment until date of death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Mortality or Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization
Hospitalization was characterized by the site principal investigator (PI) and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Measured: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of death or CV hospitalization over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Mortality, Disabling Stroke, or CV Hospitalization (for Heart Failure or Acute Ischemic Events)
Disabling stroke (including intracranial bleeding) was defined as an irreversible physical limitation defined by a Rankin Stroke Scale ≥2 and the reason for hospitalization was characterized by the site PI and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Measured: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of death, stroke, or CV hospitalization (for heart failure or acute ischemic event) over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death
Cardiovascular death as determined by the Clinical Events Committee based on the available data provided by the Principal Investigator
Measured: From date of enrollment until date of a cardiovascular death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death or Disabling Stroke
Disabling stroke (including intracranial bleeding) was defined as an irreversible physical limitation defined by a Rankin Stroke Scale ≥2.
Measured: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of a cardiovascular death or disabling stroke over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With an Arrhythmic Death or Cardiac Arrest
All deaths and cardiac arrest events were adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee
Measured: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event for an arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Heart Failure Death
All deaths were categorized and adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee
Measured: From date of enrollment until date of heart failure death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants Free From Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Following the 90 Day Blanking Period
Data from patients using the study provided ECG event recording system were analyzed. A 30-second episode of AF in either group, confirmed through blinded review by an ECG Core Lab Committee was used for defining the endpoint of recurrent AF.
Measured: From date of therapy initiation until date of first AF recurrence following a 90 day wait (blanking) period over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Hospitalization
The reason for hospitalization was characterized by the site PI and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Measured: From date of enrollment until date of cardiovascular hospitalization over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - AFEQT
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) Overall Score (Scale: 0 = complete disability, 100 = no disability). The AFEQT is a 21-item AF-specific, health-related QOL questionnaire designed to assess the effect of atrial fibrillation on patient quality of life. The AFEQT has an Overall Score (calculated from 18 of the questions) and subscale scores in three domains: symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concern. Overall and subscale scores range from 0 (corresponds to complete disability) to 100 (no AF-related disability).
Measured: Baseline ,12 month, 5 years
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - MAFSI Frequency Score
The Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) is a questionnaire comprised of a 10-item AF symptom checklist that asked about both the frequency and severity of each symptom. MAFSI frequency of symptoms over the past month was recorded as 0 (never), 1 (rarely), 2 (sometimes), 3 (often), and 4 (always) for each of the 10 items listed in the questionnaire. The 10 item responses were summed for a total Frequency Score that ranged from 0 (no AF symptoms) to 40 (worst score).
Measured: Baseline, 12 Month, 5 Year
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - MAFSI Severity Score
The Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) is a questionnaire comprised of a 10-item AF symptom checklist that asked about both the frequency and severity of each symptom. MAFSI severity scores over the past month were recorded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (extreme) for each of the 10 items listed in the questionnaire. The 10 items items were then summed for the total Severity Score that ranged from 0 (no AF symptoms) to 30 (most severe AF symptoms).
Measured: Baseline, 12 Month, 5 Year
Number of Participants With Adverse Events/Complications
Comparing individual non-endpoint adverse events between ablative and drug therapy is difficult due to the substantial difference in the types of adverse events expected.
Ablation-related events were counted among all patients that were randomized to and received an ablation.
Drug-related events were counted among all patients that were randomized to and received drug therapy.
Measured: From treatment start date to date of event over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study start13 Nov 2009
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017
- Study completion31 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,204 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Abbott Medical Devices, Biosense Webster, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Douglas L. Packer, MD, Mayo Clinic
- Investigators
- Douglas L. Packer, M.D., Principal investigator, Mayo ClinicKerry L. Lee, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Duke Clinical Research InstituteDaniel B. Mark, M.D., MPH, Principal investigator, Duke Clinical Research InstituteRich A. Robb, Ph.D. Phy, Principal investigator, Mayo ClinicYves D. Rosenberg, M.D., MPH, Study chair, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00911508
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 09-004616
- Other IDs
- U01HL089709
- Acronym
- CABANA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 28 May 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zhao M, Chen Y, Li M, Jiang C, Wang Z, Liu H, He L, Sang C, Du X, Dong J, Packer DL, Ma C, Lip GYH. Impact of diagnosis to ablation time on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: post hoc analysis of the CABANA trial. BMC Med. 2026 Jan 12;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-04615-3.
PubMed 41526927Wu Q, Wang L, Li Y, Liang Z, Li Q, Liu X, Yin Y, Liu Y, Hu Z, Gao H, Zhang T, Wang Y. Prognostic impact of mitral regurgitation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the CABANA trial. Open Heart. 2025 Nov 27;12(2):e003478. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003478.
PubMed 41314687Chen Y, Soler-Espejo E, Zhao M, Li W, Liu H, Gue Y, McDowell G, Packer DL, Lip GYH. Association between comorbidity burden and outcomes of catheter ablation vs. medical therapy for atrial fibrillation: insights from the CABANA trial. Europace. 2025 Dec 1;27(12):euaf292. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf292.
PubMed 41213867Wang Z, Wu Y, Jiang C, He L, Zhou N, Sang C, Dong J, Ma C. Catheter Ablation vs Drug Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Nonmodifiable Recurrence Risk Factors: A Secondary Analysis of the CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528124. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28124.
PubMed 40839264Zhang J, Wang L, Li Y, Li Q, Liu X, Weng S, Yin Y, Liang Z, Zhang T, Wang Y. Atrial fibrillation phenotypes identified through cluster analysis in the CABANA study. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Nov 1;438:133606. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133606. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
PubMed 40645418Martens P, Augusto SN Jr, Erzeel J, Pison L, Mullens W, Tang WHW. Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From CABANA. JACC Heart Fail. 2025 May;13(5):785-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.01.029. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
PubMed 40243977Bunch TJ, Poole JE, Silverstein AP, Lee KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Hindricks G, Romanov A, Pokushalov E, Bahnson TD, Daniels MR, Piccini JP, Mark DB, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 May;17(5):e012697. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012697. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
PubMed 38629286Cappato R, Mark DB, Silverstein AP, Noseworthy PA, Bonitta G, Poole JE, Piccini JP, Bahnson TD, Daniels MR, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Regional differences in outcomes with ablation versus drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: Results from the CABANA trial. Am Heart J. 2024 Apr;270:103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
PubMed 38307365Zeitler EP, Li Y, Silverstein AP, Russo AM, Poole JE, Daniels MR, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Bahnson TD, Anstrom KJ, Packer DL, Mark DB; CABANA Investigators. Effects of Ablation Versus Drug Therapy on Quality of Life by Sex in Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e027871. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027871. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
PubMed 36688367Monahan KH, Bunch TJ, Mark DB, Poole JE, Bahnson TD, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Daniels MR, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Influence of atrial fibrillation type on outcomes of ablation vs. drug therapy: results from CABANA. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1430-1440. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac055.
PubMed 35640922Bahnson TD, Giczewska A, Mark DB, Russo AM, Monahan KH, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Poole JE, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Association Between Age and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial. Circulation. 2022 Mar 15;145(11):796-804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055297. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
PubMed 34933570Thomas KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, Mark DB, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.092.
PubMed 34238436Rettmann ME, Holmes DR 3rd, Monahan KH, Breen JF, Bahnson TD, Mark DB, Poole JE, Ellis AM, Silverstein AP, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Robb RA, Packer DL; CABANA Imaging Investigators. Treatment-Related Changes in Left Atrial Structure in Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the CABANA Imaging Substudy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 May;14(5):e008540. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008540. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
PubMed 33848199Packer DL, Piccini JP, Monahan KH, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Noseworthy PA, Poole JE, Bahnson TD, Lee KL, Mark DB; CABANA Investigators. Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Results From the CABANA Trial. Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1377-1390. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050991. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
PubMed 33554614Russo AM, Zeitler EP, Giczewska A, Silverstein AP, Al-Khalidi HR, Cha YM, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Mark DB, Packer DL, Poole JE; CABANA Investigators. Association Between Sex and Treatment Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Versus Drug Therapy: Results From the CABANA Trial. Circulation. 2021 Feb 16;143(7):661-672. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051558. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PubMed 33499668
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00911508
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CABANA / 09-004616
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Ablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Catheter Ablation, Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,204 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Abbott Medical Devices, Biosense Webster, Inc.
- Study start
- 13 Nov 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The (Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial) CABANA Trial has the overall goal of establishing the appropriate roles for medical and ablative intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF). The CABANA Trial is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF) will be superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or rhythm control drugs for decreasing the incidence of the composite endpoint of total mortality, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest in patients with untreated or incompletely treated AF.
Detailed description
The need for this trial arises out of 1) the rapidly increasing number of pts > 60 years of age with AF accompanied by symptoms and morbidity, 2) the failure of anti-arrhythmic drug therapy to maintain sinus rhythm and reduce mortality, 3) the rapidly increasing application of radio-frequency catheter ablation without appropriate evidence-based validation, and 4) the expanding impact of AF on health care costs.
This study will randomize up to 2200 patients to a strategy of catheter ablation versus pharmacologic therapy with rate or rhythm control drugs. Each pt will have 1) characteristics similar to AFFIRM pts (≥65 yo or <65 with >1 risk factor for stroke, 2) Documented AF warranting treatment, and 3) Eligibility for both catheter ablation and ≥2 anti-arrhythmic or ≥2 rate control drugs. Pts will be followed every 6 months for an average of approximately 5 years and will undergo repeat trans-telephonic monitor, Holter monitor, and CT/MR studies to assess the impact of treatment.
The CABANA trial will disclose the role of medical and non-pharmacologic therapies for AF, establish the cost and impact of therapy on quality of life and will help determine if AF is a modifiable risk factor for increased mortality.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Left Atrial Ablation | Active comparator | Device: Left atrial ablationPulmonary vein isolation using a circumferential ablative approach in the left atrium. Ablation may be performed using circular mapping catheter-guided ablation, antral isolation using a circular guided approach, or wide area circumferential ablation. |
| Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy | Active comparator | Drug: Rate or Rhythm Control TherapyCurrent state-of-the-art drug therapy for atrial fibrillation (rate control or rhythm control). Treating physicians will be encouraged to follow the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association / European Society of Cardiology Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines with regard to drug therapy for atrial fibrillation. The specific choice of rate control versus rhythm control drug therapy and the specific drugs to be used will ultimately be left to the discretion of the treating physician. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Over the preceding 6 months have:
- Warrant active therapy (within the past 3 months) beyond simple ongoing observation
- Be eligible for catheter ablation and ≥2 sequential rhythm control and/or ≥2 rate control drugs.
- Be ≥65 yrs of age, or <65 yrs with one or more of the following risk factors for stroke: Hypertension (treated and/or defined as a blood pressure >140/90 mmHg) [90], Diabetes (treated and/or defined as a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl) [91], Congestive heart failure (including systolic or diastolic heart failure), Prior stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic emboli, Atherosclerotic vascular disease (previous myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral arterial disease or aortic plaque), left atrial (LA) size >5.0 cm (or volume index ≥40 cc/m2), or ejection fraction (EF) ≤35.
- Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Lone AF in the absence of risk factors for stroke in patients <65 years of age
- Patients who in the opinion of the managing clinician should not yet receive any therapy for AF
- Patients who have failed >2 membrane active anti-arrhythmic drugs at a therapeutic dose due to inefficacy or side effects (Table 5.2.2)
- An efficacy failure of full dose amiodarone treatment >8 weeks duration at any time
- Reversible causes of AF including thyroid disorders, acute alcohol intoxication, recent major surgical procedures, or trauma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Left atrial ablationSt. Jude: Livewire TC™ , Therapy™ Dual / Thermocouple, Safire,Therapy Cool Path Biosense Webster: NAVI-STAR, NAVI-STAR/NAVI-STAR DS, Celsius Braided/Long Tip, NAVI-STAR™ and Celsius™ ThermoCool, NAVI-STAR® RMT, Celsius® RMT, ThermoCool® SF Medtronic CryoCath LP: Freezor®/Freezor MAX®, Artic Front®, Cardiac Ablation System Bard: Stinger Boston Scientific: Blazer II RF/XP, Blazer RPM, Chilli II Cooled, SteeroCath | Device | Left Atrial Ablation |
| Rate or Rhythm Control TherapyRate control: Metoprolol 50-100mg, Atenolol 50-100mg, Propranolol 40-80mg, Acebutolol 200-300mg, Carvedilol 6.25-25mg, Diltiazem 180-240mg, Verapamil 180-240mg, Digoxin 0.125-0.25mg Rhythm control: Propafenone 450-625mg, Flecainide 200-300mg, Sotalol 240-320mg, Dofetilide 500-1000mcg, Amiodarone 200-400mg, Quinidine 600-900mg, Dronedarone 800mg | Drug | Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Composite of Total Mortality, Disabling Stroke, Serious Bleeding, or Cardiac Arrest in Patients Warranting Therapy for AF.
Time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
All events for each component of the primary endpoint were reviewed and adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent clinical events committee using prospectively determined event definitions. Death was defined as all-cause mortality, disabling stroke (including intracranial bleeding) as an irreversible physical limitation defined by a Rankin Stroke Scale ≥2, and serious bleeding as bleeding accompanied by hemodynamic compromise that required surgical intervention or a transfusion of ≥3 units of blood.
13 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Mortality or Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization
Time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of death or CV hospitalization over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Mortality, Disabling Stroke, or CV Hospitalization (for Heart Failure or Acute Ischemic Events)
Time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of death, stroke, or CV hospitalization (for heart failure or acute ischemic event) over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death
Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of a cardiovascular death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death or Disabling Stroke
Time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event of a cardiovascular death or disabling stroke over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With an Arrhythmic Death or Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event for an arrhythmic death or cardiac arrest over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Heart Failure Death
Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of heart failure death over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants Free From Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Following the 90 Day Blanking Period
Time frame: From date of therapy initiation until date of first AF recurrence following a 90 day wait (blanking) period over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time frame: From date of enrollment until date of cardiovascular hospitalization over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - AFEQT
Time frame: Baseline ,12 month, 5 years
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - MAFSI Frequency Score
Time frame: Baseline, 12 Month, 5 Year
Changes in Quality of Life Measures - MAFSI Severity Score
Time frame: Baseline, 12 Month, 5 Year
Number of Participants With Adverse Events/Complications
Time frame: From treatment start date to date of event over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41526927Zhao M, Chen Y, Li M, Jiang C, Wang Z, Liu H, He L, Sang C, Du X, Dong J, Packer DL, Ma C, Lip GYH. Impact of diagnosis to ablation time on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: post hoc analysis of the CABANA trial. BMC Med. 2026 Jan 12;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12916-026-04615-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41314687Wu Q, Wang L, Li Y, Liang Z, Li Q, Liu X, Yin Y, Liu Y, Hu Z, Gao H, Zhang T, Wang Y. Prognostic impact of mitral regurgitation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the CABANA trial. Open Heart. 2025 Nov 27;12(2):e003478. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003478.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41213867Chen Y, Soler-Espejo E, Zhao M, Li W, Liu H, Gue Y, McDowell G, Packer DL, Lip GYH. Association between comorbidity burden and outcomes of catheter ablation vs. medical therapy for atrial fibrillation: insights from the CABANA trial. Europace. 2025 Dec 1;27(12):euaf292. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf292.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40839264Wang Z, Wu Y, Jiang C, He L, Zhou N, Sang C, Dong J, Ma C. Catheter Ablation vs Drug Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Nonmodifiable Recurrence Risk Factors: A Secondary Analysis of the CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528124. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28124.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40645418Zhang J, Wang L, Li Y, Li Q, Liu X, Weng S, Yin Y, Liang Z, Zhang T, Wang Y. Atrial fibrillation phenotypes identified through cluster analysis in the CABANA study. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Nov 1;438:133606. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133606. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40243977Martens P, Augusto SN Jr, Erzeel J, Pison L, Mullens W, Tang WHW. Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From CABANA. JACC Heart Fail. 2025 May;13(5):785-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.01.029. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38629286Bunch TJ, Poole JE, Silverstein AP, Lee KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Hindricks G, Romanov A, Pokushalov E, Bahnson TD, Daniels MR, Piccini JP, Mark DB, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 May;17(5):e012697. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012697. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38307365Cappato R, Mark DB, Silverstein AP, Noseworthy PA, Bonitta G, Poole JE, Piccini JP, Bahnson TD, Daniels MR, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Regional differences in outcomes with ablation versus drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: Results from the CABANA trial. Am Heart J. 2024 Apr;270:103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36688367Zeitler EP, Li Y, Silverstein AP, Russo AM, Poole JE, Daniels MR, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Bahnson TD, Anstrom KJ, Packer DL, Mark DB; CABANA Investigators. Effects of Ablation Versus Drug Therapy on Quality of Life by Sex in Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e027871. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027871. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35640922Monahan KH, Bunch TJ, Mark DB, Poole JE, Bahnson TD, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Daniels MR, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Influence of atrial fibrillation type on outcomes of ablation vs. drug therapy: results from CABANA. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1430-1440. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac055.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34933570Bahnson TD, Giczewska A, Mark DB, Russo AM, Monahan KH, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Poole JE, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Association Between Age and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial. Circulation. 2022 Mar 15;145(11):796-804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055297. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34238436Thomas KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, Mark DB, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.092.
- Mayo Clinic Clinical TrialsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Douglas L. Packer, M.D. principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
Kerry L. Lee, Ph.D. principal investigator
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Daniel B. Mark, M.D., MPH principal investigator
Duke Clinical Research Institute
118 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Left atrial ablation in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Arrhythmia, run by Mayo Clinic at 118 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 118 sites in United States, Germany, China, Canada, Czechia and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Composite of Total Mortality, Disabling Stroke, Serious Bleeding, or Cardiac Arrest in Patients Warranting Therapy for AF. (time frame: From date of enrollment until time-to-first event over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00911508, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2021.