Coronary Artery DiseaseBIF IIINCT00914199
The Nordic Bifurcation Study III
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Should we, or should we not, perform dilatation of the side branch through the main vessel stent, if there is acceptable blood flow in the side branch? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 477 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 2 Apr 2007to Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris. -Bifurcation lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA--
- PDA/posterola¬te¬ral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
- Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate > 2.5 mm.
- Diameter of side branch by visual estimate > 2.25 mm.
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years.
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- Expected survival < 1 year.
- S-creatinine > 200 µmol/l.
- Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
- Allergy to Sirolimus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Stenting of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branches. Should we, or Should we Not, Perform Dilatation of the Side Branch Through the Main Vessel Stent, if There is Acceptable Blood Flow in the Side Branch?
Should we, or should we not, perform dilatation of the side branch through the main vessel stent, if there is acceptable blood flow in the side branch?
Read the detailed description
Design:
- Randomised open multicentre trial
Patients:
- Number 477
Randomisation:
- Treatment strategy kissing or no kissing balloon post-dilatation
Primary end point:
- Combined end point of: cardiac death, index lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularisation after 6 months.
Secondary end points:
- Clinical
- MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularisation) during hospital period, after 1, 8, and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Cardiac death during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Myocardial infarction during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Stent thrombosis during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Target vessel revascularisation during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Total mortality during hospital period, after 1, 6, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Target lesion revascularisation during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Myocardial infarction related to the index procedure.
- CCS angina score after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Angiographic. Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or occlusion of the side branch after 8 months.
- Late loss of main vessel and side branch after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or side branch after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of side branch after 8 months.
- Markers. All patients with stable angina pectoris and the patients with unstable angina pectoris, who have normal markers (CK-MB or TnT/TnI) before and after the procedure, will enter into the marker study.
End point evaluation:
- Primary and secondary end points will be assessed by an independent end point committee. The end point committee will consist of experienced cardiologists. The detailed end point definitions are the following:
- Q wave myocardial infarction. Appearance of a new Q wave in two or more contiguous leads on ECG.
- Non Q wave myocardial infarction.Infarction, which is considered present in a patient having clinical, angiographic electrocardiographic and/or laboratory evidence of myocardial necrosis with an ECG showing no new Q waves
- Procedure related myocardial infarction. A > threefold increase of CK-MB or Troponin-T/I.
- Target lesion revascularization. Coronary bypass operation with grafting or PCI of index lesion.
- Target vessel revascularization. Coronary bypass operation with grafting or PCI of index vessel
- Stent thrombosis. Stent thromboses are categorized as acute, sub acute, late and very late and as definite, probable and possible (see appendix).
- Vessel measurement. Proximal reference diameter: Vessel diameter proximal to lesion.Distal reference diameter: Vessel diameter distal to lesion.Percentual diameter stenosis: (Reference diameter - minimal luminal diameter)/reference diameter in percent.
- Angiographic restenosis. > 50% diameter stenosis.
- Recommendations for re-revascularization. Main vessel:Angina pectoris, CCS 1 related to index lesion and stenosis diameter >40%* Stenosis diameter >70%*. Side branch: AP, CCS >1 related to index lesion and stenosis diameter >40%*
- The stenosis diameter is evaluated by eyeballing.
Angiographic core lab:
- The index and follow-up angiograms will be asses by the QCA-laboratories at Department of Cardiology, Paul Stradins Clinical Hospital, Riga, Latvia and Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Definition of index angiography:
- The angiography obtained during the PCI-procedure will be used as index angiography
Follow-up angiography:
- After 8 months conventional diagnostic angiography will be performed and the projections used at the index angiography will be repeated after 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerine. The index angiograms will be stored on CD and sent by mail to the angiographic core laboratories.
Steering committee:
- The steering committee members will be selected on basis of participation in the study. All steering committee members will have full access to the database and will participate in the interpretation of data.
Progress of the study:
- The progress of the study will be checked on a weekly basis by the steering committee. They will receive and evaluate data on inclusion rate and the primary end point event rate. Further, the steering committee will receive and evaluate the weekly safety data on the rate of stent thrombosis in the three groups.
Statistics and data management:
- The statistical analyses will be performed by UNI-C, Aarhus.
- Primary end point. The composite end point in the two groups at six month follow-up will be described by Kaplan-Meier event graphs. The event graphs in the two groups will be compared by a log-rank test. A two-sided test is used. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered significant.
- Secondary end points and other variables. For continuous variables, differences between the treatment groups will be evaluated by Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. For discrete variables, differences will be expressed as counts and in percent and will be analyzed with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Secondary end points will be assessed after 6 or 8 months. Two- sided test is used and the p-value considered indicating significance will be 0.05.
Safety:
- For safety reasons, stent thrombosis after one month will be monitored continuously. A stent thrombosis rate of > 5% in any of the treatment groups will necessitate premature termination of the study.
Analysis population:
- The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. patients randomized to a certain group will be followed and assessed irrespectively of the actual treatment. Protocol violations will be noted and the responsible centres notified.
Sample size calculation:
- A total of 225 patients will be included in each group, in total 450 patients. This is based on the following: We expect a MACE rate of 2% in the group of dilatation of side branch through main vessel stent and of 8% in the group without side branch dilatation through main vessel stent. With an alfa of 5% and a strength of 80%, 206 patients will be needed in each group (two-sided chi square test) to demonstrate this difference. By including 225 patients in each group, a possible dropout before follow-up is counted for.
Randomization procedure:
- The patient will be randomized after successful stenting of the main vessel. There will be a block randomization according to country and a stratification according to sex, age > 70 years, diabetes, +/- measurement of FFR and +/- angiographic follow-up. The patients will be computer randomized by a 24 hour telephone service.
Monitoring of the study:
- The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals.
Publication:
- Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (core lab. function, end point committee membership etc.) and of number of included patients.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- Keywords
- PCI, Bifurcation lesion
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Procedure or surgery
Also called Percutaneous coronary intervention technique, PCI, PTCA
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Kissing balloon post-dilatation | Experimental | Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of stent using kissing balloon dilatation Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) |
| No kissing balloon post-dilatation | Experimental | Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of stent and not using kissing balloon postdilatation Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined end point of: cardiac death, index lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularisation
Measured: After 6 months
Secondary outcomes (15)
MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularisation)
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8, and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Cardiac death
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Myocardial infarction
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Stent thrombosis
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Target vessel revascularisation
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Total mortality
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 6, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Target lesion revascularisation
Measured: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Myocardial infarction
Measured: related to the index procedure
CCS angina score
Measured: after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or occlusion of the side branch
Measured: after 8 months
Late loss of main vessel and side branch
Measured: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or side branch
Measured: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel
Measured: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of side branch
Measured: after 8 months
Markers
Measured: before and after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study start2 Apr 2007
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionNov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 477 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej Christiansen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Evald Hoej Christiansen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
- Investigators
- Niels R Holm, MD, Principal investigator, MD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00914199
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20070005
- Acronym
- BIF III
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Niemela M, Kervinen K, Erglis A, Holm NR, Maeng M, Christiansen EH, Kumsars I, Jegere S, Dombrovskis A, Gunnes P, Stavnes S, Steigen TK, Trovik T, Eskola M, Vikman S, Romppanen H, Makikallio T, Hansen KN, Thayssen P, Aberge L, Jensen LO, Hervold A, Airaksinen J, Pietila M, Frobert O, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Aaroe J, Jensen JS, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, James S, Miettinen H, Lassen JF, Thuesen L; Nordic-Baltic PCI Study Group. Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation. 2011 Jan 4;123(1):79-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966879. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
PubMed 21173348
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stenting of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branches. Should we, or Should we Not, Perform Dilatation of the Side Branch Through the Main Vessel Stent, if There is Acceptable Blood Flow in the Side Branch?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00914199
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIF III / 20070005
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- PCI, Bifurcation lesion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 477 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej ChristiansenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Study start
- 2 Apr 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Should we, or should we not, perform dilatation of the side branch through the main vessel stent, if there is acceptable blood flow in the side branch?
Detailed description
Design:
- Randomised open multicentre trial
Patients:
- Number 477
Randomisation:
- Treatment strategy kissing or no kissing balloon post-dilatation
Primary end point:
- Combined end point of: cardiac death, index lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularisation after 6 months.
Secondary end points:
- Clinical
- MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularisation) during hospital period, after 1, 8, and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Cardiac death during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Myocardial infarction during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Stent thrombosis during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Target vessel revascularisation during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Total mortality during hospital period, after 1, 6, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Target lesion revascularisation during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years.
- Myocardial infarction related to the index procedure.
- CCS angina score after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2, 3 and, 5 years.
- Angiographic. Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or occlusion of the side branch after 8 months.
- Late loss of main vessel and side branch after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or side branch after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel after 8 months.
- Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of side branch after 8 months.
- Markers. All patients with stable angina pectoris and the patients with unstable angina pectoris, who have normal markers (CK-MB or TnT/TnI) before and after the procedure, will enter into the marker study.
End point evaluation:
- Primary and secondary end points will be assessed by an independent end point committee. The end point committee will consist of experienced cardiologists. The detailed end point definitions are the following:
- Q wave myocardial infarction. Appearance of a new Q wave in two or more contiguous leads on ECG.
- Non Q wave myocardial infarction.Infarction, which is considered present in a patient having clinical, angiographic electrocardiographic and/or laboratory evidence of myocardial necrosis with an ECG showing no new Q waves
- Procedure related myocardial infarction. A > threefold increase of CK-MB or Troponin-T/I.
- Target lesion revascularization. Coronary bypass operation with grafting or PCI of index lesion.
- Target vessel revascularization. Coronary bypass operation with grafting or PCI of index vessel
- Stent thrombosis. Stent thromboses are categorized as acute, sub acute, late and very late and as definite, probable and possible (see appendix).
- Vessel measurement. Proximal reference diameter: Vessel diameter proximal to lesion.Distal reference diameter: Vessel diameter distal to lesion.Percentual diameter stenosis: (Reference diameter - minimal luminal diameter)/reference diameter in percent.
- Angiographic restenosis. > 50% diameter stenosis.
- Recommendations for re-revascularization. Main vessel:Angina pectoris, CCS 1 related to index lesion and stenosis diameter >40%* Stenosis diameter >70%*. Side branch: AP, CCS >1 related to index lesion and stenosis diameter >40%*
- The stenosis diameter is evaluated by eyeballing.
Angiographic core lab:
- The index and follow-up angiograms will be asses by the QCA-laboratories at Department of Cardiology, Paul Stradins Clinical Hospital, Riga, Latvia and Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Definition of index angiography:
- The angiography obtained during the PCI-procedure will be used as index angiography
Follow-up angiography:
- After 8 months conventional diagnostic angiography will be performed and the projections used at the index angiography will be repeated after 0.1 mg intracoronary nitroglycerine. The index angiograms will be stored on CD and sent by mail to the angiographic core laboratories.
Steering committee:
- The steering committee members will be selected on basis of participation in the study. All steering committee members will have full access to the database and will participate in the interpretation of data.
Progress of the study:
- The progress of the study will be checked on a weekly basis by the steering committee. They will receive and evaluate data on inclusion rate and the primary end point event rate. Further, the steering committee will receive and evaluate the weekly safety data on the rate of stent thrombosis in the three groups.
Statistics and data management:
- The statistical analyses will be performed by UNI-C, Aarhus.
- Primary end point. The composite end point in the two groups at six month follow-up will be described by Kaplan-Meier event graphs. The event graphs in the two groups will be compared by a log-rank test. A two-sided test is used. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered significant.
- Secondary end points and other variables. For continuous variables, differences between the treatment groups will be evaluated by Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. For discrete variables, differences will be expressed as counts and in percent and will be analyzed with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Secondary end points will be assessed after 6 or 8 months. Two- sided test is used and the p-value considered indicating significance will be 0.05.
Safety:
- For safety reasons, stent thrombosis after one month will be monitored continuously. A stent thrombosis rate of > 5% in any of the treatment groups will necessitate premature termination of the study.
Analysis population:
- The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, i.e. patients randomized to a certain group will be followed and assessed irrespectively of the actual treatment. Protocol violations will be noted and the responsible centres notified.
Sample size calculation:
- A total of 225 patients will be included in each group, in total 450 patients. This is based on the following: We expect a MACE rate of 2% in the group of dilatation of side branch through main vessel stent and of 8% in the group without side branch dilatation through main vessel stent. With an alfa of 5% and a strength of 80%, 206 patients will be needed in each group (two-sided chi square test) to demonstrate this difference. By including 225 patients in each group, a possible dropout before follow-up is counted for.
Randomization procedure:
- The patient will be randomized after successful stenting of the main vessel. There will be a block randomization according to country and a stratification according to sex, age > 70 years, diabetes, +/- measurement of FFR and +/- angiographic follow-up. The patients will be computer randomized by a 24 hour telephone service.
Monitoring of the study:
- The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals.
Publication:
- Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (core lab. function, end point committee membership etc.) and of number of included patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kissing balloon post-dilatation | Experimental | Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of stent using kissing balloon dilatation |
| No kissing balloon post-dilatation | Experimental | Procedure: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of stent and not using kissing balloon postdilatation |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris. -Bifurcation lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA--
- PDA/posterola¬te¬ral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
- Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate > 2.5 mm.
- Diameter of side branch by visual estimate > 2.25 mm.
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age < 18 years.
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- Expected survival < 1 year.
- S-creatinine > 200 µmol/l.
- Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Also: Percutaneous coronary intervention technique, PCI, PTCAImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion. | Procedure or surgery | Kissing balloon post-dilatation, No kissing balloon post-dilatation |
Primary outcome
Combined end point of: cardiac death, index lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularisation
Time frame: After 6 months
15 secondary outcomes
MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularisation)
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8, and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Cardiac death
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Target vessel revascularisation
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Total mortality
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 6, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Target lesion revascularisation
Time frame: during hospital period, after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: related to the index procedure
CCS angina score
Time frame: after 1, 8 and 14 months, 2 and 3 years
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or occlusion of the side branch
Time frame: after 8 months
Late loss of main vessel and side branch
Time frame: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel and/or side branch
Time frame: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of main vessel
Time frame: after 8 months
Angiographic significant stenosis (>50%) of side branch
Time frame: after 8 months
Markers
Time frame: before and after the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21173348Niemela M, Kervinen K, Erglis A, Holm NR, Maeng M, Christiansen EH, Kumsars I, Jegere S, Dombrovskis A, Gunnes P, Stavnes S, Steigen TK, Trovik T, Eskola M, Vikman S, Romppanen H, Makikallio T, Hansen KN, Thayssen P, Aberge L, Jensen LO, Hervold A, Airaksinen J, Pietila M, Frobert O, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Aaroe J, Jensen JS, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, James S, Miettinen H, Lassen JF, Thuesen L; Nordic-Baltic PCI Study Group. Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation. 2011 Jan 4;123(1):79-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966879. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
EDIT-401 in Adults Who Require Additional Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Coronary Computed Tomography Study to Assess the Effect of Inclisiran in Addition to Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy on Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression in Participants With a Diagnosis of Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Without Previous Cardiovascular Events
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Patients With Uncommon Presentations and/or Uncommon Diseases Associated With the Cardiovascular System
Metabolic Disease, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Troponin in Acute Chest Pain to Risk Stratify and Guide EffecTive Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niels R Holm, MD principal investigator
MD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined end point of: cardiac death, index lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularisation (time frame: After 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00914199, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2026.