AzTrials
AzTrials

Prolonged LaborNCT00915148

Ultrasound Prediction of Prolonged Labour

An observational study of Prolonged Labor, run by Helse Stavanger HF at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational study is designed to correlate findings on ultrasound with manual palpation, and to consider if delivery outcome can be predicted with help of ultrasound. Specifically, the study will evaluate the significance of fetal head level (descent) in the pelvis, measured with ultrasound. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Prolonged Labor
What is being tested?
Ultrasound examination
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Nov 2008to Aug 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Primi gravidae, with one fetus, after the 37th week. Cephalic presentation. Prolonged first stage according to WHO definitions.

Who may be able to join

  • Primi gravidae
  • >37th week
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Prolonged first stage according to WHO definitions.

Who cannot join

  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Intrauterine fetal death

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Stavanger University Hospital

    Stavanger, NO-4011

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: First Stage 3D-ultrasound During Prolonged Labour.

This observational study is designed to correlate findings on ultrasound with manual palpation, and to consider if delivery outcome can be predicted with help of ultrasound. Specifically, the study will evaluate the significance of fetal head level (descent) in the pelvis, measured with ultrasound.

Read the detailed description

AIM:

To correlate findings on ultrasound with manual palpation, and to consider if delivery outcome can be predicted with help of ultrasound. Specifically evaluate the significance of fetal head level (descent) in the pelvis, measured with ultrasound.

Objective:

Labours have traditionally been evaluated by manuals methods of the "delivery helper" - midwives or doctor. There are many factors that will prolong labour such as malcontractions, disproportion of the birth canal and malpresentation/position. In about 20% of primigravidae, the first stage will last longer than 10 hours.

In this study we want to evaluate different ultrasounds measurements to see if ultrasound can be used to predict the outcome of labour.

Methods:

A descriptive observational study, with one ultrasound examination. The labour will be handled according to definitions by Woman's department, Stavanger University Hospital, and WHO.

The use of stimulating agents, as Oxytocin, will be evaluated after manual examinations, specific definitions and criteria.

The results of the ultrasound examinations will be evaluated after the delivery, since the results are not to be used clinically during the delivery.

Inclusion criteria will be primigravidae, with one fetus, after the 37th week. Feta head presentation. Ruptured membranes, at least one hour before inclusion. Prolonged first stage according to WHO definitions. The target is to include 100 subjects.

Inter- and intraobserver variation will be evaluated with intraclass coefficients. We will analyze operative delivery with normal vaginal delivery. Also, two groups divided by the stage 0 will be evaluated with statistics analyzes.

Time to delivery will be evaluated with Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyzes.

Conditions
Prolonged Labor
Being tested
Ultrasound examination
Keywords
Prolonged labor, Ultrasound, Caeserian section

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound examinationOther

    Trans-abdominal and trans-perineal 3D ultrasound examination

Study groups in NCT00915148
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound examinationWomen with prolonged Labour; Primi gravidae, single pregnancy, >37 weeks, fetus alive, cephalic presentation.
Receives: Other: Ultrasound examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC AUC) Values for Prediction of Vaginal Delivery Using 2D or 3D Ulrasound

    Fetal Head descent was first measured as the shortest distance between the outer bony limit of the fetal skull and the Perineum. Fetal head descent was re-assessed by measuring the angle of progression in a mid-sagittal plane. Fetal head-perineum distance was evaluated with using a cut-off of ≤40 mm, while the angle of progression was evaluated using a cut off of ≥ 110 degrees. The ROC curves plotted the percentage sensitivity against the percentage false positive rate for head-perineum distance and angle of progression as measured by ultrasound.

    Measured: during labor

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percentage of Women With Delivery Within 6 Hours From Defined Prolonged Labor (in Accordance With WHO Recommendations)

    Measured: 6 hours post determination of prolonged labor

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2008
  3. Primary completionAug 2010
  4. Study completionAug 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00915148
Sponsor's protocol ID
StaHF500804
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
3 Jun 2009
Last updated
26 Apr 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):199-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.5360.

    PubMed 18528923
  • Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Smedvig E, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Prediction of labour and delivery by ascertaining the fetal head position with transabdominal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabour rupture of membranes after 37 weeks. Ultraschall Med. 2008 Apr;29(2):179-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963017. Epub 2007 Jun 28.

    PubMed 17599279
  • Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Okland I, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):387-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.2744.

    PubMed 16565994
  • Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):313-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6329.

    PubMed 19248000
  • Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;28(6):753-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.3848.

    PubMed 17063455
  • Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):702-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.8951. Epub 2011 May 3.

    PubMed 21308837
  • Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebo TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):425-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12422. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

    PubMed 23371409
  • Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.9065.

    PubMed 21630362

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Prolonged Labor, run by Helse Stavanger HF at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC AUC) Values for Prediction of Vaginal Delivery Using 2D or 3D Ulrasound (time frame: during labor). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00915148, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in