ObesityNCT00922194
Metformin in Overweight Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A study testing Extended Release Metformin in people with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Era's Lucknow Medical College at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The study included 102 overweight type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 in an open label study. They were advised intensive life style modification which was reinforced at each follow-up visit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Extended Release Metformin
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- BMI more than 25
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetes
- pancreatic diabetes
- presence of concomitant endocrinal disorder
- non-overweight type 2 diabetes
- type 2 diabetes with secondary failure to sulfonylurea and taking insulin
- presence of proliferative retinopathy or chronic renal failure
Show all 20Show fewer
- known cirrhosis of liver
- heavy alcoholic
- presence of active tuberculosis
- known HIV disease or any active infection
- major mental illness
- failure to comply with the exercise advice due to physical incapacity (e.g., severe osteoarthritis, hemiparesis or any other disabling neurological disease)
- present pregnancy (or planning pregnancy)
- lactating mothers
- using any kind of hormones including oral contraceptives, systemic corticosteroids, nicotinic acid
- use of anti-obesity drug within the past 3 months
- chronic gastroparesis or chronic severe gastrointestinal symptoms
- a history of gastric or duodenal ulcers
- abdominal surgery within 1 year will not be included in the study
- patients with congestive heart failure or overt nephropathy will also not be included, due to unreliability of anthropometric measurements in such subjects and the relative risk of lactic acidosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Metformin Monotherapy Significantly Improves Anthropometric and Glycemic Values in Overweight Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: One Year or More Prospective Study.
The study included 102 overweight type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 in an open label study. They were advised intensive life style modification which was reinforced at each follow-up visit. In addition they were prescribed extended release metformin (XR) in a gradually increasing tolerable dose, starting with 0.5g twice a day after meals. In addition, hypertension and dyslipidemia, when present, were treated with appropriate recommended drugs. Those who completed a satisfactory regular follow-up for at least 12 months or more were then analyzed for changes in their anthropometric measurements and glycemic control.
Read the detailed description
From 1st February 2006 till 31st December 2008, 800 cases of diabetes mellitus who attended the diabetes clinic constituted the subjects for the present study. Majority of the subjects were from the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP). UP is the fifth largest state of India, Lucknow being the capital of UP. The area of UP is 238,566 Km². Population of UP as per census of 2001 was 166,197,921 (Census of India, www.censusindia.net). Informed written consent, printed and read out in the local language (Hindi), as per GCP guidelines (www.fda.gov./oc/gcp) was obtained from every participant of the study. The study protocol was approved by a duly constituted human ethics committee prior to start of the study.
Height was measured with a calibrated height measuring scale to the nearest cm. Subjects were requested to stand upright without shoes with their back against the scale, heels together and eyes directed forward. Weight was measured with a digital balance (Camry®). The scale was checked every day and calibration was done with "known" weights. Subjects were asked to wear minimum clothing and weight was recorded to the nearest 0.5 kg. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula: weight (kg)/height (m2). Waist was measured using a non-stretchable measuring tape without any clothing. Waist girth was measured at the midpoint point between the lowest point of the costal margin and the highest point of iliac crest in the midaxillary line at minimal respiration. Hip girth was measured as the greatest circumference at the level of greater trochanters with minimal thin clothing. Measurements were made to the nearest centimeter. Waist and hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing the waist circumference (cm) with the hip circumference (cm). Blood pressure was recorded in the sitting position in the right arm to the nearest 1mm of Hg using a mercury sphygmomanometer, calibrated at least once a week. Two readings were taken at 5 minutes apart and the mean of the two was taken as the blood pressure. Fundus examination with dilated pupils by an ophthalmologist was done in all patients at the beginning of the study.
Diabetes was diagnosed as per American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, based either on the past medical records or present blood glucose values which showed unequivocal raised fasting blood glucose of more than > 116mg% and post-prandial or post-glucose values of > 200mg%. No case of IGT or IFG was included in the study. Current age was defined as the age at the time of examination (2006 - 2008). Duration of diabetes was taken as the difference between the current date and the date when the fasting or post-prandial blood sugar level met the ADA diabetes diagnostic criteria.
The study participants had direct consultation sessions with the study nutritionist, at the beginning of the study and at every monthly follow-up visits. A standard diet according to the ADA guidelines was advised, with 500-1000 kcal/day less (depending on the patient's starting weight and acceptance) than the individual patient's requirement. Special emphasis was placed on avoiding fried food, increasing intake of monounsaturated fats, low fat milk, fibers, vegetables and fruits. Fruits and milk are often avoided by our patients due to the misconception that fruits, except one apple a day, are harmful in diabetes and that milk is "fattening". The patients were also encouraged to take non-cereal diet consisting of low fat milk or yoghurt, fruits, vegetables and green salads, once a week. Each individual was given and explained a detailed individualized diet sheet (in the local language) first by the dietitian and then by the authors. They were asked to undertake some form of aerobic exercise, at least brisk walking (5 kilometers/hour) for 45 minutes daily, or at least 5 days a week. Where available and affordable, they were encouraged to join a health-club/gymnasium where they could do graded aerobic and resistance exercises under supervision. All patients were advised to quit tobacco use in any form. None of our study subjects were in the habit of taking alcohol regularly. Those, who took alcohol, never consumed more than 100ml of spirit per week. Nonnutritive sweeteners were allowed in moderation within the limits of recommendations of ADA. On each subsequent visit, the importance of diet and exercise were re-emphasized by the dietitian, paraclinical staff and the authors. Each case was interviewed in detail about the diet and exercise regimen they were following and corrections, if any, were suggested. Each patient was supplied with printed material in local language about diabetes in general and diet in particular. Drug treatment for hypertension and hyperlipidemia, wherever indicated, were not withheld during the study period.
The extended release metformin (XR), used in the present study was Bigsens XR® (Zydus CND), comprising a dual hydrophilic polymer matrix system. The starting dose of metformin (XR) was 0.5g twice daily after meal; the dose was gradually increased to the maximal tolerated dose. Those patients who were on some other anti-diabetic drug therapy; a 4 weeks washout period was given. All the subjects were informed that at the beginning of the study there was a possibility of initial increase in their blood glucose values, but the same would settle down as they adhere to our lifestyle protocol and as the dose of metformin is increased on subsequent visits. They were also informed about the possible passage of "ghost tablet" in their stool. Patients were told to withhold metformin for at least 5 days prior to any iodinated contrast radiographic study. Every patient was asked to perform urine dip stick test for acetone, at least every week and if found positive to contact this clinic immediately. They were also asked to report immediately in case of developing dyspnoea, marked vomiting, lethargy or fatigue.
The patients were followed-up at every month, and earlier if needed. Besides repeating the anthropometric measurements, blood glucose, urine examination, liver function tests (LFT) and serum lactate were measured. The Glycosylated haemoglobin (A1C) and serum lipids were estimated at every two month. At each follow-up visit the patients were questioned in detail about their diet and exercises, and deficiency, if any, were corrected. They were also questioned in detail about any side effects. Only those cases where we were satisfied about their diet and exercise adherence and regular intake of metformin were included in the outcome analysis. All patients possessed mobile phones. A message (SMS) was sent on their mobile phones every 15 days reinforcing the importance of diet and regular exercise. A SMS was also sent on their mobile phone if they were overdue on their appointment. In subjects in whom there was weight loss of more than 10% and A1C goal (≤6%) was achieved, the dose of metformin was reduced.
Hypertension was diagnosed based on past medical documentation, if they were on drug therapy for hypertension or if the subjects had systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg. Hypertension (n=15) was treated with appropriate drugs, the first line of drug being ace inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker, or a combination of anti-hypertensive drugs, if required. Dyslipidemia was treated as per ADA guideline either by Atorvastatin or Fenofibrate or a combination thereof depending on the type of dyslipidemia. All patients more than 30 years of age, unless contraindicated, were given aspirin 150mg daily. No placebo group was included due to ethical considerations.
All investigations were carried out by SRL Ranbaxy Laboratories (www.srlranbaxy.com), Mumbai, which is accredited by the College of American Pathologist (CAP) and approved by NABL (National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories, Department of Science and Technology, India). The plasma glucose (Hexokinase method), serum creatinine (Jafees Reaction), serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (Urease-GLDH method) LFT and serum lactate were estimated on DADE RXL (Dade Behring Ltd, USA2007). Serum cholesterol, serum triglyceride, serum HDL cholesterol were measured by enzymatic method (Randox Imola, Randox Lab., UK, 2007). The A1C was estimated by HPLC method (Bio-Rad Variant II, Bio-Rad Labs, USA, 2007). Microalbuminuria and Albumin/Creatinine ratio were estimated from fasting spot urine sample by Immunoturbidimetry (Randox Imola). Serum Insulin and C-Peptide were estimated by Chemiluminescence technique (Advia Centaur, Bayer Health Care, USA, 2003).
MS-Excel was used to enter and manage the data. The significance of change in various parameters of the study were tested by using paired t-test where the data was normally distributed, otherwise its non-parametric equivalent test, Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test was applied. Data are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Values of P <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using statistical software SPSS (version 12, SPSS, Chicago, Il, USA) and Stata (version 9.2, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
- Conditions
- Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Extended Release Metformin
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes, Obesity, Extended Release Metformin
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extended Release MetforminDrug
Also called Bigsens XR® (Zydus CND)
0.5g twice a day to 2g twice a day for at least 12 months or more
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Weight From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Weight after 12 months of therapy or more - weight at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Body Mass Index (BMI) after 12 months of therapy or more - BMI at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Waist circumference after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist circumference at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Waist Circumference (Cms)/Hip Circumference (Cms)From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Waist circumference/Hip circumference ratio after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist circumference/Hip circumference ratio at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Waist (Cms) /Height (Meters) Ratio From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Waist/Height ratio after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist/Height ratio at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Fasting blood glucose after 12 months or more of therapy - Fasting blood glucose at baseline
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (A1C) From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Change: Glycosylated Haemoglobin after 12 months or more of therapy - Glycosylated Haemoglobin at baseline.
Measured: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionDec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Era's Lucknow Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Amulya R Sircar, MD, Principal investigator, Sircar Diabetes Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00922194
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- arsircar
- Status last verified
- Jul 2009
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Metformin Monotherapy Significantly Improves Anthropometric and Glycemic Values in Overweight Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: One Year or More Prospective Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00922194
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- arsircar
- Conditions
- Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Type 2 diabetes, Obesity, Extended Release Metformin
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Era's Lucknow Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study included 102 overweight type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 in an open label study. They were advised intensive life style modification which was reinforced at each follow-up visit. In addition they were prescribed extended release metformin (XR) in a gradually increasing tolerable dose, starting with 0.5g twice a day after meals. In addition, hypertension and dyslipidemia, when present, were treated with appropriate recommended drugs. Those who completed a satisfactory regular follow-up for at least 12 months or more were then analyzed for changes in their anthropometric measurements and glycemic control.
Detailed description
From 1st February 2006 till 31st December 2008, 800 cases of diabetes mellitus who attended the diabetes clinic constituted the subjects for the present study. Majority of the subjects were from the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP). UP is the fifth largest state of India, Lucknow being the capital of UP. The area of UP is 238,566 Km². Population of UP as per census of 2001 was 166,197,921 (Census of India, www.censusindia.net). Informed written consent, printed and read out in the local language (Hindi), as per GCP guidelines (www.fda.gov./oc/gcp) was obtained from every participant of the study. The study protocol was approved by a duly constituted human ethics committee prior to start of the study.
Height was measured with a calibrated height measuring scale to the nearest cm. Subjects were requested to stand upright without shoes with their back against the scale, heels together and eyes directed forward. Weight was measured with a digital balance (Camry®). The scale was checked every day and calibration was done with "known" weights. Subjects were asked to wear minimum clothing and weight was recorded to the nearest 0.5 kg. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula: weight (kg)/height (m2). Waist was measured using a non-stretchable measuring tape without any clothing. Waist girth was measured at the midpoint point between the lowest point of the costal margin and the highest point of iliac crest in the midaxillary line at minimal respiration. Hip girth was measured as the greatest circumference at the level of greater trochanters with minimal thin clothing. Measurements were made to the nearest centimeter. Waist and hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing the waist circumference (cm) with the hip circumference (cm). Blood pressure was recorded in the sitting position in the right arm to the nearest 1mm of Hg using a mercury sphygmomanometer, calibrated at least once a week. Two readings were taken at 5 minutes apart and the mean of the two was taken as the blood pressure. Fundus examination with dilated pupils by an ophthalmologist was done in all patients at the beginning of the study.
Diabetes was diagnosed as per American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, based either on the past medical records or present blood glucose values which showed unequivocal raised fasting blood glucose of more than > 116mg% and post-prandial or post-glucose values of > 200mg%. No case of IGT or IFG was included in the study. Current age was defined as the age at the time of examination (2006 - 2008). Duration of diabetes was taken as the difference between the current date and the date when the fasting or post-prandial blood sugar level met the ADA diabetes diagnostic criteria.
The study participants had direct consultation sessions with the study nutritionist, at the beginning of the study and at every monthly follow-up visits. A standard diet according to the ADA guidelines was advised, with 500-1000 kcal/day less (depending on the patient's starting weight and acceptance) than the individual patient's requirement. Special emphasis was placed on avoiding fried food, increasing intake of monounsaturated fats, low fat milk, fibers, vegetables and fruits. Fruits and milk are often avoided by our patients due to the misconception that fruits, except one apple a day, are harmful in diabetes and that milk is "fattening". The patients were also encouraged to take non-cereal diet consisting of low fat milk or yoghurt, fruits, vegetables and green salads, once a week. Each individual was given and explained a detailed individualized diet sheet (in the local language) first by the dietitian and then by the authors. They were asked to undertake some form of aerobic exercise, at least brisk walking (5 kilometers/hour) for 45 minutes daily, or at least 5 days a week. Where available and affordable, they were encouraged to join a health-club/gymnasium where they could do graded aerobic and resistance exercises under supervision. All patients were advised to quit tobacco use in any form. None of our study subjects were in the habit of taking alcohol regularly. Those, who took alcohol, never consumed more than 100ml of spirit per week. Nonnutritive sweeteners were allowed in moderation within the limits of recommendations of ADA. On each subsequent visit, the importance of diet and exercise were re-emphasized by the dietitian, paraclinical staff and the authors. Each case was interviewed in detail about the diet and exercise regimen they were following and corrections, if any, were suggested. Each patient was supplied with printed material in local language about diabetes in general and diet in particular. Drug treatment for hypertension and hyperlipidemia, wherever indicated, were not withheld during the study period.
The extended release metformin (XR), used in the present study was Bigsens XR® (Zydus CND), comprising a dual hydrophilic polymer matrix system. The starting dose of metformin (XR) was 0.5g twice daily after meal; the dose was gradually increased to the maximal tolerated dose. Those patients who were on some other anti-diabetic drug therapy; a 4 weeks washout period was given. All the subjects were informed that at the beginning of the study there was a possibility of initial increase in their blood glucose values, but the same would settle down as they adhere to our lifestyle protocol and as the dose of metformin is increased on subsequent visits. They were also informed about the possible passage of "ghost tablet" in their stool. Patients were told to withhold metformin for at least 5 days prior to any iodinated contrast radiographic study. Every patient was asked to perform urine dip stick test for acetone, at least every week and if found positive to contact this clinic immediately. They were also asked to report immediately in case of developing dyspnoea, marked vomiting, lethargy or fatigue.
The patients were followed-up at every month, and earlier if needed. Besides repeating the anthropometric measurements, blood glucose, urine examination, liver function tests (LFT) and serum lactate were measured. The Glycosylated haemoglobin (A1C) and serum lipids were estimated at every two month. At each follow-up visit the patients were questioned in detail about their diet and exercises, and deficiency, if any, were corrected. They were also questioned in detail about any side effects. Only those cases where we were satisfied about their diet and exercise adherence and regular intake of metformin were included in the outcome analysis. All patients possessed mobile phones. A message (SMS) was sent on their mobile phones every 15 days reinforcing the importance of diet and regular exercise. A SMS was also sent on their mobile phone if they were overdue on their appointment. In subjects in whom there was weight loss of more than 10% and A1C goal (≤6%) was achieved, the dose of metformin was reduced.
Hypertension was diagnosed based on past medical documentation, if they were on drug therapy for hypertension or if the subjects had systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg. Hypertension (n=15) was treated with appropriate drugs, the first line of drug being ace inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker, or a combination of anti-hypertensive drugs, if required. Dyslipidemia was treated as per ADA guideline either by Atorvastatin or Fenofibrate or a combination thereof depending on the type of dyslipidemia. All patients more than 30 years of age, unless contraindicated, were given aspirin 150mg daily. No placebo group was included due to ethical considerations.
All investigations were carried out by SRL Ranbaxy Laboratories (www.srlranbaxy.com), Mumbai, which is accredited by the College of American Pathologist (CAP) and approved by NABL (National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories, Department of Science and Technology, India). The plasma glucose (Hexokinase method), serum creatinine (Jafees Reaction), serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (Urease-GLDH method) LFT and serum lactate were estimated on DADE RXL (Dade Behring Ltd, USA2007). Serum cholesterol, serum triglyceride, serum HDL cholesterol were measured by enzymatic method (Randox Imola, Randox Lab., UK, 2007). The A1C was estimated by HPLC method (Bio-Rad Variant II, Bio-Rad Labs, USA, 2007). Microalbuminuria and Albumin/Creatinine ratio were estimated from fasting spot urine sample by Immunoturbidimetry (Randox Imola). Serum Insulin and C-Peptide were estimated by Chemiluminescence technique (Advia Centaur, Bayer Health Care, USA, 2003).
MS-Excel was used to enter and manage the data. The significance of change in various parameters of the study were tested by using paired t-test where the data was normally distributed, otherwise its non-parametric equivalent test, Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test was applied. Data are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Values of P <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using statistical software SPSS (version 12, SPSS, Chicago, Il, USA) and Stata (version 9.2, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- BMI more than 25
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes
- pancreatic diabetes
- presence of concomitant endocrinal disorder
- non-overweight type 2 diabetes
- type 2 diabetes with secondary failure to sulfonylurea and taking insulin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extended Release MetforminAlso: Bigsens XR® (Zydus CND)0.5g twice a day to 2g twice a day for at least 12 months or more | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Change in Weight From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Weight after 12 months of therapy or more - weight at baseline
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Body Mass Index (BMI) after 12 months of therapy or more - BMI at baseline
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Waist circumference after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist circumference at baseline
Change in Waist Circumference (Cms)/Hip Circumference (Cms)From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Waist circumference/Hip circumference ratio after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist circumference/Hip circumference ratio at baseline
Change in Waist (Cms) /Height (Meters) Ratio From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Waist/Height ratio after 12 months or more of therapy - Waist/Height ratio at baseline
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Fasting blood glucose after 12 months or more of therapy - Fasting blood glucose at baseline
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (A1C) From Baseline at 12 Months or More
Time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more
Change: Glycosylated Haemoglobin after 12 months or more of therapy - Glycosylated Haemoglobin at baseline.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amulya R Sircar, MD principal investigator
Sircar Diabetes Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Extended Release Metformin in people with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Era's Lucknow Medical College at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Weight From Baseline at 12 Months or More (time frame: Initial and at the end of 12 months or more). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2010.