AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT00917800

Comparison of the HyperQ Versus Conventional Electrocardiogram (ECG) to Detect Ischemia

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by West German Heart Center Essen at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the investigation is to verify the efficiency of the HyperQ™ system in detecting exercise induced ischemia, with higher specificity and sensitivity than conventional ECG Stress testing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
May 2009to Dec 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients referred to the West German Heart Center in Essen for coronary angiography

Who may be able to join

  • A patient who was referred to angiography.
  • A patient who is able (i.e., no contraindications) to perform an exercise stress test
  • A patient who signed an informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications for an exercise test.
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White (pre-excitation) syndrome.
  • Left Bundle branch block, Complete Right bundle branch block or QRS duration > 120 ms, change in QRS morphology during exercise.
  • Atrial Fibrillation or significant ventricular arrhythmia
  • Treatment with Digoxin.
  • Pacemaker.
  • Having taken beta blockers within 24 hours before the exercise test.
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • West German Heart Center

    Essen

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Benefits of HyperQ™ vs. Conventional ECG During Stress Test. A Comparison Study in Patients Referred for Angiography

The purpose of the investigation is to verify the efficiency of the HyperQ™ system in detecting exercise induced ischemia, with higher specificity and sensitivity than conventional ECG Stress testing. The study will be carried out by applying the HyperQ™ system during cycle ergometer stress testing in patients who are referred for angiography at the Department of Cardiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany. The HyperQ™ results will then be compared to the standard ECG stress test results using the angiography results as the gold standard. The study will be considered successful if analysis of the HyperQ provides a statistically significant improvement over the diagnostic accuracy of conventional ECG stress testing analysis.

Keywords
angiography, exercise testing, high frequency ECG, coronary artery disease
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00917800
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
suspected coronary artery diseasepatients referred to angiography because of suspected coronary artery disease

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary objective of this study is to determine the incremental diagnostic value of HyperQ data over exercise stress testing parameters to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for coronary angiography.

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00917800
Sponsor's protocol ID
Essen 09-3981
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
8 Jun 2009
Last updated
12 Jun 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by West German Heart Center Essen at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary objective of this study is to determine the incremental diagnostic value of HyperQ data over exercise stress testing parameters to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for coronary angiography. (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT00917800 | AzTrials